nach oben

International Orthopaedics

Erschienen in:

18.06.2018 | Original Paper

Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose and hypothesis

Subsidence is a known reason for early failure of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In particular, cementless THA might be vulnerable to migration. The present study analysed femoral stem subsidence after primary cementless THA. Prosthetic and anatomical risk factors for early femoral stem subsidence were evaluated.

Methods

Two hundred thirty-one consecutive patients who underwent primary cementless THA in a single centre were retrospectively analysed. Post-operative results were evaluated in consideration of prosthetic and anatomical properties in correlation with subsidence on standing pelvic anteroposterior radiographs. Stem type and design, demographic data, BMI, canal flare index (CFI) and canal fill ratio (CFR) were evaluated.

Results

The subsidence rate was significantly higher in collarless femoral stems [3.1 mm (SD 2.8 mm) vs. 1.9 mm (SD 1.5 mm); p = 0.013] while the anatomical type of the proximal femur as described by the canal flare index did not influenced subsidence (p = 0.050). Also, the canal fill ratio showed no significant correlation with subsidence at any level.

Conclusions

In the present study, stem subsidence was significantly higher in the collarless group compared to collared stems. No anatomical parameter (CFI and CFR) could be identified as risk factor for subsidence. Neither age nor BMI influenced subsidence in this cohort. Still, subgroup analysis indicated a sex-dependent role of BMI. Prospective studies of large cohorts should address the problem of subsidence in the future.

Level of evidence

Retrospective therapeutic study, Level IV.

Campbell D, Mercer G, Nilsson KG et al (2011) Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study. Int Orthop 35(4):483–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0913-z CrossRefPubMed

Kärrholm J, Borssén B, Löwenhielm G et al (1994) Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4–7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 76(6):912–917CrossRefPubMed

Al-Najjim M, Khattak U, Sim J et al (2016) Differences in subsidence rate between alternative designs of a commonly used uncemented femoral stem. J Orthop 5;13(4):322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2016.06.026 CrossRef

Ström H, Nilsson O, Milbrink J et al (2007) Early migration pattern of the uncemented CLS stem in total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:127–132CrossRefPubMed

Selvaratnam V, Shetty V, Sahni V (2015) Subsidence in collarless Corail hip replacement. Open Orthop J 29(9):194–197. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010194 CrossRef

Sudhahar TA, Morapudi S, Branes K (2009) Evaluation of subsidence between collarless and collared Corail femoral cement less total hip replacement. J. Orthopaedics 6(2):e3 URL: http://www.jortho.org/2009/6/2/e3

Ström H, Mallmin H, Milbrink J et al (2003) The cone hip stem: a prospective study of 13 patients followed for 5 years with RSA. Acta Orthop Scand 74(5):525–530CrossRefPubMed

Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ et al (1988) The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:148–165

Meding JB, Ritter MA, Keating EM et al (1997) Comparison of collared and collarless femoral components in primary uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 12(3):273–280CrossRef

10.

Froimson MI, Garino J, Machenaud A et al (2007) Minimum 10-year results of a tapered, titanium, hydroxyapatite-coated hip stem: an independent review. J Arthroplasty 22(1):1–7CrossRefPubMed

11.

Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J et al (2013) Independent predictors of failure up to 7.5 years after 35 386 single-brand cementless total hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Bone Joint J 95-B(6):747–757. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31378 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Demey G, Fary C, Lustig S et al (2011) Does a collar improve the immediate stability of uncemented femoral hip stems in total hip arthroplasty? A bilateral comparative cadaver study. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1549–1555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.030 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Faisal M, Thomas G, Young SK (2011) Subsidence of the Corail femoral component in the elderly. A retrospective radiological review. Hip Int 21(3):325–329. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2011.8409 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Kelley SS, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM (1993) A prospective randomized study of a collar versus a collarless femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (294):114–122

15.

Ishii S, Homma Y, Baba T et al (2016) Does the canal fill ratio and femoral morphology of Asian females influence early radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented proximally coated, tapered-wedge stem? J Arthroplast 31(7):1524–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.016 CrossRef

16.

Vidalain JP (2011) Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem. Int Orthop 35(2):189–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1117-2 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Ström H, Nilsson O, Milbrink J et al (2007) The effect of early weight bearing on migration pattern of the uncemented CLS stem in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 22(8):1122–1129CrossRef

18.

Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA et al (1981) Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 52(2):155–170CrossRefPubMed

19.

Galante J, Rostoker W, Lueck R et al (1971) Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 53(1):101–114CrossRefPubMed

20.

Engh CA, O'Connor D, Jasty M, McGovern TF et al (1992) Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res 285:13–29

21.

Burke DW, O'Connor DO, Zalenski EB et al (1991) Micromotion of cemented and uncemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73(1):33–37CrossRefPubMed

22.

Callaghan JJ, Fulghum CS, Glisson RR et al (1992) The effect of femoral stem geometry on interface motion in uncemented porous-coated total hip prostheses. Comparison of straight-stem and curved-stem designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74(6):839–848CrossRefPubMed

23.

Hua J, Walker PS (1994) Relative motion of hip stems under load. An in vitro study of symmetrical, asymmetrical, and custom asymmetrical designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76(1):95–103CrossRefPubMed

24.

Cameron HU, Pilliar RM, MacNab I (1973) The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 7(4):301–311CrossRefPubMed

25.

Haddad RJ Jr, Cook SD, Thomas KA (1987) Biological fixation of porous-coated implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(9):1459–1466 ReviewCrossRefPubMed

26.

Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113

27.

Boese CK, Bredow J, Dargel J, Eysel P et al (2016) Calibration marker position in digital templating of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(4):883–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.009 CrossRef

Titel: Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study
Publikationsdatum: 18.06.2018
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4020-x

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Femoral stem subsidence in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective single-centre study

Abstract

Purpose and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose and hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Comparison of arthroscopically assisted transfer of the latissimus dorsi with or without partial cuff repair for irreparable postero-superior rotator cuff tear

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour

A comparative biomechanical study on different fixation techniques in the management of transverse metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the distal humerus in children

Bone combined cement grafting in giant cell tumor around the knee reduces mechanical failure

Comparison between free-hand and O-arm-based navigated posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly cohorts with three-level lumbar degenerative disease

Curettage, phenolization, and cementation in paediatric Ewing’s sarcoma with a complete radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie