Improved knowledge and reported practice regarding sexually transmitted infections among healthcare providers in rural Vietnam: a cluster randomised controlled educational intervention
verfasst von:
Pham Thi Lan, Ho Dang Phuc, Nguyen Quynh Hoa, Nguyen Thi Kim Chuc, Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Healthcare providers (HCPs) play a critical role in controlling the spread of sexually transmitted infections (STI) through early and accurate diagnosis, appropriate treatment and prevention counselling. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of an educational intervention about STI on knowledge and reported practice among HCPs and to explore which determinants may influence the intervention’s effects.
Methods
A cluster randomized controlled educational intervention was carried out in a rural district, Vietnam. 32 communes of the district were randomized into two arms, with 160 HCPs in an STI intervention arm and 144 in a control arm. The STI intervention comprised interactive training with basic STI knowledge, case scenarios, and poster distribution. Questionnaires to evaluate knowledge and reported practice were completed three times: before, during and after the intervention. Correct answer was scored as 1; “do not know”, incorrect answer was scored as 0. Univariate and multilevel multivariate analyses were applied.
Results
Of the maximum 56 points, the mean knowledge score increased significantly in the STI intervention arm and in the control arm post-intervention (37.2 to 48.4, and 32.7 to 41.7, respectively). In multivariate regression analysis, knowledge improvement in the intervention arm was significantly higher than that in the control arm (regression coefficient = 2.97, p = 0.008). Other factors which positively influenced the increase in knowledge were being between 35 and 50 years old, having intermediate professional training, being a pharmacist or working at a village level (regression coefficient: 2.81, 4.43, 5.53 and 7.91, respectively). Post-intervention, the mean reported practice score increased significantly in the STI intervention arm (from 17.6 to 21.8) and insignificantly in the control arm (maximum 36 points). Factors which positively influenced the increase in reported practice were being between 35 and 50 years old, having intermediate professional training, or working at a pharmacy/drugstore (regression coefficient: 2.15, 3.33 and 3.22, respectively).
Conclusions
This study indicates that an educational intervention including interactive training and multi-faceted interventions may be effective in improving STI knowledge and reported practice of HCPs at grassroots level, particularly among pharmacists, HCPs who work in villages or pharmacies/drugstores, and who initially have low STI knowledge.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-014-0646-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CSL designed the study, contributed to the data analyses and writing. PTL contributed to study design, supervised the data collection, performed training, data analysis, and main writing. HDP contributed to the study design and data collection, facilitation of the training sessions, statistical analyses and writing. NQH contributed to the study design and data collection. NTKC supported in the data collection. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results, read and approved the final manuscript.
Background
Sexually transmitted infections (STI) have a negative impact on the health, economy and quality-of-life of individuals, as well as whole communities. The World Health Organization estimates that there are 499 million new cases of the four most common curable STI (trichomonasis, chlamydial infection, gonorrhea and syphilis) each year worldwide [1]. Furthermore, millions of viral STI cases also occur annually, and are attributable mainly to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), herpes, human papilloma virus and hepatitis B [2]. Improved case management of STI has been scientifically proven to reduce the incidence of HIV infection in the general population [3],[4]. In low-income countries, STI management is usually inadequate [5]-[7] and STI control programmes often fail for various reasons [8]. It has been shown that healthcare providers (HCPs) play an important role in reducing the burden of STI through effective prevention and management [9]. In addition, studies have shown positive impact of continuing medical education or educational interventions on improvement of HCPs’ knowledge and/or practices [10],[11], STI management [12],[13] and patient outcomes [14].
In Vietnam, curable STI are common among high-risk groups [15],[16] and not uncommon in the general population [17]. Misconceptions and low knowledge on STI among people in the community [18],[19] and HCPs [20], delays in women living in rural areas from seeking care for STI [21], and negative attitudes among HCPs towards STI patients [18], have been shown. Furthermore, previous studies demonstrate that people with STI may seek healthcare from different sources [18] and that HCPs at different levels have very low knowledge and inadequate practice regarding STI, and rarely participate in STI training [20]. Data on the effects of educational interventions regarding STI are limited. The present study was a continuation of the other studies conducted in the same setting [18]-[20]. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether this type of intervention could improve HCPs’ knowledge and reported practice regarding STI in rural Vietnam, and to examine which determinants may possibly impact the intervention’s effectiveness. The ultimate goal was to promote good STI care at grassroots level.
Anzeige
Methods
Study setting and participants
This study was a part of a cluster randomised controlled educational intervention conducted in Bavi district, Hanoi, Vietnam in 2010 and 2011. Bavi is a rural district, 60 km west of Hanoi. It covers 410 km2 and has a population of approximately 235,000 people within 32 communes. The healthcare system in Bavi district includes one district hospital with 150 beds, three regional polyclinics, 32 commune health centres, village health workers, private facilities and pharmacies/drugstores.
The study participants included medical personnel (medical doctors, assistant medical doctors, nurses and midwives) and pharmacy personnel (pharmacists and drugstore workers) working in public and private facilities in the 32 communes of Bavi district, Hanoi.
Intervention
A cluster randomised, controlled trial, with randomisation at commune level, was conducted to examine the effect of a multi-faceted educational intervention on knowledge and reported practice regarding STI and acute respiratory infections (ARI) among HCPs. The 32 communes of Bavi district were randomized into two arms (16 communes per arm), an STI intervention arm and an ARI intervention arm. All HCPs working in the communes were invited to participate. Each arm got active intervention for one topic and functioned as control arm for the other topic (Figure 1). Changes in STI knowledge and reported practice among HCPs from before to after the intervention were assessed through a self-completed questionnaire.
Figure 1
Flow chart of the study.
×
In the STI intervention arm, three activities were performed sequentially from September 2010 to March 2011, including: (i) training session on STI knowledge, (ii) training session on STI case scenario management of four syndromes (see below) based on national guidelines, and (iii) poster distribution to all healthcare facilities in the communes included. In each training session, 25–30 HCPs participated and were divided into four small groups (approximately 5–7 HCPs per group) to discuss different issues related to STI assisted by a trainer (PTL) and facilitator (HDP). Afterwards, each small group presented their group work results, which were then discussed with the entire group. Finally, the trainer gave correct information and a lecture on the topics discussed. For the first training, the issues discussed focussed on STI knowledge, i.e. diseases considered as STI, suspected symptoms, routes of transmission, causes and risk factors, complications, and partner treatment and notification. In the second training, the trainer briefly mentioned the contents of the first training and then divided the HCPs into four small groups to discuss case scenarios of four common STI syndromes including vaginal discharge, urethral discharge, genital ulcers and lower abdominal pain syndromes. The sessions were evaluated using evaluation forms.
Anzeige
Intervention messages used for this study were developed and reviewed by a group of researchers based on the national guidelines. Intervention activities were piloted in two districts outside the study setting. A poster was designed and reviewed by the authors. It comprised short specific messages focusing on STI causes, risk behaviours and complications.
Questionnaire
The questionnaire included an STI part and an ARI part with the same questions for two arms. However, for the STI intervention arm, the STI part was presented just after questions on HCPs’ characteristics and for the ARI arm, an alternative version of the questionnaire was constructed with the ARI section first, followed by the STI part.
The STI section of the questionnaire was a modified version of questionnaire from a previous study in the same setting [20]. It mainly contained closed and a few open-ended questions on STI knowledge (such as identification of the diseases, suspected symptoms, routes of transmission, causes and risk factors, complications, and partner treatment and notification) and four case scenarios one each for the four syndromes mentioned above.
Data collection and ethics
The questionnaire was distributed to HCPs just before the first and second training sessions, and one month after poster distribution. The questionnaire was self-completed under the supervision of the research team. No discussion or aid was allowed. All respondents were assured that they could respond anonymously, and that the results would only be used for research purposes. Verbal consent was sought from the respondents before distribution of the questionnaire. The study was approved by the Hanoi Medical University, Vietnam.
Data entry and analyses
ACCESS software was used for data entry, and SPSS version 16 and STATA version 11 for analyses. Proportions, mean, median, minimum and maximum were used for the descriptive analyses. Overall STI knowledge and reported practice was evaluated by scoring. Every correct answer was scored as 1. “Do not know”, incorrect answers or missing responses were given a score of 0. The maximum score one could obtain in the knowledge and reported practice sections of the questionnaire were 56 and 36, respectively. Knowledge and practice improvements were defined by differences of scores after and before the intervention.
Chi-square test was performed to examine the differences between proportions. Cochran test was used for several relative binary samples to verify the proportion trend of correct answers before, during, and after the intervention. Wilcoxon test was used for univariate comparisons of providers’ knowledge and reported practice before and after the intervention. Mann–Whitney test was used to compare knowledge and practice improvements between the STI intervention and control arm. Moreover, multi-level regression analysis was applied to determine which factors influenced the improvements. Intra-cluster correlation (ICC) was used to evaluate the similarity of HCPs within communes regarding STI knowledge and/or practice improvement. Regression coefficients and p-values in T- test, Cochran, Wilcoxon, and Mann–Whitney tests were adjusted for ICC [22].
Results
Of 415 eligible HCPs, 304 participated in the study, including 160 in the STI intervention arm and 144 in the control arm. The respondents’ mean age was 41.1 years (range 22–69). Most HCPs (89%) had 2–3 years or 6–12 months professional education, and 63% worked at commune health centres. In general, there were no significant differences in socio-demographic characteristics between the HCPs in the STI intervention arm and control arm (p > 0.05). The respondents’ characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Socio-demographic characteristics of 304 healthcare providers in the STI intervention arm and control arm
Category
Intervention arm
Control arm
Total
p-value
% (n = 160)
% (n = 144)
% (n = 304)
Age (years)
<35
34
33
34
0.943
35–50
39
41
40
>50
26
26
26
Sex
Male
35
33
34
0.664
Female
65
67
66
Occupation
MD/AMDa
59
51
55
0.479
Pharmacistb
24
29
27
Nurse/midwife
16
20
18
Working places
Commune health centre
68
57
63
0.084
Village level
8
18
12
Private clinic
5
6
6
Pharmacy/drugstore
19
19
19
Professional education
Lower professional training (6–12 months)
12
22
16
0.073
Intermediate professional training (2–3 yrs)
77
67
72
University/post-graduate
11
11
11
aMD: Medical doctor (15 respondents); AMD: assistant medical doctor (70 respondents).
In general, for almost all questions on STI knowledge, the proportion of correct answers increased significantly in both arms, although HCPs from the STI intervention arm showed a greater increase than their colleagues in the control arm. Gonorrhoea and syphilis were classified as STI by more than 90% of respondents in the two arms both before and after the intervention (Table 2). Less than two thirds of the HCPs in both arms classified trichomonas, genital warts and chlamydia as STI pre-intervention; post-intervention this increased significantly. Compared to before the intervention, the percentage of respondents who classified pubic lice as an STI post-intervention increased significantly in both the STI intervention and the control arm (from 26% to 79% and from 15% to 40%, respectively; p < 0.05). Before the intervention, 70% and 54% of HCPs in the intervention arm classified candidiasis and bacterial vaginosis (BV) as STI, and these were 58% and 37%, in the control arm respectively. After the intervention, a significant improvement to what was observed for candidiasis but not BV in the intervention arm. Conversely, in the control arm, more HCPs classified candidiasis and BV as STI (71% and 59% respectively; p < 0.05) (data not shown).
Table 2
Responses to the questions on STI knowledge among 304 healthcare providers of the two arms before (B), during (D) and after (A) the intervention
Correct identification
STI intervention arm
Control arm
% (n = 160)
% (n = 144)
B
D
A
p *
B
D
A
p *
STI identification
Gonorrhoea
94
98
99
0.119
93
98
99
0.040
Syphilis
93
96
97
0.312
92
94
99
0.033
Trichomonas
55
70
89
0.000
51
58
69
0.007
Genital warts
66
83
93
0.000
63
66
80
0.005
Chlamydia
40
55
77
0.000
36
49
50
0.019
Suspected symptoms
Vaginal discharge
70
91
96
0.000
60
72
81
0.001
Urethral discharge
75
92
98
0.000
72
78
90
0.001
Genital ulcers, warts
91
95
99
0.027
83
90
92
0.158
Lower abdominal pain in females
52
65
84
0.000
35
53
62
0.000
Causes of STI
Bacteria
69
79
75
0.226
60
77
84
0.000
Viruses
76
74
85
0.106
65
72
88
0.000
Parasites/protozoa
43
60
77
0.000
43
53
56
0.088
Risk factors for STI
Unsafe sex
91
93
100
0.005
87
91
97
0.010
Unsafe blood transfusion
40
61
75
0.000
29
38
51
0.000
Routes of transmission
Sexual intercourse
97
93
99
0.106
97
100
100
0.121
Blood transfusion/ needle sharing
51
71
81
0.000
44
58
60
0.016
Mother-to-child
64
83
93
0.000
56
56
76
0.000
Necessity of partner examination/treatment
Gonorrhoea
96
97
99
0.310
95
97
100
0.047
Syphilis
96
96
99
0.284
93
96
99
0.028
Trichomonas
62
77
86
0.000
63
63
65
0.887
Genital warts
82
86
96
0.017
77
69
76
0.231
Chlamydia
50
64
78
0.000
47
46
54
0.292
Complications of STI if untreated
Infertility
96
95
99
0.333
88
95
94
0.052
Ectopic pregnancy/cervical cancer
81
92
93
0.022
65
85
87
0.000
Adverse pregnancy outcome
85
92
98
0.004
71
90
95
0.000
Pelvic inflammation
52
65
79
0.000
36
50
49
0.017
Ways of STI prevention
Save sex including condom use
98
99
98
0.822
94
98
100
0.009
Being faithful**
93
96
97
0.186
81
90
97
0.000
*Cochran test for verifying the proportion trend of correct answers before, during and after the intervention, with p-value adjusted for ICC.
**Maintaining sexual loyalty to one's spouse or lover.
Anzeige
Concerning knowledge about partner notification for patients who suffered from trichomonas, genital warts or chlamydia, Table 2 shows significant improvements among HCPs in the intervention arm but not the control arm. Furthermore, pre-intervention, 71% and 81% of the HCPs in the STI intervention arm answered the necessity of partner notification and treatment for BV and candidiasis, and these were significantly reduced post-intervention (57% and 69%). In contrast, no significant differences knowledge on partner treatment for these two infections were observed in the control arm (data not shown).
Regarding risk factors, there was a decreased number of HCPs in the intervention arm who answered that a risk factor for STI was bad hygiene (62% before, 45% after; p < 0.05), while the number of providers who answered that having sex during menstruation posed a risk was almost unchanged (55% before, 58% after; p > 0.05). In contrast, more HCPs in the control arm responded that bad hygiene (66% before, 69% after; p > 0.05), or having sex during menstruation (37% before, 56% after; p < 0.05) were risk factors (data not shown).
Table 3 shows the improvement of STI knowledge in the two arms. Overall, after the intervention, the mean knowledge scores of most of the HCPs in both arms increased significantly (p < 0.05) and HCPs in the STI intervention arm presented higher mean knowledge scores than their colleagues in the control arm. The total mean knowledge score of the respondents in the STI intervention arm pre-intervention was 37.2 (range 12–53; median 38), and 48.4 post-intervention (range 19–56; median 50); for the control group it was 32.7 (range 0–53; median 33) and 41.7 (range 13–56; median 44), respectively. The improvement observed in both arms was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The proportion of HCPs that had positive knowledge improvement was 91% in the STI intervention arm and 80% in the control arm (p = 0.004). The ICCs of knowledge improvement among HCPs within communes were 0.21 in the STI intervention arm and 0.16 in the control arm.
