Hinge-like hyper-mobility is occasionally observed at the atlanto-occipital (O-C1) joint. However, it has not been clear if this kind of hinge-like hyper-mobility at the O-C1 joint should be regarded as “pathologic”, or referred to as “instability”. To solve this issue, we aimed to establish a reliable radiographic assessment method for this specific type of O-C1 instability and figure out the “standard value” for the range of motion (ROM) of the O-C1 joint.
Methods
To figure out the standard range of the O-C1 angle, we acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sagittal views of the cervical spine for 157 healthy volunteers [average: 37.4 year-old (yo)] without spine diseases, at neutral, maximum flexion and maximum extension positions.
Results
The average value (AVE) for ROM of O-C1 angle was 9.91°. The standard value for ROM of O-C1 angle was calculated as 0°–21°. There was no statistically significant gender difference. We also found that the older population (≧ 40 yo) significantly had a larger ROM of O-C1 angle (AVE: 11.72°) compared to the younger population (< 40 yo) (AVE: 8.99°).
Conclusions
We consider that hinge-like instability at O-C1 joint, which cannot be assessed by measuring Powers ratio, can be assessed by measuring the range of O-C1 angles using dynamic-MRI. Evaluation of O-C1 instability is important especially when we perform surgical treatment for diseases with upper cervical instability (such as retro-odontoid pseudotumor). We consider that the current study provides important information in such a case.
Introduction
Atlanto-occipital (O-C1) instability [2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11‐14, 16, 19‐23, 25, 26] is generally caused by trauma [2, 5, 7, 11‐13, 19, 21, 25]. Non-traumatic O-C1 instability [3, 8, 14, 16, 20, 22, 23, 26], which is less common, is usually associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [16, 20] or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [8, 22]. It can also be associated with Down syndrome [3, 11, 23] or infectious diseases [26].
It has been known that there are several types of O-C1 instability. We consider that O-C1 instability can be classified into three types (Table 1). The first type is the anterior hyper-shift of the occiput (Type 1). This type has been the most-reported type and is usually accompanied with trauma [2, 5, 7, 11, 12, 19, 21, 25]. The second type is characterized by posterior hyper-shift of the occiput (Type 2), which is often accompanied with RA [16, 20]. These two types of O-C1 instability have been termed as atlanto-occipital subluxation (AOS) [2, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20‐23, 25, 26] and commonly been diagnosed by measuring Powers ratio [19].
Table 1
Our classification of O-C1 instability and each type’s characteristics
Often accompanied with retro-odontoid pseudo-tumor
Anzeige
Other than these two types, we sometimes observe hinge-like hyper-mobility at the O-C1 joint (Type 3). This type of O-C1 instability is occasionally accompanied with retro-odontoid pseudotumor (ROP) [1, 4, 6, 15, 17, 18, 24, 27]. However, it has not been clear if this kind of hinge-like hyper-mobility at the O-C1 joint should be regarded as “pathologic”, or referred to as “instability”. If we can establish a reliable radiographic assessment method for O-C1 instability and figure out the “standard value” for the range of motion (ROM) of the O-C1 joint, we may be able to solve this issue.
Materials and methods
Using sagittal view T2 weighted-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we defined O-C1 angle as the angle formed by (1) the line between the anterior and posterior borders of the foramen magnum, and (2) a line through the centers of the anterior and posterior arches of the atlas (Fig. 1a). The centers of the anterior and posterior arches were defined as the cross-point of the longest and shortest axis of the sagittal view of anterior and posterior arches. The structures of the bones are usually outlined by low intensity area in MRI T2-weighted images. This low intensity area sometimes cannot be distinguished from other attaching structures such as ligaments, so that the measurements were performed by selecting relatively high intensity area as the outlines of the bones.
Fig. 1
Method for measuring O-C1 angle. a We defined O-C1 angle as the angle formed by (1) the line between the anterior and posterior borders of the foramen magnum, and (2) a line through the centers of the anterior and posterior arches of the atlas and measured it using T2-weighted sagittal view MRI. b–d We acquired T2-weighted dynamic-MRI of the cervical spine at maximum flexion (b), neutral (c), and maximum extension positions (d)
×
To figure out the standard range of the O-C1 angle, we acquired T2-weighted dynamic-MRI of the cervical spine for 157 healthy volunteers (22–65 years old (yso), average: 37.4 yso) without spine diseases, at neutral, maximum flexion and maximum extension positions (Fig. 1b–d). To make sure that the flexion and extension is at the person’s maximum, an assisting device was used to hold the person’s head position.
Intra-observer reliability was assessed by performing the measurement once a day for 3 consecutive days, obtaining a total of three measurements. For intra-observer reliability assessment, 15 different samples were used. Inter-observer reliability was assessed with six surgeons including three board-certificated instructors in spinal surgery (instructors) and three under-training-spinal surgeons (fellows). For inter-observer reliability assessment, 15 different samples and 45 images in total were used for each measurer to measure O-C1 angle at 3 different positions in each sample. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability were estimated by calculating intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at 95% confidence intervals using IBM SPSS statistics (version 24) software.
Anzeige
We calculated O-C1 ROM by subtracting the O-C1 angle at maximum extension from that of maximum flexion. Student t test was used for statistical analysis in the comparative analyses.
All the process of the current study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at our institute.
Results
We first evaluated the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of our measurement method of the O-C1 angle. The data of intra-observer reliability is shown in Table 2A. While ICC(1,3) was 0.996, ICC(1,1) was 0.989 indicating that data acquired by single measurement has an excellent enough reliability. Considering this data, we used data from single measurements in the following inter-observer reliability analysis.
Table 2
Intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability analyses of O-C1 angle measurement
A. Intra-observer reliability
Intra-observer reliability
95% confidence interval
p value
ICC(1,1)
0.989
0.973–0.996
< 0.01
ICC(1,3)
0.996
0.991–0.999
< 0.01
B: Inter-observer reliability analysis of board-certificated instructors in spinal surgery (instructors)
Inter-observer reliability (instructors)
95% confidence interval
p-value
Neutral position
ICC(2,1)
0.933
0.850–0.975
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.976
0.944–0.991
< 0.01
Maximum flexion position
ICC(2,1)
0.973
0.938–0.990
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.991
0.978–0.997
< 0.01
Maximum extension position
ICC(2,1)
0.959
0.907–0.985
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.986
0.967–0.995
< 0.01
C: Inter-observer reliability analysis of under-training-spinal surgeons (fellows)
Inter-observer reliability (fellows)
95% confidence interval
p-value
Neutral position
ICC(2,1)
0.972
0.936–0.990
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.990
0.978–0.997
< 0.01
Maximum flexion position
ICC(2,1)
0.915
0.814–0.968
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.970
0.929–0.989
< 0.01
Maximum extension position
ICC(2,1)
0.944
0.870–0.979
< 0.01
ICC(2,3)
0.981
0.953–0.993
< 0.01
As mentioned, inter-observer reliability was assessed by six surgeons including three board-certificated instructors in spinal surgery (instructors) and three under-training-spinal surgeons (fellows). Assessment was performed in all three different positions: neutral, maximum flexion and maximum extension positions.
The data of inter-observer reliability acquired from instructors are shown in Table 2B. At neutral position, ICC(2,1) was 0.933 and ICC(2,3) was 0.976. At maximum flexion position, ICC(2,1) was 0.973 and ICC(2,3) was 0.991. At maximum extension position, ICC(2,1) was 0.959 and ICC(2,3) was 0.986. These values indicate that these measurements have excellent inter-observer reliability at all three positions. The data of inter-observer reliability acquired from fellows are shown in Table 2C. These values also indicate that the measurements have excellent inter-observer reliability at all three positions.
Taken together, we considered that this measurement method of O-C1 angle is reliable enough to explore the “standard value” for the range of motion (ROM) of the O-C1 joint with good reproducibility and feasibility.
To figure out the standard range of the O-C1 angle, we measured O-C1 angle for 157 healthy volunteers at neutral, maximum flexion and maximum extension positions.
The average value (AVE) of the whole population of the study for O-C1 angle at neutral, maximum flexion and maximum extension positions was 5.06°, 9.27° and − 0.64°, respectively (Table 3). AVE for ROM of the O-C1 angle was calculated as 9.91° (Table 3). When we regard the standard value for ROM of O-C1 angle as the value within the range of ± 2SD, it was calculated as 0°–21°.
Table 3
O-C1 angle of the whole population of the study
O-C1 angle (°)
At neutral position
At maximum flexion position
At maximum extension position
ROM
Overall (n = 157)
5.06 ± 0.48
9.27 ± 0.49
− 0.64 ± 0.48
9.91 ± 0.45
AVE ± SEM is presented in the table. When we regard the standard value for ROM of O-C1 angle as the value within the range of ± 2SD, it was calculated as 0°–21°
Anzeige
We also examined whether there is a significant difference between males and females. Average age of males and females was 36.32 and 39.58 yo, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference. AVE for ROM of O-C1 angle was 10.07° in males and 9.60° in females (Table 4). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Table 4
O-C1 angle of males and females
O-C1 angle (°)
At neutral position
At maximum flexion position
At maximum extension position
ROM
Males (n = 105)
5.89 ± 0.59
9.96 ± 0.57
− 0.10 ± 0.60
10.07 ± 0.56
Females (n = 52)
3.23 ± 0.75
7.88 ± 0.88
− 1.71 ± 0.77
9.60 ± 0.77
AVE ± SEM is presented in the table. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups
Next, we examined whether there is a significant difference between the older population (≧ 40 yo) and the younger population (< 40 yo). We found that the older population significantly had a larger ROM of O-C1 angle (AVE: 11.72°) compared to the younger population (AVE: 8.99°) (p = 0.0038) (Table 5).
Table 5
O-C1 angle of the older population (≧ 40 yso) and the younger population (< 40 yso)
O-C1 angle (°)
At neutral position
At maximum flexion position
At maximum extension position
ROM
Younger population (< 40 yso) (n = 104) (73 males and 31 females)
4.70 ± 0.55
8.58 ± 0.56
− 0.41 ± 0.58
8.99 ± 0.49
Older population (≧ 40 yso) (n = 53) (32 males and 21 females)
5.60 ± 0.92
10.64 ± 0.91
− 1.08 ± 0.83
11.72 ± 0.90*
AVE ± SEM is presented in the table. The older population significantly had a larger ROM of O-C1 angle compared to the younger population (*p = 0.0038)
Discussion
The standard ROM of the O-C1 joint has not been clear partly because the precision of measurements obtained from dynamic-X-ray films, especially those using occipital landmarks is limited by the relatively poor resolution. We consider that Type 3 O-C1 instability, which cannot be assessed by measuring Powers ratio [19], can be assessed by measuring the range of O-C1 angles using dynamic-MRI. In addition, assessment using dynamic-MRI has an advantage that it can be performed without exposure to radiation.
Dvorak et al. examined age and gender related standard motion of the cervical spine. By developing a clinical method for measuring three-dimensional motion of the cervical spine using a specific device, they obtained the standard values for passive examinations of flexion–extension, lateral bending, rotation, rotation out of maximum flexion, and rotation out of maximum extension and analyzed them for each gender in a group of 150 normal subjects. Results of rotation out of maximum flexion suggest and supported their earlier conclusions that the rotation of the C1–C2 segment does not decrease with age, but rather increases slightly. They concluded that it may be the compensation for the overall decreased motion in the lower segments [10].
Anzeige
In this study, we found that the older population (≧ 40 yo) significantly had a larger ROM of O-C1 angle compared to the younger population (< 40 yo). We consider that this also may be the compensation for the overall decreased motion in the lower segments.
In the craniocervical joint, the alar and transverse ligaments provide much of the stability in the healthy spine. These ligaments can be damaged by a high-energy deceleration force that causes hyperextension–flexion. Chaput et al. performed radiographic analysis to detect these traumatic ligamentous injuries [5]. The degenerative change on the O-C1 joint may also affect the O-C1 ligaments and its joint stability. The alar ligament restrains rotation of the upper cervical spine, whereas the transverse ligament restricts flexion as well as anterior displacement of the atlas [9]. A lesion in one or both structures can produce damage to the neural structures and/or cause pain. Dvorak et al. investigated the possible role of each of these ligaments by a mechanical and histologic study of the upper cervical spine. Using the bone–ligament–bone complex of the alar and transverse ligaments, they performed a uniaxial mechanical testing in the specimens. The result reported that the transverse ligaments had greater strength in vitro strength compared with the alar ligaments. They also revealed a mainly collagenous nature in these ligaments through histologic analysis and mentioned that clinical evidence (broken odontoid processes) suggests that the transverse ligament is strong enough to withstand physiologic loads. They also mentioned that the alar ligament, on the other hand, due to its lower strength and its axial direction of loading, might be prone to injury and therefore require stabilization of the appropriate vertebra more often than normally assumed [9]. Future detailed analysis is necessary to elucidate the degenerative changes in O-C1 joint in stability occurring in the older population.
ROP is commonly associated with upper cervical instability and surgical treatment for ROP includes arthrodesis. Historically, ROP had been well-known to be accompanied with atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS). However, Chikuda et al. and Tanaka et al. suggested that AAS does not accompany ROP in some cases [6, 24]. Yet, the underlying mechanism for ROP formation without AAS has not been well-elucidated. ROP is also reported to be associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) [4, 15] at times. Taken together, O-C1 instability has been thought to be one of the possible causes of ROP without AAS. However, there has been no clear evidence of it due to the lack of reliable radiographic assessment methods for O-C1 instability. When performing arthrodesis for ROP, evaluation of O-C1 instability is important to decide if the fusion range should include O-C1 [1, 4, 17, 27]. Commonly, the type of O-C1 instability accompanied with ROP is the hinge-like hyper-mobility at the O-C1 joint. It has not been clear whether this kind of hinge-like hyper-mobility at the O-C1 joint should be regarded as “pathologic”, or referred to as “instability”.
In this study, we proposed a reliable radiographic assessment method for Type 3 O-C1 instability and figured out the “standard value” for the range of motion (ROM) of the O-C1 joint. We consider that the current study provides important information for such a case.
Anzeige
As mentioned, ROP sometimes is associated with DISH [4, 15]. O-C1 instability, as the compensation for the overall decreased motion in the lower segments, may be the underlying mechanism of ROP formation in cases associated with DISH. Future study using the radiographic method we proposed in the current study may elucidate the underlying mechanism of ROP formation with DISH, or those without AAS.
O-C1 instability can be also associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [16, 20] ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [8, 22], Down syndrome [3, 11, 23] or infectious diseases [26], as mentioned. Future study using the radiographic method we proposed in the current study may also contribute to clarify the underlying mechanism of these diseases.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Yuji Nishiwaki, Dr. Hitoshi Kono, Dr. Akio Iwanami, Dr. Junichi Yamane, Dr. Takashi Kato, Dr. Taro Umezu, Dr. Yasuhiro Kamata and Dr. Takahiro Ishizaka, who assisted this study. We also gratefully acknowledge those who accepted to be healthy volunteers in this study, those who performed MRI scanning and all other people who involved in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest to declare.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.
Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.
Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.
Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.
Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders scheint das auf weibliche Kranke zuzutreffen, wie eine Studie zeigt.
Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
