Background
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a worldwide public health problem as well as a serious social problem in South Korea [
1‐
3]. IPV is characterized as any behavior within an intimate relationship that causes physical, psychological, or sexual harm of one partner to another [
1]. According to the 2010 national survey in South Korea, the prevalence of reported IPV was 53.8%, and 81.9% of this violence was perpetrated by husbands against their wives [
4].
IPV causes a wide range of negative effects on the health of women [
5‐
7] and children, such as injury, chronic pain, gastrointestinal problems, sexually transmitted diseases, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder [
8‐
10]. In addition, a significant number of deaths among women are considered to result from IPV [
11,
12]. Moreover, children who witness IPV in their home are also significantly more likely to experience or perpetrate IPV than are children who do not [
13].
The prevalence of reported partner violence varies greatly (15%-71%) among various countries [
1,
14,
15]. In South Korea, the special law to Prevent Family Violence and Protect the Victim mandates that Korean nationals be surveyed triennially. According to this survey, the prevalence of reported IPV dropped from 53.8% in 2010 to 45.5% in 2013 [
16].
IPV typically results due to gender inequality and is frequently considered a form of gender-based violence [
1]. Violence against women has been the focus of most research, yet little is known about the prevalence of violence perpetrated against men who are in a heterosexual relationship [
17,
18]. Some studies have found the prevalence of violence against men to be equivalent to that against women [
18,
19]. Similarly, in South Korea, previous research has highlighted the scope and risk factors of violence against women; however, few studies have investigated the prevalence of violence against men or the possible risk factors associated with male perpetration and victimization [
20,
21].
Factors associated with IPV victimization among women include pregnancy, depressive symptoms, smoking, alcohol consumption, low socioeconomic status, experiencing IPV during childhood, and witnessing IPV perpetration against their mother [
22‐
28]. Tumwesigye and colleagues [
27] investigated IPV victimization among women in Uganda and found socioeconomic status including education, employment status, income, and education level as well as the employment status of the partner to be potential risk factors. Furthermore, Lemon and colleagues [
28] reported that current smoking and frequent alcohol use are related to IPV victimization among women living in the US (Rhode Island). Although few studies have examined IPV victimization among men, alcohol consumption, low socioeconomic status, experiencing IPV during childhood, and witnessing IPV perpetration against their mother were factors associated with IPV perpetration [
29‐
33]. In addition, a study that compared both men and women found alcohol dependency to be associated with severe physical IPV perpetration in the New Zealand Birth Cohort [
33].
In addition, lacking a social network, emotional support, and having low perceived life satisfaction were found to be related with IPV among men and women [
2,
33‐
37]. For example, South Korean women with poor social/support networks were more likely to experience IPV victimization [
2,
35,
36] as well as continued abuse [
37]. Among Chinese men and women, life dissatisfaction was related with IPV victimization [
34]. Furthermore, a weak social support system was strongly associated with physical IPV victimization among women in New Zealand [
33].
Although the aforementioned studies identified some factors associated with IPV, the limited sample size, lack of gender-specific analyses, and a lack of consideration for IPV perpetration among women and IPV victimization among men warrant further study. Furthermore, previous research has not considered factors related to each type of IPV (verbal and physical). To this end, we investigated whether gender-specific differences exist in the prevalence of IPV as well as the type of the violence that was perpetrated or experienced.
Results
Gender-specific data on the characteristics of the study population and the prevalence of IPV are shown in Tables
1 and
2, respectively.
Table 1
Descriptive data across the type of intimate partner violence among men
Age (years)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30-39 | 401 | 8.82 | 104 | 25.9 | <.0001 | 26 | 6.5 | <.0001 | 105 | 26.2 | <.0001 | 37 | 9.2 | <.0001 |
40-49 | 1103 | 24.27 | 322 | 29.2 | | 69 | 6.3 | | 317 | 28.7 | | 77 | 7.0 | |
50-59 | 955 | 21.01 | 254 | 26.6 | | 35 | 3.7 | | 267 | 28.0 | | 54 | 5.7 | |
60-69 | 750 | 16.5 | 159 | 21.2 | | 12 | 1.6 | | 176 | 23.5 | | 28 | 3.7 | |
70+ | 1336 | 29.39 | 269 | 20.1 | | 13 | 1.0 | | 286 | 21.4 | | 35 | 2.6 | |
Education
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
None or elementary school | 1056 | 23.23 | 253 | 24.0 | 0.936 | 23 | 2.2 | 0.021 | 278 | 26.3 | 0.645 | 38 | 3.6 | 0.034 |
Middle or high school | 2143 | 47.15 | 525 | 24.5 | | 75 | 3.5 | | 541 | 25.2 | | 123 | 5.7 | |
University or higher | 1346 | 29.61 | 330 | 24.5 | | 57 | 4.2 | | 332 | 24.7 | | 70 | 5.2 | |
Household income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quartile 1 | 1086 | 23.89 | 233 | 21.5 | 0.058 | 25 | 2.3 | 0.080 | 263 | 24.2 | 0.777 | 40 | 3.7 | 0.032 |
Quartile 2 | 1106 | 24.33 | 276 | 25.0 | | 46 | 4.2 | | 280 | 25.3 | | 53 | 4.8 | |
Quartile 3 | 1162 | 25.57 | 305 | 26.2 | | 45 | 3.9 | | 303 | 26.1 | | 74 | 6.4 | |
Quartile 4 | 1191 | 26.2 | 294 | 24.7 | | 39 | 3.3 | | 305 | 25.6 | | 64 | 5.4 | |
Employment status
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employed full time | 2161 | 47.55 | 521 | 24.1 | 0.006 | 86 | 4.0 | 0.022 | 523 | 24.2 | 0.015 | 107 | 5.0 | <.0001 |
Employed part time | 989 | 21.76 | 276 | 27.9 | | 36 | 3.6 | | 288 | 29.1 | | 77 | 7.8 | |
Self employed | 491 | 10.8 | 121 | 24.6 | | 17 | 3.5 | | 127 | 25.9 | | 17 | 3.5 | |
Unemployed | 904 | 19.89 | 190 | 21.0 | | 16 | 1.8 | | 213 | 23.6 | | 30 | 3.3 | |
Perceived wealth in childhood
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Poor | 2146 | 47.22 | 520 | 24.2 | 0.843 | 67 | 3.1 | 0.319 | 559 | 26.0 | 0.431 | 110 | 5.1 | 0.920 |
Average | 1878 | 41.32 | 465 | 24.8 | | 73 | 3.9 | | 470 | 25.0 | | 93 | 5.0 | |
Wealthy | 521 | 11.46 | 123 | 23.6 | | 15 | 2.9 | | 122 | 23.4 | | 28 | 5.4 | |
Satisfaction with family relationships
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 3682 | 81.01 | 814 | 22.1 | <.0001 | 107 | 2.9 | <.0001 | 839 | 22.8 | <.0001 | 148 | 4.0 | <.0001 |
Neutral | 732 | 16.11 | 238 | 32.5 | | 30 | 4.1 | | 253 | 34.6 | | 62 | 8.5 | |
Not satisfied | 131 | 2.88 | 56 | 42.7 | | 18 | 13.7 | | 59 | 45.0 | | 21 | 16.0 | |
Satisfaction with one’s personal life
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1668 | 36.7 | 332 | 19.9 | <.0001 | 37 | 2.2 | <.0001 | 339 | 20.3 | <.0001 | 55 | 3.3 | <.0001 |
Neutral | 2167 | 47.68 | 547 | 25.2 | | 71 | 3.3 | | 575 | 26.5 | | 114 | 5.3 | |
Not satisfied | 710 | 15.62 | 229 | 32.3 | | 47 | 6.6 | | 237 | 33.4 | | 62 | 8.7 | |
Smoking
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Never | 2351 | 51.73 | 512 | 21.8 | <.0001 | 57 | 2.4 | 0.000 | 525 | 22.3 | <.0001 | 91 | 3.9 | 0.000 |
Ever | 2194 | 48.27 | 596 | 27.2 | | 98 | 4.5 | | 626 | 28.5 | | 140 | 6.4 | |
Alcohol intake
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nondrinker | 1373 | 30.21 | 243 | 17.7 | <.0001 | 25 | 1.8 | <.0001 | 253 | 18.4 | <.0001 | 42 | 3.1 | <.0001 |
Light drinker (1-4 drinks) | 1053 | 23.17 | 249 | 23.6 | | 28 | 2.7 | | 242 | 23.0 | | 38 | 3.6 | |
Moderate drinker (5-9 drinks) | 1381 | 30.39 | 380 | 27.5 | | 53 | 3.8 | | 422 | 30.6 | | 77 | 5.6 | |
Heavy drinker (10 ≤ drinks) | 738 | 16.24 | 236 | 32.0 | | 49 | 6.6 | | 234 | 31.7 | | 74 | 10.0 | |
