Background
Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable, preventable and curable disease caused by the bacterium
Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). It is the 13th leading cause of death and the second leading infectious killer after COVID-19 (ranking above HIV/AIDS) [
1]. It is estimated that in 2019, TB was diagnosed in 10 million (range 8.9–11 million) people and 1.4 million died worldwide from this disease [
2]. The problem of managing and eliminating TB is further exacerbated by the presence of drug-resistant TB, a major public health problem that threatens progress made in TB care and control worldwide [
3]. In 2019, about half a million people developed rifampicin-resistant TB, of which 78% were multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) [
2]. Also, in 2018 it was estimated that 6.2% of MDR-TB cases were extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) [
3].
Peru has 14% of the estimated cases of tuberculosis in the Region of the Americas, with 27,000 new cases of active disease and 17,000 new cases of smear-positive pulmonary TB each year. In addition, it is one of the 30 countries in the world with the highest burden of MDR-TB [
3]. TB and MDR-TB are distributed in the 24 Departments of Peru; however, the department of Lima (capital of Peru) and the constitutional province of Callao account for 61% of TB cases and 78% of MDR-TB and XDR-TB cases [
4].
Different methodologies have been implemented over the years in Peru for the evaluation of resistance to the drugs used in the treatment of tuberculosis. Since 2004 the gold standard method at the National Mycobacterial Reference Laboratory for
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex susceptibility testing has been the 1% indirect 7H10 Agar Proportion Method (APM), which is laborious and requires 2–3 weeks from strain inoculation for results to become available [
5].
The CRyPTIC (Comprehensive Resistance Prediction for Tuberculosis: An International Consortium) research project has validated the UKMYC6 broth microdilution (BMD) plate to provide the simultaneous evaluation of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of several anti-tuberculosis drugs from a single clinical isolate of MTB. UKMYC6 plate is a variant of the original MYCOTB plate [
6,
7] and contains 13 different anti-TB drugs, including two repurposed (linezolid and clofazimine) and two new (bedaquiline and delamanid) compounds [
8]. The original MYCOTB microdilution plate showed good results of categorical agreement (92–100%) for the determination of susceptibility to the conventional first- and second-line drugs [
6,
7] evaluated by the APM; however, it was only with the development of the UKMYC5 plate that the incorporation of new and repurposed drugs was achieved [
8]. During preliminary evaluation of this plate the drug para-aminosalicylic acid was eliminated and concentration ranges for the remaining drugs were optimized, giving rise to the UKMYC6 plate. In this way, the UKMYC6 microdilution plate provides quantitative MIC values and thus a higher resolution understanding of drug resistance, potentially facilitating improved, individualized treatment for each patient.
The objective of this study was to take advantage of the opportunity presented by the CRyPTIC study of genomic determinants of drug resistance to evaluate the performance of the BMD methodology using UKMYC6 plate for susceptibility testing of MTB strains to antituberculosis drugs in Peru when compared with the APM results. Furthermore, through selection of a nationally representative sample of MTB strains, the profile of TB drug MICs in drug-resistant strains nationally can be elucidated.
Discussion
This is the first description of the comprehensive drug resistance profile, with MIC distribution of a nationally representative sample of drug-resistant strains of
M. tuberculosis in Peru. Such analyses are of fundamental importance when considering the local design of standardized treatment regimens for MDR-TB [
22]. The study also provided the opportunity to compare indirect drug susceptibility testing (DST) by the proportion method on 7H10 agar against MIC testing using liquid culture by the BMD method.
Overall, there was no resistance to the new and repurposed drugs identified with no strains exceeding the ECOFF/ECV for bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine or linezolid. This results agree with previous studies in the Americas region [
23] as well as in other contexts [
24,
25]. This reflects the sparse usage of these agents within a compassionate use framework prior to their incorporation into national guidelines in 2018 [
26] and indicates their introduction into a favourable environment from that timepoint onwards; comparison now with a similarly representative sample of contemporary TB-MDR strains would be instructive and important.
The BMD plate is a convenient tool for the analysis of MICs to any of the drugs used in the treatment of TB [
6,
27,
28]. The methodology facilitates addition of new drugs and the range of MICs being tested can be adapted, if necessary, in certain settings [
8]. The WHO-recommended critical concentrations for new and repurposed drugs are still provisional [
29,
30] and further work to define MIC distributions in a diversity of settings can contribute to refinement [
31,
32]. Recently, the WHO has highlighted the great feasibility of the BMD plate methodology for the phenotypic evaluation of various anti-TB drugs, meeting all quality control requirements. Because of this, it has begun to analyze the performance of various BMD systems, including the UKMYC6 plate, in order to provide guidelines for the development of an optimized BMD system that can be recommended for clinical use [
33].
