nach oben

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Erschienen in:

06.08.2019 | Original Article

IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and grade III/IV IDH-mutant gliomas show elevated tracer uptake in fibroblast activation protein–specific PET/CT

verfasst von: Manuel Röhrich, Anastasia Loktev, Annika K. Wefers, Annette Altmann, Daniel Paech, Sebastian Adeberg, Paul Windisch, Thomas Hielscher, Paul Flechsig, Ralf Floca, Dominik Leitz, Julius P. Schuster, Peter E. Huber, Jürgen Debus, Andreas von Deimling, Thomas Lindner, Uwe Haberkorn

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 12/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Targeting fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a new diagnostic approach allowing the visualization of tumor stroma. Here, we applied FAP-specific PET imaging to gliomas. We analyzed the target affinity and specificity of two FAP ligands (FAPI-02 and FAPI-04) in vitro, and the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in mice in vivo. Clinically, we used ⁶⁸Ga-labeled FAPI-02/04 for PET imaging in 18 glioma patients (five IDH-mutant gliomas, 13 IDH-wildtype glioblastomas).

Methods

For binding studies with ¹⁷⁷Lu-radiolabeled FAPI-02/04, we used the glioblastoma cell line U87MG, FAP-transfected fibrosarcoma cells, and CD26-transfected human embryonic kidney cells. For pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies, U87MG-xenografted mice were injected with ⁶⁸Ga-labeled compounds followed by small-animal PET imaging and ¹⁷⁷Lu-labeled FAPI-02/04, respectively. Clinical PET/CT scans were performed 30 min post intravenous administration of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI-02/04. PET and MRI scans were co-registrated. Immunohistochemistry was done on 14 gliomas using a FAP-specific antibody.

Results

FAPI-02 and FAPI-04 showed high binding specificity to FAP. FAPI-04 demonstrated higher tumor accumulation and delayed elimination compared with FAPI-02 in preclinical studies. IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and grade III/IV, but not grade II, IDH-mutant gliomas showed elevated tracer uptake. In glioblastomas, we observed spots with increased uptake in projection on contrast-enhancing areas. Immunohistochemistry showed FAP-positive cells with mainly elongated cell bodies and perivascular FAP-positive cells in glioblastomas and an anaplastic IDH-mutant astrocytoma.

Conclusions

Using FAP-specific PET imaging, increased tracer uptake in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and high-grade IDH-mutant astrocytomas, but not in diffuse astrocytomas, may allow non-invasive distinction between low-grade IDH-mutant and high-grade gliomas. Therefore, FAP-specific imaging in gliomas may be useful for follow-up studies although further clinical evaluation is required.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Liao Z, Tan ZW, Zhu P, Tan NS. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in tumor microenvironment - accomplices in tumor malignancy. Cell Immunol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2017.12.003.

Santi A, Kugeratski FG, Zanivan S. Cancer associated fibroblasts: the architects of stroma remodeling. Proteomics. 2018;18:e1700167. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201700167.CrossRefPubMed

Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16:582–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2016.73.CrossRefPubMed

McCarthy JB, El-Ashry D, Turley EA. Hyaluronan, cancer-associated fibroblasts and the tumor microenvironment in malignant progression. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2018;6:48. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2018.00048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lai D, Ma L, Wang F. Fibroblast activation protein regulates tumor-associated fibroblasts and epithelial ovarian cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:541–50. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1475.CrossRefPubMed

Koczorowska MM, Tholen S, Bucher F, Lutz L, Kizhakkedathu JN, De Wever O, et al. Fibroblast activation protein-alpha, a stromal cell surface protease, shapes key features of cancer associated fibroblasts through proteome and degradome alterations. Mol Oncol. 2016;10:40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molonc.2015.08.001.CrossRefPubMed

Loktev A, Lindner T, Mier W, Debus J, Altmann A, Jager D, et al. A new method for tumor imaging by targeting cancer associated fibroblasts. J Nucl Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.210435.

Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, et al. Development of quinoline based theranostic ligands for the targeting of fibroblast activation protein. J Nucl Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.210443.

Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Langen KJ, Stoffels G, Filss C, Heinzel A, Stegmayr C, Lohmann P, et al. Imaging of amino acid transport in brain tumours: positron emission tomography with O-(2-[(18)F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET). Methods. 2017;130:124–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.05.019.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Palanichamy K, Chakravarti A. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of methionine uptake and methionine positron emission tomography imaging in gliomas. Front Oncol. 2017;7:257. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00257.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Hoffman RM. L-[methyl-(11)C] Methionine-positron-emission tomography (MET-PET). Methods Mol Biol. 1866;2019:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8796-2_20.CrossRef

13.

Bell C, Dowson N, Puttick S, Gal Y, Thomas P, Fay M, et al. Increasing feasibility and utility of (18)F-FDOPA PET for the management of glioma. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42:788–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.06.001.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fueger BJ, Czernin J, Cloughesy T, Silverman DH, Geist CL, Walter MA, et al. Correlation of 6-18F-fluoro-L-dopa PET uptake with proliferation and tumor grade in newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1532–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.078592.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Busek P, Balaziova E, Matrasova I, Hilser M, Tomas R, Syrucek M, et al. Fibroblast activation protein alpha is expressed by transformed and stromal cells and is associated with mesenchymal features in glioblastoma. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:13961–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-016-5274-9.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Mentlein R, Hattermann K, Hemion C, Jungbluth AA, Held-Feindt J. Expression and role of the cell surface protease seprase/fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAP-alpha) in astroglial tumors. Biol Chem. 2011;392:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2010.119.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Floca R. MatchPoint: on bridging the innovation gap between algorithmic research and clinical use in image registration. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7–12, 2009, Munich, Germany. 2009:1105–8.

18.

Nolden M, Zelzer S, Seitel A, Wald D, Muller M, Franz AM, et al. The medical imaging interaction toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:607–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0840-8.CrossRefPubMed

19.

RCoreTeam. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2017.

20.

Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, Tiberti N, Lisacek F, Sanchez J-C, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:1.CrossRef

21.

Kelly T. Fibroblast activation protein-alpha and dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26): cell-surface proteases that activate cell signaling and are potential targets for cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2005;8:51–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2005.03.002.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, et al. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2016;18:1199–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/now058.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Albert NL, Winkelmann I, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Mille E, et al. Early static (18)F-FET-PET scans have a higher accuracy for glioma grading than the standard 20-40 min scans. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1105–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3276-2.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Jansen NL, Graute V, Armbruster L, Suchorska B, Lutz J, Eigenbrod S, et al. MRI-suspected low-grade glioma: is there a need to perform dynamic FET PET? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:1021–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2109-9.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, Muller HW, et al. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005;128:678–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh399.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Popperl G, Kreth FW, Mehrkens JH, Herms J, Seelos K, Koch W, et al. FET PET for the evaluation of untreated gliomas: correlation of FET uptake and uptake kinetics with tumour grading. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1933–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0534-y.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Rohrich M, Huang K, Schrimpf D, Albert NL, Hielscher T, von Deimling A, et al. Integrated analysis of dynamic FET PET/CT parameters, histology, and methylation profiling of 44 gliomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1573–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4009-0.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Verger A, Stoffels G, Bauer EK, Lohmann P, Blau T, Fink GR, et al. Static and dynamic (18)F-FET PET for the characterization of gliomas defined by IDH and 1p/19q status. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:443–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3846-6.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Di Carlo DT, Duffau H, Cagnazzo F, Benedetto N, Morganti R, Perrini P. IDH wild-type WHO grade II diffuse low-grade gliomas. A heterogeneous family with different outcomes. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Rev. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-018-0996-3.

30.

Reuss DE, Mamatjan Y, Schrimpf D, Capper D, Hovestadt V, Kratz A, et al. IDH mutant diffuse and anaplastic astrocytomas have similar age at presentation and little difference in survival: a grading problem for WHO. Acta Neuropathol. 2015;129:867–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-015-1438-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Pallud J, Capelle L, Taillandier L, Fontaine D, Mandonnet E, Guillevin R, et al. Prognostic significance of imaging contrast enhancement for WHO grade II gliomas. Neuro-Oncology. 2009;11:176–82. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2008-066.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Freyschlag CF, Krieg SM, Kerschbaumer J, Pinggera D, Forster MT, Cordier D, et al. Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging. J Neuro-Oncol. 2018;139:699–711. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-018-2916-3.CrossRef

33.

Gempt J, Bette S, Ryang YM, Buchmann N, Peschke P, Pyka T, et al. 18F-Fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine positron emission tomography for grading and estimation of prognosis in patients with intracranial gliomas. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:955–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.01.022.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Jansen NL, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Eigenbrod S, Schmid-Tannwald C, Zwergal A, et al. Dynamic 18F-FET PET in newly diagnosed astrocytic low-grade glioma identifies high-risk patients. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:198–203. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.113.122333.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Unterrainer M, Schweisthal F, Suchorska B, Wenter V, Schmid-Tannwald C, Fendler WP, et al. Serial 18F-FET PET imaging of primarily 18F-FET-negative glioma: does it make sense? J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1177–82. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.171033.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Imani F, Boada FE, Lieberman FS, Davis DK, Deeb EL, Mountz JM. Comparison of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy with fluorine-18 2-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for assessment of brain tumor progression. J Neuroimaging. 2012;22:184–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2010.00561.x.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Dankbaar JW, Snijders TJ, Robe PA, Seute T, Eppinga W, Hendrikse J, et al. The use of (18)F-FDG PET to differentiate progressive disease from treatment induced necrosis in high grade glioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;125:167–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1883-1.CrossRef

38.

Henze M, Mohammed A, Schlemmer HP, Herfarth KK, Hoffner S, Haufe S, et al. PET and SPECT for detection of tumor progression in irradiated low-grade astrocytoma: a receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:579–86.PubMed

39.

Capper D, Zentgraf H, Balss J, Hartmann C, von Deimling A. Monoclonal antibody specific for IDH1 R132H mutation. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;118:599–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-009-0595-z.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Hamson EJ, Keane FM, Tholen S, Schilling O, Gorrell MD. Understanding fibroblast activation protein (FAP): substrates, activities, expression and targeting for cancer therapy. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2014;8:454–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/prca.201300095.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Aimes RT, Zijlstra A, Hooper JD, Ogbourne SM, Sit ML, Fuchs S, et al. Endothelial cell serine proteases expressed during vascular morphogenesis and angiogenesis. Thromb Haemost. 2003;89:561–72.CrossRef

42.

Clavreul A, Etcheverry A, Chassevent A, Quillien V, Avril T, Jourdan ML, et al. Isolation of a new cell population in the glioblastoma microenvironment. J Neuro-Oncol. 2012;106:493–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-011-0701-7.CrossRef

43.

Clavreul A, Guette C, Faguer R, Tetaud C, Boissard A, Lemaire L, et al. Glioblastoma-associated stromal cells (GASCs) from histologically normal surgical margins have a myofibroblast phenotype and angiogenic properties. J Pathol. 2014;233:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4332.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Trylcova J, Busek P, Smetana K Jr, Balaziova E, Dvorankova B, Mifkova A, et al. Effect of cancer-associated fibroblasts on the migration of glioma cells in vitro. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:5873–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-015-3259-8.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: IDH-wildtype glioblastomas and grade III/IV IDH-mutant gliomas show elevated tracer uptake in fibroblast activation protein–specific PET/CT
verfasst von: Manuel Röhrich
Anastasia Loktev
Annika K. Wefers
Annette Altmann
Daniel Paech
Sebastian Adeberg
Paul Windisch
Thomas Hielscher
Paul Flechsig
Ralf Floca
Dominik Leitz
Julius P. Schuster
Peter E. Huber
Jürgen Debus
Andreas von Deimling
Thomas Lindner
Uwe Haberkorn
Publikationsdatum: 06.08.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 12/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04444-y

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2019

Atypical gouty mediastinal tophus mimicking thymoma on 18F-FDG PET/CT

Cardiac pharmacologic stress: does the gender matters?

Regarding the manuscript entitled “Association of Radioactive Iodine Treatment With Cancer Mortality in Patients With Hyperthyroidism”

Why wait for posterity (or the future) to provide proof to savor the elixir of precision oncology? Read interviews with intellects and dine with the doyens of discovery

Incidental pulmonary embolism detected on workup for Y-90 SIRT

A guide for a brave future for lung ventilation/perfusion tomography: the most important pulmonary nuclear medicine technique