Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 5/2020

22.04.2020 | Original Paper

Examining Gender Differences in Lung Cancer Screening

verfasst von: Simran Randhawa, Shelby R. Sferra, Chandra Das, Larry R. Kaiser, Grace X. Ma, Cherie P. Erkmen

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

It is unknown if gender influences outcome of lung cancer screening with Low Dose CT (LDCT), especially with frequent and continued underrepresentation of women in clinical trials. We examined a balanced cohort of men and women with the hypothesis that there would be no difference in participation or results between men and women undergoing lung cancer screening. In an urban, academic medical center, we prospectively collected data on patients referred for lung cancer screening from October 2015 to August 2018. We studied gender, age, ethnicity, level of education and smoking history. We measured results of LDCT using Lung-RADS reporting system. 546 patients underwent LDCT between October 2015 and August 2018. 279 (51%) were female and 267 (49%) were males. Age, education status or smoking patterns did not significantly differ between females and males There was a significant difference between males and females in the distribution of LDCT results (p = 0.05). 81 females and 105 males were diagnosed with Lung-RADS 1; 99 females and 92 males with Lung-RADS 2; 15 females and 8 males with Lung-RADS 3; 19 females and 11 males with Lung-RADS 4. Overall, 10 females (3.5%) and 3 males (1.1%) were diagnosed with lung cancer (risk difference 2.4, 95% CI—0.0006–0.05, p = 0.09). Women are often underrepresented in clinical trials. Preliminary results from our lung cancer screening program demonstrate equal participation and equal benefit from the screening program. Long term data is needed to study survival benefit.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Women and smoking: A report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2002. 51(RR-12): p. i-iv; 1–13. Retrieved December 19, 2018 Women and smoking: A report of the Surgeon General. Executive summary. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2002. 51(RR-12): p. i-iv; 1–13. Retrieved December 19, 2018
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Aberle, D. R., Adams, A. M., Berg, C. D., et al. (2011). Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(5), 395–409.PubMedCrossRef Aberle, D. R., Adams, A. M., Berg, C. D., et al. (2011). Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 365(5), 395–409.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Egleston, B. L., Meireles, S. I., Flieder, D. B., & Clapper, M. L. (2009). Population-based trends in lung cancer incidence in women. Seminars in Oncology, 36(6), 506–515.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Egleston, B. L., Meireles, S. I., Flieder, D. B., & Clapper, M. L. (2009). Population-based trends in lung cancer incidence in women. Seminars in Oncology, 36(6), 506–515.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Marshall, A. L., & Christiani, D. C. (2013). Genetic susceptibility to lung cancer—light at the end of the tunnel? Carcinogenesis, 34(3), 487–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Marshall, A. L., & Christiani, D. C. (2013). Genetic susceptibility to lung cancer—light at the end of the tunnel? Carcinogenesis, 34(3), 487–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ten Haaf, K., van Rosmalen, J., & de Koning, H. J. (2014). Lung cancer detectability by test, histology, stage, and gender: Estimates from the NLST and the PLCO trials. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 24(1), 154–161.CrossRef Ten Haaf, K., van Rosmalen, J., & de Koning, H. J. (2014). Lung cancer detectability by test, histology, stage, and gender: Estimates from the NLST and the PLCO trials. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 24(1), 154–161.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Koo, H. J., Choi, C. M., Park, S., et al. (2019). Chest radiography surveillance for lung cancer: Results from a National Health Insurance database in South Korea. Lung Cancer, 128, 120–126.PubMedCrossRef Koo, H. J., Choi, C. M., Park, S., et al. (2019). Chest radiography surveillance for lung cancer: Results from a National Health Insurance database in South Korea. Lung Cancer, 128, 120–126.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson, Q. (2020). NELSON trial: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening. Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8(3), 236.PubMedCrossRef Dawson, Q. (2020). NELSON trial: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with volume CT screening. Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 8(3), 236.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinsinger, L. S., Anderson, C., & Kim, J. (2017). Implementation of lung cancer screening in the veterans health administration. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(3), 399–406.PubMedCrossRef Kinsinger, L. S., Anderson, C., & Kim, J. (2017). Implementation of lung cancer screening in the veterans health administration. JAMA Internal Medicine, 177(3), 399–406.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Randhawa, S., Drizin, G., Kane, T., et al. (2018). Lung cancer screening in the community setting: Challenges for adoption. American Surgeon, 84(9), 1415–1421.PubMed Randhawa, S., Drizin, G., Kane, T., et al. (2018). Lung cancer screening in the community setting: Challenges for adoption. American Surgeon, 84(9), 1415–1421.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkmen CP, Mitchell M, Randhawa S, et al. (2017). An enhanced shared decision making model to address willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer screening and follow-up treatment in minority underserved populations. Journal of Community Health. Erkmen CP, Mitchell M, Randhawa S, et al. (2017). An enhanced shared decision making model to address willingness and ability to undergo lung cancer screening and follow-up treatment in minority underserved populations. Journal of Community Health.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Duda, C., Mahon, I., Chen, M. H., et al. (2011). Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clinical Trials, 8(2), 214–223.PubMedCrossRef Duda, C., Mahon, I., Chen, M. H., et al. (2011). Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clinical Trials, 8(2), 214–223.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferketich, A. K., Otterson, G. A., King, M., et al. (2012). A pilot test of a combined tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening program. Lung Cancer Amsterdam Netherlands, 76(2), 211–215.CrossRef Ferketich, A. K., Otterson, G. A., King, M., et al. (2012). A pilot test of a combined tobacco dependence treatment and lung cancer screening program. Lung Cancer Amsterdam Netherlands, 76(2), 211–215.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal, A., & Fedewa, S. A. (2017). Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States—2010 to 2015. JAMA Oncology., 3, 1278.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jemal, A., & Fedewa, S. A. (2017). Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography in the United States—2010 to 2015. JAMA Oncology., 3, 1278.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Examining Gender Differences in Lung Cancer Screening
verfasst von
Simran Randhawa
Shelby R. Sferra
Chandra Das
Larry R. Kaiser
Grace X. Ma
Cherie P. Erkmen
Publikationsdatum
22.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00826-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

Journal of Community Health 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe