Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.03.2009 | Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
Suture anchor fixation strength in osteopenic versus non-osteopenic bone for rotator cuff repair
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2009
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Introduction
Rotator cuff tears are increasing with age. Does osteopenic bone have an influence on the pullout strength of suture anchors?
Materials and methods
SPIRALOK 5.0 mm (DePuy Mitek), Super Revo 5 mm and UltraSorb (both ConMed Linvatec) suture anchors were tested in six osteopenic and six healthy human cadaveric humeri. Incremental cyclic loading was performed. The ultimate failure load, anchor displacement, and the mode of failure were recorded.
Results
In the non-osteopenic bone group, the absorbable SPIRALOK 5.0 mm achieved a significantly better pullout strength (274 N ± 29 N, mean ± SD) than the titanium anchor Super Revo 5 mm (188 N ± 34 N, mean ± SD), and the tilting anchor UltraSorb (192 N ± 34 N, mean ± SD). In the osteopenic bone group no significant difference in the pullout strength was found. The failure mechanisms, such as anchor pullout, rupture at eyelet, suture breakage and breakage of eyelet, varied between the anchors.
Conclusion
The present study demonstrates that, in osteopenic bone, absorbable suture anchors do not have lower pullout strengths than metal anchors. In normal bone, the bioabsorbable anchor in this study even outperformed the non-absorbable anchor.