Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 7/2017

29.11.2016 | Original Article

Incidence, grade and distribution of prostate cancer following transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation

verfasst von: Gregory S. Merrick, Robert W. Galbreath, Abbey Bennett, Wayne M. Butler, Edward Amamovich

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 7/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the role of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) diagnosed via transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (TRUS).

Methods

In total, 132 consecutive patients with TRUS-diagnosed ASAP underwent TTMB by means of an anatomic-based technique with sampling of 24 biopsy regions. For each of the 24 regions, 1–3 biopsy cores were obtained (depending on prostate size). No patient underwent pre-biopsy MRI imaging. The Gleason score, location of each positive biopsy core, the number of biopsy cores and percent involvement of each core were recorded. Anterior versus posterior cancer distribution was determined for both low- and high-grade (Gleason score ≥7) cancer.

Results

The mean patient age was 63.8 years with a mean PSA of 6.8 ng/mL. Of the 132 patients, 86 (65.2%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Of the entire cohort, 47 patients (54.7% of cancer patients and 35.6% of the entire cohort) were diagnosed with Gleason score ≥7. For both low- and high-grade cancers, the anterior gland and especially the anterior apex were the most common cancer locations.

Conclusion

In patients with ASAP, TTMB diagnosed prostate cancer in 65.2% of patients and 35.6% of the entire cohort had high-grade prostate cancer. A predilection for anterior-based cancers, especially the anterior apex, was identified. Our study may serve as a baseline reference for MRI-guided biopsy regimens.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG (1997) The focus of “atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy” in prostatic needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol 108:633–640CrossRefPubMed Cheville JC, Reznicek MJ, Bostwick DG (1997) The focus of “atypical glands, suspicious for malignancy” in prostatic needle biopsy specimens: incidence, histologic features, and clinical follow-up of cases diagnosed in a community practice. Am J Clin Pathol 108:633–640CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Montironi R, Scattoni V, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Bostwick DG, Montorsi F (2006) Atypical foci suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies (also referred to as “atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy”). Eur Urol 50:666–674CrossRefPubMed Montironi R, Scattoni V, Mazzucchelli R, Lopez-Beltran A, Bostwick DG, Montorsi F (2006) Atypical foci suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy in prostate needle biopsies (also referred to as “atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy”). Eur Urol 50:666–674CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Borboroglu PG, Sur RL, Roberts JL, Amling CL (2001) Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 166:866–870CrossRefPubMed Borboroglu PG, Sur RL, Roberts JL, Amling CL (2001) Repeat biopsy strategy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation or high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on initial prostate needle biopsy. J Urol 166:866–870CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Freschi M, Deho F, Raber M, Briganti A et al (2005) Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on extended prostatic biopsies: predictive factors of cancer detection on repeat biopsies. Arch Ital Urol Androl 77:31–36PubMed Scattoni V, Roscigno M, Freschi M, Deho F, Raber M, Briganti A et al (2005) Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) on extended prostatic biopsies: predictive factors of cancer detection on repeat biopsies. Arch Ital Urol Androl 77:31–36PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Herawi M (2006) Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 175:820–834CrossRefPubMed Epstein JI, Herawi M (2006) Prostate needle biopsies containing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical foci suspicious for carcinoma: implications for patient care. J Urol 175:820–834CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorin RP, Wiener S, Harris CD, Wagner JR (2015) Prostate atypia: does repeat biopsy detect clinically significant prostate cancer? Prostate 75:673–678CrossRefPubMed Dorin RP, Wiener S, Harris CD, Wagner JR (2015) Prostate atypia: does repeat biopsy detect clinically significant prostate cancer? Prostate 75:673–678CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Carroll PR, Parsons JK, Andriole G, Bahnson RR, Barocas DA, Catalona WJ et al (2014) Prostate cancer early detection, version 1.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12:1211–1219CrossRefPubMed Carroll PR, Parsons JK, Andriole G, Bahnson RR, Barocas DA, Catalona WJ et al (2014) Prostate cancer early detection, version 1.2014. Featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 12:1211–1219CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Van Der Kwast T et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Van Der Kwast T et al (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol 65:124–137CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Leone A, Gershman B, Rotker K, Butler C, Fantasia J, Miller A et al (2016) Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19:68–71CrossRefPubMed Leone A, Gershman B, Rotker K, Butler C, Fantasia J, Miller A et al (2016) Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP): is a repeat biopsy necessary ASAP? A multi-institutional review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 19:68–71CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Warlick C, Feia K, Tomasini J, Iwamoto C, Lindgren B, Risk M (2015) Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 18:255–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warlick C, Feia K, Tomasini J, Iwamoto C, Lindgren B, Risk M (2015) Rate of Gleason 7 or higher prostate cancer on repeat biopsy after a diagnosis of atypical small acinar proliferation. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 18:255–259CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Raskolnikov D, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Turkbey B, Shakir NA, Okoro C et al (2015) The role of image guided biopsy targeting in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. J Urol 193:473–478CrossRefPubMed Raskolnikov D, Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Turkbey B, Shakir NA, Okoro C et al (2015) The role of image guided biopsy targeting in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation. J Urol 193:473–478CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Leone L, Lacetera V, Montironi R, Cantoro U, Conti A, Sbrollini G et al (2014) Biopsy follow-up in patients with isolated atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in prostate biopsy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 86:332–335CrossRefPubMed Leone L, Lacetera V, Montironi R, Cantoro U, Conti A, Sbrollini G et al (2014) Biopsy follow-up in patients with isolated atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) in prostate biopsy. Arch Ital Urol Androl 86:332–335CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lundstrom KJ, Drevin L, Carlsson S, Garmo H, Loeb S, Stattin P et al (2014) Nationwide population based study of infections after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 192:1116–1122CrossRefPubMed Lundstrom KJ, Drevin L, Carlsson S, Garmo H, Loeb S, Stattin P et al (2014) Nationwide population based study of infections after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 192:1116–1122CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2013) Is repeat prostate biopsy associated with a greater risk of hospitalization? Data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol 189:867–870CrossRefPubMed Loeb S, Carter HB, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Schaeffer EM (2013) Is repeat prostate biopsy associated with a greater risk of hospitalization? Data from SEER-Medicare. J Urol 189:867–870CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW, Andreini H, Taubenslag W, Curtis R et al (2010) Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13:71–77CrossRefPubMed Taira AV, Merrick GS, Galbreath RW, Andreini H, Taubenslag W, Curtis R et al (2010) Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 13:71–77CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner N, Merrick GS, Butler WM, Bennett A, Galbreath RW (2013) Incidence and pathological features of prosate cancer detected on transperineal template guided mapping biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. J Urol 190:509–514CrossRefPubMed Bittner N, Merrick GS, Butler WM, Bennett A, Galbreath RW (2013) Incidence and pathological features of prosate cancer detected on transperineal template guided mapping biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. J Urol 190:509–514CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ong W, Weerakoon M, Huang S, Paul E, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M et al (2015) Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperienal Biopsy Collaboration experience. BJU Int 116:568–576CrossRefPubMed Ong W, Weerakoon M, Huang S, Paul E, Lawrentschuk N, Frydenberg M et al (2015) Transperineal biopsy prostate cancer detection in first biopsy and repeat biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: the Victorian Transperienal Biopsy Collaboration experience. BJU Int 116:568–576CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang S, Reeves F, Preece J, Satasivam P, Royce P, Grummet JP (2015) Significant impact of transperineal template biopsy of the prostate at a single tertiary institution. Urol Ann 7:428–432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang S, Reeves F, Preece J, Satasivam P, Royce P, Grummet JP (2015) Significant impact of transperineal template biopsy of the prostate at a single tertiary institution. Urol Ann 7:428–432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bittner N, Merrick GS, Taira A, Bennett A, Schattel A, Butler W et al (2016) Location and grade of prostate cancer diagnosed by transperineal template guided mapping biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. Am J Clin Oncol (in press) Bittner N, Merrick GS, Taira A, Bennett A, Schattel A, Butler W et al (2016) Location and grade of prostate cancer diagnosed by transperineal template guided mapping biopsy after negative transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. Am J Clin Oncol (in press)
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Futterer JJ, Briganti A, Visschere PD, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed Futterer JJ, Briganti A, Visschere PD, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A et al (2015) Can clinically significant prostate cancer be detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68:1045–1053CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Incidence, grade and distribution of prostate cancer following transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in patients with atypical small acinar proliferation
verfasst von
Gregory S. Merrick
Robert W. Galbreath
Abbey Bennett
Wayne M. Butler
Edward Amamovich
Publikationsdatum
29.11.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1976-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2017

World Journal of Urology 7/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.