nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

08.02.2021 | Review Article

Evaluation and interpretation of prosthetic joint infection diagnostic investigations

verfasst von: Rihard Trebse, Samo Roskar

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is considered one of the most successful surgical procedures ever developed. It can successfully provide pain relief, restore joint function, and improve mobility and quality of life. Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) presents with a wide variety and severity of signs and symptoms. It remains a major threat to the outcome of TJA procedures and usually necessitates surgical intervention and prolonged courses of antibiotics. Inappropriate treatment of an unrecognized PJI usually ends with unacceptable and sometimes catastrophic results.

The aim

The understanding and evaluation of diagnostic investigations are extremely important to properly diagnose PJI, including frequently unrecognized low-grade infections, and to provide healthcare professionals with needed information for the care of patients affected by this condition. This article aims to review most of the methods available in PJI diagnostics, to emphasize the strengths and the weaknesses of each of them, and to provide a guideline on how to select the surgical treatment strategy based on the level of diagnostic certainty during the evaluation period. To safely accomplish this, it is crucial to be aware of the limitations of each diagnostic modality.

The focus

The emphasis will be on the use and interpretation of the core criteria for PJI diagnosis, including the pathognomonic sinus tract communicating with the implant, purulent synovial fluid, inflammation in the periprosthetic tissue, cell count with differential, microbial growth in the synovial fluid culture, tissue sample cultures, and sonication samples.

Goldman AH, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG, Berry DJ, Abdel MP (2019) The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: why are contemporary revision total hip arthroplasties failing? An analysis of 2500 cases. J Arthroplast 34(7S):S11–S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.01.031CrossRef

Takakubo Y, Pajarinen J, Konttinen YT, Trebse R, Coer A, Mackiewicz M, Takagi M, Gallo J (2011) Does it exist something like long-term tolerance to an implant? Aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty as a result of local failure of tissue homeostasis. In: Fokter SK (ed) Recent advances in arthroplasty. InTech, Rijeka, pp 324–362

Jaekl DJ, Ong KL, Lau EC, Kurtz SM (2012) The epidemiology of total joint arthroplasty infections. In: Trebse R (ed) Infected total joint arthroplasty. The algorithmic approach. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 35–54CrossRef

Jakobsen TH, Eickhardt SR, Gheorghe AG, Stenqvist C, Sønderholm M, Stavnsberg C, Jensen PØ, Odgaard A, Whiteley M, Moser C, Hvolris J, Hougen HP, Bjarnsholt T (2018) Implants induce a new niche for microbiomes. APMIS 126(8):685–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12862CrossRefPubMed

Trivellas M, Cross MB (2016) Irrigation and debridement with component retention. In: Kendoff D, Morgan-Jones R, Haddad FS (eds) Periprosthetic joint infections: changing paradigms. Springer International Publishing, Gewerbestrasse, pp 221–228CrossRef

Moojen DJ, van Hellemondt G, Vogely HC, Burger BJ, Walenkamp GH, Tulp NJ, Schreurs BW, de Meulemeester FR, Schot CS, van de Pol I, Fujishiro T, Schouls LM, Bauer TW, Dhert WJ (2010) Incidence of low-grade infection in aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 81(6):667–673. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.525201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Milandt NR, Gundtoft PH, Overgaard S (2019) A single positive tissue culture increases the risk of revision of clinically aseptic THA: a national register study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 477(6):1372–1381. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1023132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jacobs AME, Bénard M, Meis JF, van Hellemondt G, Goosen JHM (2017) The unsuspected prosthetic joint infection: incidence and consequences of positive intra-operative cultures in presumed aseptic knee and hip revisions. Bone Jt J 99-B(11):1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B11.BJJ-2016-0655.R2CrossRef

Staats K, Kolbitsch P, Sigmund IK, Hobusch GM, Holinka J, Windhager R (2017) Outcome of total hip and total knee revision arthroplasty with minor infection criteria: a retrospective matched-pair analysis. J Arthroplast 32(4):1266–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.016CrossRef

10.

