Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 6/2017

17.05.2017 | Original Paper

Holding Manufacturers of Defective Firearms to Account: Does Restricting Liability Lawsuits Violate the Second Amendment?

verfasst von: Neil J. Nusbaum

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Judicial and statutory developments since 2005 have placed considerable roadblocks in the way of legal efforts against the epidemic of gun violence in the United States. Although the Second Amendment is most often cited by those opposed to gun control, it offers a potential opportunity to be invoked in support of harm minimization.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat District of Columbia v. Heller. (2008) 554 U.S. 570. District of Columbia v. Heller. (2008) 554 U.S. 570.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald v. City of Chicago. (2010). 561 U.S. 742. McDonald v. City of Chicago. (2010). 561 U.S. 742.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Borden, J. (2015). Fresh Court Challenges to Gun Sellers Undercut by Decade-Old Law, 2015, Retrieved January 8, 2017. Borden, J. (2015). Fresh Court Challenges to Gun Sellers Undercut by Decade-Old Law, 2015, Retrieved January 8, 2017.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kellerman, A. L., Rivara, F. P., Rushforth, N. B., et al. (1993). Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1084–1091.CrossRef Kellerman, A. L., Rivara, F. P., Rushforth, N. B., et al. (1993). Gun ownership as a risk factor for homicide in the home. New England Journal of Medicine, 329, 1084–1091.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Holding Manufacturers of Defective Firearms to Account: Does Restricting Liability Lawsuits Violate the Second Amendment?
verfasst von
Neil J. Nusbaum
Publikationsdatum
17.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0379-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Journal of Community Health 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe