Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
International Orthopaedics
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Original Paper

Outcome of an ultrashort metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem in highly active obese and non-obese patients

verfasst von: Young-Hoo Kim, Jang-Won Park, Jun-Shik Kim

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical and radiographic results and complication rates after cementless total hip arthroplasty using an ultrashort femoral stem in highly active [University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity level above 8 points] obese and non-obese patients.

Methods

A total of 108 patients (138 hips) in the obese group [body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m2 or greater] and 125 patients (168 hips) in the nonobese group (BMI of 29 kg/m2 or less) were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 50.7 ± 11.6 years in the obese group and 48.2 ± 13.0 years in the nonobese group. The mean follow-up was 7.4 years (range six to eight years) and 7.5 years (range six to eight years), respectively.

Results

At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences between the highly active obese and nonobese patients with regard to the mean Harris hip score (91 versus 94 points, p = 0.091), the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (16 versus 11 points, p = 0.135) or the mean UCLA activity scores (8.7 versus 8.8 points, p = 0.400). No hip in either group had thigh pain or a revision or ceramic fracture.

Conclusions

The most striking findings in this study were the equivalent results achieved in highly active obese and nonobese patients undergoing primary cementless total hip arthroplasty using an ultrashort metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless femoral component.
Literatur
1.
Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (1998) Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty-five year follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:704–714PubMed
2.
Surin VV, Sundholm K (1983) Survival of patients and prostheses after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177:148–153PubMed
3.
Sullivan PM, Mackenzie JR, Callaghan JJ, Johnston RC (1994) Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who are less than fifty years old. A sixteen to twenty-two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:863–869PubMed
4.
Paterno SA, Lachiewicz PE, Kelley SS (1997) The influence of patient-related factors and the position of the acetabular component on the rate of dislocation after hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1202–1210PubMed
5.
Lehman DE, Capello WN, Feinberg JR (1994) Total hip arthroplasty without cement in obese patients. A minimum two-year clinical and radiographic follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:854–862PubMed
6.
Jiganti JJ, Goldstein WM, Williams CS (1993) A comparison of the perioperative morbidity in total joint arthroplasty in the obese and nonobese patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 289:175–179PubMed
7.
Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M (2003) A ten-to 15-year follow-up of the cementless Spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:209–214CrossRefPubMed
8.
Teloken MA, Bissett G, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH (2002) Ten to fifteen-year follow-up after total hip arthroplasty with a tapered cobalt-chromium femoral component (Tri-Lock) inserted without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2140–2144PubMed
9.
Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS (1995) Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement. Am J Orthop 24:766–770PubMed
10.
Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13:890–895CrossRefPubMed
11.
Kuczmarski RJ, Carroll MD, Flegal KM, Troiano RP (1997) Varying body mass index cutoff points to describe overweight prevalence among U.S. adults: NHANES III (1988 to 1994). Obes Res 5:542–548CrossRefPubMed
12.
Lübbeke A, Garavaglia G, Barea C, Stern R, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P (2011) Influence of patient activity on femoral osteolysis at five and ten years following hybrid total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:456–463CrossRefPubMed
13.
Ficat RP (1985) Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head: early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:3–9PubMed
14.
Braud P, Freeman MA (1990) The effect of retention of the femoral neck and of cement upon the stability of proximal femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 5(Suppl):S5–S10CrossRefPubMed
15.
Santori FS, Santori N (2010) Mid-term results of a custom-made short proximal loading femoral component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1231–1237CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S (2013) Behaviour of the ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stem in young and elderly patients. Int Orthop 37:2323–2330CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
17.
Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S (2013) Is diaphyseal stem fixation necessary for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoporotic bone (class C bone)? J Arthroplasty 28:139–146CrossRefPubMed
18.
Kim Y-H, Oh J-H (2012) A comparison of a conventional versus a short, anatomical metaphyseal-fitting cementless femoral stem in the treatment of patients with a fracture of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:774–781CrossRefPubMed
19.
Kim Y-H, Kim J-S, Joo J-H, Park J-W (2012) A prospective short-term outcome study of a short metaphyseal fitting total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:88–94CrossRefPubMed
20.
Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755PubMed
21.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a heath status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMed
22.
Kim Y-H, Kim VE (1993) Early migration of uncemented porous coated anatomic femoral component related to aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:146–155PubMed
23.
Dorr LD (1986) Total hip replacement using the APR system. Tech Orthop 1:22–34CrossRef
24.
Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:45–55PubMed
25.
Haverkamp D, Klinkenbiji MN, Somford MP, Rob Albers GH, van der Vis HM (2011) Obesity in total hip arthroplasty-does it really matter? A meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 82:417–422CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
26.
Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC (1999) The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:481–492CrossRefPubMed
27.
Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT, Biggs JJ, Cox CM, Portmann AJ, Gildea JH, Gren LH, Lyon JL (2003) Relationship between body mass indices and surgical replacements of knee and hip joints. Am J Prev Med 25:290–295CrossRefPubMed
28.
Chan CL, Villar RN (1996) Obesity and quality of life after primary hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:78–81PubMed
29.
Stickles B, Phillips L, Brox T, Owens B, Lanzer WL (2001) Defining the relationship between obesity and total joint arthroplasty. Obes Res 9:219–223CrossRefPubMed
30.
Jackson MP, Sexton SA, Yeung E, Walter WK, Zicat BA (2009) The effect of obesity on the mid-term survival and clinical outcome of cementless total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1296–1300CrossRefPubMed
31.
Elson LC, Barr CJ, Chandran SE, Hansen VJ, Malchau H, Kwon Y-M (2013) Are morbidly obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty at an increased risk for component malpositioning? J Arthroplasty 28(8 Suppl):41–44CrossRefPubMed
32.
McCalden RW, Charron KD, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Naudie DD (2011) Does morbid obesity affect the outcome of total hip replacement? An analysis of 3290 THRs. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:321–325CrossRefPubMed
33.
Schwarzkopf R, Thompson SL, Adwar SJ, Liublinska V, Slover JD (2012) Postoperative complication rates in the “super-obese” hip and knee arthroplasty population. J Arthroplasty 27:397–401CrossRefPubMed
34.
McAuley JP, Moore KD, Culpepper WJ 2nd, Engh CA (1998) Total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated prostheses fixed without cement in patients who are sixty-five years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1648–1655PubMed
35.
Walker PS, Culligan SG, Hua J, Muirhead-Allwood SK, Bentley G (1999) The effect of a lateral feature on implant stability. Hip Int 9:71–80
36.
Kim Y-H, Choi Y-W, Kim J-S (2011) Comparison of bone mineral density changes around short, metaphyseal-fitting and conventional cementless anatomical femoral components. J Arthroplasty 26:931–940CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Outcome of an ultrashort metaphyseal-fitting anatomic cementless stem in highly active obese and non-obese patients
verfasst von
Young-Hoo Kim
Jang-Won Park
Jun-Shik Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2520-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

International Orthopaedics 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Original Paper

Influence of wound drainage in primary total knee arthroplasty without tourniquet

Editorial

International orthopaedics today

Original Paper

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants

Erratum

Erratum to: Prediction of osteonecrosis collapse of the femoral head based on the proportion of the proximal sclerotic rim

Letter to the Editor

How to explain the evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty?

Original Paper

Functional assessment of combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner with a single femoral tunnel: a two-year minimum follow-up

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise