Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 14/2022

15.07.2022 | Systematic Review

Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Yukiko Kunitomo, MD, Brett Bade, MD, Craig G. Gunderson, MD, Kathleen M. Akgün, MD, Alexandria Brackett, MLIS, Lynn Tanoue, MD, MBA, Lori A. Bastian, MD, MPH

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 14/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Annual lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose chest computed tomography for high-risk individuals reduces lung cancer mortality, with greater reduction observed in Black participants in clinical trials. While racial disparities in lung cancer mortality exist, less is known about disparities in LCS participation. We conducted a systematic review to explore LCS participation in Black compared with White patients in the USA.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted through a search of published studies in MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied-Health Literature Database, from database inception through October 2020. We included studies that examined rates of LCS participation and compared rates by race. Studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

We screened 18,300 titles/abstracts; 229 studies were selected for full-text review, of which nine studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were categorized into 2 groups: studies that reported the screening rate among an LCS-eligible patient population, and studies that reported the screening rate among a patient population referred for LCS. Median LCS participation rates were 14.4% (range 1.7 to 62.6%) for eligible patient studies and 68.5% (range 62.6 to 88.8%) for referred patient studies. The meta-analyses showed screening rates were lower in the Black compared to White population among the LCS-eligible patient studies ([OR]=0.43, [95% CI: 0.25, 0.74]). However, screening rates were the same between Black and White patients in the referred patient studies (OR=0.94, [95% CI: 0.74, 1.19]).

Discussion

Black LCS-eligible patients are being screened at a lower rate than White patients but have similar rates of participation once referred. Differences in referrals by providers may contribute to the racial disparity in LCS participation. More studies are needed to identify barriers to LCS referral and develop interventions to increase provider awareness of the importance of LCS in Black patients.
Trial Registry
PROSPERO; No.: CRD42020214213; URL: http://​www.​crd.​york.​ac.​uk/​PROSPERO
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69(3):211-33.PubMedCrossRef DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 2019; 69(3):211-33.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Soneji S, Tanner NT, Silvestri GA, Lathan CS, Black W. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Survival. Chest 2017;152(3):587–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Soneji S, Tanner NT, Silvestri GA, Lathan CS, Black W. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Survival. Chest 2017;152(3):587–97.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zavala VA, Bracci PM, Carethers JM, et al. Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. Br J Cancer 2021;124(2):315–32.PubMedCrossRef Zavala VA, Bracci PM, Carethers JM, et al. Cancer health disparities in racial/ethnic minorities in the United States. Br J Cancer 2021;124(2):315–32.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, et al. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021;325(10):971–87.PubMedCrossRef Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, et al. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021;325(10):971–87.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanner NT, Gebregziabher M, Halbert CH, Payne E, Egede LE, Silvestri GA. Racial differences in outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for widespread implementation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(2):200–8.PubMedCrossRef Tanner NT, Gebregziabher M, Halbert CH, Payne E, Egede LE, Silvestri GA. Racial differences in outcomes within the National Lung Screening Trial: Implications for widespread implementation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(2):200–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Moyer VA. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(5):330-8.PubMedCrossRef Moyer VA. Screening for lung cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160(5):330-8.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, et al. Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354(4):333–42.PubMedCrossRef Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, et al. Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2006;354(4):333–42.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldrich MC, Mercaldo SF, Sandler KL, Blot WJ, Grogan EL, Blume JD. Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines among African American Adult Smokers. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5(9):1318–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Aldrich MC, Mercaldo SF, Sandler KL, Blot WJ, Grogan EL, Blume JD. Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines among African American Adult Smokers. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5(9):1318–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Li CC, Matthews AK, Rywant MM, Hallgren E, Shah RC. Racial disparities in eligibility for low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening among older adults with a history of smoking. Cancer Causes Control 2019;30(3):235–40.PubMedCrossRef Li CC, Matthews AK, Rywant MM, Hallgren E, Shah RC. Racial disparities in eligibility for low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening among older adults with a history of smoking. Cancer Causes Control 2019;30(3):235–40.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiscella K, Winters P, Farah S, Sanders M, Mohile SG. Do Lung Cancer Eligibility Criteria Align with Risk among Blacks and Hispanics? PLoS One 2015;10(11):e0143789.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fiscella K, Winters P, Farah S, Sanders M, Mohile SG. Do Lung Cancer Eligibility Criteria Align with Risk among Blacks and Hispanics? PLoS One 2015;10(11):e0143789.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021;325(10):962–70.PubMedCrossRef Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, et al. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021;325(10):962–70.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham D, Bhandari S, Pinkston C, Oechsli M, Kloecker G. Lung Cancer Screening Registry Reveals Low-dose CT Screening Remains Heavily Underutilized. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21:e206–e211.PubMedCrossRef Pham D, Bhandari S, Pinkston C, Oechsli M, Kloecker G. Lung Cancer Screening Registry Reveals Low-dose CT Screening Remains Heavily Underutilized. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21:e206–e211.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Duda C, Mahon I, Chen MH, et al. Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clin Trials 2011;8(2):214–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Duda C, Mahon I, Chen MH, et al. Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clin Trials 2011;8(2):214–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam ACL, Aggarwal R, Cheung S, et al. Predictors of participant nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2020;146:134–44.PubMedCrossRef Lam ACL, Aggarwal R, Cheung S, et al. Predictors of participant nonadherence in lung cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2020;146:134–44.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Raudenbush SW. Analyzing Effect Sizes: Random-Effects Models. In: Cooper H, Hedges L V, Valentine JC, editors. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 295–316. Raudenbush SW. Analyzing Effect Sizes: Random-Effects Models. In: Cooper H, Hedges L V, Valentine JC, editors. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 2009. p. 295–316.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6. Cochrane; 2020. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 6. Cochrane; 2020.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Chavez C, et al. Tracking the Nonenrolled: Lung Cancer Screening Patterns Among Individuals not Accrued to a Clinical Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21(4):326–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Chavez C, et al. Tracking the Nonenrolled: Lung Cancer Screening Patterns Among Individuals not Accrued to a Clinical Trial. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21(4):326–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Richmond J, Mbah OM, Dard SZ, et al. Evaluating Potential Racial Inequities in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 2020;112(2):209–14.PubMed Richmond J, Mbah OM, Dard SZ, et al. Evaluating Potential Racial Inequities in Low-dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer. J Natl Med Assoc 2020;112(2):209–14.PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zgodic A, Zahnd WE, Miller DP, Studts JL, Eberth JM. Predictors of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization in a Population-Based Survey. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17(12):1591–1601.PubMedCrossRef Zgodic A, Zahnd WE, Miller DP, Studts JL, Eberth JM. Predictors of Lung Cancer Screening Utilization in a Population-Based Survey. J Am Coll Radiol 2020;17(12):1591–1601.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Raju S, Khawaja A, Han X, Wang X, Mazzone PJ. Lung Cancer Screening: Characteristics of Nonparticipants and Potential Screening Barriers. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21(5):e329–e336.PubMedCrossRef Raju S, Khawaja A, Han X, Wang X, Mazzone PJ. Lung Cancer Screening: Characteristics of Nonparticipants and Potential Screening Barriers. Clin Lung Cancer 2020;21(5):e329–e336.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Japuntich SJ, Krieger NH, Salvas AL, Carey MP. Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation. J Natl Med Assoc 2018;110(5):424–7.PubMed Japuntich SJ, Krieger NH, Salvas AL, Carey MP. Racial Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: An Exploratory Investigation. J Natl Med Assoc 2018;110(5):424–7.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Rennert L, Zhang L, Lumsden B, et al. Factors influencing lung cancer screening completion following participation in shared decision-making: A retrospective study in a U.S. academic health system. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020;24:0–5. Rennert L, Zhang L, Lumsden B, et al. Factors influencing lung cancer screening completion following participation in shared decision-making: A retrospective study in a U.S. academic health system. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2020;24:0–5.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tailor TD, Tong BC, Gao J, Henderson LM, Choudhury KR, Rubin GD. Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population. Chest 2020;158(5):2200–10.PubMedCrossRef Tailor TD, Tong BC, Gao J, Henderson LM, Choudhury KR, Rubin GD. Utilization of Lung Cancer Screening in the Medicare Fee-for-Service Population. Chest 2020;158(5):2200–10.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lake M, Shusted CS, Juon HS, et al. Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):561.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lake M, Shusted CS, Juon HS, et al. Black patients referred to a lung cancer screening program experience lower rates of screening and longer time to follow-up. BMC Cancer 2020;20(1):561.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Carter-Harris L, Slaven Jr. JE, Monahan PO, Shedd-Steele R, Hanna N, Rawl SM. Understanding lung cancer screening behavior: Racial, gender, and geographic differences among Indiana long-term smokers. Prev Med Rep 2018;10:49–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carter-Harris L, Slaven Jr. JE, Monahan PO, Shedd-Steele R, Hanna N, Rawl SM. Understanding lung cancer screening behavior: Racial, gender, and geographic differences among Indiana long-term smokers. Prev Med Rep 2018;10:49–54.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kats DJ, Adie Y, Timat A, Tarabichi Y. Providers at an Academic Safety-Net Hospital System Tend to Refer Patients for Lung Cancer Screening Based on Patient Risk, but Demographic Disparities Persist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:A1004. Kats DJ, Adie Y, Timat A, Tarabichi Y. Providers at an Academic Safety-Net Hospital System Tend to Refer Patients for Lung Cancer Screening Based on Patient Risk, but Demographic Disparities Persist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019;199:A1004.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Maina IW, Belton TD, Ginzberg S, Singh A, Johnson TJ. A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test. Soc Sci Med 2018;199:219–29.PubMedCrossRef Maina IW, Belton TD, Ginzberg S, Singh A, Johnson TJ. A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test. Soc Sci Med 2018;199:219–29.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Paradies Y, Truong M, Priest N. A systematic review of the extent and measurement of healthcare provider racism. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(2):364–87.PubMedCrossRef Paradies Y, Truong M, Priest N. A systematic review of the extent and measurement of healthcare provider racism. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(2):364–87.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawley LM, Ahn DK, Winkleby MA. Perceived medical discrimination and cancer screening behaviors of racial and ethnic minority adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev a Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res cosponsored by Am Soc Prev Oncol 2008;17(8):1937–44. Crawley LM, Ahn DK, Winkleby MA. Perceived medical discrimination and cancer screening behaviors of racial and ethnic minority adults. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev a Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res cosponsored by Am Soc Prev Oncol 2008;17(8):1937–44.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Shariff-Marco S, Klassen AC, Bowie J V. Racial/ethnic differences in self-reported racism and its association with cancer-related health behaviors. Am J Public Health 2010;100(2):364–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shariff-Marco S, Klassen AC, Bowie J V. Racial/ethnic differences in self-reported racism and its association with cancer-related health behaviors. Am J Public Health 2010;100(2):364–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, et al. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Prev Med 2016;93:96–105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Peterson EB, Ostroff JS, DuHamel KN, et al. Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Prev Med 2016;93:96–105.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pleasant VA, Griggs JJ. Contemporary Residential Segregation and Cancer Disparities. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2021;39(25):2739–41.CrossRef Pleasant VA, Griggs JJ. Contemporary Residential Segregation and Cancer Disparities. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2021;39(25):2739–41.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Annesi CA, Poulson MR, Mak KS, et al. The Impact of Residential Racial Segregation on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2022;113(4):1291-8.PubMedCrossRef Annesi CA, Poulson MR, Mak KS, et al. The Impact of Residential Racial Segregation on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment and Outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 2022;113(4):1291-8.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Krieger N, Wright E, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Huntley ER, Arcaya M. Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Historical Redlining, and Current Neighborhood Characteristics: Breast, Cervical, Lung, and Colorectal Cancers, Massachusetts, 2001-2015. Am J Epidemiol 2020;189(10):1065–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Krieger N, Wright E, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Huntley ER, Arcaya M. Cancer Stage at Diagnosis, Historical Redlining, and Current Neighborhood Characteristics: Breast, Cervical, Lung, and Colorectal Cancers, Massachusetts, 2001-2015. Am J Epidemiol 2020;189(10):1065–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat May FP, Bromley EG, Reid MW, et al. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in an integrated Veterans Affairs health care network. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80(2):291–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef May FP, Bromley EG, Reid MW, et al. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in an integrated Veterans Affairs health care network. Gastrointest Endosc 2014;80(2):291–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones BA, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L, et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2005;16(7):809–21.PubMedCrossRef Jones BA, Dailey A, Calvocoressi L, et al. Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2005;16(7):809–21.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosa E, D’Souza G, Akhtar A, et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(4):299–314.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sosa E, D’Souza G, Akhtar A, et al. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71(4):299–314.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Raz DJ, Wu GX, Consunji M, et al. Perceptions and utilization of lung cancer screening among primary care physicians. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11(11):1856–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Raz DJ, Wu GX, Consunji M, et al. Perceptions and utilization of lung cancer screening among primary care physicians. J Thorac Oncol 2016;11(11):1856–62.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Triplette M, Kross EK, Mann BA, et al. An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018;15(1):69–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Triplette M, Kross EK, Mann BA, et al. An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018;15(1):69–75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Raz DJ, Wu GX, Consunji M, et al. The Effect of Primary Care Physician Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines on Perceptions and Utilization of Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Clin Lung Cancer 2018;19(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRef Raz DJ, Wu GX, Consunji M, et al. The Effect of Primary Care Physician Knowledge of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines on Perceptions and Utilization of Low-Dose Computed Tomography. Clin Lung Cancer 2018;19(1):51–7.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang GX, Baggett TP, Pandharipande P V, et al. Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Engagement from the Patient and Provider Perspective. Radiology 2019;290(2):278–287.PubMedCrossRef Wang GX, Baggett TP, Pandharipande P V, et al. Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening Engagement from the Patient and Provider Perspective. Radiology 2019;290(2):278–287.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Modin HE, Fathi JT, Gilbert CR, et al. Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14(8):1320–5.PubMedCrossRef Modin HE, Fathi JT, Gilbert CR, et al. Pack-Year Cigarette Smoking History for Determination of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility. Comparison of the Electronic Medical Record versus a Shared Decision-making Conversation. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14(8):1320–5.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Triplette M, Donovan LM, Crothers K, Madtes DK, Au DH. Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16(10):1280–5.PubMedCrossRef Triplette M, Donovan LM, Crothers K, Madtes DK, Au DH. Prediction of Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Using Simplified Criteria. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2019;16(10):1280–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evidence of Racial Disparities in the Lung Cancer Screening Process: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Yukiko Kunitomo, MD
Brett Bade, MD
Craig G. Gunderson, MD
Kathleen M. Akgün, MD
Alexandria Brackett, MLIS
Lynn Tanoue, MD, MBA
Lori A. Bastian, MD, MPH
Publikationsdatum
15.07.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 14/2022
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07613-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 14/2022

Journal of General Internal Medicine 14/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.