Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 10/2009

01.12.2009 | Editorial

Intellectual property rights and good research practice

verfasst von: Dennis A. Revicki, Carolyn E. Schwartz

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 10/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Who owns the rights to health outcome-related items and instruments? There are various responses to this question, and varying interpretations of what is meant by intellectual property rights. Intellectual property lawyers would likely have a complicated and involved interpretation and it is our understanding that collections of items can be copyrighted as instruments, but the question is less clear for the individual items. Does this mean that any researcher can take any collection of items from one or more existing instruments and create a new instrument? Yes, we think so, but (and this is an important but) the new instrument cannot be labeled as any of the existing instrument(s) used to derive the new form. Recently, a group of researchers examined the factor structure and psychometric qualities of the standardized version of the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire [1] and found that several of the items may not be relevant for the Greek translation of the instrument [2]. While the psychometric results are useful for understanding the measurement qualities of the AQLQ, the authors implied that they developed a new version of the instrument, the AQLQ-18. This resulted in an interesting exchange of perspectives related to intellectual property and copyright issues related to health outcome measures [3, 4]. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Juniper, E., Buist, S., Cox, F. M., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Validation of a standardized version of the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Chest, 115, 1265–1270.CrossRefPubMed Juniper, E., Buist, S., Cox, F. M., Ferrie, P. J., & King, D. R. (1999). Validation of a standardized version of the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Chest, 115, 1265–1270.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item standardized asthma quality of life questionnaire-AQLQ(S). Quality of Life Research, 17, 323–332.CrossRef Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item standardized asthma quality of life questionnaire-AQLQ(S). Quality of Life Research, 17, 323–332.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Juniper, E. (2009). Modification, translation and adaptation of questionnaires: Should copyright laws be observed? Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 531–533. Juniper, E. (2009). Modification, translation and adaptation of questionnaires: Should copyright laws be observed? Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 531–533.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item AQLQ(s) model: A response to Juniper. Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 535–539. Grammatopolous, E., Skordilis, E., Koutsouki, D., & Baltopoulos, G. (2009). An 18-item AQLQ(s) model: A response to Juniper. Quality of Life Research, 18(5), 535–539.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group through its first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMed Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group through its first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Health, 12, 419–429.CrossRefPubMed Coons, S. J., Gwaltney, C. J., Hays, R. D., et al. (2009). Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO good research practices task force report. Value Health, 12, 419–429.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104.CrossRefPubMed Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., et al. (2005). Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: Report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health, 8, 94–104.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Intellectual property rights and good research practice
verfasst von
Dennis A. Revicki
Carolyn E. Schwartz
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2009
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 10/2009
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9551-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2009

Quality of Life Research 10/2009 Zur Ausgabe