Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 8/2016

07.01.2016 | Original Paper

Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study

verfasst von: Romain Bouchet, Damien Block, Thomas D’ollonne, François Gadea, Julia Gaillot, François Sirveaux, Dominique Saragaglia, the SOFCOT

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 8/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- and medium-term results of non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. The initial hypothesis was that non-operative treatment of fractures with little or no displacement is equivalent or superior to surgical treatment, and that non-operative treatment is probably insufficient for displaced fractures.

Methods

This was a multicentric, prospective and retrospective study, based on 384 four-part proximal humerus fractures, 58 of which involved non-operative treatments - 37 in the prospective study (Pro-CT4) and 21 in the retrospective study (Retro-CT4). The average patient age was 64 +/− 14 years (39–90); 66 % were female and 34 % male. In 88 % of these cases, non-operative treatment was chosen for the fracture, as there was little or no displacement. In 10 % of cases, non-operative treatment was chosen “by default”, due to the patient’s medical conditions, as surgery was contraindicated, and in 2 % of cases due to the patient refusing surgery. All patients were reviewed clinically and radiologically, with SSV evaluation, absolute and weighted Constant scores and the Quick DASH score all assessed. The main evaluation criterion was the weighted Constant score which was considered a failure when below 70 %.

Results

In the Pro-CT4 study, the average follow-up period was 11 +/− four months (5–18) with functional scores as follows: average SSV: 72 +/− 26 % (8–100); average Constant score: 65 +/− 21 points (21–95); average weighted Constant score: 86 +/− 26 % (32–130); average Quick DASH: 23 +/− 21 (0–64). 27 % of patients had a weighted Constant score below 70 %.
In the Retro-CT4 study, the average follow-up period was 38 +/− 13 months (18–62) with functional scores as follows: average SSV: 73 +/− 17 % (30–100); average Constant score: 68 +/− 18 points (33–95); average weighted Constant score: 88 +/− 27 % (47–133); average Quick DASH: 18 +/− 16 (0–48); 24 % of patients had a weighted Constant score below 70 %.

Conclusion

This study confirms our initial hypothesis. When non-operative treatment of four-part proximal humerus fractures is carried out by choice, the results are excellent. However, when this treatment is carried out “by default” — especially because surgery is contraindicated — the results are disappointing.
Level of evidence IV: prospective and retrospective studies.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cm C-B, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697CrossRef Cm C-B, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92CrossRefPubMed Palvanen M, Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J (2006) Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:87–92CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(suppl 2):S65–S72CrossRefPubMed Hertel R (2005) Fractures of the proximal humerus in osteoporotic bone. Osteoporos Int 16(suppl 2):S65–S72CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilbart MK, Gerber G (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:717–721CrossRef Gilbart MK, Gerber G (2007) Comparison of the subjective shoulder value and the constant score. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:717–721CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:427–433CrossRef Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, Leunig M (2004) Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 13:427–433CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Court-Brown CM, Cattermole H, McQueen MM (2002) The impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:504–508CrossRef Court-Brown CM, Cattermole H, McQueen MM (2002) The impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84:504–508CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Neer CN (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089PubMed Neer CN (1970) Displaced proximal humeral fractures classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:1077–1089PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:203–207PubMed Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zckerman JD (1997) Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:203–207PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQuenn MM (2001) The translated two-part of the proximal humerus epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 83:799–804CrossRef Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQuenn MM (2001) The translated two-part of the proximal humerus epidemiology and outcome in the older patient. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 83:799–804CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:365–371CrossRefPubMed Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM (2001) The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 72:365–371CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Boons HW, Goosen JH, Van Grinsven S, Van Susante JL, Van Loon CJ (2012) Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3483–3491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boons HW, Goosen JH, Van Grinsven S, Van Susante JL, Van Loon CJ (2012) Hemiarthroplasty for humeral four-part fractures for patients 65 years and older: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3483–3491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Egol KA, Crispin C, Ong BA, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164CrossRefPubMed Egol KA, Crispin C, Ong BA, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD (2008) Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma 22:159–164CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Van den Broek CM, van den Beddelaar M, Coenen JM, Vegt PA (2007) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: intramedullary nailing versus conservative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:459–463CrossRefPubMed Van den Broek CM, van den Beddelaar M, Coenen JM, Vegt PA (2007) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: intramedullary nailing versus conservative treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:459–463CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fu T, Xia C, Li Z, Wu H (2014) Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:4607–4615PubMedPubMedCentral Fu T, Xia C, Li Z, Wu H (2014) Surgical versus conservative treatment for displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Clin Exp Med 7:4607–4615PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fjalestad T, Hole MØ (2014) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment: a 2-year extension of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:1067–73CrossRefPubMed Fjalestad T, Hole MØ (2014) Displaced proximal humeral fractures: operative versus non-operative treatment: a 2-year extension of a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24:1067–73CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith AM, Mardones RM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2007) Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:14–24CrossRef Smith AM, Mardones RM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH (2007) Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16:14–24CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, Gerber C (2013) Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:542–549CrossRef Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, Gerber C (2013) Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:542–549CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Non-operative treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal end of the humerus: results of a prospective and retrospective multicentric study
verfasst von
Romain Bouchet
Damien Block
Thomas D’ollonne
François Gadea
Julia Gaillot
François Sirveaux
Dominique Saragaglia
the SOFCOT
Publikationsdatum
07.01.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3090-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2016

International Orthopaedics 8/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.