Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health 6/2017

06.06.2017 | Original Paper

Improving STD Screening Rates on a University Campus

verfasst von: Amanda Myers, Sherrie P. McCaskill, Kathryn VanRavenstein

Erschienen in: Journal of Community Health | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Gonorrhea and chlamydia infections have a high incidence among young adults. To increase screening rates among individuals aged 25 years of age and younger on a university campus, this quality improvement project was implemented to improve providers’ knowledge of CDC guidelines through education. Education was provided to providers and staff members at a health clinic on a private residential university campus through informational sessions to increase knowledge of guideline-directed screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia. This education was coupled with a multifaceted approach for provider-reminder interventions: flagging patients in the EHR system that fall within the age group (25 years of age and younger) to generate an alert, patients completing a questionnaire while in the exam room, and identification of a project champion. Screening rates were evaluated during pre- and post-implementation phases to determine if a change in practice occurred among providers. Post-intervention revealed the average number of patients screened for gonorrhea and chlamydia was 65.85% (349/530). This change represented a marked increase from pre-intervention screening of 2% (11/405). The testing rate increased during the post-intervention phase to 17.86% (65/364), up from 7.90% (32/405) pre-implementation. Provider education on guideline-directed screening for gonorrhea and chlamydia increased screening among providers at a university health clinic. This intervention, combined with provider-reminder interventions, increased screening of patients, leading to an increased testing rate for gonorrhea and chlamydia.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Owusu-Edusei, K., Chesson, H.W., Gift, T.L., Mahajan, R., Ocfemia, M.C.B., & Kent, C.K. (2013). The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Disease 40(3), 197–201.CrossRef Owusu-Edusei, K., Chesson, H.W., Gift, T.L., Mahajan, R., Ocfemia, M.C.B., & Kent, C.K. (2013). The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sexually Transmitted Disease 40(3), 197–201.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Loosier, P. S., Malcarney, M., Slive, L., Cramer, R. C., Burgess, B., Hoover, K. W., & Romaguera, R. (2014). Chlamydia screening for sexually active young women under the Affordable Care Act: New opportunities and lingering barriers. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 41(9), 538–544. doi:10.1097/QLQ.0000000000000170.CrossRefPubMed Loosier, P. S., Malcarney, M., Slive, L., Cramer, R. C., Burgess, B., Hoover, K. W., & Romaguera, R. (2014). Chlamydia screening for sexually active young women under the Affordable Care Act: New opportunities and lingering barriers. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 41(9), 538–544. doi:10.​1097/​QLQ.​0000000000000170​.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McNulty, C. A., Freeman, E., Howell-Jones, R., Hogan, A., Randall, S., et al. (2010). Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: A qualitative study. Family Practice, 27(3), 291–302.CrossRefPubMed McNulty, C. A., Freeman, E., Howell-Jones, R., Hogan, A., Randall, S., et al. (2010). Overcoming the barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: A qualitative study. Family Practice, 27(3), 291–302.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ricketts, E. J., Francischetto, E. O., Wallace, L. M., Hogan, A., & McNulty, C.A.M. (2016). Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention. BMC Family Practice, 17(33), 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0430-2. Ricketts, E. J., Francischetto, E. O., Wallace, L. M., Hogan, A., & McNulty, C.A.M. (2016). Tools to overcome potential barriers to chlamydia screening in general practice: Qualitative evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention. BMC Family Practice, 17(33), 1–12. doi:10.​1186/​s12875-016-0430-2.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat McNulty, C.A.M., Hogan, A.H., Ricketts, E.J., et al. (2014). Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: A modified Zelen prospective cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Sexual Transmitted Infections, 90, 188–194. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2013-051029.CrossRef McNulty, C.A.M., Hogan, A.H., Ricketts, E.J., et al. (2014). Increasing chlamydia screening tests in general practice: A modified Zelen prospective cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a complex intervention based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Sexual Transmitted Infections, 90, 188–194. doi:10.​1136/​sextrans-2013-051029.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker, J., Fairley, C. K., Walker, S. M., Gurrin, L. C., Gunn, J., Pirotta, M. et al., (2010). Computer reminders for chlamydia screening in general practice: A randomized controlled trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(7), 445–450.PubMed Walker, J., Fairley, C. K., Walker, S. M., Gurrin, L. C., Gunn, J., Pirotta, M. et al., (2010). Computer reminders for chlamydia screening in general practice: A randomized controlled trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 37(7), 445–450.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rashidian, A., & Russell, I. (2011). Intentions and statins prescribing: Can the Theory of Planned Behaviour explain behavior in following guideline recommendations? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 749–757.CrossRefPubMed Rashidian, A., & Russell, I. (2011). Intentions and statins prescribing: Can the Theory of Planned Behaviour explain behavior in following guideline recommendations? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17, 749–757.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Improving STD Screening Rates on a University Campus
verfasst von
Amanda Myers
Sherrie P. McCaskill
Kathryn VanRavenstein
Publikationsdatum
06.06.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Community Health / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0094-5145
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3610
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-017-0377-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Journal of Community Health 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe