Erschienen in:
19.01.2016 | Original Article
Acceptability and feasibility of an e-mental health intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors: “Cascade”
verfasst von:
Claire E. Wakefield, Ursula M. Sansom-Daly, Brittany C. McGill, Sarah J. Ellis, Emma L. Doolan, Eden G. Robertson, Sanaa Mathur, Richard J. Cohn
Erschienen in:
Supportive Care in Cancer
|
Ausgabe 6/2016
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of “Cascade”: an online, group-based, cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, delivered “live” by a psychologist, to assist parents of children who have completed cancer treatment.
Methods
Forty-seven parents were randomized to Cascade (n = 25) or a 6-month waitlist (n = 22). Parents completed questionnaires at baseline, 1–2 weeks and 6 months post-intervention. Thirty parents completed full evaluations of the Cascade program (n = 21 randomized to Cascade, n = 9 completed Cascade post-waitlist).
Results
Ninety-six percent of Cascade participants completed the intervention (n = 24/25). Eighty percent of parents completed every questionnaire (mean completion time 25 min (SD = 12)). Cascade was described as at least “somewhat” helpful by all parents. None rated Cascade as “very/quite” burdensome. Parents reported that the “online format was easy to use” (n = 28, 93.3 %), “I learnt new skills” (n = 28, 93.3 %), and “I enjoyed talking to others” (n = 29, 96.7 %). Peer-to-peer benefits were highlighted by good group cohesion scores.
Conclusions
Cascade is highly acceptable and feasible. Its online delivery mechanism may address inequities in post-treatment support for parents, a particularly acute concern for rural/remote families. Future research needs to establish the efficacy of the intervention.