Total
| 4545 | 100 | 1108 | 24.4 | | 155 | 3.4 | | 1151 | 25.3 | | 231 | 5.1 | |
Table 2
Descriptive data across the type of intimate partner violence among Women
Age (years)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30-39 | 658 | 15.19 | 176 | 26.7 | 0.001 | 65 | 9.9 | <.0001 | 197 | 29.9 | <.0001 | 42 | 6.4 | <.0001 |
40-49 | 1175 | 27.12 | 372 | 31.7 | | 96 | 8.2 | | 363 | 30.9 | | 61 | 5.2 | |
50-59 | 877 | 20.24 | 269 | 30.7 | | 71 | 8.1 | | 244 | 27.8 | | 25 | 2.9 | |
60-69 | 762 | 17.59 | 194 | 25.5 | | 39 | 5.1 | | 174 | 22.8 | | 11 | 1.4 | |
70+ | 860 | 19.85 | 211 | 24.5 | | 27 | 3.1 | | 180 | 20.9 | | 9 | 1.0 | |
Education
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
None or elementary school | 1400 | 32.32 | 404 | 28.9 | 0.448 | 78 | 5.6 | 0.061 | 358 | 25.6 | 0.185 | 21 | 1.5 | <.0001 |
Middle or high school | 2068 | 47.74 | 589 | 28.5 | | 157 | 7.6 | | 549 | 26.5 | | 79 | 3.8 | |
University or higher | 864 | 19.94 | 229 | 26.5 | | 63 | 7.3 | | 251 | 29.1 | | 48 | 5.6 | |
Household income
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Quartile 1 | 1038 | 23.96 | 300 | 28.9 | 0.766 | 59 | 5.7 | 0.239 | 273 | 26.3 | 0.932 | 22 | 2.1 | 0.027 |
Quartile 2 | 1055 | 24.35 | 306 | 29.0 | | 74 | 7.0 | | 288 | 27.3 | | 36 | 3.4 | |
Quartile 3 | 1098 | 25.35 | 304 | 27.7 | | 87 | 7.9 | | 297 | 27.0 | | 39 | 3.6 | |
Quartile 4 | 1141 | 26.34 | 312 | 27.3 | | 78 | 6.8 | | 300 | 26.3 | | 51 | 4.5 | |
Employment status
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Employed full time | 2094 | 48.34 | 582 | 27.8 | 0.072 | 161 | 7.7 | <.0001 | 591 | 28.2 | 0.000 | 97 | 4.6 | <.0001 |
Employed part time | 875 | 20.2 | 277 | 31.7 | | 75 | 8.6 | | 263 | 30.1 | | 28 | 3.2 | |
Self employed | 189 | 4.36 | 50 | 26.5 | | 15 | 7.9 | | 44 | 23.3 | | 10 | 5.3 | |
Unemployed | 1174 | 27.1 | 313 | 26.7 | | 47 | 4.0 | | 260 | 22.1 | | 13 | 1.1 | |
Perceived wealth in childhood
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Poor | 1548 | 35.73 | 463 | 29.9 | 0.179 | 118 | 7.6 | 0.316 | 440 | 28.4 | 0.050 | 47 | 3.0 | 0.052 |
Average | 2219 | 51.22 | 605 | 27.3 | | 146 | 6.6 | | 587 | 26.5 | | 89 | 4.0 | |
Wealthy | 565 | 13.04 | 154 | 27.3 | | 34 | 6.0 | | 131 | 23.2 | | 12 | 2.1 | |
Satisfaction with family relationships
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 3396 | 78.39 | 841 | 24.8 | <.0001 | 168 | 4.9 | <.0001 | 811 | 23.9 | <.0001 | 88 | 2.6 | <.0001 |
Neutral | 780 | 18.01 | 294 | 37.7 | | 88 | 11.3 | | 264 | 33.8 | | 34 | 4.4 | |
Not satisfied | 156 | 3.6 | 87 | 55.8 | | 42 | 26.9 | | 83 | 53.2 | | 26 | 16.7 | |
Satisfaction with one’s personal life
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1451 | 33.49 | 303 | 20.9 | <.0001 | 58 | 4.0 | <.0001 | 296 | 20.4 | <.0001 | 37 | 2.5 | 0.000 |
Neutral | 2216 | 51.15 | 654 | 29.5 | | 154 | 6.9 | | 596 | 26.9 | | 71 | 3.2 | |
Not satisfied | 665 | 15.35 | 265 | 39.8 | | 86 | 12.9 | | 266 | 40.0 | | 40 | 6.0 | |
Smoking
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Never | 4254 | 98.2 | 1199 | 28.2 | 0.800 | 292 | 6.9 | 0.775 | 1134 | 26.7 | 0.416 | 141 | 3.3 | 0.006 |
Ever | 78 | 1.8 | 23 | 29.5 | | 6 | 7.7 | | 24 | 30.8 | | 7 | 9.0 | |
Alcohol intake
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nondrinker | 3026 | 69.85 | 778 | 25.7 | <.0001 | 179 | 5.9 | 0.000 | 721 | 23.8 | <.0001 | 81 | 2.7 | <.0001 |
Light drinker (1-4 drinks) | 1046 | 24.15 | 345 | 33.0 | | 88 | 8.4 | | 342 | 32.7 | | 44 | 4.2 | |
Moderate drinker (5-9 drinks) | 213 | 4.92 | 81 | 38.0 | | 24 | 11.3 | | 75 | 35.2 | | 17 | 8.0 | |
