nach oben

Annals of Nuclear Medicine

Erschienen in:

01.07.2010 | Original Article

Is the predicted postoperative FEV1 estimated by planar lung perfusion scintigraphy accurate in patients undergoing pulmonary resection? Comparison of two processing methods

verfasst von: Meltem Caglar, Murat Kara, Tamer Aksoy, Pinar Ozgen Kiratli, Erdem Karabulut, Rıza Dogan

Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Ausgabe 6/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Estimation of postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) with radionuclide lung scintigraphy is frequently used to define functional operability in patients undergoing lung resection. We conducted a study to outline the reliability of planar quantitative lung perfusion scintigraphy (QLPS) with two different processing methods to estimate the postoperative lung function in patients with resectable lung disease.

Methods

Forty-one patients with a mean age of 57 ± 12 years who underwent either a pneumonectomy (n = 14) or a lobectomy (n = 27) were included in the study. QLPS with Tc-99m macroaggregated albumin was performed. Both three equal zones were generated for each lung [zone method (ZM)] and more precise regions of interest were drawn according to their anatomical shape in the anterior and posterior projections [lobe mapping method (LMM)] for each patient. The predicted postoperative (ppo) FEV1 values were compared with actual FEV1 values measured on postoperative day 1 (pod1 FEV1) and day 7 (pod 7 FEV1).

Results

The mean of preoperative FEV1 and ppoFEV1 values was 2.10 ± 0.57 and 1.57 ± 0.44 L, respectively. The mean of Pod1FEV1 (1.04 ± 0.30 L) was lower than ppoFEV1 (p < 0.0001) but increased on day 7 (1.31 ± 0.32 L) (p < 0.0001); however, it never reached the predicted values. Zone and LMMs estimated mean ppoFEV1 as 1.56 ± 0.45 and 1.57 ± 0.44 L, respectively. Both methods overestimated the actual value by 50% (ZM), 51% (LMM) and 19% (ZM), 20% (LMM) for pod 1 and pod 7, respectively. This overestimation was more pronounced in patients with chronic lung disease and hilar tumors. No significant differences were observed between ppoFEV1 values estimated by ZM or by LMM (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

PpoFEV1 values predicted by both the zone and LMMs overestimated the actual measured lung volumes in patients undergoing pulmonary resection in the early postoperative period. LMM is not superior to ZM.

Colice GL, Shafazand S, Griffin JP, Keenan R, Bolliger CT. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:161S–77S.CrossRefPubMed

Giordano A, Calcagni ML, Meduri G, Valente S, Galli G. Perfusion lung scintigraphy for the prediction of postlobectomy residual pulmonary function. Chest. 1997;111:1542–7.CrossRefPubMed

Bolliger CT, Jordan P, Soler M, Stulz P, Tamm M, Wyser C, et al. Pulmonary function and exercise capacity after lung resection. Eur Respir J. 1996;9:415–21.CrossRefPubMed

Smulders SA, Smeenk FW, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Postmus PE. Actual and predicted postoperative changes in lung function after pneumonectomy: a retrospective analysis. Chest. 2004;125:1735–41.CrossRefPubMed

Wyser C, Stulz P, Soler M, Tamm M, Müller-Brand J, Habicht J, et al. Prospective evaluation of an algorithm for the functional assessment of lung resection candidates. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159:1450–6.PubMed

Kristersson S, Lindell SE, Svanberg L. Prediction of pulmonary function loss due to pneumonectomy using Xe-133-radiospirometry. Chest. 1972;62:694–8.CrossRefPubMed

Olsen GN, Block AJ, Swenson EW, Castle JR, Wynne JW. Pulmonary function evaluation of the lung resection candidate: a prospective study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1975;111:379–87.PubMed

Win T, Laroche CM, Groves AM, White C, Wells FC, Ritchie AJ, et al. Use of quantitative lung scintigraphy to predict postoperative pulmonary function in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:1215–8.CrossRefPubMed

Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir. 2005;26:319–38.CrossRef

10.

Bolliger CT, Guckel C, Engel H, Stohr S, Wyser C, Schoetzau A, et al. Prediction of functional reserves after lung resection: comparison between quantitative computed tomography, scintigraphy, and anatomy. Respiration. 2002;69:482–9.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Markos J, Mullan PB, Hillman DR, Musk AW, Antico VF, Lovegrove FT, et al. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;139:902–10.PubMed

12.

Juhl B, Frost N. A comparison between measured and calculated changes in the lung function after operation for pulmonary cancer. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1975;57(Suppl):39–45.CrossRef

13.

Wernly JA, DeMeester TR, Kirchner PT, Myerowitz PD, Oxford DE, Golomb HM. Clinical value of quantitative ventilation-perfusion lung scans in the surgical management of bronchogenic carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980;80:535–43.PubMed

14.

Kearney DJ, Lee TH, Reilly JJ, DeCamp MM, Sugarbaker DJ. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:753–9.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Zeiher BG, Gross TJ, Kern JA, Lanza LA, Peterson MW. Predicting postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung resection. Chest. 1995;108:68–72.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Olsen GN, Block AJ, Tobias JA. Prediction of postpneumonectomy pulmonary function using quantitative macroaggregate lung scanning. Chest. 1974;66:13–6.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Bollinger CT, Wyser C, Roser H, Soler M, Perruchoud AP. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest. 1995;108:341–8.CrossRef

18.

Hosokawa N, Tanabe M, Satoh K, Takashima H, Ohkawa M, Maeda M, et al. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary function using Tc-99m MAA perfusion lung SPECT. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1995;55:414–22.PubMed

19.

Hirose Y, Imaeda T, Doi H, Kokubo M, Sakai S, Hirose H. Lung perfusion SPECT in predicting postoperative pulmonary function in lung cancer. Ann Nucl Med. 1993;7:123–6.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Mineo TC, Schillaci O, Pompeo E, Mineo D, Simonetti G. Usefulness of lung perfusion scintigraphy before lung cancer resection in patients with ventilatory obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1828–34.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Ohno Y, Koyama H, Takenaka D, Nogami M, Kotani Y, Nishimura Y, et al. Coregistered ventilation and perfusion SPECT using krypton-81m and Tc-99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin with multislice CT utility for prediction of postoperative lung function in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:830–8.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Suga K, Kawakami Y, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Shimizu K, Matsunaga N. Clinical utility of co-registered respiratory-gated (99m)Tc-Technegas/MAA SPECT-CT images in the assessment of regional lung functional impairment in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1280–90.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Takenaka D, Ohno Y, Koyama H, Nogami M, Onishi Y, Matsumoto K et al. Co-registered perfusion SPECT/CT: utility for prediction of improved postoperative outcome in lung volume reduction surgery candidates. Eur J Radiol. 2009 [Epub ahead of print].

24.

Quint L, Francis I, Wahl R, Gross B. Imaging. In: Pass H, Mitchell J, Johnson D, Turrisi A, Minna J, editors. Lung cancer. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 535–78.

25.

Magnant J, Vecellio L, de Monte M, Grimbert D, Valat C, Boissinot E, et al. Comparative analysis of different scintigraphic approaches to assess pulmonary ventilation. J Aerosol Med. 2006;19:148–59.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Bria WF, Kanarek DJ, Kazemi H. Prediction of postoperative pulmonary function following thoracic operations. Value of ventilation-perfusion scanning. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:186–92.PubMed

27.

Corris PA, Ellis DA, Hawkins T, Gibson GJ. Use of radionuclide scanning in the preoperative estimation of pulmonary function after pneumonectomy. Thorax. 1987;42:285–91.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Bastin R, Moraine JJ, Bardocsky G, Kahn RJ, Melot C. Incentive spirometry performance. A reliable indicator of pulmonary function in the early postoperative period after lobectomy? Chest. 1997;111:559–63.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Tronc F, Gregoire J, Leblanc P, Deslauriers J. Physiologic consequences of pneumonectomy: consequences on the pulmonary function. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1999;9:459–73.PubMed

30.

Laros CD. Lung function data on 123 persons followed up for 20 years after pneumonectomy. Respiration. 1982;43:81–7.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Munoz JI, Pelaez MC, Alvarez MJ, Gil PU, de Ugarte AV. Lung volume reduction surgery: new expectations in the surgical treatment of lung cancer. Chest. 1996;109:1664.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Olsen GN. Physiology of lung resection: no rules, just…Rx. Chest. 1998;113:1438–9.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Is the predicted postoperative FEV1 estimated by planar lung perfusion scintigraphy accurate in patients undergoing pulmonary resection? Comparison of two processing methods
verfasst von: Meltem Caglar
Murat Kara
Tamer Aksoy
Pinar Ozgen Kiratli
Erdem Karabulut
Rıza Dogan
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2010
Verlag: Springer Japan
Erschienen in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Ausgabe 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Elektronische ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-010-0378-6

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2010

Relationship between exercise capacity and cardiac diastolic function assessed by time–volume curve from 16-frame gated myocardial perfusion SPECT

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy following dipyridamole pharmacologic stress

18F-FDG PET/CT findings of pharyngeal tuberculosis

Role of 11C-choline PET/CT in the restaging of prostate cancer patients showing a single lesion on bone scintigraphy

Initial experience with 18F-fluoroethylcholine PET/CT in staging and monitoring therapy response of advanced renal cell carcinoma

Normoglycemic plasma glucose levels affect F-18 FDG uptake in the brain