Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 10/2020

Open Access 28.05.2020 | Heart Failure

Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Heart failure (HF) is a common condition that places considerable burden on patients. We aimed to develop a patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure to assess the symptoms and impacts of HF.

Methods

Phase 1: a targeted literature review, expert interviews, and concept elicitation (CE) interviews with patients with HF (n = 26) were used to develop a conceptual model of the core symptoms and impacts of HF. To capture these concepts, three new fit-for-purpose PRO questionnaires were constructed in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance. Phase 2: three ‘waves’ of cognitive interviews were conducted with patients with HF (n = 28) to validate and refine the questionnaires.

Results

Three key symptoms—shortness of breath, oedema, and fatigue—were identified across the literature review, expert interviews and CE interviews. Several additional symptoms, cognitive changes and impacts of HF were reported in the CE interviews and included in the conceptual model. A 10-item symptom questionnaire (Heart Failure-Daily Symptom Diary) was constructed; cognitive testing showed that the final PRO measure was easy to understand/complete and relevant to patients with HF, confirming content validity. Two HF impact questionnaires were developed (Assessing Dyspnoea’s Impact on Mobility and Sleep and Heart Failure-Functional Status Assessment), but required refinement to ensure patient understanding.

Conclusions

Patient input contributed to the development of a PRO instrument for assessing physical and cognitive symptoms important to patients with HF using novel measurement strategies. Inclusion of daily metrics offers differentiation from other qualified instruments and may provide clinical insight for improving lifestyles. Additionally, two draft PRO measures may, after further validation, be useful to assess the impacts of HF.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14(8), 967–977. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​014.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013.CrossRefPubMed Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2—Assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14(8), 978–988. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jval.​2011.​06.​013.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rector, T., Kubo, S., & Cohn, J. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure—Part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3, 198–209. Rector, T., Kubo, S., & Cohn, J. (1987). Patients' self-assessment of their congestive heart failure—Part 2: Content, reliability and validity of a new measure, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Heart Failure, 3, 198–209.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Braunstein, J. B., Anderson, G. F., Gerstenblith, G., Weller, W., Niefeld, M., Herbert, R., et al. (2003). Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(7), 1226–1233.CrossRef Braunstein, J. B., Anderson, G. F., Gerstenblith, G., Weller, W., Niefeld, M., Herbert, R., et al. (2003). Noncardiac comorbidity increases preventable hospitalizations and mortality among Medicare beneficiaries with chronic heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 42(7), 1226–1233.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Development of a conceptual model and patient-reported outcome measures for assessing symptoms and functioning in patients with heart failure
Publikationsdatum
28.05.2020
Schlagwort
Heart Failure
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02537-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2020

Quality of Life Research 10/2020 Zur Ausgabe