Heavy drinker (10 ≤ drinks) | 47 | 1.08 | 18 | 38.3 | | 7 | 14.9 | | 20 | 42.6 | | 6 | 12.8 | |
Total
| 4332 | 100 | 1222 | 28.2 | | 298 | 6.9 | | 1158 | 26.7 | | 148 | 3.4 | |
The majority of men reported working full time (47.6%), had at least a middle or high school education (47.2%), were non-smokers (51.7%), and moderate drinkers (30.4%). For men, the prevalence of verbal IPV was 24.4% for victimization and 25.3% for perpetration. The prevalence of physical IPV was 3.4% for victimization and 5.1% for perpetration (Table
1).
The majority of women in this study population were employed full time (48.3%) and had at least a middle or high school education (47.7%). In addition, most women were nonsmokers (98.2%) and nondrinkers (69.9%). For women, the prevalence of verbal IPV was 28.2% for victimization and 26.7% for perpetration. The prevalence of physical IPV was 6.9% for victimization and 3.4% for perpetration (Table
2). For both men and women, the prevalence of victimization and perpetration may be overlapped, thus should not be considered independent measures.
Women were significantly more likely than men were to report being a victim of IPV (verbal: 28.2% vs. 24.4% [p < .0001], physical: 6.9% vs. 3.4% [p < .0001]). In addition, women tended to perpetrate verbal violence against their spouse more often than men were (26.7% vs. 25.3%). However, 5.1% of men and 3.4% of women reported perpetrating physical violence against their spouse. A similar proportion of men and women reported male-to-female violence, yet more women than men reported female-to-male violence.
Among males, household income, perceived wealth during childhood, and smoking were not significantly associated with IPV victimization nor with IPV perpetration. Men with a middle or high school education were significantly less likely to report perpetrating verbal IPV than were men with only an elementary school education. In addition, men employed part time were significantly more likely to perpetrate physical IPV than men employed full time were. Moreover, having a high level of satisfaction with family relationships and one’s personal life made men less likely to perpetrate both verbal and physical IPV. Compared with men who were satisfied with their family relationships, the adjusted OR for men dissatisfied with their family relationships was 2.44 (95% CI: 1.66-3.58) for verbal IPV victimization, 5.49 (95% CI: 2.91-10.37) for physical IPV victimization, 2.54 (95% CI: 1.74-3.71) for verbal IPV perpetration, and 4.68 (95% CI: 2.66-8.27) for physical IPV perpetration. However, the adjusted OR among men who were dissatisfied with their personal life was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.39-2.22) for verbal IPV victimization, 3.07 (95% CI: 1.79-5.26) for physical IPV victimization, 1.69 (95% CI: 1.34-2.13) for verbal IPV perpetration, and 2.51 (95% CI: 1.60-3.95) for physical IPV perpetration when compared to men who were satisfied with their personal life. Among the measured health behaviors, men reporting high alcohol intake were more likely to have experienced verbal IPV victimization, physical IPV victimization, verbal IPV perpetration, and physical IPV perpetration. Compared with non-drinkers, the adjusted OR of heavy drinkers was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.65-2.58) for verbal IPV victimization, 2.54 (95% CI: 1.49-4.31) for physical IPV victimization, 2.00 (95% CI: 1.60-2.50) for verbal IPV perpetration, and 2.81 (95% CI: 1.84-4.30) for physical IPV perpetration (Table
3).
