Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2016

Open Access 20.08.2016 | Commentary

Challenges in supportive cancer care: perspectives from the Asia Pacific and Middle East

verfasst von: Dorothy Keefe, Abdullah Al Garni, Antonio Villalon, Azza Hassan, Dora Kwong, Pingping Li, Kazuo Tamura, Jee Hyun Kim, Mastura Md Yusof, Muhammad Zafar Javed, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Ruey-Kuen Hsieh, Matti Aapro

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 11/2016

The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer defines supportive care in cancer as “the prevention and management of the adverse effects of cancer and its treatment. This includes management of physical and psychological symptoms and side effects across the continuum of the cancer experience from diagnosis through treatment to post-treatment care. Supportive care aims to improve the quality of rehabilitation, secondary cancer prevention, survivorship, and end-of-life care” [1]. Interventions in supportive care includes pharmacological therapy, rehabilitation, and psychosocial support and supportive communication in a multidisciplinary setting. While this approach has gained much headway in developed Western countries, countries in the Asia Pacific and Middle East face a wide variety of challenges that hinder optimal supportive care delivery. To complicate matters, the individual supportive care needs vary from one country to the next due to differences in culture and available resources [2]. This limits the direct application of Western approaches to the Asia Pacific and Middle East regions [2].

Challenges in the Asia Pacific and Middle East

On 18 December 2015, a group of 13 oncologists and supportive care specialists convened to discuss challenges in supportive cancer care in the Asia Pacific and Middle East, as well as plans to address these challenges.
Suboptimal treatment of cancer symptoms and treatment toxicities was identified as the first challenge. Studies on various cancers indicate that symptom relief remained a major unmet need among cancer patients in this region [3, 4]. For example, undertreated cancer pain in Asia has a weighted mean prevalence of 59.1 %; this is higher than the values of 39.1 and 40.3 % in North America and Europe, respectively [5]. Inadequate symptom control was correlated with poor satisfaction with medical care, as well as delays and modifications in the initially planned tumor-directed therapy [6].
One of the major contributors for the suboptimal treatment of cancer symptoms and treatment toxicities is the relegation of supportive care as secondary to tumor-directed therapy (primary cancer treatment) [7]. On the other hand, the Asia Oncology Summit 2012 resource-stratified guidelines on supportive care encouraged the prioritization of supportive care in resource-poor countries [7]. The undervaluing of supportive care is compounded by the low confidence in using supportive care pharmacological agents, such as opioids, which are still feared to be habit-forming by both physicians and patients.
Availability and access to treatment is also severely limited in the region, as reported by an analysis on the availability and accessibility of opioids for cancer pain treatment in 20 Asian countries [8]. Several essential opioid formulations were not available in Afghanistan, Cambodia, China (rural areas), Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Kazakhstan, Laos, and Myanmar. Patients in Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Nepal, and the Philippines also had to pay for opioids at full cost.
The non-registration or delayed registration of supportive care drug is a common hindrance to treatment access. For example, one or more of the following antiemetics for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are not available in many Asia Pacific and Middle East countries either at the time of international guidelines updates, or in selected countries, not at all due to local pharmaceutical industry decision not to commercialize: dolasetron, palonosetron, rolapitant, dronabinol, nabilone, prochlorperazine, netupitant, fosaprepitant, and tropisetron. Other obstacles to access may be attributed to local decisions on drug coverage/subsidy protocols either at national or institutional level.
In the case of oral mucositis (OM), there is a dearth of proven therapies. Despite this huge gap in treatment options, research on breakthrough OM treatments are lacking, which also hinders the development of strong evidence-based guidelines. Because of this, physicians are limited to the prevention of OM, with some success. In Hong Kong, patients are encouraged to see a dentist and a dietitian before initiating tumor-directed therapy. In Japan, health insurance covers the cost of oral examination and care before chemotherapy is initiated. After chemotherapy, there is a follow-up by the dentist. However, when OM eventually develops, physicians and patients are left with few options, and many patients turn to traditional or alternative therapies instead.
Limitations in treatment access and suboptimal treatment have led to the popular use of complementary medicine throughout the region. These include traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and other herbal medicines, which either lack support from clinical trials, or carry potential for drug interactions with cancer treatments. One survey reported that 58 % of oncology practitioners in the Middle East have patients that use herbal medicines [8]. Reports in East Asia and Southeast Asia have indicated that up to 85 % of cancer patients use TCM or herbal medicines.
Lastly, there is the issue of cost and reimbursement. The health care financing structures in the Asia Pacific and Middle East vary widely. Many developing nations remain out-of-pocket markets, while in others, CINV drugs, OM therapies, and other supportive care medications are not reimbursed.

Meeting the challenges in supportive cancer care

Addressing these challenges requires the concerted effort of various sectors. A conceptual framework is presented in Fig. 1.
All throughout the Asia Pacific and Middle East, more physicians should be encouraged to specialize in supportive care. Medical education should emphasize the crucial role of supportive cancer care in improving patient quality of life and treatment satisfaction. Medical education efforts should include programs to dispel the misconceptions about supportive care and medications, especially around opioid use. Educational programs should also reach patients and their relatives or caregivers so that supportive cancer care becomes a priority for them as well.
Supportive care practitioners and their parent organizations (e.g., oncology, pain, or palliative care medical associations) should also advocate for the reduction or removal of restrictions in opioid prescription. Medical associations may also strengthen guidance and processes for the integration of supportive care in oncology services.
Pharmaceutical companies should be encouraged to register supportive care agents in developing countries. Industry and academia may also work together in research that could fast-track drug discovery, development, and commercialization. Clinical trials and pharmacoeconomic studies to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of treatments would also facilitate drug reimbursement and the development of evidence-based guidelines. In terms of prioritization, there should be focus on areas with wide unmet needs, such as CINV and OM.
Finally, countries in the Asia Pacific and Middle East should self-organize and develop country-specific action plans to address the unique challenges faced by their supportive care practitioners.
The points outlined here are based on experts’ opinions and should be considered against other scientific evidence. Furthermore, greater representation of the Middle East is recommended to provide a more comprehensive perspective of supportive care challenges in this region. Well-designed studies are recommended to establish the challenges in supportive care in the Asia Pacific and Middle East, and collaborative meetings may be conducted to establish actions to address the gaps in care.

