nach oben

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

Erschienen in:

16.03.2021 | Original Article

Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine

verfasst von: Ahmet Oğuz Şahan, Burçin Akan, DDS, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the symmetry of the facial and dentoalveolar structures of patients with unilateral impacted maxillary canine teeth with a control group of individuals without impacted teeth using three-dimensional face scans.

Methods

The study included 28 patients (10 females, 18 males) with unilateral impacted maxillary canine teeth and 28 patients (15 females, 13 males) without any impacted maxillary canine between 12 and 25 years of age. The 3dMDface™ (3dMD Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA) imaging system was used to obtain 3D face images. 3dMD Vultus® (3dMD Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA) software was used for the measurements.

Results

According to the study findings, there were differences in linear measurements and volume measurements between the right and left sides of the face in patients with an impacted canine. However, these differences were not statistically significant. In patients with an impacted canine, surface differences between the right and left halves of the face were not found to be statistically different from the control group.

Conclusion

There was no difference in the amount of facial asymmetry between patients with unilateral maxillary impacted canine and patients with normal tooth alignment in the control group.

Holmes S, Hatch C (1938) Personal appearance as related to scholastic records and marriage selection in college women. Hum Biol 10:65

Rhodes G, Tremewan T (1996) Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychol Sci 7:105–110CrossRef

Alley TR, Cunningham MR (1991) Article commentary: averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol Sci 2:123–125CrossRef

Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M (1991) Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod 61:43–48PubMed

Little AC, Jones BC (2003) Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proc Biol Sci 270:1759–1763PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Serrao G (1995) A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry. J Anat 186:103PubMedPubMedCentral

Stewart JA, Heo G, Glover KE, Williamson PC, Lam EW, Major PW (2001) Factors that relate to treatment duration for patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119:216–225PubMedCrossRef

Ericson S, Kurol J (1987) Incisor resorption caused by maxillary cuspids: a radiographic study. Angle Orthod 57:332–346PubMed

Meyer-Marcotty P, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Bareis U, Hartmann J, Kochel J (2011) Three-dimensional perception of facial asymmetry. Eur J Orthod 33:647–653PubMedCrossRef

10.

McAvinchey G, Maxim F, Nix B, Djordjevic J, Linklater R, Landini G (2014) The perception of facial asymmetry using 3‑dimensional simulated images. Angle Orthod 84:957–965PubMedCrossRef

11.

Meyer-Marcotty P, Kochel J, Boehm H, Linz C, Klammert U, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A (2011) Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and patients with severe class III malocclusion compared to controls. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39:158–163PubMedCrossRef

12.

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Ciusa V, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM (2001) The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59:382–388PubMedCrossRef

13.

Smith WM (2000) Hemispheric and facial asymmetry: gender differences. Laterality 5:251–258PubMedCrossRef

14.

Smith WM (1998) Hemispheric and facial asymmetry: faces of academe. J Cogn Neurosci 10:663–667PubMedCrossRef

15.

Farkas LG, Cheung G (1981) Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians: an anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod 51:70–77PubMed

16.

Severt T, Proffit W (1997) The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 12:171–176PubMed

17.

O’Grady KF, Antonyshyn OM (1999) Facial asymmetry: three-dimensional analysis using laser surface scanning. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:928–937PubMedCrossRef

18.

Duran GS, Dindaroğlu F, Görgülü S (2017) Three-dimensional evaluation of social smile symmetry. Angle Orthod 87:96–103PubMedCrossRef

19.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191CrossRef

20.

Developed by tne National Center for Health Statistics in collaboration with the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 2000. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/index.htm

21.

Dindaroğlu F, Duran GS, Görgülü S, Yetkiner E (2016) Social smile reproducibility using 3‑D stereophotogrammetry and reverse engineering technology. Angle Orthod 86:448–455PubMedCrossRef

22.

Primožič J, Richmond S, Kau CH, Zhurov A, Ovsenik M (2011) Three-dimensional evaluation of early crossbite correction: a longitudinal study. Eur J Orthod 35:7–13PubMedCrossRef

23.

Williams A, Shah H, Sandy J, Travess H (2005) Patients’ motivations for treatment and their experiences of orthodontic preparation for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod 32:191–202PubMedCrossRef

24.

Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC (2002) The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 24:1–7PubMedCrossRef

25.

Henson ST, Lindauer SJ, Gardner WG, Shroff B, Tufekci E, Best AM (2011) Influence of dental esthetics on social perceptions of adolescents judged by peers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 140:389–395PubMedCrossRef

26.

Linn EL (1966) Social meanings of dental appearance. J Health Soc Behav 7(4):289–295

27.

Djordjevic J, Pirttiniemi P, Harila V, Heikkinen T, Toma AM, Zhurov AI et al (2011) Three-dimensional longitudinal assessment of facial symmetry in adolescents. Eur J Orthod 35:143–151PubMedCrossRef

28.

Djordjevic J, Toma AM, Zhurov AI, Richmond S (2011) Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning. Eur J Orthod 36:125–132PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

29.

Primožič J, Ovsenik M, Richmond S, Kau CH, Zhurov A (2009) Early crossbite correction: a three-dimensional evaluation. Eur J Orthod 31:352–356PubMedCrossRef

30.

Naini FB, Donaldson ANA, McDonald F, Cobourne MT (2012) Assessing the influence of asymmeftry affecting the mandible and chin point on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, clinician, and layperson. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:192–206PubMedCrossRef

31.

Chu EA, Farrag TY, Ishii LE, Byrne PJ (2011) Threshold of visual perception of facial asymmetry in a facial paralysis model. Arch Facial Plast Surg 13:14–19PubMedCrossRef

32.

Nouraei SR, Pulido MA, Saleh HA (2009) Impact of rhinoplasty on objective measurement and psychophysical appreciation of facial symmetry. Arch Facial Plast Surg 11:198–202PubMedCrossRef

33.

Kronmiller JE (1998) Development of asymmetries. Semin Orthod 4(3):134–137PubMedCrossRef

34.

Bishara SE, Burkey PS, Kharouf JG (1994) Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. Angle Orthod 64(2):89–98PubMed

35.

Dindaroğlu F, Duran GS, Aras I (2016) Three-dimensional evaluation of morphologic tooth symmetry in various malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 150(3):459–466PubMedCrossRef

36.

Kolar JC, Salter EM (1997) Craniofacial anthropometry: practical measurement of the head and face for clinical, surgical, and research use. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL

37.

Mortenson PA, Steinbok P (2006) Quantifying positional plagiocephaly: reliability and validity of anthropometric measurements. J Craniofac Surg 17:413–419PubMedCrossRef

38.

Mendonca DA, Naidoo SD, Skolnick G, Skladman R, Woo AS (2013) Comparative study of cranial anthropometric measurement by traditional calipers to computed tomography and three-dimensional photogrammetry. J Craniofac Surg 24:1106–1110PubMedCrossRef

39.

Wong JY, Oh AK, Ohta E, Hunt AT, Rogers GF, Mulliken JB et al (2008) Validity and reliability of craniofacial anthropometric measurement of 3D digital photogrammetric images. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 45:232–239PubMedCrossRef

40.

Aynechi N, Larson BE, Leon-Salazar V, Beiraghi S (2011) Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition. Angle Orthod 81:245–252PubMedCrossRef

41.

Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR (2006) Image analysis and superimposition of 3‑dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:611–618PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Levin MD, Gane D (2010) Essentials of maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Alpha Omega Fr 103:62–67CrossRef

43.

Germec-Cakan D, Canter HI, Nur B, Arun T (2010) Comparison of facial soft tissue measurements on three-dimensional images and models obtained with different methods. J Craniofac Surg 21:1393–1399PubMedCrossRef

44.

Weber DW, Fallis DW, Packer MD (2013) Three-dimensional reproducibility of natural head position. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:738–744PubMedCrossRef

45.

Maal T, Verhamme L, van Loon B, Plooij J, Rangel F, Kho A et al (2011) Variation of the face in rest using 3D stereophotogrammetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:1252–1257CrossRef

46.

Ras F, Habets LL, van Ginkel FC, Prahl-Andersen B (1995) Method for quantifying facial asymmetry in three dimensions using stereophotogrammetry. Angle Orthod 65:233–239PubMed

47.

Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Tartaglia G (1994) Distance from symmetry: a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:1126–1132PubMedCrossRef

48.

Taylor HO, Morrison CS, Linden O, Phillips B, Chang J, Byrne ME et al (2014) Quantitative facial asymmetry: using three-dimensional photogrammetry to measure baseline facial surface symmetry. J Craniofac Surg 25:124–128PubMedCrossRef

49.

Langberg BJ, Peck S (2000) Tooth-size reduction associated with occurrence of palatal displacement of canines. Angle Orthod 70:126–128PubMed

50.

Yan B, Sun Z, Fields H, Wang L, Luo L (2013) Etiologic factors for buccal and palatal maxillary canine impaction: a perspective based on cone-beam computed tomography analyses. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 143:527–534PubMedCrossRef

51.

Leonardi R, Muraglie S, Rugeri M, Barbato E (2019) Three-dimensional evaluations of the digital casts of morphologic maxillary teeth symmetry in patients with unilateral palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 155:339–346PubMedCrossRef

52.

Langberg BJ, Peck S (2000) Adequacy of maxillary dental arch width in patients with palatally displaced canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:220–223PubMedCrossRef

53.

Al-Khateeb S, Abu Alhaija ES, Rwaite A, Burqan BA (2012) Dental arch parameters of the displacement and nondisplacement sides in subjects with unilateral palatal canine ectopia. Angle Orthod 83:259–265PubMedCrossRef

54.

Metzger MC, Hohlweg-Majert B, Schön R, Teschner M, Gellrich N‑C, Schmelzeisen R et al (2007) Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104:1–10CrossRef

55.

Mathis A, Laskin DM, Tüfekçi E, Caricco C, Lindauer SJ (2018) Upper lip asymmetry during smiling: an analysis using three-dimensional images. Turk J Orthod 31:32PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Titel: Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine
verfasst von: Ahmet Oğuz Şahan
Burçin Akan, DDS, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 16.03.2021
Verlag: Springer Medizin
Erschienen in: Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1434-5293
Elektronische ISSN: 1615-6714
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00285-3

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

19.04.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Werden Personen mit Vorhofflimmern in der Blanking-Periode nach einer Katheterablation gegen eine bestehende Parodontitis behandelt, verbessert dies die Erfolgsaussichten. Dafür sprechen die Resultate einer prospektiven Untersuchung.

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

11.04.2024 Endokarditis Nachrichten

Bei welchen Personen eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe zur Prävention einer infektiösen Endokarditis nach invasiven zahnärztlichen Eingriffen sinnvoll ist, wird diskutiert. Neue Daten stehen im Einklang mit den europäischen Leitlinienempfehlungen.

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

08.04.2024 Zahnmedizin Nachrichten

Der Aufbau von Geweben und Organen während der Embryonalentwicklung wird von den Zellen bemerkenswert choreografiert. Für diesen Prozess braucht es spezielle sogenannte „Organisatoren“. In einer aktuellen Veröffentlichung im Fachjournal Nature Cell Biology berichten Forschende durch welchen Vorgang diese Organisatoren im Gewebe entstehen und wie sie dann die Bildung von Zähnen orchestrieren.

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

11.03.2024 Kinderzahnmedizin Nachrichten

Infolge der Umbenennung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnheilkunde in Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kinderzahnmedizin (DGKiZ) wird deren Mitgliederzeitschrift Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde in Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnmedizin umbenannt. Aus diesem Grunde trägt die erste Ausgabe in 2024 erstmalig den neuen Titel.

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Postorthodontic lower incisor and canine inclination and labial gingival recession in adult patients

Mitteilung des Präsidenten der DGKFO

Three-dimensional changes in the location of soft tissue landmarks following bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

Possible ambiguities regarding blinding, mean change/month, canine rotation and (i‑)PRF use

Authors’ response to ambiguities regarding the effect of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) on canine retraction

Which method is more effective for accelerating canine distalization short term, low-level laser therapy or piezocision? A split-mouth study

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Invasive Zahnbehandlung: Wann eine Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor infektiöser Endokarditis schützt

Zell-Organisatoren unter Druck: Mechanismen des embryonalen Zahnwachstums aufgedeckt

Die Oralprophylaxe & Kinderzahnheilkunde umbenannt

Newsletter