Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2015

01.02.2015

Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis

verfasst von: Atul B. Shinagare, Ivan K. Ip, Ali S. Raja, V. Anik Sahni, Peter Banks, Ramin Khorasani

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Assess the utility of CT and MRI in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) presenting to emergency department (ED).

Materials and Methods

In this Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study, we identified all patients with AP from March 2012 through February 2013 in ED of a teaching hospital with approximately 60,000 annual visits. Patients were initially identified via ICD-9 code for AP (577.0); diagnosis was confirmed by chart review using established diagnostic criteria (presence of two of the following: typical abdominal pain, elevated lipase/amylase >3 times normal, or imaging findings of pancreatitis). Abdominal CT or MRI obtained in the ED and within 24 h of admission was reviewed by a fellowship-trained abdominal radiologist.

Results

Of 101 patients admitted with AP (60 women, 41 men; mean age 52 years, range 20–89), 63 (62.4%) underwent imaging; only one (1.6%) showed pancreatic necrosis. 88 (87.1%) patients could have been clinically diagnosed without imaging based on presence of abdominal pain and elevated laboratory values; 13 (12.9%) required imaging for diagnosis. Of 88 patients who met AP diagnostic criteria without imaging, 50 (56.8%) nonetheless underwent imaging, with AP without necrosis seen in 34 (68.0%), pancreatic necrosis in one (2.0%), sequelae of prior AP in four (8.0%), and no abnormality in 11 (22.0%).

Conclusion

Early imaging is common in patients with AP, even when the diagnosis can be established based on non-imaging criteria, rarely demonstrating pancreatic necrosis. Reducing overuse of early imaging in patients with confident diagnosis of AP may improve quality and reduce waste.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5):1179–1187PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. (2012) Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143(5):1179–1187PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedCrossRef Bradley EL (1993) A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 128(5):586–590PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef Balthazar EJ (2002) Acute pancreatitis: assessment of severity with clinical and CT evaluation. Radiology 223(3):603–613PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61(6):443–451PubMed Ranson JH, Rifkind KM, Roses DF, et al. (1974) Objective early identification of severe acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 61(6):443–451PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (1986) Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 1(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef Agarwal N, Pitchumoni CS (1986) Simplified prognostic criteria in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 1(1):69–73PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829PubMedCrossRef Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE (1985) APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 13(10):818–829PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2(8656):201–205PubMedCrossRef Larvin M, McMahon MJ (1989) APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet 2(8656):201–205PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef Wilson C, Heath DI, Imrie CW (1990) Prediction of outcome in acute pancreatitis: a comparative study of APACHE II, clinical assessment and multiple factor scoring systems. Br J Surg 77(11):1260–1264PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. (2009) A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):966–971PubMedCrossRef Singh VK, Wu BU, Bollen TL, et al. (2009) A prospective evaluation of the bedside index for severity in acute pancreatitis score in assessing mortality and intermediate markers of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 104(4):966–971PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Wiesner W, Intriere L, et al. (2004) A modified CT severity index for evaluating acute pancreatitis: improved correlation with patient outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(5):1261–1265PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62(1):102–111PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRef Banks PA, Freeman ML (2006) Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 101(10):2379–2400PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanier BWM, Nio Y, van der Hulst RWM, et al. (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 10(2–3):222–228PubMedCrossRef Spanier BWM, Nio Y, van der Hulst RWM, et al. (2010) Practice and yield of early CT scan in acute pancreatitis: a Dutch observational multicenter study. Pancreatology 10(2–3):222–228PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Forsmark CE, Baillie J, AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board (2007) AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 132(5):2022–2044PubMedCrossRef Forsmark CE, Baillie J, AGA Institute Clinical Practice and Economics Committee, AGA Institute Governing Board (2007) AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 132(5):2022–2044PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, et al. (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital—analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258(1):174–181PubMedCrossRef Mortele KJ, Ip IK, Wu BU, et al. (2011) Acute pancreatitis: imaging utilization practices in an urban teaching hospital—analysis of trends with assessment of independent predictors in correlation with patient outcomes. Radiology 258(1):174–181PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Gabbrielli A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic assessment and outcome of acute pancreatitis in Italy: results of a prospective multicentre study. ProInf-AISP: Progetto informatizzato pancreatite acuta, Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas, phase II. Dig Liver Dis 39(9):829–837PubMedCrossRef Uomo G, Pezzilli R, Gabbrielli A, et al. (2007) Diagnostic assessment and outcome of acute pancreatitis in Italy: results of a prospective multicentre study. ProInf-AISP: Progetto informatizzato pancreatite acuta, Associazione Italiana Studio Pancreas, phase II. Dig Liver Dis 39(9):829–837PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54(Suppl 3):1–9 Working Party of the British Society of Gastroenterology (2005) Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; Pancreatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland; Association of Upper GI Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland. UK guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Gut 54(Suppl 3):1–9
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Toosie K, Chang L, Renslo R, et al. (1997) Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 63(10):904–907PubMed Toosie K, Chang L, Renslo R, et al. (1997) Early computed tomography is rarely necessary in gallstone pancreatitis. Am Surg 63(10):904–907PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanier BWM, Bruno MJ (2011) Use of early CT scanning in patients with acute pancreatitis. Radiology 260(2):606PubMedCrossRef Spanier BWM, Bruno MJ (2011) Use of early CT scanning in patients with acute pancreatitis. Radiology 260(2):606PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619PubMedCrossRef Bollen TL, Singh VK, Maurer R, et al. (2012) A comparative evaluation of radiologic and clinical scoring systems in the early prediction of severity in acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 107(4):612–619PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R, et al. (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef Treacy J, Williams A, Bais R, et al. (2001) Evaluation of amylase and lipase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. ANZ J Surg 71(10):577–582PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yegneswaran B, Pitchumoni CS (2010) When should serum amylase and lipase levels be repeated in a patient with acute pancreatitis? Cleve Clin J Med 77(4):230–231PubMedCrossRef Yegneswaran B, Pitchumoni CS (2010) When should serum amylase and lipase levels be repeated in a patient with acute pancreatitis? Cleve Clin J Med 77(4):230–231PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Use of CT and MRI in emergency department patients with acute pancreatitis
verfasst von
Atul B. Shinagare
Ivan K. Ip
Ali S. Raja
V. Anik Sahni
Peter Banks
Ramin Khorasani
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0210-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2015

Abdominal Radiology 2/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.