Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 8/2019

31.10.2018 | Original Article

Impact of sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI on the management of patients with prostate cancer suspicious for metastasis: a prospective multicentre study

verfasst von: Mathieu Gauthé, Cyrielle Aveline, Frédéric Lecouvet, Laure Michaud, Caroline Rousseau, Marc Tassart, Olivier Cussenot, Jean-Noël Talbot, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 8/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the impact of 18F-sodium-fluoride (NaF) PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT and diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) on the management of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) suspicious for distant metastasis.

Methods

Prostate cancer patients were prospectively included between December 2011 and August 2014 and benefited from these three whole-body imaging (WBI) modalities within 1 month in addition to the standard PCa workup. Management was prospectively decided by clinicians during two multidisciplinary meetings, before and after the whole-body imaging workup. Rates of induced changes of whole-body imaging modalities were compared by Cochran’s Q test.

Results

One-hundred-one patients (27 at staging, 59 at first biochemical recurrence (BCR) and 15 at first episode of rising serum level of prostate-specific antigen during androgen-deprivation therapy) were included. The overall rate of management changes was 52%: 29% as a consequence of WBI, higher for FCH-PET/CT than for NaF-PET/CT or DW-MRI (p < 0.0001) and highest (41%) for FCH-PET/CT at BCR. Actual management was adequate in all patients but two.

Conclusions

Whole-body imaging induced a change in management in approximately a third of PCa patients suspicious for metastasis. The impact rate was determined to be greatest at first BCR using FCH-PET/CT. NaF-PET/CT and DW-MRI seemed less useful in this context.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat James ND, Spears MR, Clarke NW et al (2015) Survival with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the “docetaxel era”: data from 917 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019). Eur Urol 67:1028–1038CrossRefPubMed James ND, Spears MR, Clarke NW et al (2015) Survival with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer in the “docetaxel era”: data from 917 patients in the control arm of the STAMPEDE trial (MRC PR08, CRUK/06/019). Eur Urol 67:1028–1038CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat von Eyben FE, Kairemo K (2016) Acquisition with 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT for patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Nucl Med 30:385–392CrossRef von Eyben FE, Kairemo K (2016) Acquisition with 11C-choline and 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT for patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Nucl Med 30:385–392CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629PubMed Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71:618–629PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z (2014) Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skelet Radiol 43:1503–1513CrossRef Shen G, Deng H, Hu S, Jia Z (2014) Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Skelet Radiol 43:1503–1513CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L et al (2014) Impact of 18F-fluoride PET in patients with known prostate cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med 55:574–581CrossRefPubMed Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L et al (2014) Impact of 18F-fluoride PET in patients with known prostate cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med 55:574–581CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5 T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol 55:59–67CrossRefPubMed Jambor I, Kuisma A, Ramadan S et al (2016) Prospective evaluation of planar bone scintigraphy, SPECT, SPECT/CT, 18F-NaF PET/CT and whole body 1.5 T MRI, including DWI, for the detection of bone metastases in high risk breast and prostate cancer patients: SKELETA clinical trial. Acta Oncol 55:59–67CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tateishi U, Morita S, Taguri M et al (2010) A meta-analysis of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography for assessment of metastatic bone tumor. Ann Nucl Med 24:523–531CrossRefPubMed Tateishi U, Morita S, Taguri M et al (2010) A meta-analysis of (18)F-fluoride positron emission tomography for assessment of metastatic bone tumor. Ann Nucl Med 24:523–531CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mosavi F, Johansson S, Sandberg DT et al (2012) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with 18F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 199:1114–1120CrossRef Mosavi F, Johansson S, Sandberg DT et al (2012) Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with 18F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 199:1114–1120CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Barchetti F, Stagnitti A, Megna V et al (2016) Unenhanced whole-body MRI versus PET-CT for the detection of prostate cancer metastases after primary treatment. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:3770–3776PubMed Barchetti F, Stagnitti A, Megna V et al (2016) Unenhanced whole-body MRI versus PET-CT for the detection of prostate cancer metastases after primary treatment. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 20:3770–3776PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P et al (2008) Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1766–1774CrossRefPubMed Beheshti M, Vali R, Waldenberger P et al (2008) Detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer by 18F fluorocholine and 18F fluoride PET-CT: a comparative study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 35:1766–1774CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Langsteger W, Balogova S, Huchet V et al (2011) Fluorocholine (18F) and sodium fluoride (18F) PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: prospective comparison of diagnostic performance determined by masked reading. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 55:448–457PubMed Langsteger W, Balogova S, Huchet V et al (2011) Fluorocholine (18F) and sodium fluoride (18F) PET/CT in the detection of prostate cancer: prospective comparison of diagnostic performance determined by masked reading. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 55:448–457PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR et al (2004) Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol 172:S42–S46 (discussion S46–S47) D’Amico AV, Moul J, Carroll PR et al (2004) Prostate specific antigen doubling time as a surrogate end point for prostate cancer specific mortality following radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. J Urol 172:S42–S46 (discussion S46–S47)
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Romesser PB et al (2015) The natural history and predictors of outcome following biochemical relapse in the dose escalation era for prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive external beam radiotherapy. Eur Urol 67:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed Zumsteg ZS, Spratt DE, Romesser PB et al (2015) The natural history and predictors of outcome following biochemical relapse in the dose escalation era for prostate cancer patients undergoing definitive external beam radiotherapy. Eur Urol 67:1009–1016CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ et al (2008) Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 299:2760–2769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trock BJ, Han M, Freedland SJ et al (2008) Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 299:2760–2769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 71:630–642CrossRefPubMed Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol 71:630–642CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodolic M, Michaud L, Huchet V et al (2014) Consequence of the introduction of routine FCH PET/CT imaging for patients with prostate cancer: a dual centre survey. Radiol Oncol 48:20–28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hodolic M, Michaud L, Huchet V et al (2014) Consequence of the introduction of routine FCH PET/CT imaging for patients with prostate cancer: a dual centre survey. Radiol Oncol 48:20–28CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjölhede H, Ahlgren G, Almquist H et al (2012) Combined 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1501–1506CrossRefPubMed Kjölhede H, Ahlgren G, Almquist H et al (2012) Combined 18F-fluorocholine and 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for staging of high-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 110:1501–1506CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Soyka JD, Muster MA, Schmid DT et al (2012) Clinical impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:936–943CrossRefPubMed Soyka JD, Muster MA, Schmid DT et al (2012) Clinical impact of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 39:936–943CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillebert Q, Huchet V, Rousseau C et al (2018) 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with occult biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: detection rate, impact on management and adequacy of impact. A prospective multicentre study. PLoS One 13:e0191487CrossRefPubMed Gillebert Q, Huchet V, Rousseau C et al (2018) 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with occult biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: detection rate, impact on management and adequacy of impact. A prospective multicentre study. PLoS One 13:e0191487CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Ceci F, Herrmann K, Castellucci P et al (2014) Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:2222–2231CrossRefPubMed Ceci F, Herrmann K, Castellucci P et al (2014) Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:2222–2231CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lecouvet FE, Simon M, Tombal B et al (2010) Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) versus axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) to detect and measure bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa). Eur Radiol 20:2973–2982CrossRefPubMed Lecouvet FE, Simon M, Tombal B et al (2010) Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) versus axial skeleton MRI (AS-MRI) to detect and measure bone metastases in prostate cancer (PCa). Eur Radiol 20:2973–2982CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A et al (2014) Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:11–20CrossRefPubMed Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A et al (2014) Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41:11–20CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ et al (2015) Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients who have rising PSA after curative treatment and are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med 56:1185–1190CrossRefPubMed Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ et al (2015) Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients who have rising PSA after curative treatment and are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med 56:1185–1190CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gauthé M, Belissant O, Girard A et al (2017) TEP/TDM et récidive biologique d’adénocarcinome prostatique: apport du 68Ga-PSMA-11 lorsque la 18F-fluorocholine n’est pas contributive. Prog En Urol 27:474–481CrossRef Gauthé M, Belissant O, Girard A et al (2017) TEP/TDM et récidive biologique d’adénocarcinome prostatique: apport du 68Ga-PSMA-11 lorsque la 18F-fluorocholine n’est pas contributive. Prog En Urol 27:474–481CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Impact of sodium 18F-fluoride PET/CT, 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT and whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI on the management of patients with prostate cancer suspicious for metastasis: a prospective multicentre study
verfasst von
Mathieu Gauthé
Cyrielle Aveline
Frédéric Lecouvet
Laure Michaud
Caroline Rousseau
Marc Tassart
Olivier Cussenot
Jean-Noël Talbot
Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
Publikationsdatum
31.10.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2547-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2019

World Journal of Urology 8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.