nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.04.2008 | Orthopaedic Outcome Assessment

Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study

verfasst von: Radek Hart, Pavel Šváb, Peter Filan

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The goal of the current prospective randomised radiological study was to determine the accuracy of conventional and computer-assisted femoral component implantation in surface arthroplasty (SRA).

Methods

We analysed on standard radiographs the femoral component positions after 30 conventional instrumented (Group 1) and 30 navigated (Group 2) SRA femoral components. We evaluated: varus or valgus orientation, horizontal femoral offset and translation of the component.

Results

The tendency to implant the femoral component in mild valgus position (2.8° in Group 1 compared to 2.1° in Group 2), more distally and ventrally in the femoral neck (in Group 1) and with femoral off-set increase (4.8 mm in Group 1 compared to 3.4 mm in Group 2) was found.

Conclusions

The navigation system enables a more accurate insertion of the femoral component.

Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Duff ML (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:1874–1877

Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Winzenrieth R, Plamondon D, Nuno N (2006) Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Hip Int 16(Suppl):106

Itayem R, Arndt A, Nistor L, McMinn D, Lundberg A (2005) Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. J Bone Joint Surg 87B:158–162

Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, McLardy-Smith P, Murray DW (2004) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:172–176CrossRef

Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2003) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:177–184

Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF (2002) Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg 84A:1788–1792

Kishida Y, Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yamaguchi K, Yoshikawa H (2004) Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86B:185–189CrossRef

Silva M, Lee KH, Heisel Ch, delaRosa MA, Schmalzried TP (2004) The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:40–46

Bogoch ER, Fornasier VL, Capello WN (1982) The femoral head remnant in resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 167:92–105PubMed

10.

Ito K, Minka MA, Leunig M, Werlen S, Ganz R (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J Bone Joint Surg 83B:171–176CrossRef

11.

Nötzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J (2002) The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of the anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg 84B:556–560CrossRef

12.

Meyer DC, Beck M, Ellis T, Ganz R, Leunig M (2006) Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity. Clin Orthop 445:181–185PubMed

13.

D´Lima DD, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr (2001) Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg 83A:87–91

14.

Berry DJ (1999) Dislocation. In: Steinberg ME, Garino JP (eds) Revision total hip arthroplasty. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 463–481

15.

Beaulé PE, Lee JL, LeDuff MJ, Amstutz HC, Ebramzadeh E (2004) Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 86A:2015–2021

16.

Bernsmann K, Langlotz U, Ansari B, Wiese M (2000) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in hip arthroplasty—application study in clinical routine. Z Orthop 138:515–521PubMedCrossRef

17.

DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Simon DA, Morgan F, Moody JE, Nikou C, Colgan BD, Aston CA, Labarca RS, Kischell E, Kanade T (1998) The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively actabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop 355:8–22PubMedCrossRef

18.

Haaker R, Tiedjen K, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M (2003) Computer assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips. Z Orthop 141:105–111PubMedCrossRef

19.

Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Blackwell M, Nikou C (1998) Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 354:70–81PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kiefer H (2003) OrthoPilot cup navigation—how to optimise cup positioning? Int Orthop 27(S1):S37–S42PubMed

21.

Ottersbach A, Haaker R (2005) Optimization of cup positioning in THA—comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the OrthoPilot navigation system. Z Orthop 143:611–615PubMedCrossRef

22.

Saxler G, Marx A, Vabndervelde D (2004) A comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop 142:286–291PubMedCrossRef

23.

Štipčák V, Stoklas J, Hart R, Janeček M (2004) Implantation of a non-cemented acetabulum with the use of a navigation system. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 71:288–291PubMed

24.

Richolt JA, Rittmeister ME (2006) Misinterpretation of the anteversion in computer-assisted acetabular cup navigation as a result of a simplified palpation method of the frontal pelvic plane. An untrasonographic assessment. Z Orthop 144:305–310PubMedCrossRef

25.

Štipčák V, Hart R, Kučera B (2006) Our experience with an image guided navigation system for accurate alignment in total hip replacement by minimally invasive posterolateral surgery. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 73:350–352PubMed

26.

Hess T, Gampe T, Köttgen C, Szawlowski B (2004) Intraoperative navigation for hip resurfacing. Methods and first results. Orthopade 33:1183–1193PubMedCrossRef

27.

Bäthis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Kalteis T, Grifka J (2007) Comparison of fluoroscopic and landmark-based technique with the Vector-Vision system. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, DiGioia AM (eds) Navigation and MIS in orthopedic surgery. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 359–364CrossRef

28.

Chandler M, Kowalski RSZ, Watkins ND, Briscoe A, New AMR (2006) Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing. Proc IMechE 220(part H):321–331CrossRef

29.

Siebel T, Maubach S, Morlock MM (2006) Lessons learned from early clinical experience and results of 300 ASR^® hip resurfacing implantations. Proc IMechE 220(part H):345–353CrossRef

Titel: Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study
verfasst von: Radek Hart
Pavel Šváb
Peter Filan
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2008
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2008
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0540-3

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2008

In reference to: The utility of the perioperative autologous transfusion system the OrthoPAT ® in total hip replacement surgery

Rotational acetabular osteotomy with a resection of the lateral edge of the acetabulum for the treatment of advanced coxarthrosis

Chondromyxoid fibroma: a rare tumor with an unusual location

Hip arthroplasty with the thrust plate prosthesis in patients of 65 years of age or older: 67 patients followed 2–7 years

Femoral revision using long hydroxyapatite-coated interlocking stem