nach oben

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Erschienen in:

01.02.2019

Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest–Posttest Quasi-experimental Study

verfasst von: Beth Sundstrom, Deborah Billings, Ellie Smith, Merissa Ferrara, Bill Albert, Katherine Suellentrop

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction: In South Carolina, 50% of all pregnancies are unintended. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and the implant are recommended as top-tier contraceptive options for all women and adolescents. The Whoops Proof S.C. campaign was evaluated to determine if women (ages 18 to 29) who do not intend to become pregnant in the next year report greater awareness of and positive regard for IUDs and the implant after exposure to a multi-channel campaign. Methods: A pair-matched group pretest–posttest quasi-experimental design was utilized. A total of 1,439 women responded to the pretest survey (May–July 2016) and 1,534 responded to the posttest survey (October–November 2016) in four South Carolina counties. Statistical analysis include paired-sample and independent t-tests and one-way ANOVA tests for variance. Results: At posttest, intervention county participants were significantly more likely to recall messaging and to report receiving contraceptive information from Whoops Proof S.C (t(1533)= − 8.466, p < .0001). Participants who saw ads more than once per week reported a significant increase in awareness of IUDs and the implant (F(6,1532) = 5.571; p < .001). Participants in intervention counties reported a significant increase in positive attitudes toward IUDs (t(616) = − 1.740; p = .041) and the implant (t(603)= − 1.665; p = .048). Discussion: The Whoops Proof S.C. campaign offers strategies to campaign planners and health care providers to optimize exposure and recall frequency to increase awareness of and positive regard for highly effective contraceptive methods. Campaign planners should test messages and focus on communication channels to increase engagement and avoid saturation.

Power analysis calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.2. Power calculation assumes required significance level α = 0.05, statistical power 1 − β = 0.95, and population effect size = 0.5.

ACOG. (2015). Increasing access to contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. Committee Opinion, 642. http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Increasing-Access-to-Contraceptive-Implants-and-Intrauterine-Devices-to-Reduce-Unintended-Pregnancy.

Andersen, P. A., Buller, D. B., Voeks, J. H., Walkosz, B. J., Scott, M. D., Cutter, G. R., & Dignan, M. B. (2008). Testing the long-term effects of the Go Sun Smart worksite health communication campaign: A group-randomized experimental study. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 447–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00394.x.CrossRef

Anderson, N., Steinauer, J., Valente, T., Koblentz, J., & Dehlendorf, C. (2014). Women’s social communication about IUDs: A qualitative analysis. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 46(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1814.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bajos, N., Leridon, H., Goulard, H., Oustry, P., & Job-Spira, N. (2003). Contraception: from accessibility to efficiency. Human Reproduction, 18(5), 994–999. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg215.CrossRefPubMed

Black, K., Lotke, P., Buhling, K. J., & Zite, N. B. (2012). A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 17(5), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.700744.CrossRefPubMed

Blunt-Vinti, H. D., Thompson, E. L., & Griner, S. B. (2018). Contraceptive use effectiveness and pregnancy prevention information preferences among heterosexual and sexual minority college women. Women’s Health Issues, 28(4), 342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2018.03.005.CrossRefPubMed

Brucker, C., Karck, U., & Merkle, E. (2008). Cycle control, tolerability, efficacy and acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring, NuvaRing: Results of clinical experience in Germany. The European Journal Of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 13(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625180701577122.CrossRef

Dehlendorf, C., Ruskin, R., Grumbach, K., Vittinghoff, E., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Schillinger, D., & Steinauer, J. (2010). Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: A randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(4), 319.e1–319.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.009.CrossRef

DeMaria, A. L., Sundstrom, B. L., Moxley, G. E., & Meier, S. (2017). Predicting women’s responses to contraceptive campaign messages. Health Behavior and Policy Review, 4(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.14485/HBPR.4.1.10.CrossRef

Downing, R. A., LaVeist, T. A., & Bullock, H. E. (2007). Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health. American Journal of Public Health, 97(10), 1803–1807. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.092585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Eisenberg, D. L., Secura, G. M., Madden, T. E., Allsworth, J. E., Zhao, Q., & Peipert, J. F. (2012). Knowledge of contraceptive effectiveness. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 206(6), 479.e1–479.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.012.CrossRef

Everett, B. G., McCabe, K. F., & Hughes, T. L. (2017). Sexual orientation disparities in mistimed and unwanted pregnancy among adult women. Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health, 49(3), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12032.CrossRef

Finer, L. B., Jerman, J., & Kavanaugh, M. L. (2012). Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertility and Sterility, 98(4), 893–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: Incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception, 84(5), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine. Retrieved from http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/ https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.

Frost, J. J., Singh, S., & Finer, L. B. (2007). Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 39(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1363/3909007.CrossRefPubMed

Gilliam, M. L., Neustadt, A., Kozloski, M., Mistretta, S., Tilmon, S., & Godfrey, E. (2010). Adherence and acceptability of the contraceptive ring compared with the pill among students: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 115(3), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181cf45dc.CrossRef

Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies In Family Planning, 39(1), 18–38.CrossRefPubMed

Goldberg, S. K., Reese, B. M., & Halpern, C. T. (2016). Original article: Teen pregnancy among sexual minority women: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59, 429–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.05.009.CrossRef

Guttmacher Institute. (2013). Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Unintended-Pregnancy-US.html#2.

Guttmacher Institute. (2015a). Contraceptive use in the United States. Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_contr_use.html#2.

Guttmacher Institute. (2015b). State facts about unintended pregnancy: South Carolina. Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/unintended-pregnancy/SC.html.

Jones, R. K., & Dreweke, J. (2016). Countering conventional wisdom: New evidence on religion and contraceptive use. Guttmacher Institute. Retrieved from https://www.guttmacher.org/report/countering-conventional-wisdom-new-evidence-religion-and-contraceptive-use.

Keefe, M. (2012). The Iowa initiative to reduce unintended pregnancies. Webinar: Presented at the NWX-OS-OGC-RKVL.

Khajehpour, M., Simbar, M., Jannesari, S., Ramezani-Tehrani, F., & Majd, H. A. (2013). Health status of women with intended and unintended pregnancies. Public Health, 127, 58–64.CrossRefPubMed

LaCaille, L. J., Schultz, J. F., Goei, R., LaCaille, R. A., Dauner, K. N., de Souza, R., … Regal, R. (2016). Go! Results from a quasi-experimental obesity prevention trial with hospital employees. BMC Public Health, 16(171). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2828-0.

Moreau, C., Bohet, A., Hassoun, D., Ringa, V., & Bajos, N. (2014). IUD use in France: Women’s and physician’s perspectives. Contraception, 89(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.10.003.CrossRefPubMed

Mowery, B. D. (2011). The Paired t-Test. Pediatric Nursing, 37(6), 320–321.PubMed

Reger, B., Cooper, L., Booth-Butterfield, S., Smith, H., Bauman, A., Wootan, M. G., … Greer, F. (2002). Wheeling walks: A community campaign using paid media to encourage walking among sedentary older adults. Preventive Medicine, 35, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2002.1074.CrossRefPubMed

Rietveld, T., & van Hout, R. (2017). The paired t test and beyond: Recommendations for testing the central tendencies of two paired samples in research on speech, language and hearing pathology. Journal of Communication Disorders, 69, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.07.002.CrossRefPubMed

Russo, J. A., Miller, E., & Gold, M. A. (2013). Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003. Supplement, .CrossRef

Ryder, K. (2014). Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC): a reproductive justice concern? Feminist Collections: A Quarterly of Women’s Studies Resources, 35(1–2), 15.CrossRef

Schwarz, E. B., Smith, R., Steinauer, J., Reeves, M. F., & Caughey, A. B. (2008). Measuring the effects of unintended pregnancy on women’s quality of life. Contraception, 78, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Scott, M. D., Buller, D. B., Anderson, P. A., Cutter, G. R., Dignan, M. B., & Walker, B. J. (2008). Go Sun Smart. Communication Education, 57(4), 423. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802047378.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Secura, G. M., Allsworth, J. E., Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., & Peipert, J. F. (2011). The contraceptive CHOICE project: Reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(2), 115.e1–115.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017.CrossRef

Smith, A., & Anderson, M. (2018). Social media use in 2018. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/03/01/social-media-use-in-2018/.

Spies, E. L., Askelson, N. M., Gelman, E., & Losch, M. (2010). Young women’s knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors related to long-acting reversible contraceptives. Women’s Health Issues, 20(6), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2010.07.005.CrossRefPubMed

Stoddard, A., McNicholas, C., & Peipert, J. F. (2011). Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception. Drugs, 71(8), 969–980. https://doi.org/10.2165/11591290-000000000-00000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sundstrom, B., Baker-Whitcomb, A., & DeMaria, A. L. (2015). A qualitative analysis of long-acting reversible contraception. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 19(7), 1507–1514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-014-1655-0.CrossRefPubMed

Sundstrom, B., Billings, D., & Zenger, K. E. (2016). Keep calm and LARC on: A theory-based long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) access campaign. Journal of Communication in Healthcare: Strategies, Media and Engagement in Global Health, 9, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2016.1143165.CrossRef

Sundstrom, B., DeMaria, A. L., Meier, S., Jones, A., & Moxley, G. E. (2015). It makes you rethink your choice of the pill: Theory-based formative research to design a contraceptive choice campaign. Journal of Health Communication, 20(11), 1346–1354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018650.CrossRefPubMed

Trussell, J., Henry, N., Hassan, F., Prezioso, A., Law, A., & Filonenko, A. (2013). Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: Potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception, 87(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.016.CrossRefPubMed

US Census Bureau. (2012, 2016). U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: South Carolina. Retrieved September 13, 2018, from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/sc/EDU685216.

West, S. G., Duan, N., Pequegnat, W., Gaist, P., Des Jarlais, D. C., Holtgrave, D., … Mullen, P. D. (2008). Alternatives to the randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.124446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Winner, B., Peipert, J. F., Zhao, Q., Buckel, C., Madden, T., Allsworth, J. E., & Secura, G. M. (2012). Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. The New England Journal of Medicine, 366(21), 1998–2007. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110855.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest–Posttest Quasi-experimental Study
verfasst von: Beth Sundstrom
Deborah Billings
Ellie Smith
Merissa Ferrara
Bill Albert
Katherine Suellentrop
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2019
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-02729-6

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

Reproductive and Pregnancy Experiences of Diverse Sexual Minority Women: A Descriptive Exploratory Study

Geographic Inequities in Coverage of Maternal and Child health Services in Haryana State of India

Adult-Oriented Health Reform and Children’s Insurance and Access to Care: Evidence from Massachusetts Health Reform

Increase in Contraceptive Counseling by Primary Care Clinicians After Implementation of One Key Question® at an Urban Community Health Center

Severe Maternal Morbidity, A Tale of 2 States Using Data for Action—Ohio and Massachusetts

Association Between Motor Skills and Musculoskeletal Physical Fitness Among Preschoolers