Acknowledgment

The International Cancer Supportive Care Leaders’ Meeting was supported by an educational grant from Mundipharma Pte Ltd. We would like to acknowledge MIMS Pte Ltd. for providing editorial support for this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interests

Mundipharma Pte Ltd. provided logistic support and funding for the International Cancer Supportive Care Leaders’ Meeting. Mundipharma Pte Ltd. also paid for MIMS Pte Ltd. to provide editorial support. Abudulla Algarni, Antonio H Villalon, Azza Adel Hassan, Ping Ping Li, Jee Hyun Kim declare no other conflicts of interest.
Dorothy Keefe has served in advisory roles for Merck, Norvartis, Pfizer, Helsinn and received personal funding from Pfizer Entera and Helsinn. Dora Kwong has received remuneration from Taiho Pharma, served as a consultant for Merck Sharp & Dohme (Asia) Ltd. and hold stocks in Pfizer. Kazuo Tamura has received remuneration from Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co Ltd., Celgene K. K., Eli Lilly Japan K. K. and Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Muhammad Zafar Javed has served as consult for Mundipharma. Ravindran Kanesvaran has received remuneration from Mundipharma, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, and acted in an advisory role for Bayer, Novartis and Astellas.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fielding R, Lam WW, Shun SC, Okuyama T, Lai YH, Wada M, Akechi T, Li WW, for Asia-Pacific Psycho-Oncology Network (APPON) (2013) Attributing variance in supportive care needs during cancer: culture-service, and individual differences, before clinical factors. PLoS One 8:e65099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fielding R, Lam WW, Shun SC, Okuyama T, Lai YH, Wada M, Akechi T, Li WW, for Asia-Pacific Psycho-Oncology Network (APPON) (2013) Attributing variance in supportive care needs during cancer: culture-service, and individual differences, before clinical factors. PLoS One 8:e65099CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liao YC, Liao WY, Shun SC, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Lai YH (2011) Symptoms, psychological distress, and supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 19:1743–1751CrossRefPubMed Liao YC, Liao WY, Shun SC, Yu CJ, Yang PC, Lai YH (2011) Symptoms, psychological distress, and supportive care needs in lung cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 19:1743–1751CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lam WW, Au AH, Wong JH, Lehmann C, Koch U, Fielding R, Mehnert A (2011) Unmet supportive care needs: a cross-cultural comparison between Hong Kong Chinese and German Caucasian women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:531–541CrossRefPubMed Lam WW, Au AH, Wong JH, Lehmann C, Koch U, Fielding R, Mehnert A (2011) Unmet supportive care needs: a cross-cultural comparison between Hong Kong Chinese and German Caucasian women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:531–541CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G (2008) Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol 19:1985–1991CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deandrea S, Montanari M, Moja L, Apolone G (2008) Prevalence of undertreatment in cancer pain. A review of published literature. Ann Oncol 19:1985–1991CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Au A, Lam W, Tsang J, Yau TK, Soong I, Yeo W, et al (2013). Supportive care needs in Hong Kong Chinese women confronting advanced breast cancer. Psychooncology 2013; 22:1144–1151. Au A, Lam W, Tsang J, Yau TK, Soong I, Yeo W, et al (2013). Supportive care needs in Hong Kong Chinese women confronting advanced breast cancer. Psychooncology 2013; 22:1144–1151.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne S, Chan N, Davies A, Poon E, Connor S, Goh C (2012) Supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care for patients with cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines from the Asian Oncology Summit 2012. Lancet Oncol 13:e492–e500CrossRefPubMed Payne S, Chan N, Davies A, Poon E, Connor S, Goh C (2012) Supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care for patients with cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines from the Asian Oncology Summit 2012. Lancet Oncol 13:e492–e500CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cleary J, Radbruch L, Torode J, Cherny NI (2013). Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Asia: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI). Ann Oncol 24 Suppl 11:xi24–32. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt500. Cleary J, Radbruch L, Torode J, Cherny NI (2013). Formulary availability and regulatory barriers to accessibility of opioids for cancer pain in Asia: a report from the Global Opioid Policy Initiative (GOPI). Ann Oncol 24 Suppl 11:xi24–32. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt500.
Metadaten
Titel
Challenges in supportive cancer care: perspectives from the Asia Pacific and Middle East
verfasst von
Dorothy Keefe
Abdullah Al Garni
Antonio Villalon
Azza Hassan
Dora Kwong
Pingping Li
Kazuo Tamura
Jee Hyun Kim
Mastura Md Yusof
Muhammad Zafar Javed
Ravindran Kanesvaran
Ruey-Kuen Hsieh
Matti Aapro
Publikationsdatum
20.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-016-3381-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Supportive Care in Cancer 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.