Yang Q, Wang J, Xu Y, Chen Y, Lian Q, Zhang Y (2020) Incidence and risk factors of in-hospital prosthesis-related complications following total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective Nationwide Inpatient Sample database study. Int Orthop 44(11):2243–2252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04682-yCrossRefPubMed

11.

Sierra JM, García S, Martínez-Pastor JC, Tomás X, Gallart X, Vila J, Bori G, Maculé F, Mensa J, Riba J, Soriano A (2011) Relationship between the degree of osteolysis and cultures obtained by sonication of the prostheses in patients with aseptic loosening of a hip or knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(10):1357–1361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1307-4CrossRefPubMed

12.

Fernandez-Sampedro M, Salas-Venero C, Fariñas-Álvarez C, Sumillera M, Pérez-Carro L, Fakkas-Fernandez M, Gómez-Román J, Martínez-Martínez L, Fariñas MC (2015) 26Postoperative diagnosis and outcome in patients with revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening. BMC Infect Dis 15:232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0976-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Ribera A, Morata L, Moranas J, Agulló JL, Martínez JC, López Y, García D, Cabo J, García-Ramiro S, Soriano A, Murillo O (2014) Clinical and microbiological findings in prosthetic joint replacement due to aseptic loosening. J Infect 69(3):235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2014.05.003CrossRefPubMed

14.

Trebse R, Brce A (2012) Current treatment strategies in prosthetic joint infections. In: Trebse R (ed) Infected total joint arthroplasty; the algorithmic approach. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 215–247CrossRef

15.

Shi X, Yang J, Zhou Z, Shen B, Kang P, Pei F (2020) Partial implant retention in two-stage exchange for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 44(3):461–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04473-0CrossRefPubMed

16.

Karczewski D, Winkler T, Perka C, Müller M (2018) The preoperative microbial detection is no prerequisite for the indication of septic revision in cases of suspected periprosthetic joint infection. Biomed Res Int:1729605. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1729605

17.

Iqbal F, Shafiq B, Zamir M, Noor S, Memon N, Memon N, Dina TK (2020) Micro-organisms and risk factors associated with prosthetic joint infection following primary total knee replacement-our experience in Pakistan. Int Orthop 44(2):283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04472-1CrossRefPubMed

18.

Moreira AI, Mendes L, Pereira JA (2020) Is there scientific evidence to support antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with periodontal disease as a means to decrease the risk of prosthetic joint infections? A systematic review. Int Orthop 44(2):231–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04433-8CrossRefPubMed

19.

Trebse R, Levasic V, Milosev I, Kovac S (2014) Does the bearing type influence the incidence of periprosthetic infections of the hip? CeraNews 1:12–16

20.

Yahia SA, Zeller V, Desplaces N, Chazerain P, Lhotellier L, Marmor S, Ziza JM (2016) Crystal-induced arthritis after arthroplasty: 7 cases. Joint Bone Spine 83(5):559–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2016.01.006CrossRefPubMed

21.

Mihalic R, Trebse R (2020) Reactive arthritis provoked by Campylobacter jejuni enterocolitis mimicking prosthetic joint infection: a case report. JBJS Case Connect 10(3):e2000043. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00043CrossRefPubMed

22.

Krenn V, Morawietz L, Perino G, Kienapfel H, Ascherl R, Hassenpflug GJ, Thomsen M, Thomas P, Huber M, Kendoff D, Baumhoer D, Krukemeyer MG, Natu S, Boetner F, Zustin J, Kölbel B, Rüther W, Kretzer JP, Tiemann A, Trampuz A, Frommelt L, Tichilow R, Söder S, Müller S, Parvizi J, Illgner U, Gehrke T (2014) Revised histopathological consensus classification of joint implant related pathology. Pathol Res Pract 210(12):779–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2014.09.017CrossRefPubMed

23.

Tsaras G, Maduka-Ezeh A, Inwards CY, Mabry T, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Montori VM, West CP, Osmon DR, Berbari EF (2012) Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(18):1700–1711. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.00502CrossRefPubMed

24.

Trampuz A, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Mandrekar J, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2004) Synovial fluid leukocyte count and differential for the diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. Am J Med 117(8):556–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.06.022CrossRefPubMed

25.

Zmistowski B, Della Valle C, Bauer TW, Mallizos IN, Alavi A, Bedair H, Booth RE, Choong P, Deirmengian C, Ehrlich GD, Gambir A, Huang R, Kissin Y, Kobayashi H, Kobayashi N, Krenn V, Lorenzo D, Marston SB, Meermans G, Perez J, Ploegmakers JJ, Rosenberg A, Simpfendorfer C, Thomas P, Tohtz S, Villafuerte JA, Wahl P, Wagenaar FC, Witzo E (2014) Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 29(2 Suppl):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.040CrossRef

26.

Krenn V, Perino G (2017) Histological diagnosis of implant-associated pathologies. In: Krenn V, Perino G (eds) Histological diagnosis of implant-associated pathologies, 1st edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1–44CrossRef

27.

Krenn VT, Liebisch M, Kölbel B, Renz N, Gehrke T, Huber M, Krukemeyer MG, Trampuz A, Resch H, Krenn V (2017) CD15 focus score: infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection. Pathol Res Pract 213(5):541–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2017.01.002CrossRefPubMed

28.

Randelli F, Brioschi M, Randelli P, Ambrogi F, Sdao S, Aliprandi A (2018) Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best? Radiol Med 123(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0811-1CrossRefPubMed

29.

Fritz J, Lurie B, Miller TT (2013) Imaging of hip arthroplasty. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 17(3):316–327. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1348098CrossRefPubMed

30.

Hargunani R, Madani H, Khoo M, Fotiadou A, Pressney I, Calleja M, O'Donnell P (2016) Imaging of the painful hip arthroplasty. Can Assoc Radiol J 67(4):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2015.11.003CrossRefPubMed

31.

Dinneen A, Guyot A, Clements J, Bradley N (2013) Synovial fluid white cell and differential count in the diagnosis or exclusion of prosthetic joint infection. Bone Jt J 95:554–557. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B4.30388CrossRef

32.

Schinsky MF, Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2008) Perioperative testing for joint infection in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1869–1875. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01255CrossRefPubMed

33.

Cipriano CA, Brown NM, Michael AM, Moric M, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ (2012) Serum and synovial fluid analysis for diagnosing chronic periprosthetic infection in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(7):594–600. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01318CrossRefPubMed

34.

Sousa R, Serrano P, Gomes Dias J, Oliveira JC, Oliveira A (2017) Improving the accuracy of synovial fluid analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with simple and inexpensive biomarkers: C-reactive protein and adenosine deaminase. Bone Jt J 99-B(3):351–357. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B3.BJJ-2016-0684.R1CrossRef

35.

De Fine M, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Illuminati A, Terrando S, Pignatti G (2018) The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 42(5):983–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3865-3CrossRefPubMed

36.

Shohat N, Goswami K, Fillingham Y, Tan TL, Calkins T, Della Valle CJ, George J, Higuera C, Parvizi J (2018) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection in inflammatory arthritis: assumption is the enemy of true understanding. J Arthroplast 33(11):3561–3566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.016CrossRef

37.

Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L (2008) The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90(7):874–878. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20417CrossRef

38.

Trampuz A, Osmon DR, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2003) Molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:69–88. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000087324.60612.93CrossRef

39.

Tande AJ, Patel R (2014) Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev 27(2):302–345. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00111-13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Suren C, Feihl S, Cabric S, Banke IJ, Haller B, Trampuz A, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Prodinger PM (2020) Improved pre-operative diagnostic accuracy for low-grade prosthetic joint infections using second-generation multiplex polymerase chain reaction on joint fluid aspirate. Int Orthop 44(9):1629–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-020-04552-7CrossRefPubMed

41.

