Facilitating the targeted delivery of particulate vaccines to DCs in vivo via receptor-mediated endocytosis seems an interesting opportunity, since this mechanism allows the specific and simultaneous delivery of maturation factors and antigens. But which receptor should be selected to obtain a potent immune response when considering antigen-presenting pDCs?
Several studies identified receptors for in vivo targeting of pDCs. In mice, Siglec-H and bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST2) were identified as pDC-specific receptors that opt for interesting targets [
68]. Siglec-H is an endocytic receptor and member of the Siglec receptor family. Although most Siglec family members contain an ITIM sequence, Siglec-H lacks this domain [
69,
70]. Siglec-H associates with DAP-12, which in spite of having this ITAM motif, result in impaired secretion of type I IFN [
71,
72]. In mice, Siglec-H is involved in antigen cross-presentation, as demonstrated by the priming of antigen-specific CD8
+ T cells upon antigen uptake via Siglec-H [
69]. Recently, Loschko et al. [
73] underscored the potency of targeting pDCs in vivo via BST2. In their study, they reported that targeted pDCs were efficient inducers of the expansion of both antigen-specific CD4
+ and CD8
+ T-cell responses. Interestingly, they observed protective antitumor responses when targeting pDCs with simultaneous administration of a TLR agonist [
73]. This makes Siglec-H and BST2 potent receptors for targeting murine pDCs for the induction of CD8
+ T-cell responses and protective tumor immunity. Although specific for murine pDCs, human pDCs do not express Siglec-H [
74]. Freshly isolated as well as activated human pDCs do express BST2 [
75]. However, in man expression of BST2 is not restricted to pDCs as it is also expressed by B cells. Moreover, it is upregulated on various cells upon IFNα treatment. Therefore, other receptors expressed by pDCs might be better suited [
75]. Regarding the characteristics of the different surface receptors expressed by pDCs, specifically targeting antigen to the ITAM-containing FcγRIIa seems to be a promising strategy to induce immunity, since FcγRII is involved in T-cell priming, and moreover triggering FcγRIIa does not negatively affect type I IFN production. One disadvantage of FcγRIIa is that it is not uniquely expressed by pDCs, meaning that pDCs cannot be specifically targeted by triggering FcγRIIa [
52]. Similarly, although DEC-205 expression is largely restricted to DCs in mice, it is broadly expressed on different immune cells in man (Table
1) [
76]. In this respect, DCIR is expressed by less diverse immune cell types, making this receptor more potent for specific targeting of pDCs. Nevertheless, targeting DCIR might also activate other DC types like mDCs. Combining the stimulation of both DC types unlocks an interesting approach to potentially establish a more potent vaccine, since interaction between pDCs and mDCs has been demonstrated to increase antigen-specific immune responses. Activating pDCs along with mDCs leads also to induction of innate immune responses, likely resulting in an intensified adaptive immune response. pDCs are found to stimulate and enhance the cytokine secretion and cross-presentation of antigens leading to CD8
+ T-cell priming by mDCs and induction of an antiviral immune response by moDCs [
77‐
79]. In turn, pDCs cocultured with mDCs are capable of inducing an immune response against bacteria where they fail to respond on their own [
45]. In mice, an enhanced antitumor response was found when mDCs and pDCs were cocultured during pulsing with tumor antigens [
80]. Moreover, pDCs were found to cross-talk indirectly with mDCs, via activation of specific lymphocyte subsets that can interact with, and might thereby stimulate, mDCs [
81]. Together, these observations strongly suggest that combining pDC activation with the activation of other DC subsets might be advantageous and result in a more powerful immune response. Triggering DCIR could potentially establish such a synergetic immune response, while triggering pDC-specific receptors, like BDCA-2, initiate a more restricted induced immune response. Moreover, triggering DCIR does not completely inhibit TLR-induced type I IFN secretion by pDC as would be caused by BDCA-2 ligation. We hypothesize that the locally secreted type I IFN is important to establish an effective immune response, since type I IFNs links innate and adaptive immune responses by cross-talk with mDCs, natural killer T cells, natural killer cells and B cells. Alternatively, targeting CD40 could be considered, since it induces TLR-independent pDC maturation without negatively affecting type I IFN secretion. However, like FcγRIIa, BST2 and DEC-205, CD40 is expressed on many different cell types other then DCs and might therefore be less powerful for targeting pDCs.