Background
Lung cancer, one of the most common malignant tumors, is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among both men and women [
1,
2], with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounting for about 15% of all lung cancers [
3]. SCLC is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor characterized by uncontrolled fast tumor growth, abundant neoangiogenesis, early metastasis, drug resistance and early disease relapse, which together lead to extremely poor outcomes for SCLC patients [
3,
4]. Tumor angiogenesis facilitates tumor growth, survival and metastasis and is a hallmark of cancer [
5]. Tumor-associated neovasculatures have been found to play pivotal roles in the development and progression of SCLC and are related to the poor prognosis of SCLC patients [
6,
7]. A number of anti-angiogenetic agents, such as bevacizumab and sorafenib, have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors and have obtained promising results [
8‐
11]. However, clinical trials containing antiangiogenetic drugs in the therapy of SCLC patients showed limited effects [
12‐
15] and the traditional therapy for SCLC patients have not been advanced for about three decades [
3]. Thus, further exploration of the molecular mechanisms of SCLC-associated angiogenesis might help to clarify the complex angiogenetic processes in SCLC microenvironment which might broaden our knowledge about SCLC malignancy and have potential value in promoting the development of effective antiangiogenic therapeutics in SCLC patients.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression, are a group of endogenous small noncoding RNAs that have approximately 23 nucleotides. miRNAs mediate the degradation or translational inhibition of their downstream messenger RNAs (mRNAs) by binding to the seeding sequences of the 3′ untranslated regions (3’UTRs) of these mRNAs [
16]. miRNAs have been shown to be up- or downregulated in various tumor types [
17,
18], and dysregulated miRNA expression has been widely demonstrated to affect multiple tumor biological processes, including tumor angiogenesis [
19‐
21].
miR-141 is one of members belonging to the miR-200 family, which is a group of miRNAs documented to regulate the epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumors by regulating two EMT-associated genes, ZEB1 and ZEB2 [
22,
23]. However, the effects of miR-141 on tumor angiogenesis remain unclear, as conflicting evidence suggests a dual role for miR-141 in the neovascularization of different cancer types [
24‐
27]. For example, in basal-like breast cancers, miR-141 was found to reduce microvessel density (MVD) and inhibit tumor growth by targeting IL-8 and CXCL1 [
25]. In contrast, in non-small cell lung cancers, tumor tissues with higher expression of miR-141 showed significantly more tumor-associated blood vessels than those with lower miR-141 expression [
27]. The pro- and antiangiogenic effects of miR-141 are complicated and confusing, and the specific function of miR-141 in SCLC angiogenesis has never been explored.
Exosomes, small extracellular vesicles containing numerous miRNAs, protect RNAs from degradation by circulating RNA enzymes and transfer biological information between cells and microenvironments [
28]. The realization of the effects of miRNAs on tumor angiogenesis mainly depends on transport and protection by these vesicles [
29‐
31]. Thus, in the present study, we focused on exosomal miR-141 to study its effect on SCLC angiogenesis. We found that miR-141 could be transferred from SCLC cells to human umbilical vein vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) via SCLC cell-secreted exosomes and that internalized miR-141 promoted HUVEC proliferation, migration, tube formation and new blood vessel formation in vitro and in vivo. KLF12 was demonstrated to be directly downregulated by miR-141, and in HUVECs, the effects of KLF12 knockdown were similar to those of miR-141 overexpression. Additionally, miR-141 was confirmed to be significantly upregulated in both the plasma and serum of SCLC patients and was related to patient TNM stages. Taken together, our research reveals novel details elaborating the mechanism of exosomal miR-141 in SCLC angiogenesis and offers a promising clue for identifying effective antiangiogenic targets to improve the prognosis of SCLC patients.
Methods
SCLC patient specimens
Both plasma (n = 77) and serum samples (n = 101) from SCLC patients and normal volunteers were collected from the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital. All SCLC patients were pathologically confirmed to have SCLC by surgery or tissue aspiration biopsy, and all blood samples were collected before any antitumor therapies. Informed consent was acquired from every participant, and approval of the experimental protocol was obtained from the medical ethics committee of the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital. Detailed information about the clinical and pathological features of all individuals is listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Exosome isolation, characterization and quantification
Exosomes from the SCLC cell culture medium (CM) were isolated by ultracentrifugation. Briefly, cells were refreshed with CM containing 10% exosome-removed fetal bovine serum (FBS) (ultracentrifuged at 110,000×g at 4 °C overnight) after washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice. The CM was collected after the cells were cultured for 48 h. The obtained CM was processed for differential centrifugation at 500×g for 10 min, 2000×g for 10 min and 10,000×g for 30 min successively to remove dead cells, cell debris and large vesicles. The supernatant was then ultracentrifuged at 110,000×g for 70 min to collect exosome pellet followed by washing pellet with PBS once. All centrifugation procedures were conducted under the condition of 4 °C. The obtained exosomes were finally resuspended and preserved in PBS. The BCA assay was used to detect the protein concentration of exosomes. 15 μg of exosomes were used to stimulate 1 × 105 HUVECs. To isolate exosomes from plasma, we used the Total Exosome Isolation (from plasma) Kit (Invitrogen, cat. No. 4484450) to precipitate exosomes according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
A total of 10 μl of exosomes were used for sample preparation to observe exosomes under a transmission electron microscope (JEOL-JEM1400, Tokyo, Japan). Briefly, after incubation at room temperature for 10 min, exosomes on a copper mesh were washed with sterile distilled water followed by incubation with uranyl-oxalate solution for 1 min. The copper mesh was then dried for 2 min under incandescent light and observed under a microscope. The exosome suspension was diluted by PBS to examine the size and quantity of exosomes under a ZetaView PMX 110 (Particle Metrix, Meerbusch, Germany). Exosome-specific proteins, namely, CD9 and TSG101, were detected by western blot.
RNA oligonucleotides, plasmids and virus
The following were synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China): both the mimics and inhibitors of miR-141, their respective negative controls and Cy3-labeled mimics of miR-141 (miR-141, 5′-UAACACUGUCUGGUAAAGAUGG-3′; negative control (NC), 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; Anti-miR-141, 5′-CCAUCUUUACCAGACAGUGUUA-3′; Anti-NC, 5′-CAGUACUUUUGUGUAGUACAA-3′). Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) of KLF12 together with their negative control (siRNA-1, 5′-GGACUCGUUAUCUGUAGAUTT-3′; siRNA-2, 5′-GCACAUUAUCCAUCCCGUATT-3′; siRNA-NC, 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′) were synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Plasmids for KLF12 overexpression were purchased from Vigene Biosciences (Shandong, China).
To construct the dual-luciferase reporter vectors of KLF12, three 3′ UTR fragments of KLF12 containing the predicted seeding sequences or the mutant ones were inserted into PGL3.0 vectors that expressed firefly luciferase. The plasmid expressing Renilla luciferase was used as the internal reference.
The lentiviral vectors expressing pri-miR-141 (OE-miR-141) or the control (OE-NC), together with three lentiviral packaging vectors were cotransfected into 293 T cells, and the lentivirus was collected after 48–72 h to infect SCLC cells. All transfection assays were carried out using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, cat. No. 13778150) or Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, cat. No. L3000015) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Cell culture and subline construction
SCLC cell lines (H446 and H1048) obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) were maintained in the recommended CM in an incubator containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Corning) containing 10% FBS (Gibco) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Gibco) was used to culture HUVECs and EAhy.926 cells. To develop SCLC sublines that stably overexpressed miR-141, SCLC cells were screened with puromycin after lentivirus infection for half a month and then maintained in CM with low-dose puromycin.
Exosome processing and internalization
To visualize the internalization of exosomal miR-141 in HUVECs, exosomes isolated from H446 cells, which were transfected with Cy3-labeled mimics of miR-141 for 48 h, were labeled with PKH67 and incubated with HUVECs. After 12 h, exosome-treated HUVECs were photographed under a fluorescence microscope.
RNA isolation, PCR and western blotting
TRIzol reagent was utilized to extract total RNA from cells, patient serum and plasma exosomes, with cel-miR-39 added to serum or exosome solutions before chloroform. Cel-miR-39 was used as the external reference for the PCR analysis of miRNA in serum or exosomes, while RNU6 was used as the internal reference for the detection of miRNA in cells. The primers of miRNAs or mRNAs used in the present study were listed as follows: miR-141 (Forward, 5′-CGCTAACACTGTCTGGTAAAGATGG-3′); cel-miR-39 (Forward, 5′-TCACCGGGTGTAAATCAGCTTG-3′); RNU6 (Forward, 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′); KLF12 (Forward, 5′-CCTTTCCATAGCCAGAGCAGTAC-3′; Reverse, 5′-CTGGCGTCTTGTGCTCTCAATAC-3′); and GAPDH (Forward, 5′-GTCTCCTCTGACTTCAACAGCG-3′; Reverse, 5′-ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAA-3′).
