Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2021

11.11.2020 | Original Article

Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT

verfasst von: Wei Guo, Yizhen Pang, Lanlin Yao, Liang Zhao, Chunlei Fan, Jingpeng Ke, Ping Guo, Bing Hao, Hao Fu, Chengrong Xie, Qin Lin, Hua Wu, Long Sun, Haojun Chen

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 5/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT for diagnosing primary and metastatic lesions in patients with liver cancer, as well as to compare it with contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), liver MRI, and [18F]-FDG PET/CT.

Methods

We performed a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis of data obtained from a prospective parent study (NCT04416165). This study included 34 patients diagnosed with or suspected hepatic lesions who underwent concomitant [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 and [18F]-FDG/CT scans. Moreover, these patients underwent liver MRI (n = 34) and CE-CT (n = 25). Histopathologic (n = 62) or radiographic follow-up (n = 128) served as the reference standard for the final diagnosis.

Results

Among the 34 patients, 20, 12, and 2 patients presented with hepatocellular carcinomas, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, and benign hepatic nodules, respectively. The sensitivities of CE-CT, MRI, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04, and [18F]-FDG/CT for detecting primary liver tumors were 96%, 100%, 96%, and 65%, respectively. Regarding the diagnosis of all intrahepatic lesions, the per-lesion detection rate of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was slightly lower than that of MRI (85% vs. 100%, P = 0.34) and significantly higher than that of [18F]-FDG PET/CT (85% vs. 52%, P < 0.001). Regarding the diagnosis of all malignant lesions (including extrahepatic disease), the tumor detection rate of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT was 87.4%, which was significantly higher than that of [18F]-FDG PET/CT (65.0%, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the sensitivity of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT to correctly identify primary liver tumors and metastatic lesions is equivalent to that of CE-CT and liver MRI. Moreover, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT is better at identifying liver lesions than [18F]-FDG PET/CT, and its use may improve tumor staging, recurrence detection, and implementation of necessary treatment modifications.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Altekruse SF, Devesa SS, Dickie LA, Mcglynn KA, Kleiner DE. Histological classification of liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancers in SEER registries. J Registry Manag. 2011;38:201–5.PubMedPubMedCentral Altekruse SF, Devesa SS, Dickie LA, Mcglynn KA, Kleiner DE. Histological classification of liver and intrahepatic bile duct cancers in SEER registries. J Registry Manag. 2011;38:201–5.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, Tsushima Y, Higuchi T, Miyakubo M, et al. Clinicopathological presentation of varying 18F-FDG uptake and expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:83–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-007-0076-1.CrossRefPubMed Paudyal B, Oriuchi N, Paudyal P, Tsushima Y, Higuchi T, Miyakubo M, et al. Clinicopathological presentation of varying 18F-FDG uptake and expression of glucose transporter 1 and hexokinase II in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:83–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s12149-007-0076-1.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Metadaten
Titel
Imaging fibroblast activation protein in liver cancer: a single-center post hoc retrospective analysis to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT versus MRI and [18F]-FDG PET/CT
verfasst von
Wei Guo
Yizhen Pang
Lanlin Yao
Liang Zhao
Chunlei Fan
Jingpeng Ke
Ping Guo
Bing Hao
Hao Fu
Chengrong Xie
Qin Lin
Hua Wu
Long Sun
Haojun Chen
Publikationsdatum
11.11.2020
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-05095-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2021

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 5/2021 Zur Ausgabe