Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.12.2015 | Original Research
Evaluating a Model to Predict Primary Care Physician-Defined Complexity in a Large Academic Primary Care Practice-Based Research Network
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 12/2015
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenABSTRACT
BACKGROUND
Improving the ability to risk-stratify patients is critical for efficiently allocating resources within healthcare systems.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a physician-defined complexity prediction model against outpatient Charlson score (OCS) and a commercial risk predictor (CRP).
DESIGN
Using a cohort in which primary care physicians reviewed 4302 of their adult patients, we developed a predictive model for estimated physician-defined complexity (ePDC) and categorized our population using ePDC, OCS and CRP.
PARTICIPANTS
143,372 primary care patients in a practice-based research network participated in the study.
MAIN MEASURES
For all patients categorized as complex in 2007 by one or more risk-stratification method, we calculated the percentage of total person time from 2008–2011 for which eligible cancer screening was incomplete, HbA1c was ≥ 9 %, and LDL was ≥ 130 mg/dl (in patients with cardiovascular disease). We also calculated the number of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions per person year (ppy).
KEY RESULTS
There was modest agreement among individuals classified as complex using ePDC compared with OCS (36.7 %) and CRP (39.6 %). Over 4 follow-up years, eligible ePDC-complex patients had higher proportions (p < 0.001) of time with: incomplete cervical (17.8 % vs. 13.3 % for OCS; 19.4 % vs. 11.2 % for CRP), breast (21.4 % vs. 14.9 % for OCS; 22.7 % vs. 15.0 % for CRP), and colon (25.9 % vs. 18.7 % for OCS; 27.0 % vs. 18.2 % for CRP) cancer screening; HbA1c ≥ 9 % (15.6 % vs. 8.1 % for OCS; 15.9 % vs. 6.9 % for CRP); and LDL ≥ 130 mg/dl (12.4 % vs. 7.9 % for OCS; 11.8 % vs 9.0 % for CRP). ePDC-complex patients had higher rates (p < 0.003) of: ED visits (0.21 vs. 0.11 ppy for OCS; 0.17 vs. 0.15 ppy for CRP), and admissions in patients 45–64 and ≥ 65 years old (0.11 vs. 0.10 ppy AND 0.24 vs. 0.21 ppy for OCS).
CONCLUSION
Our measure for estimated physician-defined complexity compared favorably to commonly used risk-prediction approaches in identifying future suboptimal quality and utilization outcomes.