nach oben

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®

Erschienen in:

01.12.2012 | Symposium: ABJS Carl T. Brighton Workshop on Hip Preservation Surgery

Hip Ontogenesis: How Evolution, Genes, and Load History Shape Hip Morphotype and Cartilotype

verfasst von: Tom Hogervorst, MD, PhD, Wouter Eilander, MD, Joost T. Fikkers, MSc, Ingrid Meulenbelt, PhD

Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Ausgabe 12/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Developmental hip disorders (DHDs), eg, developmental dysplasia of the hip, slipped capitis femoris epiphysis, and femoroacetabular impingement, can be considered morphology variants of the normal hip. The femoroacetabular morphology of DHD is believed to induce osteoarthritis (OA) through local cumulative mechanical overload acting on genetically controlled patterning systems and subsequent damage of joint structures. However, it is unclear why hip morphology differs between individuals with seemingly comparable load histories and why certain hips with DHD progress to symptomatic OA whereas others do not.

Questions/Purposes

We asked (1) which mechanical factors influence growth and development of the proximal femur; and (2) which genes or genetic mechanisms are associated with hip ontogenesis.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review of mechanical and genetic factors of hip ontogeny. We focused on three fields that in recent years have advanced our knowledge of adult hip morphology: imaging, evolution, and genetics.

Where Are We Now?

Mechanical factors can be understood in view of human evolutionary peculiarities and may summate to load histories conducive to DHD. Genetic factors most likely act through multiple genes, each with modest effect sizes. Single genes that explain a DHD are therefore unlikely to be found. Apparently, the interplay between genes and load history not only determines hip morphotype, but also joint cartilage robustness (“cartilotype”) and resistance to symptomatic OA.

Where Do We Need to Go?

We need therapies that can improve both morphotype and cartilotype.

How Do We Get There?

Better phenotyping, improving classification systems of hip morphology, and comparative population studies can be done with existing methods. Quantifying load histories likely requires new tools, but proof of principle of modifying morphotype in treatment of DDH and of cartilotype with exercise is available.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Agricola R, Bessems JH, Ginai AZ, Heijboer MP, van der Heijden RA, Verhaar JA, Weinans H, Waarsing JH. The development of cam-type deformity in adolescent and young male soccer players. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40:1099–1106.PubMedCrossRef

Anemone RL. The VCL hypothesis revisited: patterns of femoral morphology among quadrupedal and saltatorial prosimian primates. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1990;83:373–393.PubMedCrossRef

Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HH, van den Bogert AJ, Bruin G, Hartman W, Barneveld A. How the horse moves: 2. Significance of graphical representations of equine hind limb kinematics. Equine Vet J. 1995;27:39–45.PubMedCrossRef

Baker JJ, Searight KJ, Atzeva Stump M, Kehrer MB, Shanafelt C, Graham E, Smith TD. Hip Anatomy and Ontogeny of Lower Limb Musculature in Three Species of Nonhuman Primates. Anatomy Research International, Hindawi Publishing Corporation; 2011. Available at: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ari/2011/580864/. Accessed July 1, 2012.

Baker-Lepain JC, Lynch JA, Parimi N, McCulloch CE, Nevitt MC, Corr M, Lane NE. Variant alleles of the WNT antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1457–1465.PubMedCrossRef

Bardakos NV, Villar RN. Predictors of progression of osteoarthritis in femoroacetabular impingement: a radiological study with a minimum of ten years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:162–169.PubMedCrossRef

Bastow ER, Lamb KJ, Lewthwaite JC, Osborne AC, Kavanagh E, Wheeler-Jones CP, Pitsillides AA. Selective activation of the MEK-ERK pathway is regulated by mechanical stimuli in forming joints and promotes pericellular matrix formation. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:11749–11758.PubMedCrossRef

Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–1292.PubMed

Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in two patients. J Biomech. 1993;26:969–990.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint forces in sheep. J Biomech. 1999;32:769–777.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Bonneau N, Simonis C, Seringe R, Tardieu C. Study of femoral torsion during prenatal growth: interpretations associated with the effects of intrauterine pressure. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2011;145:438–445.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Bos SD, Slagboom PE, Meulenbelt I. New insights into osteoarthritis: early developmental features of an ageing-related disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008;20:553–559.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Browne D. Congenital Deformities of mechanical origin: section for the study of disease in children. Proc Royal Soc Med. 1936;29:1409–1431.

14.

Burr DB, Robling AG, Turner CH. Effects of biomechanical stress on bones in animals. Bone. 2002;30:781–786.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Carter DR, Orr TE, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ. Influences of mechanical stress on prenatal and postnatal skeletal development. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;219:237–250.PubMed

16.

Daans M, Luyten FP, Lories RJ. GDF5 deficiency in mice is associated with instability-driven joint damage, gait and subchondral bone changes. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:208–213.PubMedCrossRef

17.

De Pellegrin M, Moharamzadeh D. Developmental dysplasia of the hip in twins: the importance of mechanical factors in the etiology of DDH. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30:774–778.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Dickson JW. Pierre Le Damany on congenital dysplasia of the hip. Proc Royal Soc Med. 1969;62:575–577.

19.

Doherty M, Courtney P, Doherty S, Jenkins W, Maciewicz RA, Muir K, Zhang W. Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3172–3182.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Doran DM. Ontogeny of locomotion in mountain gorillas and chimpanzees. J Hum Evol. 1997;32:323–344.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Drachman DB, Sokoloff L. The role of movement in embryonic joint formation. Dev Biol. 1966;14:401–420.CrossRef

22.

Dudda M, Albers C, Mamisch TC, Werlen S, Beck M. Do normal radiographs exclude asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:651–659.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Dudda M, Kim YJ, Zhang Y, Nevitt MC, Xu L, Niu J, Goggins J, Doherty M, Felson DT. Morphologic differences between the hips of Chinese women and white women: could they account for the ethnic difference in the prevalence of hip osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:2992–2999.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:264–272.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Goldring MB, Tsuchimochi K, Ijiri K. The control of chondrogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 2006;97:33–44.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Goodman DA, Feighan JE, Smith AD, Latimer B, Buly RL, Cooperman DR. Subclinical slipped capital femoral epiphysis. Relationship to osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:1489–1497.PubMed

27.

Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Palm H, Sonne-Holm S, Magnusson E. A new radiological index for assessing asphericity of the femoral head in cam impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1309–1316.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Gosvig KK, Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Palm H, Troelsen A. Prevalence of malformations of the hip joint and their relationship to sex, groin pain, and risk of osteoarthritis: a population-based survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1162–1169.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Gregory JS, Waarsing JH, Day J, Pols HA, Reijman M, Weinans H, Aspden RM. Early identification of radiographic osteoarthritis of the hip using an active shape model to quantify changes in bone morphometric features: can hip shape tell us anything about the progression of osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3634–3643.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hack K, Di Primio G, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2436–2444.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Hadley NA, Brown TD, Weinstein SL. The effects of contact pressure elevations and aseptic necrosis on the long-term outcome of congenital hip dislocation. J Orthop Res. 1990;8:504–513.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Harila V, Valkama M, Sato K, Tolleson S, Hanis S, Kau CH, Pirttiniemi P. Occlusal asymmetries in children with congenital hip dislocation. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:307–311.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Harris WH. Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;213:20–33.PubMed

34.

Hartofilakidis G, Bardakos NV, Babis GC, Georgiades G. An examination of the association between different morphotypes of femoroacetabular impingement in asymptomatic subjects and the development of osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:580–586.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Heegaard JH, Beaupre GS, Carter DR. Mechanically modulated cartilage growth may regulate joint surface morphogenesis. J Orthpo Res. 1999;17:509–517.CrossRef

36.

Hoaglund FT, Shiba R, Newberg AH, Leung KY. Diseases of the hip. A comparative study of Japanese Oriental and American white patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1376–1383.PubMed

37.

Inoue K, Wicart P, Kawasaki T, Huang J, Ushiyama T, Hukuda S, Courpied J. Prevalence of hip osteoarthritis and acetabular dysplasia in French and Japanese adults. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000;39:745–748.CrossRef

38.

Ito K, Minka MA 2nd, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:171–176.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Jazrawi LM, Alaia MJ, Chang G, Fitzgerald EF, Recht MP. Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011;19:420–429.PubMed

40.

Jouve JL, Glard Y, Garron E, Piercecchi MD, Dutour O, Tardieu C, Bollini G. Anatomical study of the proximal femur in the fetus. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2005;14:105–110.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Kahn J, Shwartz Y, Blitz E, Krief S, Sharir A, Breitel DA, Rattenbach R, Relaix F, Maire P, Rountree RB, Kingsley DM, Zelzer E. Muscle contraction is necessary to maintain joint progenitor cell fate. Dev Cell. 2009;16:734–743.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Kavanagh E, Church VL, Osborne AC, Lamb KJ, Archer CW, Francis-West PH, Pitsillides AA. Differential regulation of GDF-5 and FGF-2/4 by immobilisation in ovo exposes distinct roles in joint formation. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:826–834.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Kim YH. Relationship between the sphericity of femoral head-acetabulum and the low incidence of primary osteoarthritis of the hip joint in Koreans. Yonsei Med J. 1989;30:280–287.PubMed

44.

Laborie LB, Lehmann TG, Engesaeter IO, Eastwood DM, Engesaeter LB, Rosendahl K. Prevalence of radiographic findings thought to be associated with femoroacetabular impingement in a population-based cohort of 2081 healthy young adults. Radiology. 2011;260:494–502.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Lane NE, Lin P, Christiansen L, Gore LR, Williams EN, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC. Association of mild acetabular dysplasia with an increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis in elderly white women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:400–404.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Lango Allen H, Estrada K, Lettre G, Berndt SI. Hundreds of variants clustered in genomic loci and biological pathways affect human height. Nature. 2010;467:832–838.

47.

Larsen LJ, Schottstaedt ER, Bost FC. Multiple congenital dislocations associated with characteristic facial abnormality. J Pediatr. 1950;37:574–581.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Le Damany P. [The Congenital Hip Dislocation] [in French]. Paris, France: Masson; 1923.

49.

Leunig M, Casillas MM, Hamlet M, Hersche O, Notzli H, Slongo T, Ganz R. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: early mechanical damage to the acetabular cartilage by a prominent femoral metaphysis. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:370–375.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Loder RT. The demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis. An international multicenter study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;322:8–27.PubMed

51.

Loder RT, Nechleba J, Sanders JO, Doyle P. Idiopathic slipped capital femoral epiphysis in Amish children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:543–549.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Lories RJ, Peeters J, Bakker A, Tylzanowski P, Derese I, Schrooten J, Thomas JT, Luyten FP. Articular cartilage and biomechanical properties of the long bones in Frzb-knockout mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:4095–4103.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Loughlin J. Genetics of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011;23:479–483.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Lovejoy CO, McCollum MA, Reno PL, Rosenman BA. Developmental biology and human evolution. Annu Rev Anthropol. 2003;32:85–109.CrossRef

55.

Lynch JA, Parimi N, Chaganti RK, Nevitt MC, Lane NE. The association of proximal femoral shape and incident radiographic hip OA in elderly women. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1313–1318.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Meulenbelt I, Min JL, Bos S, Riyazi N, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, van der Wijk HJ, Kroon HM, Nakajima M, Ikegawa S, Uitterlinden AG, van Meurs JB, van der Deure WM, Visser TJ, Seymour AB, Lakenberg N, van der Breggen R, Kremer D, van Duijn CM, Kloppenburg M, Loughlin J, Slagboom PE. Identification of DIO2 as a new susceptibility locus for symptomatic osteoarthritis. Hum Mol Genet. 2008;17:1867–1875.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Miyamoto Y, Mabuchi A, Shi D, Kubo T, Takatori Y, Saito S, Fujioka M, Sudo A, Uchida A, Yamamoto S, Ozaki K, Takigawa M, Tanaka T, Nakamura Y, Jiang Q, Ikegawa S. A functional polymorphism in the 5’ UTR of GDF5 is associated with susceptibility to osteoarthritis. Nat Genet. 2007;39:529–533.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Murray AW, Wilson NI. Changing incidence of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: a relationship with obesity? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:92–94.PubMed

59.

Murray RO. The aetiology of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. Br J Radiol. 1965;38:810–824.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Murray RO, Duncan C. Athletic activity in adolescence as an etiological factor in degenerative hip disease. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971;53:406–419.PubMed

61.

Myers J, Hadlow S, Lynskey T. The effectiveness of a programme for neonatal hip screening over a period of 40 years: a follow-up of the New Plymouth experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:245–248.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Nakahara I, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N. Gender differences in 3D morphology and bony impingement of human hips. J Orthop Res. 2011;29:333–339.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Nguyen AR, Ling J, Gomes B, Antoniou G, Sutherland LM, Cundy PJ. Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: rising rates with obesity and aboriginality in South Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:1416–1423.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Nicholls AS, Kiran A, Pollard TC, Hart D, Arden CP, Spector T, Gill HS, Murray DW, Carr AJ, Arden NK. The association between hip morphology parameters and 19-year risk of end-stage osteoarthritis in the hip: a nested case-control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2011.

65.

Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:556–560.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Novacheck TF. Walking, running, and sprinting: a three-dimensional analysis of kinematics and kinetics. Instr Course Lect. 1995;44:497–506.PubMed

67.

Nowlan NC, Prendergast PJ, Murphy P. Identification of mechanosensitive genes during embryonic bone formation. PLoS Comp Biol. 2008;4:e1000250.CrossRef

68.

Nowlan NC, Sharpe J, Roddy KA, Prendergast PJ, Murphy P. Mechanobiology of embryonic skeletal development: insights from animal models. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Rev. 2010;90:203–213.CrossRef

69.

Ogden JA. Development and growth of the hip. In: Katz JF, Siffert, RS, eds. Managment of Hip Disorders in Children. Philadelphia, PA, USA: JB Lippincott; 1983:1–32.

70.

Palacios J, Rodriguez JI, Ruiz A, Sanchez M, Alvarez I, DeMiguel E. Long bone development in extrinsic fetal akinesia: an experimental study in rat fetuses subjected to oligohydramnios. Teratology. 1992;46:79–84.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Murray DW, Carr AJ. Genetic influences in the aetiology of femoroacetabular impingement: a sibling study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:209–216.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Simpson DJ, Murray DW, Carr AJ. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:134–141.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Ralis Z, McKibbin B. Changes in shape of the human hip joint during its development and their relation to its stability. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973;55:780–785.PubMed

74.

Reichenbach S, Juni P, Nuesch E, Frey F, Ganz R, Leunig M. An examination chair to measure internal rotation of the hip in routine settings: a validation study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18:365–371.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Reichenbach S, Juni P, Werlen S, Nuesch E, Pfirrmann CW, Trelle S, Odermatt A, Hofstetter W, Ganz R, Leunig M. Prevalence of cam-type deformity on hip magnetic resonance imaging in young males: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1319–1327.CrossRef

76.

Reynard LN, Bui C, Canty-Laird EG, Young DA, Loughlin J. Expression of the osteoarthritis-associated gene GDF5 is modulated epigenetically by DNA methylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:3450–3460.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Roaas A, Andersson GB. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30–40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:205–208.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Roach KE, Miles TP. Normal hip and knee active range of motion: the relationship to age. Phys Ther. 1991;71:656–665.PubMed

79.

Roddy KA, Prendergast PJ, Murphy P. Mechanical influences on morphogenesis of the knee joint revealed through morphological, molecular and computational analysis of immobilised embryos. PloS One. 2011;6:e17526.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Roos EM, Dahlberg L. Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage: a four-month, randomized, controlled trial in patients at risk of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:3507–3514.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Sakao K, Takahashi KA, Arai Y, Saito M, Honjyo K, Hiraoka N, Kishida T, Mazda O, Imanishi J, Kubo T. Asporin and transforming growth factor-beta gene expression in osteoblasts from subchondral bone and osteophytes in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sci. o2009;14:738–747.

82.

Schultz AH. The physical distinctions of man. Proc Am Phil Soc. 1950;94:428–449.

83.

Schumann S, Tannast M, Nolte LP, Zheng G. Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur—a morphology study. Med Eng Phys. 2010;32:638–644.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Shea BT. Allometry and heterochrony in the African apes. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1983;62:275–289.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Shefelbine SJ, Carter DR. Mechanobiological predictions of growth front morphology in developmental hip dysplasia. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:346–352.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Shi D, Dai J, Zhu P, Qin J, Zhu L, Zhu H, Zhao B, Qiu X, Xu Z, Chen D, Yi L, Ikegawa S, Jiang Q. Association of the D repeat polymorphism in the ASPN gene with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a case-control study in Han Chinese. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R27.PubMedCrossRef

87.

Siebenrock KA, Ferner F, Noble PC, Santore RF, Werlen S, Mamisch TC. The cam-type deformity of the proximal femur arises in childhood in response to vigorous sporting activity. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:3229–3240.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Smyth PP, Taylor CJ, Adams JE. Vertebral shape: automatic measurement with active shape models. Radiology. 1999;211:571–578.PubMed

89.

Song KS, Oh CW, Lee HJ, Kim SD. Epidemiology and demographics of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in Korea: a multicenter study by the Korean Pediatric Orthopedic Society. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:683–686.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Starke A, Herzog K, Sohrt J, Haist V, Hohling A, Baumgartner W, Rehage J. Diagnostic procedures and surgical treatment of craniodorsal coxofemoral luxation in calves. Vet Surg. 2007;36:99–106.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Stecher RM. Osteoarthritis of the hip in a gorilla; report of a third case. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1958;12:307–314.

92.

Stevenson DA, Mineau G, Kerber RA, Viskochil DH, Schaefer C, Roach JW. Familial predisposition to developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 2009;29:463–466.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Takeyama A, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Kiyama T. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in Asian patients with osteoarthritis of the hip. Int Orthop. 2009;33:1229–1232.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Tannast M, Goricki D, Beck M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Hip damage occurs at the zone of femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:273–280.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Tardieu C. Short adolescence in early hominids: infantile and adolescent growth of the human femur. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1998;107:163–178.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Tayton E. Femoral anteversion: a necessary angle or an evolutionary vestige? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1283–1288.PubMedCrossRef

97.

Teer JK, Mullikin JC. Exome sequencing: the sweet spot before whole genomes. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19:R145–151.PubMedCrossRef

98.

Tong SH, Eid MA, Chow W, To MK. Screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Hong Kong. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011;19:200–203.

99.

Toogood PA, Skalak A, Cooperman DR. Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:876–885.PubMedCrossRef

100.

Valdes AM, Evangelou E, Kerkhof HJ, Tamm A, Doherty SA, Kisand K, Tamm A, Kerna I, Uitterlinden A, Hofman A, Rivadeneira F, Cooper C, Dennison EM, Zhang W, Muir KR, Ioannidis JP, Wheeler M, Maciewicz RA, van Meurs JB, Arden NK, Spector TD, Doherty M. The GDF5 rs143383 polymorphism is associated with osteoarthritis of the knee with genome-wide statistical significance. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:873–875.PubMedCrossRef

101.

Valdes AM, Spector TD. The genetic epidemiology of osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010;22:139–143.PubMedCrossRef

102.

Valdes AM, Spector TD, Tamm A, Kisand K, Doherty SA, Dennison EM, Mangino M, Tamm A, Kerna I, Hart DJ, Wheeler M, Cooper C, Lories RJ, Arden NK, Doherty M. Genetic variation in the SMAD3 gene is associated with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:2347–2352.PubMedCrossRef

103.

Waarsing JH, Kloppenburg M, Slagboom PE, Kroon HM, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, Weinans H, Meulenbelt I. Osteoarthritis susceptibility genes influence the association between hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63:1349–1354.PubMedCrossRef

104.

Walker JM. Histological study of the fetal development of the human acetabulum and labrum: significance in congenital hip disease. Yale J Biol Med. 1981;54:255–263.PubMed

105.

Walker JM, Goldsmith CH. Morphometric study of the fetal development of the human hip joint: significance for congenital hip disease. Yale J Biol Med. 1981;54:411–437.PubMed

106.

Weinstein SL. Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;225:62–76.PubMed

107.

Wiberg G. The anatomy and roentgenographic appearance of a normal hip joint. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1939;83:7–38.

108.

Wilkinson JA. Femoral anteversion in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1962;44:386–397.PubMed

109.

Wilkinson JA. Prime factors in the etiology of congenital dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1963;45:268–283.

110.

Wolpert L. Principles of Development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.

111.

Yiv BC, Saidin R, Cundy PJ, Tgetgel JD, Aguilar J, McCaul KA, Keane RJ, Chan A, Scott H. Developmental dysplasia of the hip in South Australia in 1991: prevalence and risk factors. J Paediatr Child Health. 1997;33:151–156.PubMedCrossRef

112.

Yoshimura N, Campbell L, Hashimoto T, Kinoshita H, Okayasu T, Wilman C, Coggon D, Croft P, Cooper C. Acetabular dysplasia and hip osteoarthritis in Britain and Japan. Br J Rheumatol. 1998;37:1193–1197.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Hip Ontogenesis: How Evolution, Genes, and Load History Shape Hip Morphotype and Cartilotype
verfasst von: Tom Hogervorst, MD, PhD
Wouter Eilander, MD
Joost T. Fikkers, MSc
Ingrid Meulenbelt, PhD
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2012
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Ausgabe 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Elektronische ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2511-4

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Questions/Purposes

Methods

Where Are We Now?

Where Do We Need to Go?

How Do We Get There?

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2012

Quantitative 3D-CT Anatomy of Hamate Osteoarticular Autograft for Reconstruction of the Middle Phalanx Base

Erratum to: MRI of Hip Cartilage: Joint Morphology, Structure, and Composition

Parafoveal Chondral Defects Associated with Femoroacetabular Impingement

MRI of Hip Cartilage: Joint Morphology, Structure, and Composition

What Are the Factors Associated With Acetabular Correction in Perthes-like Hip Deformities?