Table 3
Univariate comparison of knowledge improvement between the STI intervention arm and control arm
STI intervention arm
Control arm
Mean score (n = 160)
Mean score (n = 144)
Category
Before
After
p *
Difference
Before
After
p *
Difference
p **
Sex
Male
37.4
48.7
0.000
11.3
33.0
41.1
0.000
8.0
0.261
Female
37.2
48.2
0.000
11.1
32.51
42.0
0.000
9.5
0.212
Age (years)
<35
37.4
48.5
0.000
11.0
34.0
42.1
0.000
8.1
0.223
35-50
35.6
48.5
0.000
12.9
34.0
43.3
0.000
9.4
0.107
>50
39.5
48.2
0.000
8.7
29.1
38.7
0.000
9.6
0.694
Profesional education
Lower training (6–12 months)
32.5
43.8
0.002
11.3
23.7
36.0
0.000
12.3
0.897
Intermediate training (2–3 yrs)
37.3
48.8
0.000
11.5
34.9
43.8
0.000
8.8
0.029
University/post-graduate
41.8
50.3
0.001
8.6
36.4
40.3
0.044
3.9
0.261
Occupation
MD/AMDa
38.8
48.5
0.000
9.7
37.4
43.6
0.000
6.2
0.034
Pharmacist
37.4
48.0
0.000
10.6
28.0
37.7
0.000
9.7
0.638
Nurse/midwife
33.3
48.3
0.000
15.0
30.7
42.6
0.000
11.9
0.317
Working places
Commune health centre
38.9
48.7
0.000
9.8
37.0
44.1
0.000
7.2
0.082
Village level
29.6
46.2
0.001
16.5
21.7
38.0
0.000
16.3
0.987
Private clinic
41.4
51.1
0.012
9.8
21.8
27.6
0.091
5.9
0.154
Pharmacy/drugstore
33.5
47.9
0.000
14.4
32.0
41.7
0.000
9.7
0.154
Total scores
Mean
37.2
48.4
0.000
11.2
32.7
41.7
0.000
9.0
0.207
Median
38
50
0.000
11
33
44
0.000
8
0.142
Minimum
12
19
−14
0
13
−10
Maximum
53
56
40
53
56
46
* Wilcoxon test (T-test for mean of total scores) to compare related samples (before and after intervention) of each arm, with p-value adjusted for ICC.
**Mann–Whitney test (T-test for mean of total scores) to compare knowledge scores differences (after - before) between the intervention and the control arms, with p-value adjusted for ICC.
aMD: Medical doctor AMD: assistant medical doctor.
When comparing by HCPs’ characteristics between the STI intervention and control arms, a significantly higher improvement in knowledge scores was observed in the STI intervention arm among HCPs who had intermediate professional training, and medical doctors or assistant medical doctors (p < 0.05).
Anzeige
Intervention and STI reported practice
In general, after the intervention, the reported practice scores of most of HCPs in both arms increased significantly (p < 0.05) and HCPs in the STI intervention arm presented higher scores than their colleagues in the control arm. Average reported practice score of the respondents in the STI intervention arm before the intervention was 17.6 (range 1–28, median 18), and after the intervention 21.8 (range 0–34; median 23); for the control arm it was 14.8 (range 1–26; median 16) and 18.5 (range 3–33; median 19), respectively. The improvement observed in both arms was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The difference in average scores before and after the intervention (after - before) in the STI intervention arm and control arm was 4.3 and 3.6, respectively, but this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The proportion of HCPs that had positive practice improvement was 72% in the STI intervention arm and 65% in the control arm (p = 0.349). The ICCs of practice improvement among HCPs within communes were for 0.20 in the STI intervention arm and 0.07 in the control arm.
When comparing the differences in the mean scores after and before the intervention between the two arms by each category of participants (Table 4), the results showed significantly higher improvement in the STI intervention arm, only among HCPs with intermediate professional training.
Table 4
Univariate comparison of practice improvement between the STI intervention arm and control arm
STI intervention arm
Control arm
Mean score (n = 160)
Mean score (n = 144)
Category
Before
After
p *
Difference
Before
After
p *
Difference
p **
Sex
Male
18.9
21.9
0.003
2.9
14.6
18.4
0.000
3.8
0. 857
Female
16.8
21.8
0.001
5.0
14.9
18.5
0.000
3.6
0.228
Age (years)
<35
16.9
22.0
0.001
5.2
14.8
18.5
0.002
3.6
0.442
35-50
16.9
22.4
0.000
5.5
16.3
19.8
0.001
3.4
0.052
>50
19.4
20.7
0.149
1.3
12.5
16.5
0.004
4.0
0.291
Education
Lower training (6–12 months)
16.0
16.2
0.892
0.2
13.5
16.6
0.002
3.2
0.358
Intermediate training (2–3 yrs)
17.5
22.6
0.000
5.2
15.3
19.1
0.000
3.8
0.047
University/post-graduate
19.6
22.2
0.159
2.6
14.6
18.3
0.008
3.8
0.767
Occupation
MD/AMDa
18.2
22.3
0.000
4.1
15.7
19.6
0.000
3.9
0.494
Nurse/midwife
17.8
21.1
0.079
3.3
13.8
17.0
0.018
3.3
0.936
Pharmacist
15.7
21.1
0.014
5.3
14.4
18.1
0.000
3.7
0.279
Working places
Commune health centre
18.2
22.2
0.001
4.0
16.0
19.6
0.001
3.6
0.386
Village level
18.1
18.7
0.503
0.6
13.6
17.6
0.002
3.9
0.184
Private clinic
18.0
22.0
0.024
4.0
11.3
13.0
0.445
1.8
0.173
Pharmacy/drugstore
14.8
21.7
0.002
6.8
13.6
18.2
0.001
4.6
0.173
Total scores
Mean
17.6
21.8
0.000
4.3
14.8
18.5
0.000
3.6
0.581
Median
18
23
0.000
4
16
19
0.000
3
0.388
Minimum
1
0
−21
1
3
−12
Maximum
28
34
29
26
33
22
*Wilcoxon test (T-test for mean of total scores) to compare related samples (before and after intervention) of each arm, with p-value adjusted for ICC.
**Mann–Whitney test (T-test for mean of total scores) to compare practice scores differences (after - before) between the STI intervention and the control arm, with p-value adjusted for ICC.
aMD: Medical doctor; AMD: assistant medical doctor.
Factors influencing the interventions’ effects
Table 5 presents the improvement of HCPs’ STI knowledge and reported practice using multi-level multivariate regression analysis. The improvement of both STI knowledge and reported practice was not significant in reference categories (regression constants were 0.78 and −0.99; p > 0.05). However, being aged between 35 and 50 years, having intermediate professional training, being a pharmacist, working at village level, or being part of the STI intervention arm, were significant determinants which added 2.81, 4.43, 5.53, 7.91, or 2.97 points, respectively (p < 0.05) to the improvement of HCPs’ STI knowledge.
Table 5
Knowledge and practice improvement in multi-level multivariate regression analysis
Knowledge improvement
Practice improvement
Regression coefficient *
p-value
Regression coefficient *
p-value
Participation in the STI intervention
No
0
Reference
0
Reference
Yes
2.97
0.008
0.33
0.688
Age (years)
<35
0.35
0.795
2.00
0.075
35-50
2.81
0.028
2.15
0.042
>50
0
Reference
0
Reference
Professional education
Lower training (6–12 months)
0
Reference
0
Reference
Intermediate training (2–3 yrs)
4.43
0.006
3.33
0.014
University/Postgraduate
1.72
0.424
2.26
0.207
Occupation
MD/AMDa
0
Reference
0
Reference
Nurse/midwife
1.60
0.263
−0.36
0.756
Pharmacist
5.53
0.001
−0.73
0.580
Working places
Commune health centrer
0
Reference
0
Reference
Village level
7.91
0.000
1.65
0.299
Private clinic
2.22
0.347
0.96
0.620
Pharmacy/drugstore
0.73
0.671
3.22
0.024
Constant
0.78
0.718
−0.99
0.573
*Regression coefficients were adjusted for intra-cluster correlations.
aMD: Medical doctor; AMD: assistant medical doctor.
Concerning HCPs’ reported practice, being aged between 35 and 50 years, having intermediate professional training, or working at a pharmacy/drugstore, were significant determinants which added 2.15, 3.33, or 3.22 points (p < 0.05).
Anzeige
Discussion
In this study we found that HCPs who received an educational intervention on STI were more likely to have improved STI knowledge and reported practice than those in the control arm, though a significant different in reported practice was not found in multivariate analysis. The study also identified several determinants influencing the interventions’ effectiveness.
Our results showed that the number of correct answers increased after each educational activity, both in the intervention as well as the control arm, and that the majority of the improvements were statistically significant. This improvement could be due to the impact of the intervention because HCPs in the intervention arm showed a greater increase than their colleagues in the control arm. Moreover, for issues where we considered initial knowledge low, such as STI identification and partner treatment for pubic lice, genital herpes/warts, and chlamydia, improved much more among HCPs in STI intervention arm as compared to that of the control arm. On the other hand, misconceptions on the definition of STI and partner treatment for BV and candidiasis, and risk factors of STI, decreased among HCPs in the STI intervention arm, and increased in the control arm.
Surprisingly, more than 60% of the HCPs in both arms considered partner treatment necessary for BV and candidiasis, and also, more than half believed that bad hygiene or sex during menses were risk factors for STI. After the intervention, the misconceptions were reduced but remained common. Previous studies conducted in the same setting, also show these misconceptions among HCPs [20], as well as among people in the community [18],[19]. After several years, these misconceptions have remained mostly unchanged, though HCPs’ knowledge in the present study was better as compared to the earlier study [20]. This implies the need to provide educational activities that focus not only on knowledge, but also misconceptions.
The ICCs in the STI intervention arm can be considered high, which indicates high similarities of the HCPs within communes regarding the improvements of both knowledge and practice. This may be due to discussions on STI among trained HCPs within communes after each educational activity. Lower values of ICCs in the control arm might indicate less emphasising STI discussions among HCPs within communes, especially issues related to written case scenarios (reported practice).
We considered that the intervention activities might provide impacts on knowledge and practice improvement. The impacts could be produced by: i) training/education activities, ii) repeated filling of the questionnaires, and iii) possible discussions among HCPs on the related topic. Multi-level multivariate regression analysis showed significant impact of several factors, including being part of the STI intervention, age, professional education, occupation or working place, on knowledge improvement. Among these factors, being part of the STI intervention contributed 3 points to knowledge improvement.
Randomised controlled studies have shown positive effects of educational interventions on improving HCPs’ practice [23] or self-efficacy to perform a certain task [24],[25] especially when taking multi-component interventions into account, including a simulated client method [26],[27]. Our study did not show significant direct impacts of the STI intervention on HCPs’ reported practice, as shown elsewhere [28]. However, our study did show that, indirect impacts of the intervention on practice improvement were significant in specific groups based on, age, professional education, and working place.
Notably, in the multivariate analysis models, our results showed significant knowledge improvement among pharmacists and reported practice, among those who worked at pharmacies/drugstores. Studies have also shown that educational interventions improve pharmacy workers’ practice [26],[29], syndromic management of STI at pharmacies [30], and cost-effectiveness of syndromic management of STI though pharmacist training [31]. Studies in Vietnam and elsewhere show that STI patients usually go to pharmacies/drugstores for treatment or advice [18],[32]-[34] because of the lower costs, higher accessibility [18],[34] and less stigmatisation [18]. Moreover, the majority of pharmacies treat STI patients [35] therefore training of pharmacy workers can improve antimicrobial prescribing practices for STI syndrome management in Vietnam [36]. Thus improving knowledge and practice for pharmacists/drug sellers may play an important role in STI control and prevention strategies, and it cannot be ignored.
Methodological considerations
A consensus about the types of situations in which the contamination of educational interventions is more or less likely has been shown [37], and cluster randomisation may reduce contamination [38]. However, in our study, prevention of contamination could not be entirely assured due to the fact that HCPs in different communes could meet each other on various occasions where they might have exchanged information, including issues related to STI. Therefore, the improvement in the control group could partially have been a consequence of contamination. Subsequently, the impact of the STI intervention might actually be higher than presented in our results. Further, reported practice of HCPs might not reflect their actual practice due to lack of information provided in the scenarios, which might cause biases in the evaluation of practice improvement.
A point which might be raised here is that, asking questions repetitively can automatically result in improvements. Possibly, completing the questionnaire three times made the HCPs familiar with the questions asked, which made their responses easier the subsequent times. It could also be assumed that filling in the questionnaire several times is an intervention in itself. Moreover, possible discussions about STI among HCPs in both arms after each training session could be a potential influencing factor.
The randomised design can be considered the best protection against confounding and selection bias [39]. By choosing a randomised controlled design, the intention of producing comparable groups of HCPs who differ only in terms of their exposure to intervention during the study was assured, and several potential confounders or biases, such as geographical location, HCPs’ professional education and occupation, could be removed. However, due to the fact that the study was carried out in a rural district of Vietnam, the results of this study may be considered to be representative for only HCPs working at similar grassroots healthcare settings.
We found that the initial proportions of correct answers and mean knowledge scores in the intervention arm were higher as compared to those in the control arm. This could be due to the difference in the order of questions related to STI and ARI within the questionnaires used for each arm. Moreover, HCPs may have placed more attention on the topic they were trained in. Consequently, they could have correctly answered more questions related to the main topic of the arm in which they participated. However, the above mentioned effects did not influence our results since the improvements were calculated as the differences between pre- and post- intervention scores.
We also analysed the impact of each educational activity on STI knowledge and reported practice and found that, the differences of STI knowledge before and after the first training, as well as the second training, were not significant (results not shown). However, knowledge improvement in the whole intervention process was significant. While, practice training was given only once in our study, which might possibly have influenced the impact of the STI intervention on practice improvement. Hence, multi-faceted interventions have been shown to be effective in particular environments [26],[36]. We used an interactive training method for each training session, which is not commonly applied in our educational system, as well as training in the field. This method is considered to motivate active learning from participants and provide better training effects, and can result in moderately large changes in practice, while didactic lectures alone are unlikely to affect change [40].
Conclusion
This study shows the effectiveness of an educational intervention on STI knowledge of HCPs at grassroots level, especially for pharmacists, HCPs who worked in villages, and who initially had low STI knowledge. Our study does not show the significant effect of intervention on practice overall, however the significant effect was observed among pharmacy/drugstore workers. Interactive training and multi-faceted educational interventions may give better and more sustainable improvements, and the education curriculum should not only focus on providing correct knowledge but also address misconceptions.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank all the healthcare providers from the 32 communes of Bavi district for their participation. Special thanks to Dr Nguyen Phuong Hoa (lecturer at Hanoi Medical University) and FilaBavi’s staff for their assistance during the study period. The study was funded by ASIA Link, Swedish Research Council, Sweden. Ho Dang Phuc (co-author) was partially funded by Nafosted, Vietnam.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
CSL designed the study, contributed to the data analyses and writing. PTL contributed to study design, supervised the data collection, performed training, data analysis, and main writing. HDP contributed to the study design and data collection, facilitation of the training sessions, statistical analyses and writing. NQH contributed to the study design and data collection. NTKC supported in the data collection. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results, read and approved the final manuscript.
Improved knowledge and reported practice regarding sexually transmitted infections among healthcare providers in rural Vietnam: a cluster randomised controlled educational intervention
verfasst von
Pham Thi Lan Ho Dang Phuc Nguyen Quynh Hoa Nguyen Thi Kim Chuc Cecilia Stålsby Lundborg
Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren.
Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.
Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.
Ob die Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern bei Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz die Komplikationsraten senkt, scheint davon abzuhängen, ob die Auswurfleistung erhalten ist oder nicht. Das legen die Ergebnisse einer Metaanalyse nahe.
Update Innere Medizin
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.
