Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2007

01.12.2007 | Editorial commentary

Can PET–CT with FDG replace contrast enhanced CT for imaging of liver metastases?

verfasst von: Ludwig G. Strauss, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 12/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Liver is a common site of metastatic spread of different primary tumours and a non-invasive detection of liver metastases is a clinical challenge. In particular, in colorectal cancer, the liver is often the first site of metastatic disease and may be the only site of spread in as many as 30–40% of the patients with advanced disease [1]. Colorectal carcinoma is the third most common solid tumour and ranks second as a cause of death because of neoplasia in the Western world [2]. The overall 5-year survival rate is approximately 60% and differs for each stage. For Dukes A (tumours involving only the mucosa) the 5-year survival rate exceeds 90%, whereas for metastatic colorectal cancer is about 5%, with liver metastases being the main cause of death in these patients [3]. Approximately 20% of those patients have synchronous liver metastases and 25% develop metachronous liver metastases. The accurate and early diagnosis of liver metastases has an impact on the overall survival because of the possibility of surgical resection in an early stage and if the tumour is confined to liver. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, Rees M. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 2006;10:982–9.CrossRef Simmonds PC, Primrose JN, Colquitt JL, Garden OJ, Poston GJ, Rees M. Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies. Br J Cancer 2006;10:982–9.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cancer. World Health Organization [February 2006]. Retrieved on 2007-05-24. Cancer. World Health Organization [February 2006]. Retrieved on 2007-05-24.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss LG, Clorius JH, Schlag P, Lehner B, Kimmig B, Engenhart R, et al. Recurrence of colorectal tumours: PET evaluation. Radiology 1989;170:329–32.PubMed Strauss LG, Clorius JH, Schlag P, Lehner B, Kimmig B, Engenhart R, et al. Recurrence of colorectal tumours: PET evaluation. Radiology 1989;170:329–32.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Minn H, Soini I. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy in diagnosis and follow-up of treatment in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1989;15:61–6.PubMedCrossRef Minn H, Soini I. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose scintigraphy in diagnosis and follow-up of treatment in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1989;15:61–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chua SC, Groves AM, Kayani I, Menezes L, Gacinovic S, Du Y, et al. The impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT in patients with liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; xx:xx–xx. Chua SC, Groves AM, Kayani I, Menezes L, Gacinovic S, Du Y, et al. The impact of 18F-FDG PET–CT in patients with liver metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; xx:xx–xx.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiering B, Krabbe PF, Jager GJ, Oyen WJG, Ruers TJM. The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer 2005;104:2658–70.PubMedCrossRef Wiering B, Krabbe PF, Jager GJ, Oyen WJG, Ruers TJM. The impact of fluor-18-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer 2005;104:2658–70.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruers TJ, Langenhoff BS, Neeleman N, Jager GJ, Strijk S, Wobbes T, et al. Value of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:388–95.PubMedCrossRef Ruers TJ, Langenhoff BS, Neeleman N, Jager GJ, Strijk S, Wobbes T, et al. Value of positron emission tomography with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in patients with colorectal liver metastases: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:388–95.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, Pijl ME, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH, et al. Colorectal liver metastases. CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis-meta-analysis. Radiology 2005;237:123–31.PubMedCrossRef Bipat S, van Leeuwen MS, Comans EF, Pijl ME, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH, et al. Colorectal liver metastases. CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis-meta-analysis. Radiology 2005;237:123–31.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rappeport ED, Loft A, Bertheisen AK, von der Recke P, Larsen PN, Mogensen AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced FDG–PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG–PET vs CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 2007;48:369–78.PubMedCrossRef Rappeport ED, Loft A, Bertheisen AK, von der Recke P, Larsen PN, Mogensen AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced FDG–PET/CT vs. SPIO-enhanced MRI vs. FDG–PET vs CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation. Acta Radiol 2007;48:369–78.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Fischman AJ, Kadavigere R, Blake M, Hahn PF, et al. Detection of liver metastases from adenocarcinoma of the colon and pancreas: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced liver MRI and whole-body FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:239–47.PubMed Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Fischman AJ, Kadavigere R, Blake M, Hahn PF, et al. Detection of liver metastases from adenocarcinoma of the colon and pancreas: comparison of mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced liver MRI and whole-body FDG PET. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:239–47.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss L, Bostel F, Clorius JH, Raptou E, Wellman H, Georgi P. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessment of hepatic lesions. J Nucl Med 1982;23:1059–65.PubMed Strauss L, Bostel F, Clorius JH, Raptou E, Wellman H, Georgi P. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) for assessment of hepatic lesions. J Nucl Med 1982;23:1059–65.PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Messa C, Choi Y, Hoh CK, Jacobs EL, Glaspy JA, Rege S, et al. Quantification of glucose utilization in liver metastases: parametric imaging of FDG uptake with PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:684–89.PubMedCrossRef Messa C, Choi Y, Hoh CK, Jacobs EL, Glaspy JA, Rege S, et al. Quantification of glucose utilization in liver metastases: parametric imaging of FDG uptake with PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:684–89.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Strauss LG, Klippel S, Pan L, Schönleben K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:868–77.PubMedCrossRef Strauss LG, Klippel S, Pan L, Schönleben K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34:868–77.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Koukouraki S, Strauss LG, Georgoulias V, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1115–22.PubMedCrossRef Koukouraki S, Strauss LG, Georgoulias V, Eisenhut M, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 18F-FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:1115–22.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C. Quantitative PET Studies in pretreated melanoma patients: a comparison of 6-18F-fluoro-l-dopa with 18F-FDG and 15O-water using compartment and noncompartment analysis. J Nucl Med 2001;42:248–56.PubMed Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C. Quantitative PET Studies in pretreated melanoma patients: a comparison of 6-18F-fluoro-l-dopa with 18F-FDG and 15O-water using compartment and noncompartment analysis. J Nucl Med 2001;42:248–56.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hohenberger P, Haberkorn U, Mäcke HR, Eisenhut M, Strauss LG. 68Ga-labeled bombesin studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1245–50.PubMedCrossRef Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hohenberger P, Haberkorn U, Mäcke HR, Eisenhut M, Strauss LG. 68Ga-labeled bombesin studies in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med 2007;48:1245–50.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Can PET–CT with FDG replace contrast enhanced CT for imaging of liver metastases?
verfasst von
Ludwig G. Strauss
Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 12/2007
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-007-0619-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2007

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 12/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the editor

PET-CT is only one option