Hughes JG, Vetter EA, Patel R, Schleck CD, Harmsen S, Turgeant LT, Cockerill FR (2001) Culture with BACTEC Peds Plus/F bottle compared with conventional methods for detection of bacteria in synovial fluid. J Clin Microbiol 39(12):4468–4471. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.12.4468-4471.2001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Kheir MM, Tan TL, Ackerman CT, Modi R, Foltz C, Parvizi J (2018) Culturing periprosthetic joint infection: number of samples, growth duration, and organisms. J Arthroplast 33(11):3531–3536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.06.018CrossRef

43.

Aggarwal VK, Higuera C, Deirmengian G, Parvizi J, Austin MS (2013) Swab cultures are not as effective as tissue cultures for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471(10):3196–3203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2974-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar IN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357(7):654–663. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa061588CrossRefPubMed

45.

Trampuz A, Piper KE, Hanssen AD, Osmon DR, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Patel R (2006) Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J Clin Microbiol 44(2):628–631. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.2.628-631.2006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Portillo ME, Salvadó M, Trampuz A, Siverio A, Alier A, Sorli L, Martínez S, Pérez-Prieto D, Horcajada JP, Puig-Verdie L (2015) Improved diagnosis of orthopedic implant-associated infection by inoculation of sonication fluid into blood culture bottles. J Clin Microbiol 53(5):1622–1627. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.03683-14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Janz V, Trampuz A, Perka CF, Wassilew GI (2017) Reduced culture time and improved isolation rate through culture of sonicate fluid in blood culture bottles. Technol Health Care 25(4):635–640. https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-160660CrossRefPubMed

48.

Dudareva M, Barrett L, Figtree M, Scarborough M, Watanabe M, Newnham R, Wallis R, Oakley S, Kendrick B, Stubbs D, McNally MA, Bejon P, Atkins BA, Taylor A, Brent AJ (2018) Sonication versus tissue sampling for diagnosis of prosthetic joint and other orthopedic device-related infections. J Clin Microbiol 56(12):e00688–e00618. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00688-18CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Puig-Verdie L, Alentorn-Geli E, Gonzalez-Cuevas A, Sorlı L, Salvado M, Alier A, Pelfort X, Portillo ME, Horcajada JP (2013) Implant sonication increases the diagnostic accuracy of infection in patients with delayed, but not early, orthopaedic implant failure. Bone Jt J 95-B(2):244–249. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30486CrossRef

50.

Kummer A, Tafin UF, Borens O (2017) Effect of sonication on the elution of antibiotics from polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). J Bone Jt Infect 2(4):208–212. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.22443CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Akgün D, Müller M, Perka C, Winkler T (2018) The serum level of C-reactive protein alone cannot be used for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections, especially in those caused by organisms of low virulence. Bone Jt J 100-B(11):1482–1486. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0514.R1CrossRef

52.

Dodson CC, Craig EV, Cordasco FA, Dines DM, Dines JS, Dicarlo E, Brause BD, Warren RF (2010) Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(2):303–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.07.065CrossRef

53.

Bejon P, Byren I, Atkins BL, Scarborough M, Woodhouse A, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Berendt AR (2011) Serial measurement of the C-reactive protein is a poor predictor of treatment outcome in prosthetic joint infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 66(7):1590–1593. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr182CrossRefPubMed

54.

Berbari E, Mabry T, Tsaras G, Spangehl M, Erwin PJ, Murad MH, Steckelberg J, Osmon D (2010) Inflammatory blood laboratory levels as markers of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Jt Bone Surg Am 92(11):2102–2119. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01199CrossRef

55.

Trebse R, Mihalic R (2014) Acute osteomyelitis in children. N Engl J Med 370(14):1364–1365. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1402234CrossRefPubMed

56.

