Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 5/2007

01.10.2007 | Original Paper

Evaluation of complications of three different types of proximal extra-articular femur fractures

Differences in complications, age, sex and surviving rates

verfasst von: Andreas A. Suckel, Klaus Dietz, Nikolaus Wuelker, Peter Helwig

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 5/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The comparability of studies of extra-articular proximal femur fractures is compromised by the lack of a widely accepted, simple classification system with clinical and prognostic relevance. The aim of the study is to define the complication profile as well as differences relating to age, gender and survival rate of simple trochanteric fractures, intertrochanteric comminuted and subtrochanteric fractures. Records of 335 consecutive patients were analysed. Patients had a median follow-up of 10 (1–56) months, and were treated operatively with three intramedullary nailing systems. Simple trochanteric fractures (n=67) show wound healing problems (1.5%). Median age is m/f 77(45–98) years/ 85(39–101), and two-year survival rate is m/f 50.3%/ 84.9%. Intertrochanteric comminuted fractures (n=204) show the highest complications (25%), 9.7% femoralhead perforations, 3.5% hardware related problems and 11.8% wound healing problems. Median age is m/f 75(41–94) years/ 85(54–100), survival rate is m/f 92.7%/ 66.5%. Complication rate is 17.0% in subtrochanteric fractures (n=64), no femoralhead perforation but 9.1% other hardware problems and 7.8% wound healing problems. Median age is m/f 72(24–91) years/ 83(38–99), survival rate is m/f 92.3%/ 67.9%. Females show higher complication rates compared to males (19% versus 10%). The three types of fractures show different patterns of complications, survival rates, age, and sex distribution.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic srew and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15:394–400PubMedCrossRef Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2001) Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic srew and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 15:394–400PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones WM, Al-Lami M (2002) The AO/ ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 33:395–399PubMedCrossRef Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones WM, Al-Lami M (2002) The AO/ ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury 33:395–399PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Audige L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203PubMedCrossRef Audige L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Banan H, Al-Sabti TA, Jimulia T, Hart AJ (2002) The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)- our first 60 cases. Injury 33:401–405PubMedCrossRef Banan H, Al-Sabti TA, Jimulia T, Hart AJ (2002) The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)- our first 60 cases. Injury 33:401–405PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of Tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 77-A:1058–1064 Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of Tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 77-A:1058–1064
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomechanics 34:859–871CrossRef Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M (2001) Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomechanics 34:859–871CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F (2003) The proximal femoral nail (PFN)- a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow- up of 15 month. Acta Orthop Scand 74:53–58PubMedCrossRef Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F (2003) The proximal femoral nail (PFN)- a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow- up of 15 month. Acta Orthop Scand 74:53–58PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Boyd H, Griffin L (1949) Classification and treatment of trochanteric fractures. Arch Surg 58:853–866PubMed Boyd H, Griffin L (1949) Classification and treatment of trochanteric fractures. Arch Surg 58:853–866PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Curtis MJ, Jinnah RH, Wilson V, Cunningham BW (1994) Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation. Injury 25:99–104PubMedCrossRef Curtis MJ, Jinnah RH, Wilson V, Cunningham BW (1994) Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation. Injury 25:99–104PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ender J (1970) Probleme beim frischen per- und subtrochanteren Oberschenkelbruch. Hefte Unfallheilk 106:2–11 Ender J (1970) Probleme beim frischen per- und subtrochanteren Oberschenkelbruch. Hefte Unfallheilk 106:2–11
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedl W (1993) Relevance of osteotomy and implant characteristics in inter- and subtrochanteric osteotomies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:5–11PubMedCrossRef Friedl W (1993) Relevance of osteotomy and implant characteristics in inter- and subtrochanteric osteotomies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 113:5–11PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Haynes RC, Pöll RG, Miles AW, Weston RB (1997) An experimental study of the failure modes of the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw under static loading: a cadaveric study. Med Eng Phys 19:446–453PubMedCrossRef Haynes RC, Pöll RG, Miles AW, Weston RB (1997) An experimental study of the failure modes of the gamma locking nail and AO dynamic hip screw under static loading: a cadaveric study. Med Eng Phys 19:446–453PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G (2001) Musculo-sceletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomechanics 34:883–893CrossRef Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G (2001) Musculo-sceletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J Biomechanics 34:883–893CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369PubMedCrossRef Herrera A, Domingo LJ, Calvo A (2002) A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 26:365–369PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen JS, Michaelsen M (1975) Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 46:795–803PubMedCrossRef Jensen JS, Michaelsen M (1975) Trochanteric femoral fractures treated with McLaughlin osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Scand 46:795–803PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen JS (1980) Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 51:803–810PubMed Jensen JS (1980) Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 51:803–810PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russel TA (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A:924–950 Kyle RF, Cabanela ME, Russel TA (1994) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 76-A:924–950
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1987) The comprehensive classification of fractures of the long bones. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 120–121 Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P (1987) The comprehensive classification of fractures of the long bones. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 120–121
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker MJ (1992) Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B:625 Parker MJ (1992) Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position. J Bone Joint Surg 74-B:625
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2002) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2002) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenthal RE (1996) Prevention of complications with the gamma nail. Am J Orthop 25:729PubMed Rosenthal RE (1996) Prevention of complications with the gamma nail. Am J Orthop 25:729PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95° screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A:372–381PubMed Sadowski C, Lubbeke A, Saudan M (2002) Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or 95° screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg 84-A:372–381PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 60-A:300–306 Seinsheimer F (1978) Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg 60-A:300–306
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, Van der Werken Ch (1999) The AO/ ASIF- proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30:327–332PubMedCrossRef Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, Van der Werken Ch (1999) The AO/ ASIF- proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury 30:327–332PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maihi PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg 52-A:457–467 Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maihi PS (1970) Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg 52-A:457–467
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Trozo RG (1973) Surgery of the hip joint. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia Trozo RG (1973) Surgery of the hip joint. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of complications of three different types of proximal extra-articular femur fractures
Differences in complications, age, sex and surviving rates
verfasst von
Andreas A. Suckel
Klaus Dietz
Nikolaus Wuelker
Peter Helwig
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 5/2007
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0250-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2007

International Orthopaedics 5/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.