Table 3
Factors associated with intimate partner violence reported by men
Age (years)
| | | | | | | | |
30-39 | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
40-49 | 1.16 | (0.89 - 1.51) | 0.92 | (0.57 - 1.50) | 1.11 | (0.85 - 1.45) | 0.70 | (0.45 - 1.07) |
50-59 | 0.98 | (0.74 - 1.30) | 0.46 | (0.26 - 0.81) | 1.02 | (0.77 - 1.35) | 0.52 | (0.32 - 0.83) |
60-69 | 0.75 | (0.55 - 1.03) | 0.18 | (0.08 - 0.39) | 0.81 | (0.60 - 1.11) | 0.36 | (0.20 - 0.64) |
70+ | 0.74 | (0.54 - 1.02) | 0.08 | (0.04 - 0.20) | 0.73 | (0.53 - 1.00) | 0.27 | (0.15 - 0.51) |
Education
| | | | | | | | |
None or elementary school | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Middle or high school | 0.81 | (0.66 - 1.01) | 0.69 | (0.38 - 1.26) | 0.81 | (0.66 - 1.00) | 1.09 | (0.69 - 1.71) |
University or higher | 0.82 | (0.62 - 1.07) | 0.74 | (0.37 - 1.50) | 0.83 | (0.63 - 1.08) | 0.97 | (0.56 - 1.70) |
Employment status
| | | | | | | | |
Employed full time | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Employed part time | 1.13 | (0.94 - 1.36) | 0.73 | (0.48 - 1.13) | 1.18 | (0.98 - 1.42) | 1.45 | (1.05 - 2.02) |
Self employed | 1.13 | (0.88 - 1.45) | 1.22 | (0.68 - 2.19) | 1.16 | (0.90 - 1.48) | 0.83 | (0.47 - 1.44) |
Unemployed | 0.93 | (0.74 - 1.17) | 0.82 | (0.44 - 1.54) | 1.02 | (0.82 - 1.28) | 0.99 | (0.61 - 1.60) |
Satisfaction with family relationships
| | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Neutral | 1.68 | (1.39 - 2.02) | 1.58 | (1.01 - 2.47) | 1.73 | (1.43 - 2.08) | 2.38 | (1.70 - 3.35) |
Not satisfied | 2.44 | (1.66 - 3.58) | 5.49 | (2.91 - 10.37) | 2.54 | (1.74 - 3.71) | 4.68 | (2.66 - 8.27) |
Satisfaction with one’s personal life
| | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Neutral | 1.30 | (1.10 - 1.54) | 1.62 | (1.05 - 2.51) | 1.31 | (1.11 - 1.55) | 1.55 | (1.08 - 2.21) |
Not satisfied | 1.76 | (1.39 - 2.22) | 3.07 | (1.79 - 5.26) | 1.69 | (1.34 - 2.13) | 2.51 | (1.60 - 3.95) |
Alcohol intake
| | | | | | | | |
Nondrinker | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Light drinker (1-4 drinks) | 1.50 | (1.22 - 1.83) | 1.46 | (0.84 - 2.57) | 1.36 | (1.11 - 1.67) | 1.17 | (0.74 - 1.84) |
Moderate drinker (5-9 drinks) | 1.71 | (1.40 - 2.08) | 1.62 | (0.97 - 2.70) | 1.92 | (1.58 - 2.33) | 1.58 | (1.05 - 2.38) |
Heavy drinker (10 ≤ drinks) | 2.06 | (1.65 - 2.58) | 2.54 | (1.49 - 4.31) | 2.00 | (1.60 - 2.50) | 2.81 | (1.84 - 4.30) |
Among women, age was significantly associated with all types of IPV, but household income, employment status, perceived wealth during childhood, and smoking were not. In addition, women with at least a middle or high school education were significantly less likely to report verbal IPV victimization and physical IPV perpetration than women with less education were. Similar to men, increased alcohol intake was associated with an increased odds of verbal and physical IPV perpetration. However, unlike men, alcohol drinking was not significantly associated with physical IPV victimization. Compared with non-drinkers, the adjusted ORs of moderate drinkers for verbal IPV victimization, verbal IPV perpetration, and physical IPV perpetration were 1.68 (95% CI: 1.24-2.27), 1.53 (95% CI: 1.13-2.08), and 2.15 (95% CI: 1.21-3.83), respectively. Moreover, women with a high level of family and life satisfaction were less likely to report verbal IPV victimization, physical IPV victimization, verbal IPV perpetration, and physical IPV perpetration; these findings are similar to that among men. Compared with women who were satisfied with their family relationships, the adjusted ORs among women dissatisfied with their relationships were 3.17 (95% CI: 2.23-4.52) for verbal IPV victimization, 6.68 (95% CI: 4.23-10.56) for physical IPV victimization, 2.78 (95% CI: 1.95-3.96) for verbal IPV perpetration, and 9.46 (95% CI: 5.21-17.19) for physical IPV perpetration. Moreover, the adjusted ORs among women dissatisfied with their personal life was 1.96 (95% CI: 1.55-2.49) for verbal IPV victimization, 2.52 (95% CI: 1.64-3.89) for physical IPV victimization, 2.36 (95% CI: 1.85-3.00) for verbal IPV perpetration, and 2.23 (95% CI: 1.22-4.08) for physical IPV perpetration when compared to women who reported being satisfied with their personal life (Table
4).
Table 4
Factors associated with intimate partner violence reported by women
Age (years)
| | | | | | | | |
30-39 | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
40-49 | 1.23 | (0.99 - 1.54) | 0.75 | (0.53 - 1.07) | 1.04 | (0.84 - 1.30) | 0.79 | (0.52 - 1.22) |
50-59 | 1.06 | (0.82 - 1.36) | 0.63 | (0.42 - 0.96) | 0.86 | (0.66 - 1.10) | 0.43 | (0.24 - 0.77) |
60-69 | 0.69 | (0.51 - 0.93) | 0.31 | (0.18 - 0.52) | 0.57 | (0.42 - 0.78) | 0.22 | (0.09 - 0.50) |
70+ | 0.53 | (0.38 - 0.75) | 0.15 | (0.08 - 0.28) | 0.43 | (0.30 - 0.61) | 0.14 | (0.05 - 0.39) |
Education
| | | | | | | | |
None or elementary school | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Middle or high school | 0.77 | (0.61 - 0.96) | 0.70 | (0.46 - 1.07) | 0.73 | (0.57 - 0.92) | 1.07 | (0.53 - 2.17) |
University or higher | 0.76 | (0.56 - 1.02) | 0.67 | (0.39 - 1.13) | 0.87 | (0.64 - 1.17) | 1.38 | (0.62 - 3.11) |
Satisfaction with family relationships
| | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Neutral | 1.66 | (1.39 - 1.99) | 2.43 | (1.80 - 3.28) | 1.48 | (1.23 - 1.78) | 1.94 | (1.24 - 3.04) |
Not satisfied | 3.17 | (2.23 - 4.52) | 6.68 | (4.23 - 10.56) | 2.78 | (1.95 - 3.96) | 9.46 | (5.21 - 17.19) |
Satisfaction with one’s personal life
| | | | | | | | |
Satisfied | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Neutral | 1.48 | (1.25 - 1.76) | 1.63 | (1.16 - 2.29) | 1.45 | (1.22 - 1.73) | 1.45 | (0.92 - 2.27) |
Not satisfied | 1.96 | (1.55 - 2.49) | 2.52 | (1.64 - 3.89) | 2.36 | (1.85 - 3.00) | 2.23 | (1.22 - 4.08) |
Alcohol intake
| | | | | | | | |
Nondrinker | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | | 1.00 | |
Light drinker (1-4 drinks) | 1.38 | (1.17 - 1.62) | 1.21 | (0.91 - 1.61) | 1.45 | (1.23 - 1.70) | 1.13 | (0.76 - 1.67) |
Moderate drinker (5-9 drinks) | 1.68 | (1.24 - 2.27) | 1.58 | (0.98 - 2.53) | 1.53 | (1.13 - 2.08) | 2.15 | (1.21 - 3.83) |
Heavy drinker (10 ≤ drinks) | 1.47 | (0.80 - 2.70) | 1.78 | (0.75 - 4.18) | 1.83 | (1.00 - 3.35) | 3.18 | (1.23 - 8.20) |
Discussion
In this nationally representative population of Korean men and women, significant gender-specific differences were evident for the prevalence of IPV and its associated factors. Factors significantly associated with an increased likelihood of IPV victimization and perpetration among men and women were the subjective measures of family and personal life satisfaction as well as alcohol intake. In addition, the prevalence of IPV victimization was significantly higher among women than among men.
