Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Original Article

The development and evaluation of an oncological palliative care deprescribing guideline: the ‘OncPal deprescribing guideline’

verfasst von: Julian Lindsay, Michael Dooley, Jennifer Martin, Michael Fay, Alison Kearney, Mohsina Khatun, Michael Barras

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Current data suggests that potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) are common in palliative cancer patients; however, there is a lack of criteria to assist clinicians in identifying PIMs in these patients. The aims of this study were to design and validate a deprescribing guideline for palliative cancer patients and to undertake a descriptive analysis of the identified PIMs.

Methods

This prospective, non-interventional cohort study consisted of four major stages: developing an ‘OncPal Deprescribing Guideline’ from current evidence, the prospective recruitment of consecutive palliative cancer inpatients with an estimated <6-month prognosis, the assessment of all medications to identify PIMs using both a panel of medical experts without access to the guideline as well as a Clinical Pharmacist independently using the OncPal Deprescribing Guideline and the evaluation of the guideline by testing concordance. Descriptive data on the incidence of PIMs identified were also assessed.

Results

A total of 61 patients were recruited. The OncPal Deprescribing Guideline matched 94 % of 617 medicines to the expert panel with a Kappa value of 0.83 [95 % CI (0.76, 0.89)] demonstrating an ‘outstanding’ concordance. Forty-three (70 %) patients were taking at least one PIM, with 21.4 % of the total medicines assessed identified as PIMs. The medication-associated cost per patient/month was AUD$26.71.

Conclusion

A guideline to assist in the de-escalation of inappropriate medications in palliative cancer patients was developed from current literature. The OncPal Deprescribing Guideline was successfully validated, demonstrating statistically significant concordance with an expert panel. We found that the incidence of PIMs was high in our patient group, demonstrating the potential benefits for the OncPal Deprescribing Guideline in clinical practice.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fede A, Miranda M, Antonangelo D, Trevizan L, Schaffhausser H, Hamermesz B, Zimmermann C, Del Giglio A, Riechelmann RP (2011) Use of unnecessary medications by patients with advanced cancer: cross-sectional survey. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 19(9):1313–1318. doi:10.1007/s00520-010-0947-1 CrossRef Fede A, Miranda M, Antonangelo D, Trevizan L, Schaffhausser H, Hamermesz B, Zimmermann C, Del Giglio A, Riechelmann RP (2011) Use of unnecessary medications by patients with advanced cancer: cross-sectional survey. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 19(9):1313–1318. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-010-0947-1 CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jecker NS, Schneiderman LJ (1992) Futility and rationing. The American journal of medicine 92(2):189–196PubMedCrossRef Jecker NS, Schneiderman LJ (1992) Futility and rationing. The American journal of medicine 92(2):189–196PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindsay J, Dooley M, Martin J, Fay M, Kearney A, Barras M (2013) Reducing potentially inappropriate medications in palliative cancer patients: evidence to support deprescribing approaches. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-2098-7 Lindsay J, Dooley M, Martin J, Fay M, Kearney A, Barras M (2013) Reducing potentially inappropriate medications in palliative cancer patients: evidence to support deprescribing approaches. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-013-2098-7
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tollier C, Fusier I, Husson MC (2005) ATC and EphMRA classifications: evolution from 1996 to 2003 and comparative analysis. Therapie 60(1):47–56PubMedCrossRef Tollier C, Fusier I, Husson MC (2005) ATC and EphMRA classifications: evolution from 1996 to 2003 and comparative analysis. Therapie 60(1):47–56PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Rollingher I, Reuben DB, Brooks J, Beck JC (1991) Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing home residents. UCLA Division of Geriatric Medicine Archives of internal medicine 151(9):1825–1832CrossRef Beers MH, Ouslander JG, Rollingher I, Reuben DB, Brooks J, Beck JC (1991) Explicit criteria for determining inappropriate medication use in nursing home residents. UCLA Division of Geriatric Medicine Archives of internal medicine 151(9):1825–1832CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang SS, Scott CB, Chang VT, Cogswell J, Srinivas S, Kasimis B (2004) Prediction of survival for advanced cancer patients by recursive partitioning analysis: role of Karnofsky performance status, quality of life, and symptom distress. Cancer Investig 22(5):678–687CrossRef Hwang SS, Scott CB, Chang VT, Cogswell J, Srinivas S, Kasimis B (2004) Prediction of survival for advanced cancer patients by recursive partitioning analysis: role of Karnofsky performance status, quality of life, and symptom distress. Cancer Investig 22(5):678–687CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gwilliam B, Keeley V, Todd C, Gittins M, Roberts C, Kelly L, Barclay S, Stone PC (2011) Development of prognosis in palliative care study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study. Bmj 343:d4920. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4920 Gwilliam B, Keeley V, Todd C, Gittins M, Roberts C, Kelly L, Barclay S, Stone PC (2011) Development of prognosis in palliative care study (PiPS) predictor models to improve prognostication in advanced cancer: prospective cohort study. Bmj 343:d4920. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4920
8.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sim J, Wright C (2005) The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85(3):257–268PubMed Sim J, Wright C (2005) The Kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85(3):257–268PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Riechelmann RP, Krzyzanowska MK, Zimmermann C (2009) Futile medication use in terminally ill cancer patients. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 17(6):745–748. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0541-y CrossRef Riechelmann RP, Krzyzanowska MK, Zimmermann C (2009) Futile medication use in terminally ill cancer patients. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer 17(6):745–748. doi:10.​1007/​s00520-008-0541-y CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat De Muth JE (2009) Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 66(1):70–81. doi:10.2146/ajhp070006 CrossRef De Muth JE (2009) Overview of biostatistics used in clinical research. American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists 66(1):70–81. doi:10.​2146/​ajhp070006 CrossRef
12.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat AIHW & AACR (2012) Cancer in Australia: an overview. Cancer series Canberra: AIHW 74 (70) AIHW & AACR (2012) Cancer in Australia: an overview. Cancer series Canberra: AIHW 74 (70)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The development and evaluation of an oncological palliative care deprescribing guideline: the ‘OncPal deprescribing guideline’
verfasst von
Julian Lindsay
Michael Dooley
Jennifer Martin
Michael Fay
Alison Kearney
Mohsina Khatun
Michael Barras
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2322-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.