Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 3/2019

22.06.2019 | Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (W Hsu, Section Editor)

Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Current Concepts and a Review of Recent Literature

verfasst von: Raymond Hah, H. Paco Kang

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To review the relevant recent literature regarding minimally invasive, lateral, and oblique approaches to the anterior lumbar spine, with a particular focus on the operative and postoperative complications.

Methods

A literature search was performed on Pubmed and Web of Science using combinations of the following keywords and their acronyms: lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF), anterior-to-psoas approach (ATP), direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF), extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF), and minimally invasive surgery (MIS). All results from January 2016 through January 2019 were evaluated and all studies evaluating complications and/or outcomes were included in the review.

Recent Findings

Transient neurological deficit, particularly sensorimotor symptoms of the ipsilateral thigh, remains the most common complication seen in LLIF. Best available current literature demonstrates that approximately 30–40% of patients have postoperative deficits, primarily of the proximal leg. Permanent symptoms are less common, affecting 4–5% of cases. Newer techniques to reduce this rate include different retractors, direct visualization of the nerves, and intraoperative neuromonitoring. OLIF may have lower deficit rates, but the available literature is limited. Subsidence rates in both LLIF and OLIF are comparable to ALIF (anterior lumbar interbody fusion), but further study is required. Supplemental posterior fixation is an active area of investigation that shows favorable biomechanical results, but additional clinical studies are needed.

Summary

Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion techniques continue to advance rapidly. As these techniques continue to mature, evidence-based risk-stratification systems are required to better guide both the patient and clinician in the joint decision-making process for the optimal surgical approach.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobbs, R., Phan, K., Malham, G., Seex, K., Rao,P. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. Journal of Spine Surgery 2015; 1:2–18. Mobbs, R., Phan, K., Malham, G., Seex, K., Rao,P. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. Journal of Spine Surgery 2015; 1:2–18.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pimenta L, Figueredo F, DaSilva M. The lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach (LETRA): a new technique for accessing the lumbar spine. AANS/CNS joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. San Diego, CA; 2004. Pimenta L, Figueredo F, DaSilva M. The lateral endoscopic transpsoas retroperitoneal approach (LETRA): a new technique for accessing the lumbar spine. AANS/CNS joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. San Diego, CA; 2004.
10.
16.
23.
29.
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang TY, Nayar G, Brown CR, Pimenta L, Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Bony lateral recess stenosis and other radiographic predictors of failed indirect decompression via extreme lateral interbody fusion: multi-institutional analysis of 101 consecutive spinal levels. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:819–26 doi: S1878-8750(17)31145-2 [pii].CrossRefPubMed Wang TY, Nayar G, Brown CR, Pimenta L, Karikari IO, Isaacs RE. Bony lateral recess stenosis and other radiographic predictors of failed indirect decompression via extreme lateral interbody fusion: multi-institutional analysis of 101 consecutive spinal levels. World Neurosurg. 2017;106:819–26 doi: S1878-8750(17)31145-2 [pii].CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lang G, Perrech M, Navarro-Ramirez R, Hussain I, Pennicooke B, Maryam F, et al. Potential and limitations of neural decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion-a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:99–113 doi: S1878-8750(17)30103-1 [pii].CrossRefPubMed Lang G, Perrech M, Navarro-Ramirez R, Hussain I, Pennicooke B, Maryam F, et al. Potential and limitations of neural decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion-a systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:99–113 doi: S1878-8750(17)30103-1 [pii].CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarro-Ramirez R, Lang G, Moriguchi Y, Elowitz E, Corredor JA, Avila MJ, et al. Are locked facets a contraindication for extreme lateral interbody fusion? World Neurosurg. 2017;100:607–18 doi: S1878-8750(16)31207-4 [pii].CrossRefPubMed Navarro-Ramirez R, Lang G, Moriguchi Y, Elowitz E, Corredor JA, Avila MJ, et al. Are locked facets a contraindication for extreme lateral interbody fusion? World Neurosurg. 2017;100:607–18 doi: S1878-8750(16)31207-4 [pii].CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Park S, Lee C, Chung S, Kang S, Park H, Kim S. The ideal cage position for achieving both indirect neural decompression and segmental angle restoration in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E790. Park S, Lee C, Chung S, Kang S, Park H, Kim S. The ideal cage position for achieving both indirect neural decompression and segmental angle restoration in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:E790.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Sembrano JN, Horazdovsky RD, Sharma AK, Yson SC, Santos ERG, Polly DW, Jr. Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)?. Clin Spine Surg. 2017; 30:E343. Sembrano JN, Horazdovsky RD, Sharma AK, Yson SC, Santos ERG, Polly DW, Jr. Do lordotic cages provide better segmental lordosis versus nonlordotic cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF)?. Clin Spine Surg. 2017; 30:E343.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner JD, Akbarnia BA, Eastlack RK, Bagheri R, Nguyen S, Pimenta L, et al. Radiographic outcomes of anterior column realignment for adult sagittal plane deformity: a multicenter analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:427–32.CrossRefPubMed Turner JD, Akbarnia BA, Eastlack RK, Bagheri R, Nguyen S, Pimenta L, et al. Radiographic outcomes of anterior column realignment for adult sagittal plane deformity: a multicenter analysis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:427–32.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Malham GM, Parker RM, Blecher CM, Chow FY, Seex KA. Choice of approach does not affect clinical and radiologic outcomes: a comparative cohort of patients having anterior lumbar interbody fusion and patients having lateral lumbar interbody fusion at 24 months. Glob Spine J. 2016;6:472–81. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1569055.CrossRef Malham GM, Parker RM, Blecher CM, Chow FY, Seex KA. Choice of approach does not affect clinical and radiologic outcomes: a comparative cohort of patients having anterior lumbar interbody fusion and patients having lateral lumbar interbody fusion at 24 months. Glob Spine J. 2016;6:472–81. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1055/​s-0035-1569055.CrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A. Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global spine journal. 2016;29:147–54.CrossRef Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Daly D, Rao PJ, Lennox A. Approach-related complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: results of a combined spine and vascular surgical team. Global spine journal. 2016;29:147–54.CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Assina R, Majmundar NJ, Herschman Y, Heary RF. First report of major vascular injury due to lateral transpsoas approach leading to fatality: case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:794–8.CrossRefPubMed Assina R, Majmundar NJ, Herschman Y, Heary RF. First report of major vascular injury due to lateral transpsoas approach leading to fatality: case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:794–8.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Mai HT, Schneider AD, Alvarez AP, Hashmi SZ, Smith JT, Freshman RD, et al. Anatomic considerations in the lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: the impact of age, sex, BMI, and scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2018. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760 [doi]. Mai HT, Schneider AD, Alvarez AP, Hashmi SZ, Smith JT, Freshman RD, et al. Anatomic considerations in the lateral transpsoas interbody fusion: the impact of age, sex, BMI, and scoliosis. Clin Spine Surg. 2018. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000760 [doi].
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang J, Kim J, Jo H. Ventral dural injury after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2017; 98:UNSP 881.e1s doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.028 Chang J, Kim J, Jo H. Ventral dural injury after oblique lumbar interbody fusion. World Neurosurg. 2017; 98:UNSP 881.e1s doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.028
Metadaten
Titel
Lateral and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion—Current Concepts and a Review of Recent Literature
verfasst von
Raymond Hah
H. Paco Kang
Publikationsdatum
22.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2019
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09562-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Distal Radius and Wrist Fractures (E Shin, Section Editor)

Emerging Technologies in Distal Radius Fracture Fixation

Concussion (C Senter and M Kapadia, Section Editors)

Current Concepts in the Evaluation of the Pediatric Patient with Concussion

Distal Radius and Wrist Fractures (E Shin, Section Editor)

Management of High Energy Distal Radius Injuries

Femoroacetabular impingement/labral tears (A Zhang, Section Editor)

Surgical Treatment for FAI: Arthroscopic and Open Techniques for Osteoplasty

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.