Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2015

01.12.2015 | Original Article

Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counseling

verfasst von: Leonora Chiavari, Sara Gandini, Irene Feroce, Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, William Russell-Edu, Bernardo Bonanni, Fedro Alessandro Peccatori

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 12/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of patient decisional support interventions is to promote shared decision making. Many of these interventions are comprehensive of information and guidance. In this pilot study, we evaluate the effects of a decision-making support (decision counseling (DeCo)) on decision making, decisional conflict, and anxiety in cancer patients facing with values-based decisions on fertility and procreation or genetic testing and risk reduction options in oncology.

Methods

DeCo was proposed during the medical consultation. The following questionnaires were administered to 54 patients before the DeCo session and 1 week after it: stage of decision making (SDM), decisional conflict scale (DCS) and subscales (“uncertainty,” “informed,” ”clarity,” “support,” and “effective decision”), state-trait anxiety inventory. Decision Support Questionnaire and Usefulness of Decision Counseling were created ad hoc for this study. Multivariate logistic models and ANCOVA models were used to investigate the changes of SDM and DCS in association with DeCo.

Results

We found a significant improving in SDM with DeCo (P = 0.01) and a significant reduction in DCS with DeCo (P = 0.007) measured with the Decision Support Questionnaire. In particular, the DCS informed subscale showed a significant decrease in time (P = 0.002).

Conclusion

DeCo is useful to facilitate decision making and reduce decisional conflict. It plays a role in the perception of being informed while not directly providing clinical information. This model of decisional support intervention, in which information is provided only by the clinician and decisional support is focused on personal aspects that influence the decision, could improve shared decision making between patient and clinicians.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M et al (2011) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(10):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858 Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M et al (2011) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5(10):CD001431. doi:10.​1002/​14651858
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ, Jr, Mulley AG, Jr. (2004) Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff (Millwood) (Suppl Variation): VAR54–VAR62. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.var.54 Sepucha KR, Fowler FJ, Jr, Mulley AG, Jr. (2004) Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Aff (Millwood) (Suppl Variation): VAR54–VAR62. doi:10.​1377/​hlthaff.​var.​54
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM (2010) Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making 30(6):701–711. doi:10.1177/0272989X10386231 CrossRefPubMed Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM (2010) Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Med Decis Making 30(6):701–711. doi:10.​1177/​0272989X10386231​ CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H et al (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 319(7212):731–734PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H et al (1999) Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. BMJ 319(7212):731–734PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB et al (2007) Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 27(5):554–574CrossRefPubMed O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB et al (2007) Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making 27(5):554–574CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Bennett C, Murray MA, Mullan S, Legare F (2012) Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making 32(3):E22–33. doi:10.1177/0272989X12443311 CrossRefPubMed Stacey D, Kryworuchko J, Bennett C, Murray MA, Mullan S, Legare F (2012) Decision coaching to prepare patients for making health decisions: a systematic review of decision coaching in trials of patient decision AIDS. Med Decis Making 32(3):E22–33. doi:10.​1177/​0272989X12443311​ CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G et al (1998) A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 33(3):267–279CrossRefPubMed O'Connor AM, Tugwell P, Wells GA, Elmslie T, Jolly E, Hollingworth G et al (1998) A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Couns 33(3):267–279CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A (2005) Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):247–249CrossRefPubMed O'Connor AM, Graham ID, Visser A (2005) Implementing shared decision making in diverse health care systems: the role of patient decision aids. Patient Educ Couns 57(3):247–249CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Spielberger CD (1989) STAI - State-Trait anxiety inventory forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze Spielberger CD (1989) STAI - State-Trait anxiety inventory forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze
19.
Zurück zum Zitat SAS Institute (2011) SAS 9. 3 Output Delivery System: User’s Guide. SAS institute SAS Institute (2011) SAS 9. 3 Output Delivery System: User’s Guide. SAS institute
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:1. doi:10.1002/14651858 Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB et al (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28:1. doi:10.​1002/​14651858
Metadaten
Titel
Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counseling
verfasst von
Leonora Chiavari
Sara Gandini
Irene Feroce
Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga
William Russell-Edu
Bernardo Bonanni
Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 12/2015
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2726-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2015

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Nodal-negativ nach neoadjuvanter Chemo: Axilladissektion verzichtbar?

03.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Wenn bei Mammakarzinomen durch eine neoadjuvante Chemotherapie ein Downstaging von nodal-positiv zu nodal-negativ gelingt, scheint es auch ohne Axilladissektion nur selten zu axillären Rezidiven zu kommen.

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.