RIPA lysis reagent was used to isolate proteins from cells or exosomes, and the concentrations of proteins were measured using BCA assay method. Proteins with different molecular weights were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) followed by transferring onto PVDF membranes. The membranes containing separated proteins were washed and then incubated with the objective primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were incubated with the membranes the next day to detect the chemiluminescence signals. The primary antibodies used in the present study included KLF12 (Abcam, ab129459), GAPDH (CST, #5174), CD9 (Abcam, ab92726), and TSG101 (Abcam, ab83).
Cell proliferation, invasion and migration assays
For cell proliferation assay, 1500 HUVECs or 2500 EAhy.926 cells were added into 96-well plates per well, Cell Counting Kit 8 (CCK8, Dojindo) was used to detect the cell viability every day for 3–4 days.
Transwell inserts (Corning) were utilized to evaluate the invasion and migration of vascular endothelial cells. Cells (6 × 104 or 3 × 104) were resuspended in FBS-depleted CM and placed in the upper chambers of 24-well inserts coated with or without Matrigel. After twenty hours, cells remaining on the insert upper surfaces, namely, that did not pass through the pores, were wiped off. Then, cells on the insert lower surfaces were carefully fixed with methyl alcohol followed by staining with Giemsa, and the invaded or migrated cells were counted under a microscope.
For tube formation assays, 50 μl of Matrigel was added to each well of a precooled 96-well plate and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. HUVECs or EAhy.926 cells were trypsinized, and their concentrations were adjusted to 2 × 105/ml or 5 × 105/ml, respectively. A total of 100 μl of cell suspension was added to each well of the Matrigel-precoated 96-well plate, and the tubes that formed were imaged and counted under a microscope.
For aortic ring assays, the thoracic aortas of 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice were processed according to a previously published protocol [
32]. Briefly, the dissected thoracic aorta was first flushed gently with Opti-MEM (Gibco) through its lumen to remove residual blood, and the aorta was then cut into 0.5-mm rings. The obtained aortic rings were incubated in a starvation medium, namely, Opti-MEM, at 37 °C overnight to equilibrate their response to stimulation. Nucleotide transfections or exosome treatments were conducted at the same time as starvation of the aortic rings. Afterward, aortic rings were embedded in collagen (collagen type I, rat tail, Millipore) and supplemented with Opti-MEM CM containing 2.5% FBS and 30 ng/ml VEGF (Peprotech, cat. No. 450–32-2). Microvessels that sprouted from the aortic rings were observed under a microscope.
Luciferase reporter assay
HUVECs were cotransfected with reporter plasmids containing the 3’UTR of KLF12 and the Renilla luciferase vector, together with miR-141 mimics or the NC, using the Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent. Cell lysates were harvested 48 h later and added to 96-well plates, and luciferase activity was measured with a microplate reader.
In vivo Matrigel plug assay
A total of 500 μl of growth factor-reduced Matrigel (Corning, cat. No. 356231) mixed with exosomes was injected into the right axillae of C57BL/6 mice (6 weeks old) subcutaneously. The plugs that had formed were removed ten days later, fixed with formalin and sliced for immunohistochemistry (IHC). The presence of the blood vessel-specific marker CD31 was assessed with CD31 antibody (Abcam, ab28364) to measure the density of vessels generated in the plug.
Animal model
To evaluate whether miR-141 could promote SCLC tumor growth by inducing angiogenesis, 5 × 106 H1048 cells or 1 × 107 H446 cells stably overexpressing miR-141 were injected into BALB/c nude mice (female, 6 weeks of age) subcutaneously. Tumor growth was monitored two times per week. The tumor MVD was evaluated by IHC of CD31. Mouse plasma exosomes were isolated using the Total Exosome Isolation (from plasma) Kit, and exosomal miR-141 was measured by qRT-PCR.
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism software was utilized to perform all analysis of experimental data, with the results presented as the mean ± SD. The statistical differences between two groups were detected by Student’s t-test, and one-way ANOVA was applied for three or more groups. Statistical results with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, or ****P < 0.0001, were considered to be statistically significant.
Discussion
Numerous studies have aimed to dissect the role of angiogenesis, a hallmark of cancer [
5], in tumor growth and metastasis, and the various mediators and pathways involved in angiogenesis have been largely characterized, thereby contributing to the development of antiangiogenic therapeutics [
35]. miRNAs comprise the most common group of direct or indirect regulators of the angiogenesis associated with different cancer types and thus serve as promising targets for novel antitumor therapies [
36]. For example, miR-25-3p induces colorectal cancer angiogenesis by inhibiting the expression of KLF4, thereby downregulating the expression of VEGFR2 in HUVECs [
29]. miR-9 promotes the angiogenesis and tumorigenesis of glioma by targeting COL18A1, THBS2, PTCH1 and PHD3 directly [
37]. miR-155 induces angiogenesis by regulating VHL in breast cancer and is related to poor outcomes among breast cancer patients [
38]. However, studies investigating how miRNAs function in SCLC angiogenesis remain rare. In our present study, we demonstrated that the level of exosomal miR-141 was increased in SCLC patients and that it was essential for SCLC angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. We observed that the levels of circulating miR-141 were significantly higher in both the plasma and serum of SCLC patients than in those normal volunteers and that the miR-141 expression level was statistically associated with advanced TNM stages, implying the oncogenic role of miR-141 in SCLC. In vitro experiments demonstrated that miR-141 derived from SCLC cells was transported to HUVECs via exosomes and that internalized miR-141 promoted HUVEC proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation and induced microvessel sprouting. The pro-angiogenic effect of miR-141 was validated in vivo, and tumors of SCLC cells with miR-141 upregulation had an increased MVD and grew faster in mice.
The dysregulation of miR-200 family members, including miR-141, has been demonstrated to be related to various human cancer types, and these miRNAs usually function as tumor suppressors by suppressing EMT and tumor metastasis, inhibiting cancer stem cell (CSC) self-renewal and differentiation and modulating tumor cell growth and apoptosis [
39]. In previous studies, the miR-200 family members are regarded as epithelial markers that inhibit the EMT process by directly targeting several EMT-associated genes including ZEB1 and ZEB2 [
22,
40], and the upregulation of miR-200 family members is related to the promotion of the mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) process [
41]. In contrast, accumulative data have revealed the oncogenic functions of the miR-200 family, whose members are upregulated in several cancers and are associated with poor clinical outcomes [
42,
43], suggesting a dual role for the miR-200 family in tumorigenesis. Indeed, miR-141 has been widely considered a promising biomarker for a variety of cancers, such as non-small cell lung cancer [
44], colorectal cancer [
45] and prostate cancer [
46], and miR-141 levels are correlated with tumor metastatic progression and poor patient prognosis [
27,
47‐
49]. In accordance with these studies, we found that the increase of circulating miR-141 in SCLC patients was significantly associated with advanced TNM stages, highlighting its critical role in SCLC malignancy. Tumor angiogenesis is one process that is induced by miR-141, with increased tumor progression and worsened patient outcomes [
27]. However, contradictory reports have indicated that miR-141 can inhibit tumor angiogenesis by targeting multiple downstream genes [
25,
26]. With these controversial data, the function of miR-141 in tumor angiogenesis is still largely obscure and the function of miR-141 in SCLC angiogenesis has never been explored. Here, we found that exosomal miR-141 is delivered to HUVECs and promotes SCLC angiogenesis by enhancing HUVEC proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation and by stimulating the sprouting of new microvessels, which supports the function of miR-141 in angiogenesis.
Further mechanistic explorations showed that the expression of KLF12 was directly regulated by miR-141 and that the proangiogenic effect of miR-141 was rescued by overexpressing KLF12. KLF12 is a member of the Krüppel-like factor (KLF) family, whose members function as transcriptional regulators in a multitude of cancer-relevant processes, including tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, distant metastasis, tumor inflammation and angiogenesis [
50]. The roles of KLF family members, especially KLF2, KLF4 and KLF6, in vascular endothelial cells and angiogenesis have been well studied [
33,
34]. In fact, KLF12 has been previously reported to be targeted by miR-141 to strengthen anoikis resistance to facilitate ovarian cancer metastasis [
51]. However, the role KLF12 plays in tumor angiogenesis remains obscure. Our study revealed the antiangiogenic effect of KLF12 for the first time. KLF12 knockdown with specific siRNAs significantly promoted HUVEC proliferation, migration, invasion and tube formation, as did miR-141 expression in HUVECs. Moreover, luciferase analysis demonstrated that KLF12 was directly regulated by miR-141, and overexpression of KLF12 in miR-141 mimic-transfected HUVECs abrogated the proangiogenic effect of miR-141, thereby confirming that miR-141 promotes SCLC tumor angiogenesis by targeting KLF12.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.