nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

27.01.2018 | Original Paper

Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 8/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The two-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CLR) technique is one of the treatment approaches commonly used in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) injuries. Clavicular tunnel malposition is one of the major causes of failure in coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of clavicular tunnel placement on tendon loading in the CLR technique with finite element analysis.

Methods

Models of clavicle and scapula were constructed using computerized tomography images. Two clavicular bone tunnel reconstruction models were created with the tendon passing through the conoid and trapezoid tunnels. Four models based on the tunnel ratio (TR) method and defined as primary, anatomic, medialized, and lateralized were constructed to evaluate the effect of tunnel placement on loading conditions during tendon graft. All models were loaded by insertion from the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles. The loading on the tendon were evaluated with the finite element analysis.

Results

The highest load value measured on the tendon was in the anatomic model (0.789 kPa), and the lowest load value (0.598 kPa) was measured in the lateralized tunnel model. The load value of the primary model was (0.657 kPa), and the medialized model’s value was (0.752 kPa).

Conclusions

In two-tunnel CLR technique, tendon loadings are related to tunnel placement. Medialized tunnel placement increases tendon loading. The TR method may be an appropriate option for determining tunnel placement.

Grutter PW, Petersen SA (2005) Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Sports Med 33:1723–1728. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505275646 CrossRefPubMed

Pallis M, Cameron KL, Svoboda SJ, Owens BD (2012) Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes. Am J Sports Med 40:2072–2077. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512450162 CrossRefPubMed

Shu B, Johnston T, Lindsey DP, McAdams TR (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of a novel reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint separation. Am J Sports Med 40:440–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511426099 CrossRefPubMed

Weiser L, Nüchtern JV, Sellenschloh K, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Rueger JM, Hoffmann M, Lehmann W, Großterlinden LG (2017) Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2025–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3920-1 CrossRefPubMed

Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, Carson EW, Miller MD, Diduch DR (2012) Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 40:1628–1634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512445273 CrossRefPubMed

Carofino BC, Mazzocca AD (2010) The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and indications. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.01.004 CrossRef

Cook JB, Shaha JS, Rowles DJ, Bottoni CR, Shaha SH, Tokish JM (2013) Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 41:142–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546512465591 CrossRefPubMed

Spencer HT, Hsu L, Sodl J, Arianjam A, Yian EH (2016) Radiographic failure and rates of re-operation after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparison of surgical techniques. Bone Joint J 98-B:512–518. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.35935 CrossRefPubMed

Eisenstein ED, Lanzi JT, Waterman BR, Bader JM, Pallis MP (2016) Medialized clavicular bone tunnel position predicts failure after anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction in young, active male patients. Am J Sports Med 44:2682–2689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546516651613 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, Cote MP, Russell RP, Charette R, Singh H, Arciero RA, Imhoff AB, Mazzocca AD (2014) Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2141–2148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514538947 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Mazzocca AD, Santangelo SA, Johnson ST, Rios CG, Dumonski ML, Arciero RA (2006) A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 34:236–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281795 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Rios CG, Arciero RA, Mazzocca AD (2007) Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 35:811–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506297536 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Shih C-M, Huang K-C, Pan C-C, Lee C-H, Su K-C (2015) Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with clavicle hook plates in different lengths. Int Orthop 39:2239–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2890-8 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Seo Y-J, Yoo Y-S, Noh K-C, Song S-Y, Lee Y-B, Kim H-J, Kim HY (2012) Dynamic function of coracoclavicular ligament at different shoulder abduction angles: a study using a 3-dimensional finite element model. Arthroscopy 28:778–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.04.001 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Sano H, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E (2006) Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon with partial-thickness tears: an analysis using two-dimensional finite element model. J Shoulder Elb Surg 15:100–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2060-0 CrossRef

16.

Ackerman MJ (1998) The Visible Human Project: a resource for anatomical visualization. Stud Health Technol Inform 52(Pt 2):1030–1032PubMed

17.

Hung LK, Su KC, Lu WH, Lee CH (2017) Biomechanical analysis of clavicle hook plate implantation with different hook angles in the acromioclavicular joint. Int Orthop 41:1663–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3384-z CrossRefPubMed

18.

Cronskär M, Rasmussen J, Tinnsten M (2015) Combined finite element and multibody musculoskeletal investigation of a fractured clavicle with reconstruction plate. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:740–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2013.845175 CrossRef

19.

Pena E, Martinez M, Calvo B, Palanca D, Doblare M (2005) A finite element simulation of the effect of graft stiffness and graft tensioning in ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech 20:636–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.014 CrossRef

20.

Wan C, Hao Z, Wen S (2011) The finite element analysis of three grafts in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In: 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). pp. 1338–1342

21.

Webb JD, Blemker SS, Delp SL (2014) 3D finite element models of shoulder muscles for computing lines of actions and moment arms. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17:829–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2012.719605 CrossRef

22.

Thomas K, Litsky A, Jones G, Bishop JY (2011) Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques. Am J Sports Med 39:804–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546510390482 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Walz L, Salzmann GM, Fabbro T, Eichhorn S, Imhoff AB (2008) The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 36:2398–2406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508322524 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Spencer H, Hsu L, Sodl J, Arianjam A, Yian E (2016) Radiographic failure and rates of re-operation after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Bone Joint J 98:512–518CrossRefPubMed

25.

Martetschläger F, Horan MP, Warth RJ, Millett PJ (2013) Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments. Am J Sports Med 41:2896–2903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513502459 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Turman KA, Miller CD, Miller MD (2010) Clavicular fractures following coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with tendon graft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.l.00410 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis
Publikationsdatum: 27.01.2018
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3789-y

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of the clavicular tunnel placement on coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocations: a finite element analysis

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2018

One-bone forearm osteodesis and biceps re-routing to correct severe supination contracture in a paediatric patient with late obstetric brachial plexus palsy

A comparative study of single-stage transpedicular debridement, fusion, and posterior long-segment versus short-segment fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis in adults: minimum five year follow-up outcomes

A novel percutaneous achievement and maintenance of reduction and screw fixation for acute displaced scaphoid fractures: minimum two-year follow-up

Incidence of knee height asymmetry in a paediatric population of corrected leg length discrepancy: a retrospective chart review study

Hip fracture time-to-surgery and mortality revisited: mitigating comorbidity confounding by effect of holidays on surgical timing

Understanding the factors that influence patient participation in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie