nach oben

Supportive Care in Cancer

Erschienen in:

01.12.2009 | Original Article

An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer

verfasst von: Emanuela Mauri, Elena Vegni, Edoardo Lozza, Patricia A. Parker, Egidio A. Moja

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 12/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Goal

Major cross-cultural differences in truth-telling attitudes and practices have been demonstrated. Until recently, in Italy the doctor could conceal both diagnosis and prognosis to seriously ill patients out of beneficence. Signs of change have been reported, but the extent and way patients would be informed is still unknown. The aim of the study was to assess Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer and its treatment. We examined the factor structure of the Measure of Patients’ Preferences—Italian version (MPP-It) and whether demographical and medical variables were associated with the dimensions of patients’ preferences.

Materials and methods

Patients were invited to participate during a visit to the oncology department of the Lecco hospital (Italy) for chemotherapy or follow-up. An Italian version of the MPP-It was administered. Data were analyzed through a factor analysis.

Main results

A total of 210 cancer patients agreed to participate. Three main factors were identified: (1) Information (Talking About the Disease). Items in this factor were concerned with the dialogue about the disease and treatment options; (2) Support (The Emotional World of the Patient). These items referred to the supportive and relational aspects of the physician–patient encounter; (3) Care (The Ideal Doctor). These items related to the patients’ desires about the doctor’s personal attributes.

Conclusions

The first two factors, information and support, were comparable to those of similar American and Asian studies. The study suggests a cross-cultural uniformity among cancer patients who appreciate the informative and clearness of the communication aspects as being primarily important, while also giving high points to relationship aspects. The third factor appears unique to the Italian context.

Anderlik MR, Pentz RD, Hess KR (2000) Revisiting the truth-telling debate: a study of disclosure practices at a major cancer center. J Clin Ethics 11:251–259PubMed

Cavanna L, Anselmi E, Lazzaro A, Seghini P, Di Nunzio C, Dallanegra L, Monfredo M (2007) Cancer diagnosis disclosure in a northern Italian hospital. Report on 312 consecutive cancer patients. Tumori 93:290–291PubMed

Chiu L-Q, Lee W-S, Gao F, Parker PA, Ng G-Y, Toh C-K (2006) Cancer patients’ preferences for communication of unfavourable news: an Asian perspective. Support Care Cancer 14:818–824. doi:10.1007/s00520-005-0911-7 CrossRefPubMed

Costantini M, Marasso G, Montella M, Borgia P, Cecioni R, Beccaro M, Sguazzotti E, Bruzzi P (2006) Diagnosis and prognosis disclosure among cancer patients. Results from an Italian mortality follow-back survey. Ann Oncol 17:853–859. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl028 CrossRefPubMed

De Lorenzo F, Ballatori E, Di Costanzo F, Giacalone A, Ruggeri B, Tirelli U (2004) Improving information to Italian cancer patients: results of a randomized study. Ann Oncol 15:721–725. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdh190 CrossRefPubMed

Fallowfield L (1996) Things to consider when teaching doctors how to deliver good, bad and sad news. Med Teach 18:27–30. doi:10.3109/01421599609040258 CrossRef

Fontanesi S, Goss C, Rimondini M (2007) How to involve patients in the decision making process. Recenti Prog Med 98:611–618PubMed

Fujimori M, Akechi T, Morita T, Inagaki M, Azikuki N, Sakano Y, Uchitomi Y (2007) Preferences of cancer patients regarding the disclosure of bad news. Psychooncology 16:573–581. doi:10.1002/pon.1093 CrossRefPubMed

Grassi L, Girali T, Messina EG, Magnani K, Valle E, Cartei G (2000) Physicians’ attitudes to and problems with truth-telling to cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 8:40–45PubMed

10.

The Italian Group for the Evaluation of Outcomes in Oncology (IGEO) (1999) Awareness of disease among Italian cancer patients: Is there a need for further improvement in patient information? Ann Oncol 10:1095–1100. doi:10.1023/A:1017278918524 CrossRef

11.

Kusec S, Oreskovic S, Skegro M, Korolija D, Busic Z, Horzic M (2006) Improving comprehension of informed consent. Patient Educ Couns 60:294–300. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.009 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Lamiani G, Meyer EC, Rider EA, Browning DM, Vegni E, Mauri E, Moja EA, Truog RD (2008) Assumptions and blind spots in patient-centeredness: action research between American and Italian healthcare professionals. Med Educ 42:712–720. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03038.x CrossRefPubMed

13.

Mobeireek AF, Al-Kassimi F, Al-Zahrani K, Al-Shimemeri A, Al-Damegh S, Al-Amoudi O, Al-Eithan S, Al-Ghamdi B, Gamal-Eldin M (2008) Information disclosure and decision-making: the Middle East versus the Far East and the West. J Med Ethics 34:225–229. doi:10.1136/jme.2006.019638 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, Ochitill H, Morrow GR, Bennett JM (1979) Changes in physicians’ attitudes toward telling the cancer patient. JAMA 241:897–900. doi:10.1001/jama.241.9.897 CrossRefPubMed

15.

Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C, Lenzi R, Kudelka AP, Cohen L (2001) Breaking bad news about cancer: patients’ preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol 19:2049–2056PubMed

16.

Ptacek JT, Fries EA, Eberhardt TL, Ptacek JJ (1999) Breaking bad news to patients: physicians’ perceptions of the process. Support Care Cancer 7:113–120. doi:10.1007/s005200050240 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Searight HR, Gafford J (2005) Cultural diversity at the end of life: issues and guidelines for family physicians. Am Fam Physician 71:515–522PubMed

18.

Sokol DK (2006) How the doctor’s nose has shortened over time; a historical overview of the truth-telling debate in the doctor–patient relationship. J R Soc Med 99:632–636. doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.12.632 CrossRefPubMed

19.

Surbone A (1992) Truth telling to the patient. JAMA 268:1661–1663. doi:10.1001/jama.268.13.1661 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Surbone A (2006) Telling the truth to patients with cancer: what is the truth? Lancet Oncol 7:944–950. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70941-X CrossRefPubMed

21.

Surbone A (2008) Cultural aspects of communication in cancer care. Support Care Cancer 16:235–240. doi:10.1007/s00520-007-0366-0 CrossRefPubMed

22.

Surbone A, Ritossa C, Spagnolo AG (2004) Evolution of truth-telling attitudes and practices in Italy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 52:165–172. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.10.003 CrossRefPubMed

23.

Vincent JL (1998) Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a European questionnaire. Intensive Care Med 24:1251–1256. doi:10.1007/s001340050758 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Whitney SN, McCullough LB (2007) Physicians’ silent decisions: because patient autonomy does not always come first. Am J Bioeth 7:33–38. doi:10.1080/15265160701399735 PubMed

Titel: An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer
verfasst von: Emanuela Mauri
Elena Vegni
Edoardo Lozza
Patricia A. Parker
Egidio A. Moja
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 12/2009
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-009-0621-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Springer Medizin

An exploratory study on the Italian patients’ preferences regarding how they would like to be told about their cancer

Abstract