Li R, Shao HY, Hao LB, Yu BZ, Qu PF, Zhou YX, Chen JY (2019) Plasma fibrinogen exhibits better performance than plasma D-dimer in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter retrospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101(7):613–619. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.00624CrossRefPubMed

57.

Levon J, Al Samadi A, Mackiewicz Z, Coer A, Trebse R, Waris E, Konttinen Y (2015) Human beta-defensin-3 producing cells in septic implant loosening. J Mater Sci Mater Med 26(2):98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5440-4CrossRefPubMed

58.

Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, Cameron A, Schiller K, Parvizi J (2014) Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(11):3254–3262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3543-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Gehrke T, Lausmann C, Citak M, Bonanzinga T, Frommelt L, Zahar A (2018) The accuracy of the alpha defensin lateral flow device for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: comparison with a gold standard. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01522CrossRefPubMed

60.

Bingham J, Clarke H, Spangehl M, Schwartz A, Beauchamp C, Goldberg B (2014) The alpha defensin-1 biomarker assay can be used to evaluate the potentially infected total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(12):4006–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3900-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Sigmund IK, Holinka J, Gamper J, Staats K, Böhler C, Kubista B, Windhager R (2017) Qualitative a-defensin test (Synovasure) for the diagnosis of periprosthetic infection in revision total joint arthroplasty. Bone Jt J 99-B(1):66–72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0295.R1CrossRef

62.

Rak M, Barlic-Maganja D, Kavcic M, Trebse R, Cőr A (2013) Comparison of molecular and culture method in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. FEMS Microbiol Lett 343(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12125CrossRefPubMed

63.

Rak M, Trebse R (2015) Identification of the same species in at least two intraoperative samples for prosthetic joint infection diagnostics yields the best results with broad-range PCR. Int Orthop 39(5):975–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2552-2CrossRefPubMed

64.

Li M, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Si H, Bao X, Shen B (2019) Performance of sequencing assays in diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplast 34(7):1514–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.044CrossRef

65.

Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Ploegmakers JJW, Ottink K, Kampinga GA, Wagenmakers-Huizenga L, Jutte PC, Kobold ACM (2018) Synovial calprotectin: an inexpensive biomarker to exclude a chronic prosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 33(4):1149–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.006CrossRef

66.

Lee YS, Koo KH, Kim HJ, Tian S, Kim TY, Maltenfort MG, Chen AF (2017) Synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(24):2077–2084. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00123CrossRefPubMed

67.

Karbysheva S, Yermak K, Grigoricheva L, Renz N, Perka C, Trampuz A (2020) Synovial fluid d-lactate: a novel pathogen-specific biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast 35(8):2223–2229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.016CrossRef

68.

Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens O, Glaudemans AWJM, Cassar-Pullicino V, Trampuz A, Winkler H, Gheysens O, Vanhoenacker FMHM, Petrosillo N, Jutte PC (2019) Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46(4):971–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-4263-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Evaluation and interpretation of prosthetic joint infection diagnostic investigations
verfasst von: Rihard Trebse
Samo Roskar
Publikationsdatum: 08.02.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-04958-x

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation and interpretation of prosthetic joint infection diagnostic investigations

Abstract

Background

The aim

The focus

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

The aim

The focus

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Central and Eastern Europe actual orthopaedics profile

Meniscal scaffold for the treatment of partial meniscal defect—clinical and radiological outcomes in a two-year follow-up

Functional and magnetic resonance imaging outcome after polyurethane meniscal scaffold implantation following partial meniscectomy

Comment on article by Milenkovic et al.: lateral tibial plateau fractures—functional outcomes and complications after open reduction and internal fixation

Patient-reported joint status and quality of life in sports-related ankle disorders and osteoarthritis

Lateral tibial plateau fractures—functional outcomes and complications after open reduction and internal fixation

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie