Introduction
Beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYVV)[
1] is a member of the
Benyvirus genus, which causes rhizomania disease of sugar beet (
Beta vulgaris L.) transmitted by the soil-inhabiting plasmodiophorid,
Polymyxa betae[
2]. Rhizomania[
3] is one of the most economically important diseases affecting sugar beet, and it is widespread in all of the sugar beet-growing areas of Europe, Asia and America[
4]. The disease is characterized by abnormal rootlet proliferation and reduced sugar yields[
5]. The BNYVV genome consists of four or five plus-sense 5′-capped and 3′-polyadenylated RNAs[
6,
7]. RNA1 and RNA2 carry ‘house-keeping’ genes that are involved in virus replication, assembly, cell-to-cell movement and the suppression of post-transcriptional gene silencing[
8‐
11]. Extra genomic components, consisting of smaller RNA3, RNA4 and RNA5, each of which plays an important but unique role in pathogenicity and vector transmission are necessary for the efficient production of typical rhizomania symptoms, long-distance movement and vector propagation[
6,
10,
12‐
15]. The RNA3-encoded P25 protein is responsible for the virulence and avirulence factors in leaves of some resistant sugar beet lines[
16]. The P25 protein also functions in the induction of rhizomania symptoms of sugar beet roots and the severe symptom expression in the Chenopodiaceae hosts[
17‐
21]. The RNA5-encoded 26-kDa protein (P26), which is associated with symptom severity but is dispensable for BNYVV survival, has been found in small areas of Europe and in most areas of Asia[
4,
22,
23].
In the case of BNYVV, the presence of the RNA4-encoded single 31-kDa protein (P31) is involved in enhanced symptom expression, efficient root-specific silencing suppression and efficient vector transmission by
P. betae[
13]. BNYVV induces plant stunting, downward curling of the upper leaves and severe mosaicism with leaf distortions in the systemic host
Nicotiana benthamiana[
24] without affecting viral RNA accumulation[
2,
13]. The entire P31 is required for the expression of severe symptoms in
N. benthamiana[
13].
When a pathogen attacks a plant, it displays an innate pathogen-specific resistance by producing responses, including oxidative bursts of cells, changes in cell wall composition and the synthesis of compounds like phytoalexin and pathogenesis-related proteins (PRs). PRs are a major category of host proteins induced during biotic and abiotic stresses, which have been identified in 17 different families thus far in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants based on their structural and functional properties[
25‐
28]. The PR-10 family plays an important role among the PR groups. RNase activity has been reported for some PR-10 proteins and may be involved in its antimicrobial activity[
29].
Thus, we investigated gene transcription levels in N. benthamiana infected by different BNYVV isolates, and we found that RNA4 could dramatically up-regulate PR-10 expression and was closely linked to symptom appearance. Frame-shift and deletion mutations in the P31-encoding region indicated that only an entire intact P31 could induce PR-10 up-regulation. An amino acid substitution analysis of the P31 protein showed that several cysteine/tryptophan positions affected PR-10 expression and symptom development during BNYVV infection.
Discussion
In the presence of RNA-1 and −2, RNA4 induces leaf stunting, curling and severe mosaicism with leaf distortions in
N. benthamiana without affecting viral RNA accumulation[
39]. BNYVV p31 plays a multifunctional role in efficient vector transmission, enhanced symptom expression and root-specific silencing suppression[
13]. Here, we demonstrated that RNA4 drastically up-regulated the expression of PR-10 and PR-Q genes, but the silencing-associated genes had the same expression levels as in
N. benthamiana infected with BN3. A time-course detection showed that the up-regulation of
PR-10 gene in the presence of RNA4 was coincided closely with the appearance of symptoms, and that the
PR-10 expression occurred slightly before the symptoms.
The PR-10 family is one of the most important families among the PR groups. Unlike most PRs, PR-10 proteins are typically intracellular, small and acidic, with similar three-dimensional structures[
26,
40‐
42].
In vitro PR-10 proteins have been reported to have ribonuclease activity, enzymatic activities in plant secondary metabolisms and roles in abiotic stresses[
26]. The
PR-10 family is structurally related to ribonucleases[
29,
43,
44]. As reported, there is a strikingly conserved sequence motif GxGGxG at residues aa 47–52 throughout the family of intracellular PR proteins[
45]. This same motif also occurred in the
NbPR-10 from
N. benthamiana. This motif is frequently found in protein kinases and nucleotide-binding proteins[
46].
A few viruses can trigger a
PR-10 response in their host[
43,
47‐
49], but the capability to cleave viral RNA remains to be determined. Some PR-10s have their strongest expression in root tissue[
40,
50,
51]. BNYVV causes rhizomania disease of sugar beet, which is characterized by excessive growth of lateral roots and constriction of the taproot, and RNA4-encoded P31 is involved in root-specific silencing suppression. Our results showed that, in BN3 + 4 infected plants,
PR-10 expression and symptom development occurred at similar times. This is somewhat surprising given that
PR-10 is associated with inducing symptoms. However, the experiment showed that P31 could not interact directly with PR-10. Thus, P31, like P25, which interacts with transcription factors[
52], works with some factors in the process of
PR-10 expression. Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility that the increased PR-10 level is a response to BN3 + 4 infection, although it failed to achieve its aim of defending against virus infection. However, it can be an indirect result, a molecular marker or an indicator of symptom development. To address the relationship between PR-10 expression and symptom development, additional experiments will be required.
The RNA4-encoded putative ORF contains five potential in-frame initiation codons. Our results clearly demonstrated that the first AUG in the P31 ORF was used for expression of P31, but the second and third AUG may have weak functions in expressing an incomplete protein if the first AUG was shifted. This was indirectly demonstrated by the GUS activities. Such lower accumulation levels are probably due to a nucleotide sequence upstream of the AUG codon[
53], which can down-regulate ribosome scanning and initiation at the first AUG. We viewed other proteins encoded by BNYVV, including RdRp, CP, P14 and P26, and found that these proteins also had more than one potential initiation codon in the RNA’s 5′-leader sequence[
54]. This may be an expression strategy. As observed, if P31 was incomplete, then, regardless of the spontaneous deletion mutant, it could not induce
PR-10 up-regulation or severe systemic symptoms in
N. benthamiana. Thus, the totality of P31 is necessary for viral pathogenicity and induction of
PR-10 expression[
13].
Cys with its thiol side-chain often participates in enzymatic reactions. Because of its high reactivity, the thiol group of cysteine has numerous biological functions[
55]. Disulfide bonds are common to many extracellular proteins, where they presumably serve to stabilize the native conformation, and the improved stability can be translated in practical terms as better resistance to environmental extremes[
56,
57]. The zinc finger is a structural motif of small proteins that is characterized by the coordination of one or more zinc ions to stabilize the fold[
58]. In general, zinc fingers coordinate zinc ions with a combination of Cys and histidine residues, and recently different structures have been found[
59].
Beet soil borne mosaic virus (BSBMV) is a member of
Benyvirus and possesses a similar genomic organization to BNYVV[
60]. A putative protein, P32, is encoded by BSBMV RNA-4 (GenBank: FJ424610.2) and has a similar function to P31. For instance, it is involved in symptom expression and viral transmission through its vector
P. betae[
61]. A sequence alignment of P31 and P32 showed that both were rich in Cys, about 6.03% and 6.36%, respectively, and, interestingly, 12 Cys shared the same locations. Based on structural predictions, several of them may link to form disulfide bonds, and if these links are broken, then P31 is probably easily degraded. In the N-terminal sequence of P31, there is a Cys7Cys9His19Cys24 motif. Although it is not predicted to result in a zinc finger, we hypothesize that it, or another region, has a similar functional domain. P31 is involved in silencing suppression in roots[
13]. P14 and P16, which are found in BNYVV and
Tobacco rattle virus, have the ability to suppress transgene silencing specifically in roots. All of these are cysteine-rich proteins, so we suspect that Cys may play an important role in root suppression.
In our results, plants infected by Cys mutants showed different relationships between PR-10 expression and symptom appearance. The most prominent one, C161A, showed a seven-fold higher expression level of PR-10 than that found with a BN3 infection, but it could not induce serious symptoms. We suspect that the region containing Cys 161 was important for symptom appearance but had less impact on the interaction with factors that up-regulated PR-10 expression. Accompanying PR-10 up-regulation, P31 can induce some symptoms, but the Cys mutants showed that P31 had more than one functional motif. Determining how these motifs function will require further experiments.
Proteins that perform biological functions should interact with other protein(s), and the amino acid Trp is more conserved within protein hotspot sites[
62,
63]. Different residues in proteins affect their structure and function[
64]. The three-dimensional structure of P31 has not been reported, so we cannot determine the function of Trp in the protein structure. The Trp mutants resulted in the loss of
PR-10 induction and disease symptoms, suggesting that Trp may be involved in protein–protein interactions between virus and host.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
WQW, HYF and NJ performed the experiments. YW, ZYZ, YLZ, XBW, DWL, JLY contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. CGH conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination. WQW, YW and CGH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.