Heart Failure (HF) results in an immense impact on the patients’ Health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Heart failure patients HRQOL is dependent on the patients’ level of engagement in self-care behaviors. Therefore this study aimed to determine HF patients’ health-related quality of life and its relationship with self-care behaviors.
Methods
An institutional-based study was conducted on 284 heart failure patients at the University of Gondar referral hospital. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire-based interview. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Both descriptive and analytical statistical tests were utilized. A multinomial logistic regression analysis was done to determine the association between HRQOL and different independent variables. Variables with a p-value< 0.05 were considered as a significant predictor of the outcome variable.
Results
The finding of this study showed that more than sixty-six percent of the study population were females. The overall mean score of HF patients’ quality of life was 46.4 ± 22.4 and the physical and emotional subscale mean score was 20.2 ± 9.8 and 10.5 ± 6.8 respectively. The majority of the study participants 147(51.8%) had poor quality of life. The multinomial logistic regression analysis result showed that rural residence (odds ratio 2.41, 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.71) and inadequate level of self-care practice (odds ratio 2.61, 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.78) were independent predictors of poor HRQOL. The correlation analysis also showed that there was a significant negative relationship between HF patients’ HRQOL score and Self-care practice score (r = − 0.127, P = 0.032).
Conclusion
Overall, the majority of HF patients had poor HRQOL. Heart failure patients’ HRQOL was significantly associated with place of residence and patients’ level of self-care practice. Therefore, patients with HF are required to learn the benefit of self-care behaviors to improve their quality of life and to decrease the disease progression. Furthermore, HF patients who come from rural areas need special emphasis in each follow-up evaluation.
Hinweise
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
C. I
Confidence Interval
EHFScBS-9
European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior Scale
HF
Heart Failure
HRQOL
Health-Related Quality Of Life
IQR
Interquartile Range
MLHFQ
Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire
OR
Odds Ratio
SD
Standard Deviation
SOB
Shortness of breath
SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
Introduction
Heart failure is a progressive clinical syndrome affecting more than 38 million people globally (1, 2). HF leads to significant morbidity, mortality and has an immense impact on the patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (3‐6). Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a general concept that represents the patient’s overall perception of the impact of an illness and its treatment. At a minimum, it reflects physical, psychological (including emotional and cognitive), and social functioning (7). Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is substantially more impaired in patients with HF than patients with other chronic diseases (8, 9).
The principle of HF management focuses on prolonging HF patients’ life by maintaining physiological stability (10) and improving HRQOL (11). Despite the advancement of heart failure management, HF related hospitalization and mortality are increasing (12). It is assumed that HF patients’ involvement in the daily self-care behavior activities, including adherence to medication, monitoring of signs and symptoms and lifestyle modifications had a great influence on the disease progression (13, 14). These self-care behavior activities among heart failure patients vary considerably in Africa, including Ethiopia (15‐17).
Anzeige
Heart failure patients’ HRQOL is dependent on the patients’ level of engagement in self-care behaviors (18). Self-care behavior is a modifiable factor that emphasizes the actions to be taken by HF patients to maintain life, healthy functioning and to improve the overall HRQOL (19‐21). Appropriate self-care behavior in HF patients is assumed to have a good outcome in the overall disease progression. However, based on previous studies, the evidence is inconsistent for health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (22‐25).
Improving HRQOL is one of the primary objectives in the management of patients with heart failure (26). Therefore, having a comprehensive understanding regarding the relationship between HF patients’ self-care behaviors and their level of HRQOL will support to develop tailored interventions to reduce symptom burden and improve patient quality of life (18).
To the best of the author’s knowledge, there was no evidence regarding HRQOL in heart failure patients in Ethiopia. Hence, the aim of this study was to determine HF patients’ health-related quality of life and the relationship with self-care behaviors.
Methods
Study setting and period
An institutional-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Gondar referral hospital from March to June 2017. The University of Gondar is located in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia. Heart failure patients had once per week follow up services in the outpatient department (OPD) of the hospital. In this study, patients who were 18 years old or above, had been diagnosed with HF, and start to take medications and had at least 1 month of follow up were included. Data were collected from a total of 284 heart failure patients who were included in this study.
