Background
Alzheimer’s disease is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly and is characterized, in part, by the deposition of amyloid beta (Aβ) in the brain and cerebrovasculature. The accumulation of soluble Aβ precedes the initial neurodegeneratitive and neurotoxic cascade and correlates strongly with reductions in cognitive performance [
1‐
3]. It has been reported that the accumulation of Aβ in AD is primarily the result of inadequate Aβ elimination, with AD patients showing a 30 % reduction in the overall clearance of Aβ from the brain [
4,
5]. Furthermore, in the Dutch-type mouse model of AD, the elimination of Aβ through the BBB is significantly reduced, which results in Aβ deposition along the cerebral vessels and the development of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) [
6,
7].
One of the prominent mechanisms responsible for the elimination of Aβ from the brain involves transcytosis across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). The rate in which Aβ is cleared from the brain to the blood through the BBB is greater than the rate in which it can be removed via interstitial fluid bulk flow [
8], likely due to the presence of various transport systems including the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) [
9‐
11]. After binding to LRP1 at the abluminal surface of the brain endothelium, Aβ is transported across the BBB where it is then released into the general circulation [
12,
13]. Recently, conditional endothelial LRP1 KO mice developed by Storck et al. [
11] showed significant reductions in the transit of Aβ across the BBB and deficits in memory and spatial learning, highlighting the importance of BBB transport in the elimination of Aβ from the brain.
In addition to the membrane-associated protein, LRP1 also exists in a soluble form as a result of proteolytic cleavage at the surface of the cell. This soluble LRP1 fragment retains its binding capacity, but loses its ability to endocytose and transport ligands [
14‐
16]. In line with this, recent work by our group demonstrated a strong inverse correlation between LRP1 shedding in the brain and Aβ clearance across the BBB [
17], indicating that reductions in brain LRP1 shedding could promote Aβ clearance across the BBB and attenuate Aβ accumulation in the AD brain. As such, investigating the factors that regulate LRP1 shedding in the brain may provide therapeutic opportunities to lower Aβ burden and modulate the AD phenotype. One of the enzymes implicated in LRP1 ectodomain shedding is the α-secretase, ADAM10 (a desintegrin and metalloproteinase domain containing protein 10), [
18]. The following studies examined the influence of ADAM10 on LRP1 shedding in vitro and in vivo and the evaluated the impact of ADAM10 modulation on Aβ clearance across the BBB.
Discussion
Dysfunction within the cerebrovascular system is now recognized as a major contributory factor in the development of AD [
28]. It has been suggested that the excessive accumulation of Aβ in the AD brain may be due to aberrant Aβ elimination [
29,
30] as several studies have identified reduced brain Aβ clearance in AD patients and AD animal models [
5,
7]. More specifically, an important component in the removal of Aβ from the brain involves cerebrovascular transport across the BBB. Prior studies have shown that reduced levels of the receptors that transport Aβ in brain endothelia, such as LRP1, results in decreased Aβ clearance across the BBB, elevated Aβ burden in the brain, and aggravated memory and learning deficits [
11,
29]. In normal aging and AD, LRP1 expression is diminished in the brain vasculature [
10,
31‐
33] and correlates with Aβ accumulation in the brain and cerebrovasculature [
13,
32]. In addition, the expression of LRP1 can be affected by a variety of upstream events such as the promoter methylation status, which controls the generation of LRP1 mRNA [
34]. Previously it has been shown that promoting LRP1 expression enhances the cellular uptake of Aβ [
35] and facilitates Aβ clearance from the brain extracellular space [
36]. Our previous work shows LRP1 is susceptible to ectodomain shedding, a process that inactivates the transport capabilities of the receptor, which results in reduced Aβ clearance across the BBB [
17]. The current studies evaluated a treatment strategy targeting LRP1 shedding in the brain as a novel means to promote Aβ BBB clearance and attenuate Aβ accumulation in the AD brain.
Previous investigations have implicated the α-secretase enzyme, ADAM10, in the ectodomain shedding of LRP1 [
18,
37]. In the present studies, we found that inhibition of ADAM10 effectively reduced LRP1 shedding and increased Aβ transit across an in vitro model of the BBB. This was supported by our in vivo studies in which ADAM10 endothelial KO mice displayed less LRP1 shedding in the brain in conjunction with increased Aβ clearance across the BBB compared to wild-type animals. However, the reduced shedding of brain LRP1 in the ADAM10 endothelial KO group did not reach statistical significance when compared to wild-type mice. This may not be all that unexpected as there are number of cell types in the brain that express LRP1 in addition to brain endothelia. As our analytical approach assessed LRP1 levels in the entire soluble fraction of the brain, endothelial-specific changes in LRP1 shedding may be difficult to capture with so many other cells types contributing to the soluble pool of LRP in the brain. Nevertheless, our findings in vitro and in vivo demonstrate that modulation of the ADAM10 enzyme minimizes LRP1 shedding and facilitates Aβ clearance across the BBB.
As we identified a role for ADAM10 in mediating Aβ clearance across the BBB, we next examined the impact of ADAM10 inhibition on Aβ tissue levels in an animal model of AD. Using an acute 5-day treatment paradigm with the ADAM10-selective inhibitor GI254023X in PSAPP mice, we observed a substantial decrease in LRP1 shedding in the brain compared to vehicle-treated animals. Moreover, as previous studies have reported that soluble LRP1 levels in the plasma can facilitate Aβ removal from the brain by acting as a peripheral sink [
12], we investigated LRP1 levels in the plasma following GI254023X administration. Soluble LRP1 levels in the plasma were found not to be significantly different between treated and control animals. However, we did find that The decrease in soluble LRP1 in the brain following treatment with GI254023X coincided with a significant increase in plasma Aβ40 levels. As such, we propose that inhibition of ADAM10 facilitates Aβ40 transit from the brain to the periphery (via reduced LRP shedding at the BBB), resulting in the elevated Aβ40 plasma levels we observed. However, no significant changes in plasma Aβ42 levels were detected following GI254023X treatment. A potential explanation for the disparity we observed in the BBB clearance between Aβ40 and Aβ42 may be due to differences in the transport rates for these species. A recent report indicated LRP1 preferentially clears Aβ40 over Aβ42 [
11] and prior studies have shown that the rate of Aβ40 transport across the BBB is more than twice that observed for Aβ42 [
8,
38]. Nevertheless, the increased levels of Aβ40 in the plasma following ADAM10 inhibition suggest this treatment strategy may be used to facilitate the transit of Aβ from the brain to the periphery.
To examine the impact of ADAM10 inhibition on Aβ levels in the brain, we examined both soluble and insoluble Aβ following GI254023X treatment in PSAPP animals. While we observed reductions in both soluble and insoluble Aβ40 and Aβ42 in the brain following GI254023X treatment, none of these effects were statistically significant. It is unclear why this treatment paradigm did not modulate Aβ levels in the brain more effectively. Both our prior work [
17] and our current findings demonstrate a strong relationship between brain LRP1 shedding and Aβ clearance across the BBB. GI254023X treatment in the PSAPP mice reduced LRP1 shedding in the brain by 60 %, however, this effect did not translate to significant changes in Aβ levels in the brain. It may be that such an acute treatment paradigm (5 days) is not sufficient to demonstrably lower Aβ levels in the brain, and that a more chronic treatment paradigm is necessary. Another possible explanation for our observations is that LRP1 expression is known to be lower in AD patients [
13,
39] and AD animals, including the PSAPP mice used in the current studies [
40]. Exposure of brain vascular cells to high levels of Aβ for a prolonged period has previously been shown to reduce the expression of LRP1 [
39]. In our study, the PSAPP mice were tested at an age when extensive Aβ pathology is present [
22,
41]. As such, the total LRP1 population may be depleted to such an extent that any improvements in BBB LRP1 shedding to promote Aβ elimination would still prove insufficient. Therefore, this therapeutic approach may be more impactful if used earlier in the disease process when a greater density of LRP1 receptors is available for therapeutic targeting. Further evaluation of this treatment protocol and the feasibility of targeting LRP1 sheddase enzymes in AD are certainly warranted.
A primary concern in targeting an enzyme like ADAM10, especially in AD, is the potential impact on other substrates that are metabolized by ADAM10. ADAM10 is one of the α-secretases which processes APP through the non-amyloidogenic pathway, resulting in the formation of sAPPα while at the same time avoiding the production of Aβ peptides. As such, inhibition of this pathway could facilitate Aβ synthesis and potentially exacerbate Aβ burden in the AD brain. Our data suggests this is not the case, as Aβ levels in the brain did not increase upon ADAM10 inhibition, but in fact decreased. To ascertain whether GI254023X treatment influenced the α-secretase pathway specifically, we measured sAPPα levels in the brain and found no difference between GI254023X-treated animals and the vehicle control group. These data indicate ADAM10 can be modulated to reduce LRP1 shedding in the brain without affecting the α-secretase cleavage of APP. One explanation for this may be the presence of other α-secretase enzymes, which process APP when ADAM10 is diminished or absent. To this point, it was previously found that sAPPα formation was preserved in fibroblast cells derived from ADAM10-deficient animals [
42]. It has also been reported that other members of the α-secretase family such as ADAM9 and ADAM17 are able to compensate for reductions in ADAM10 activity [
42,
43]. Alternatively, other studies have reported a significant change in sAPPα production or increase in Aβ when ADAM10 was absent or diminished, suggesting a lack of compensation by other α-secretases [
19,
44‐
46]. Nevertheless, our studies demonstrate that targeting the ADAM10 enzyme can effectively reduce LRP1 shedding in the cerebrovasculature without impacting APP proteolysis.
Conclusions
Previously, our work demonstrated a strong inverse correlation between LRP1 shedding in the brain and Aβ clearance across the BBB. In the present studies, we show that modulation of the ADAM10 enzyme can effectively reduce LRP1 shedding and promote Aβ transport out of the brain. In an AD mouse model, acute treatment with an ADAM10 inhibitor substantially lowered LRP1 brain shedding and increased the appearance of Aβ40 in the plasma, indicating enhanced Aβ transit from the brain to the periphery. Alternatively, while ADAM10 inhibition decreased both Aβ40 and Aβ42 brain levels in the AD mice, these values were not statistically significant, indicating a more chronic treatment paradigm may be necessary to observe demonstrable changes in Aβ brain burden. Nevertheless, while further interrogation of this therapeutic approach is necessary, our findings indicate LRP1 sheddases can be targeted to facilitate Aβ elimination from the brain, providing a novel therapeutic strategy to mitigate Aβ accumulation in the AD brain.
Authors’ contributions
BS: design, data processing and analysis, interpretation of data, manuscript drafting, revision, and finalising; FC: conception and design, interpretation of data; CB: conception and design, data processing and analysis, interpretation of data, manuscript drafting, revision and finalising. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.