The detection of discordant results is a fact that has been documented in previous studies for the different antituberculosis drugs and for both phenotypic and genotypic tests [
34], which have been studied in countries with a high burden of drug-resistant strains, including Peru [
35]. The fact that the highest percentage of discordant results between the APM and BMD methods have been detected in ethambutol and ethionamide drugs corroborates the existing problem of obtaining inconsistent results for both drugs [
36‐
38]. This was also previously identified as a problem by the WHO, acknowledging that phenotypic DST lacks sufficient reproducibility and is not recommended for these drugs [
39]. The considerable decrease in discordant cases through the application of borderline concentrations demonstrates the big challenge of defining a binary susceptible/resistant phenotype for certain drugs. These findings highlight the well-recognised imperfections of all approaches to
M. tuberculosis DST. Sometimes there is no ‘one right answer’.
The BMD system is presented as an alternative to susceptibility determination against traditional systems such as APM. The latter has longer incubation times and is aimed at only evaluating critical concentrations of a limited number of drugs [
39]. Against this, the use of BMD plates allows the simultaneous evaluation of between 12 to 14 drugs including traditional drugs, as well as new and recently repurposed ones [
6,
8]. This generates advantages such as: the simultaneous evaluation of a range of concentrations for each drug, a reduction in the times for obtaining results for the complete set of drugs from months to only 14 days, and simplification of workflows in the laboratory [
8]. Likewise, the practicality of the design and manufacture allow the BMD system plates to be personalized with different drugs and concentration ranges that best fit the reality of drug resistance prevalence in each country or study [
33,
40]. Simultaneous analysis of various anti-tuberculosis drugs would be a great advantage in countries with a high burden of drug resistance such as Peru, where traditional flows establish that a filter is first carried out by means of a susceptibility test against first-line drugs (FLD). Only those with demonstrated FLD resistance are evaluated for susceptibility to second-line agents, including new and repurposed drugs, resulting in further delay in time to results and additional cost. On the other hand, it is estimated that the replacement of drugs and readjustment of concentrations evaluated in microdilution plates would not cause a significant increase in production costs in each country [
8].
What is the clinician to make of the information provided by the laboratory and how should the laboratory present it? There is a reluctance to share MIC data with clinicians who lack the training to interpret it. Few laboratory scientists and even fewer clinicians understand the complexities of the pharmacokinetics of TB drugs and how this relates to the MIC for a particular drug for a particular strain, so it still seems reasonable to try to simplify the message to the binary susceptible/resistant call where possible.
The value of MIC data lies in understanding the drift in the distribution in well characterised populations over time (public health usage) and in case management when therapeutic options are very limited but dosage increases might facilitate efficacy (clinical usage) [
41]. Periodically re-evaluating the national MIC distribution profile, in particular for the new and repurposed drugs which have been introduced since this strain sample was obtained, would shed important light upon the speed at which drug-resistant strains are (or are not) emerging, information which might not be immediately apparent from simply looking at the binary susceptible/resistant data.
An important strength of this analysis is the national representativity. All strains identified nationally during the study period should have been sent to the National Mycobacteria Reference Laboratory for further testing so stratified sampling of the strain bank according to MDR-TB burden during the study period ensured a comprehensive and proportionate national coverage. The availability and use of WGS for discrepant analysis was a critically important enhancement that reinforced the importance of not depending upon a single methodology as the ‘gold standard’. A limitation of the analysis was the lack of APM data for the new and repurposed agents, reflecting the earlier time period during which the original proportion method testing was done, and highlighting the power and versatility of the BMD plate methodology in accommodating a large number of drugs within a single assay.
The rapid expansion of the use of WGS for TB DST [
42,
43], the growing library of identified resistance-conferring SNPs for all drugs and the tumbling cost (sequencing of the MTB genome is now no more expensive than MGIT phenotypic DST for 4 agents in the UK), place WGS as a likely near-horizon successor to phenotypic DST in settings where the infrastructure allows. Web-based tools for WGS interpretation can deliver (almost instantaneously) a ‘resistance probability’ for every drug based upon SNP identification in an uploaded sequence. This is derived by comparison with a large iterative database of paired phenotypic-genotypic data combined with some prediction modelling. Crucially for the clinician, the ‘probability’ acknowledges the uncertainty inherent in the result, allowing for a more intelligent and informed decision-making.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.