Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2019

28.07.2018 | Original Article

A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer

verfasst von: Melissa Legg, Melissa K. Hyde, Stefano Occhipinti, Philippa H. Youl, Jeff Dunn, Suzanne K. Chambers

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The degree to which peer support is used and accepted as a supportive care approach by women with breast cancer is unclear. We examine peer support use across three major modalities (i.e. support groups, online platforms, one-on-one) and identify enablers and barriers to peer support using the beliefs framework of the theory of planned behaviour. A population-based sample of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer (n = 3105) who were on average 54.08 weeks since diagnosis completed mailed surveys at baseline measuring beliefs about peer support and intention. Peer support use was measured via telephone interview at baseline and prospectively at 12-month follow-up (n = 2780). In all, 37% of women had used at least one peer support service since diagnosis (support group = 20%, online = 18%, one-on-one = 10%). A path analysis examined what beliefs enabled or acted as barriers to peer support use at follow-up adjusting for past behaviour (i.e. baseline use), sociodemographic characteristics, and treatment. In order of relative strength, enablers included beliefs that peer support is an outlet for honest expression of feelings (β = .35), a source of empathy (β = .30), approved by doctors (β = .07), and approved by family/partner (β = .04). Barriers were beliefs that it encourages dwelling about breast cancer (β = − .06) and involves exposure to negative stories about this disease (β = − .04). Strategies which communicate the potential emotional support benefits of a shared illness experience and social approval by others, particularly the medical profession, may help to promote acceptance of peer support and encourage service uptake in breast cancer.
Fußnoten
1
For the present study, the criteria for a support group were (a) a formalised group of people who meet at a scheduled time on a regular basis and (b) the people in the group are connected in some way by cancer (e.g. currently undergoing or finished treatment for cancer or friend/relative/partner of someone with cancer). This included both professional- and peer-led groups. The criteria for an online peer support platform were (a) an online service where people can join to seek contact with other people (e.g. discussion boards, chat rooms, or interactive online mailing lists) and (b) all people who sign up to the online service are connected in some way by cancer. A one-on-one peer support service was defined as a service that organised women diagnosed with breast cancer to speak one-on-one with a breast cancer volunteer.
 
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehnert A, Koch U (2008) Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization, and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register-based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosom Res 64(4):383–391CrossRef Mehnert A, Koch U (2008) Psychological comorbidity and health-related quality of life and its association with awareness, utilization, and need for psychosocial support in a cancer register-based sample of long-term breast cancer survivors. J Psychosom Res 64(4):383–391CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Brédart A, Merdy O, Sigal-Zafrani B, Fiszer C, Dolbeault S, Hardouin JB (2016) Identifying trajectory clusters in breast cancer survivors’ supportive care needs, psychosocial difficulties, and resources from the completion of primary treatment to 8 months later. Support Care Cancer 24(1):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2799-1 CrossRefPubMed Brédart A, Merdy O, Sigal-Zafrani B, Fiszer C, Dolbeault S, Hardouin JB (2016) Identifying trajectory clusters in breast cancer survivors’ supportive care needs, psychosocial difficulties, and resources from the completion of primary treatment to 8 months later. Support Care Cancer 24(1):357–366. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-015-2799-1 CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw BR, Hawkins R, Arora N, McTavish F, Pingree S, Gustafson DH (2006) An exploratory study of predictors of participation in a computer support group for women with breast cancer. Comput Inform Nurs 24(1):18–27CrossRef Shaw BR, Hawkins R, Arora N, McTavish F, Pingree S, Gustafson DH (2006) An exploratory study of predictors of participation in a computer support group for women with breast cancer. Comput Inform Nurs 24(1):18–27CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Parry DC (2007) “There is life after breast cancer”: nine vignettes exploring dragon boat racing for breast cancer survivors. Leis Sci 29(1):53–69CrossRef Parry DC (2007) “There is life after breast cancer”: nine vignettes exploring dragon boat racing for breast cancer survivors. Leis Sci 29(1):53–69CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaw BR, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson DH, Pingree S (2000) Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. J Health Commun 5(2):135–159CrossRef Shaw BR, McTavish F, Hawkins R, Gustafson DH, Pingree S (2000) Experiences of women with breast cancer: exchanging social support over the CHESS computer network. J Health Commun 5(2):135–159CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Yaskowich KM, Stam HJ (2003) Cancer narratives and the cancer support group. J Health Psychol 8(6):720–737CrossRef Yaskowich KM, Stam HJ (2003) Cancer narratives and the cancer support group. J Health Psychol 8(6):720–737CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2010) Mplus User’s Guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2010) Mplus User’s Guide, 6th edn. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yli-Uotila T, Rantanen A, Suominen T (2013) Motives of cancer patients for using the internet to seek social support. Eur J Cancer Care 22(2):261–271CrossRef Yli-Uotila T, Rantanen A, Suominen T (2013) Motives of cancer patients for using the internet to seek social support. Eur J Cancer Care 22(2):261–271CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Australia C (2014) Clinical guidance for responding to suffering in adults with cancer. Cancer Australia, NSW, Australia Australia C (2014) Clinical guidance for responding to suffering in adults with cancer. Cancer Australia, NSW, Australia
33.
Zurück zum Zitat National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown National Breast Cancer Centre and National Cancer Control Initiative (2003) Clinical practice guidelines for the psychosocial care of adults with cancer. National Breast Cancer Centre, Camperdown
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Høybye MT, Dalton SO, Christensen J, Ross L, Kuhn KG, Johansen C (2010) Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups. Support Care Cancer 18(5):553–560CrossRef Høybye MT, Dalton SO, Christensen J, Ross L, Kuhn KG, Johansen C (2010) Social and psychological determinants of participation in internet-based cancer support groups. Support Care Cancer 18(5):553–560CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
verfasst von
Melissa Legg
Melissa K. Hyde
Stefano Occhipinti
Philippa H. Youl
Jeff Dunn
Suzanne K. Chambers
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4358-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.