Although gender-specific data on IPV are limited, our findings are consistent with estimates gathered from previous studies with smaller samples of South Korean adults and population-based studies conducted in other Asian countries [
20,
42‐
45], which found higher exposures to IPV among women than men.
Investigation into the physical perpetration of IPV revealed that males had slightly higher rates of perpetration than that of females (males, 5.1% vs. females, 3.4%). In addition, women reported a lower rate of experiencing male perpetration than that of experiencing victimization. However, the rate of female perpetration was roughly aligned with the rate of victimization that was reported by men. One interpretation for this discrepancy may be that men underreported IPV perpetration due to a social desirability bias. Similar disparities in reporting have been found in studies conducted in other countries [
46].
The majority of research surrounding IPV has addressed violence against women, examining prevalence estimates of female victimization and male perpetration. In the current study, rates of verbal IPV victimization among females (28.2%) fell within the range of previous estimates (24.6%-55.0%) [
47,
48], although male rates of verbal perpetration (25.3%) were slightly lower than previous estimates (31.8%-42.3%) [
49,
50]. However, limitations between survey methods make comparing our results with previous studies difficult; inconsistencies in defining violence and variations in survey periods may have created discrepancies between these estimates.
Among men, low education level was positively associated with perpetrating verbal violence; however, among women, low education level was positively associated with both victimizing and perpetrating verbal IPV. Previous studies have reported similar associations and have strongly suggested that future violence prevention programs should aim to increase levels of education and understanding about IPV [
47].
Our results also confirm the finding of other studies that IPV victimization and perpetration are likely to occur regardless of one’s drinking habits [
46,
47]. However, we cannot determine whether alcohol is a risk factor of or a result of IPV due to the cross-sectional design of our study. Nevertheless, our findings support previous assertions that alcohol interventions may be a crucial component of future violence prevention programs [
19,
51,
52].
Our study has important limitations. First, the prevalence of IPV was measured over the previous 12 months; therefore, these data may have underestimated the actual prevalence of IPV in this study population. Second, the KOWEPS dataset did not measure experiences with IPV during childhood such as any exposures to domestic violence or witnessing IPV perpetration among their parents. Third, the KOWEPS dataset did not ask participants who were married whether they live with their spouse. We cannot assume that all married couples live with their spouse and this factor may influence the prevalence of IPV; therefore, future studies should investigate whether this factor is associated with IPV. Fourth, IPV related to sexual abuse was not included in the KOWEPS survey. Last, the confidence intervals estimated in our analyses were wide; therefore, future prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to better understand these relationships.
In this nationally representative study, we found that the prevalence of IPV and its associated factors were gender specific. In particular, alcohol intake, family, and life satisfaction were strongly associated with both verbal and physical IPV among men and women. In addition, the prevalence of IPV victimization was significantly higher among women than among men. Moreover, older men who were dissatisfied with their family and personal life as well as heavy drinkers were more likely to be victims of physical IPV than their counterparts were. Furthermore, older women who were dissatisfied with their family and personal life as well as heavy drinkers were more likely to perpetrate physical IPV than their counterparts were. Large, prospective studies are needed to understand the etiology of these factors for the proper implementation of preventative measures to reduce IPV in South Korea.
Conclusions
Worldwide, gender differences in IPV have been reported and, among those countries, South Korea has one of the highest prevalences of IPV. However, the factors related to IPV in Korean adults are unknown.
We found significant gender-specific differences among the factors related to IPV. In addition, the prevalences for each the type of violence perpetrated and victimized varied significantly by gender.
This is the first study to utilize nationally representative data to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of IPV in South Korea. This study measured IPV as a self-reported experience over the previous 12 months, yet further data such as sexual IPV and violence during childhood were not collected; therefore, further studies are needed.
Competing interests
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Authors’ contributions
ML developed the research question and performed the analysis, ML and KMS drafted the manuscript and interpreted the data, ML and ECP participated in the design and planning of the study and ECP is guarantor. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.