Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2017

19.05.2016 | Original Article

Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal

verfasst von: Stefanie J. Gartenmann, Thomas Thurnheer, Thomas Attin, Patrick R. Schmidlin

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on the removal of a multispecies biofilm under standardized conditions in vitro.

Methods

Six-species biofilms were grown on hydroxyapatite discs for 64 h and treated with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic tip (Cavitron) placed either on contact or at 0.25- and 0.5-mm distance. The treatment was performed for 15 s with either the tip at right angle or sideways. Biofilm removal was evaluated by assessing the viable bacteria in each supernatant and compared to respective controls. In the latter, biofilms were mechanically removed and evaluated in supernatants to assess adhering and floating bacteria. Colony-forming units (CFU) were determined by cultivation on solid media. Any remaining biofilm on the treated discs was also visualized after staining with green-fluorescent SYTO® 9 stain using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Mann–Whitney U tests and Bonferroni correction were used to analyze the results between the groups.

Results

Sideways application of the ultrasonic tip at distances of 0.25 and 0.5 mm removed as many bacteria as present on the control discs compared to the tip on contact (p < 0.05). All other application modes, especially the ultrasonic tip applied perpendicularly on contact, showed no statistical significance in removing biofilm.

Conclusion

Overall, data indicated that bacterial detachment depended on tip orientation and distance, especially when the tip was applied sideways similar to the clinical setting.

Clinical relevance

Biofilm removal by means of ultrasonic debridement remains a crucial aspect in the treatment of periodontal disease. To ensure sufficient biofilm removal, the tip does not necessarily require contact to the surface, but an application parallel to the surface on the side is recommended.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Slots J (1979) Subgingival microflora and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 6:351–382CrossRefPubMed Slots J (1979) Subgingival microflora and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 6:351–382CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Slots J (1999) Update on Actinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease. J Int Acad Periodontol 1:121–126PubMed Slots J (1999) Update on Actinobacillus Actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease. J Int Acad Periodontol 1:121–126PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Slots J, Ting M (1999) Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease: occurrence and treatment. Periodontol 20:82–121, 1999CrossRef Slots J, Ting M (1999) Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis in human periodontal disease: occurrence and treatment. Periodontol 20:82–121, 1999CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF (2002) A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):72–81, discussion 90–71CrossRefPubMed Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF (2002) A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 29(Suppl 3):72–81, discussion 90–71CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer K, Lie T (1977) Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Periodontol 4:77–91CrossRefPubMed Meyer K, Lie T (1977) Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy. J Clin Periodontol 4:77–91CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Torfason T, Kiger R, Selvig KA, Egelberg J (1979) Clinical improvement of gingival conditions following ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation of periodontal pockets. J Clin Periodontol 6:165–176CrossRefPubMed Torfason T, Kiger R, Selvig KA, Egelberg J (1979) Clinical improvement of gingival conditions following ultrasonic versus hand instrumentation of periodontal pockets. J Clin Periodontol 6:165–176CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J (1984) Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 11:63–76CrossRefPubMed Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J (1984) Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 11:63–76CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Caffesse RG, Sweeney PL, Smith BA (1986) Scaling and root planing with and without periodontal flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 13:205–210CrossRefPubMed Caffesse RG, Sweeney PL, Smith BA (1986) Scaling and root planing with and without periodontal flap surgery. J Clin Periodontol 13:205–210CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lampe Bless K, Sener B, Dual J, Attin T, Schmidlin PR (2011) Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings. Clin Oral Investig 15:241–248. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0379-9 CrossRefPubMed Lampe Bless K, Sener B, Dual J, Attin T, Schmidlin PR (2011) Cleaning ability and induced dentin loss of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic instrument at different power settings. Clin Oral Investig 15:241–248. doi:10.​1007/​s00784-009-0379-9 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1988) Dental plaque removal by cavitational activity during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol 15:539–543CrossRefPubMed Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1988) Dental plaque removal by cavitational activity during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol 15:539–543CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Walmsley AD, Walsh TF, Laird WR, Williams AR (1990) Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of teeth during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol 17:306–312CrossRefPubMed Walmsley AD, Walsh TF, Laird WR, Williams AR (1990) Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of teeth during ultrasonic scaling. J Clin Periodontol 17:306–312CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1986) Displacement amplitude as a measure of the acoustic output of ultrasonic scalers. Dent Mater 2:97–100CrossRefPubMed Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1986) Displacement amplitude as a measure of the acoustic output of ultrasonic scalers. Dent Mater 2:97–100CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1986) Inherent variability of the performance of the ultrasonic descaler. J Dent 14:121–125CrossRefPubMed Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR (1986) Inherent variability of the performance of the ultrasonic descaler. J Dent 14:121–125CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong P, Chuong CJ (1993) Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. I: theoretical formulation. J Acoust Soc Am 94:19–28CrossRefPubMed Zhong P, Chuong CJ (1993) Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. I: theoretical formulation. J Acoust Soc Am 94:19–28CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhong P, Chuong CJ, Preminger GM (1993) Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. II: application in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 94:29–36CrossRefPubMed Zhong P, Chuong CJ, Preminger GM (1993) Propagation of shock waves in elastic solids caused by cavitation microjet impact. II: application in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 94:29–36CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA (1996) A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:1131–1154CrossRefPubMed Miller MW, Miller DL, Brayman AA (1996) A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound Med Biol 22:1131–1154CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Shapiro S, Giertsen E, Guggenheim B (2002) An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. Caries Res 36:93–100, 57866CrossRefPubMed Shapiro S, Giertsen E, Guggenheim B (2002) An in vitro oral biofilm model for comparing the efficacy of antimicrobial mouthrinses. Caries Res 36:93–100, 57866CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gmur R, Guggenheim B (1983) Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 42:459–470PubMedPubMedCentral Gmur R, Guggenheim B (1983) Antigenic heterogeneity of Bacteroides intermedius as recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 42:459–470PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurnheer T, Gmur R, Shapiro S, Guggenheim B (2003) Mass transport of macromolecules within an in vitro model of supragingival plaque. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1702–1709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thurnheer T, Gmur R, Shapiro S, Guggenheim B (2003) Mass transport of macromolecules within an in vitro model of supragingival plaque. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1702–1709CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Walmsley AD, Williams AR (1991) Measurement of cavitational activity within ultrasonic baths. J Dent 19:62–66CrossRefPubMed Walmsley AD, Williams AR (1991) Measurement of cavitational activity within ultrasonic baths. J Dent 19:62–66CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Riesz P, Kondo T (1992) Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radic Biol Med 13:247–270CrossRefPubMed Riesz P, Kondo T (1992) Free radical formation induced by ultrasound and its biological implications. Free Radic Biol Med 13:247–270CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 25:158–163CrossRefPubMed Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B (1998) The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 25:158–163CrossRefPubMed
38.
41.
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schupbach P, Shapiro S (2001) Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res 80:363–370CrossRefPubMed Guggenheim B, Giertsen E, Schupbach P, Shapiro S (2001) Validation of an in vitro biofilm model of supragingival plaque. J Dent Res 80:363–370CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Guggenheim B, Gmur R, Galicia JC, Stathopoulou PG, Benakanakere MR, Meier A, Thurnheer T, Kinane DF (2009) In vitro modeling of host-parasite interactions: the ‘subgingival’ biofilm challenge of primary human epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 9:280. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-9-280 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guggenheim B, Gmur R, Galicia JC, Stathopoulou PG, Benakanakere MR, Meier A, Thurnheer T, Kinane DF (2009) In vitro modeling of host-parasite interactions: the ‘subgingival’ biofilm challenge of primary human epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 9:280. doi:10.​1186/​1471-2180-9-280 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of ultrasonic tip distance and orientation on biofilm removal
verfasst von
Stefanie J. Gartenmann
Thomas Thurnheer
Thomas Attin
Patrick R. Schmidlin
Publikationsdatum
19.05.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Clinical Oral Investigations 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Newsletter

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.