Anzeige
Data collection tools and procedures
Structured and validated tools that were adopted from previous studies were used for data collection (19, 27, 28). The prepared questionnaire had four different sections, which include socio-demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, Quality of life, and Self-care components. Heart failure-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was assessed by using the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire (MLHFQ), a 21-item scale that has a physical (8 items) and an emotional (5 items) subscales. This MLHFQ used to evaluate how much the disease and its treatment had affected the patient’s life in the last month (4 weeks). The MLHFQ is a valid and reliable tool extensively used to assess HRQOL in HF patients. The 21-items have a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no effect) to 5 (very much). The maximum total score of the MLHFQ is 105, with a higher score indicating worse HRQOL. HF patients who score less than 24 labeled as having (Good) HRQOL, 24–45 (Moderate), and greater than 45 as (Poor) HRQOL (29‐32).
The European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior scale (EHFScBS-9) questionnaire was used for the assessment of self-care behavior. All the EHFScBS-9 items had a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (“completely agree”) to 5 (“completely disagree”). This scale has two components the adherence (weight monitoring, limit the amount of fluid intake, follow a low-sodium diet, take their medications as prescribed, and regular exercise) and the consulting behaviors (HF patients contact their doctor/nurse in case of shortness of breath, legs/feet swelling, weight gain, and fatigue). The possible score of this scale varies from 9 to 45, with a lower score indicating better self-care. To make the interpretation of the EHFScBS-9 easier, each Likert scale is reversed to 1 (“completely disagree”) to 5 (“completely agree”) then converted to 0 to 100 standardized score based on this formula ((total score-9)*2.7777) from the previous study and with a higher score indicating better self-care (28). Furthermore in this study self-care behavior of HF patients was classified as adequate (above the mean score) and inadequate (below the mean score). Data were collected through a structured interview by trained pharmacists and nurses.
Data analysis and interpretation
All the collected data were checked for completeness and consistency of responses manually. After cleaning, data were coded, entered into Epi Data version 3.1 and finally analyzed using SPSS version 20. Both descriptive and analytical statistical tests were utilized. The multinomial logistic regression analysis was done to determine the association between HRQOL and different independent variables. Independent variables with a p-value< 0.05 were considered as a significant predictor of the outcome variable.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics
More than half of the study participants (159,56%) were above the age of 50 years. The majority were females (187,65.8%) and more than half were married (149,52.5%). Of all participants, (175,61.6%) of HF patients had not attended formal education, and (130, 46%) were living in rural areas (Table 1).
Table 1
Socio-demographic characteristics of heart failure patients at the University of Gondar referral hospital
Variables
Frequency
Percentage
Age (in years)
< 50
125
44
≥ 50
159
56
Sex
Male
97
34.2
Female
187
65.8
Marital status
Married
149
52.5
Single
55
19.4
Divorce
31
10.9
Widowed
49
17.3
Educational level
No formal Education
175
61.6
1–8
57
20.1
9–12
33
11.6
College/University
19
6.7
Occupation
Farmer
58
20.4
Housewife
109
38.4
Merchant
12
4.2
Student
28
9.9
Retired
10
3.6
Daily labor
67
23.6
Place of residence
Urban
154
54.2
Rural
130
45.8
Clinical characteristics of the study participants
In this study, nearly half (134,47.2%) of the study participants had chronic disease comorbidity. The majority (169,59.5%) had less than 5 years of history with the diseases and around two thirds (179,63%) of the study participants had a history of hospitalization due to HF (Table 2).
Table 2
Clinical characteristics of the study participants at the University of Gondar referral hospital
Variable
Frequency
Percentage
Chronic comorbidity
None
150
52.8
Yes
134
47.2
Duration since diagnosed for heart failure (in years)
< 5 years
169
59.5
5–10
86
30.3
> 10 years
29
10.2
Duration since started to take HF medications
< 5 years
191
67.3
5–10
71
25.0
> 10 years
22
7.7
Hospitalization history
No
105
37.0
Yes
179
63.0
Total number of prescribed medication per day (Mean ± SD)
3.11 ± 1.104.
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of heart failure patients
In this study, The mean score of HF patients’ quality of life was 46.4 ± 22.4. The mean physical and emotional subscale scores were 20.2 ± 9.8 and 10.5 ± 6.8, respectively. The majority (147,51.8%) of the study participants had poor Quality of life (Table 3). The results of the multinomial logistic regression analysis presented in (Table 4) showed that place of residence (odds ratio 2.41, 95% CI, 1.23 to 4.71) and levels of self-care practice (odds ratio 2.61, 95% CI, 1.43 to 4.78,) were independent predictors of poor HRQOL.
Table 3
level of heart failure patients’ quality of life at the University of Gondar referral hospital
Heart failure patients HRQOL score
Median (IQR)
Mean (±SD)
Total MLHFQ score (range 0–105)
47 (42–52)
46.4 ± 22.4
Physical score (range 0–40)
21 (18–23)
20.2 ± 9.8
Emotional score (range 0–25)
10 (9–12)
10.5 ± 6.8
Levels of quality of life
Good
58
20.4%
Moderate
79
27.8%
Poor
147
51.8%
MLHFQ Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire
Table 4
Multinomial logistic regression analysis for factors associated with heart failure patients’ quality of life (with moderate HRQOL as the reference category)
Variables
Level of HRQOL
Good
Poor
Odds ratio
95% CI
p-value
Odds ratio
95% CI
p-value
Age (in years)
< 50
1.11
0.43
2.88
0.826
1.32
0.58
2.99
0.507
≥ 50
_
_
Sex
Female
0.93
0.39
2.16
0.857
1.32
0.66
2.61
0.432
Male
_
_
Marital status
Single
0.24
0.04
1.31
0.100
1.00
0.26
3.79
0.999
Married
1.28
0.45
3.59
0.644
1.18
0.49
2.79
0.715
Divorce
2.45
0.51
11.77
0.264
2.72
0.68
10.80
0.156
Widowed
_
_
Educational level
No formal Education
0.41
0.09
1.86
0.247
0.62
0.16
2.42
0.492
1–8
0.49
0.11
2.31
0.368
0.56
0.15
2.18
0.406
9–12
0.96
0.18
5.21
0.963
1.09
0.26
4.65
0.906
College/University
_
_
Place of residence
Rural
0.89
0.392
2.07
0.802
2.41
1.23
4.71
0.010*
Urban
_
_
Chronic comorbidity
None
1.33
0.60
2.93
0.479
0.54
0.28
1.04
0.067
Yes
_
_
Hospitalization history
No
1.55
0.75
3.23
0.238
1.12
0.60
2.08
0.727
Yes
_
_
Self-care practice
Inadequate
0.99
0.47
2.08
0.969
2.61
1.43
4.78
0.002*
Adequate
_
_
*Statistically significant (p < 0.05)
Heart failure patients’ self-care practices
This study showed that around 48% of the participants had inadequate self-care practices. It also revealed that heart failure patients give more emphasis on selected self-care recommendations. Such as, if they experience shortness of breath (mean score 4.75), and a sign of legs/feet edema (4.49) they would contact their doctor or nurse more frequently and the majority of them also took their medication as prescribed. In contrast, HF patients had poor self-care practices towards regular exercise (mean score 2.21), limit the amount of fluid intake (1.32), and weight monitoring (1.55) (Table 5).
Table 5
Mean EHFScBS-9 items self-care practice score in rank order in patients with HF at the University of Gondar referral hospital
EHFScBS-9* items
Mean score of each self-care
1. If SOB increases I contact my doctor or nurse
4.75
2. I take my medication as prescribed
4.74
3. If legs/feet are more swollen, I contact my doctor or nurse
4.49
4. I eat a low-salt diet
3.86
5. If I experience fatigue I contact my doctor or nurse
3.56
6. If I gain weight more than 2 kg in 7 days I contact my doctor or nurse
2.89
7. I exercise regularly
2.21
8. I weigh myself every day
1.55
9. I limit the amount of fluids
1.32
Overall self-care practices
Adequate
148 (52.1)
Inadequate
136 (47.9)
EHFScBS-9- The European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior scale- a nine-item scale, SOB-shortness of breath.
The relationship between HF patients’ HRQOL and self-care practice
The result of this study showed that there was a significant negative relationship between HF patients’ HRQOL score and Self-care practice score (r = −0.127, P = 0.032). When HF patients’ self-care practice score increases (good self-care) their HRQOL score decreases (Good Quality of life) (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
The correlation between HRQOL score and Self-care practice score among heart failure patients at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital
×
Anzeige
Discussion
The ultimate goal in HF management is not merely focused on the patients’ survival but also on the improvement of their HRQOL (31, 33). This study aimed to assess HF patients’ HRQOL and its association with the patients’ level of engagement towards self-care recommendations. Quality of life in patients with HF was significantly impaired in all dimensions (physical functioning and emotional subcomponent). The finding of this study revealed that the majority of heart failure patients (52%) had poor HRQOL (95% CI, 46.2–58.1%). This quality of life score implicates that the majority of heart failure patients’ life in this setup is much more affected by the disease condition and its management.
This study also showed that nearly half (48%) of HF patients’ self-care engagement was found to be inadequate. The mean score (Table 5) for each self-care recommendations showed that HF patients contact their health care provider more frequently when they experience shortness of breath (SOB) than other symptoms. The majority of HF patients also take their medications as prescribed. However, the finding of this study implicates that HF patients had poor self-care engagement towards performing regular exercise, monitoring their weight and limiting the amount of fluid intake. Therefore healthcare providers should give more emphasis on these self-care recommendations during each follow-up evaluation.
In this study, the patients’ place of residence and their level of self-care practice had a statistically significant association with HRQOL. HF patients who came from rural areas had 2.4 times poorer quality of life than those living in urban areas (OR = 2.41, 95% CI, 1.23–4.71). This might be due to the fact that patients in rural areas had low literacy levels to practice each self-care recommendation and the presence of different challenges in this area impede them to get high-quality healthcare service which leads to poorer HRQOL than urban HF patients (23).
Regarding the association between self-care and HRQOL, previous studies reported inconclusive results (23‐25, 34, 35). The result of the current study supports the existence of a significant association between self-care behaviors and HRQOL. It is understood that HF patients who had inadequate self-care practices had 2.6 times poorer HRQOL than patients who had adequate self-care engagement (OR = 2.61, 95%CI, 1.43–4.78). The correlation analysis also showed that there is a significant negative relationship between HF patients’ HRQOL and Self-care practice scores (r = − 0.127, P = 0.032). When HF patients had poor self-care practice their quality of life become worse. This finding is consistent with other similar studies report, heart failure patients who had poor self-care engagement had worse HRQOL (18, 24, 30, 34, 36, 37). Kessing et al. (30) also reported that lower self-care was associated not only with the overall HRQOL but also with physical and emotional subcomponents of quality of life. The result of the present study provides an insight into the inconclusive association among self-care behaviors and HRQOL. Further prospective, follow-up based research is recommended in the future to elucidate the temporal relationships and other factors associated with HRQOL. In addition to this, considering qualitative research will be one of the best methods to generate data which support the comprehensive understanding of their self-care behaviors and their quality of life from the perspective of each study participants, and to uncover their beliefs, values, and motivations that underlie the individual health behaviors (38).
Anzeige
Even though this study was the first study to assess HF patients’ HRQOL and its association with self-care behavior in Ethiopia, it was not out of limitations. It is a single-center study, the presence of social desirability and the recall bias during self-report might have affected the data obtained. The cross-sectional nature of the study design cannot delineate a causal relationship between quality of life and self-care. Therefore, it is better to take into consideration these limitations while interpreting the finding of this study.
Conclusions
The majority of HF patients attending this hospital had poor HRQOL and nearly half of the patients also had inadequate levels of self-care practices. Mainly, HF patients had poor self-care behavior towards performing regular exercise, weight monitoring and limitation of fluid intake. Worse HRQOL had a statistically significant association with inadequate self-care practice and rural residence. It implicates that health care providers should work on the improvement of HF patients’ self-care engagement to improve their quality of life and to decrease the overall disease progression.
Acknowledgments
I would like to acknowledge data collectors, the University of Gondar and the Hospital administrative staff for their permission and support to conduct this study.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical clearance and approval were obtained from the ethical review committee of the School of Pharmacy, University of Gondar. In addition, a brief explanation about the purpose of the study was given for the study participants. Data collection was started after the willingness of the patients obtained, and after verbal consent was taken. Confidentiality was ensured and maintained by the principal investigator and data collectors.
Anzeige
Competing interests
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
