Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2010

01.08.2010 | Original Article

Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2–3 fusion patients?

verfasst von: Shenglin Wang, Chao Wang, Peter G. Passias, Ming Yan, Haitao Zhou

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Patients with Klippel–Feil syndrome (KFS) have congenital fusions of at least 1 cervical motion segment, and often present with compensatory hypermobility or symptomatic stenosis of the cranio-vertebral junction which requires occipitocervical reconstruction and fusion. One subgroup of KFS patients in which this is particularly common is those with isolated C2–3 congenital fusion (C2–3 CF). The anatomic suitability for C2 pedicle and laminar screw placement had been analyzed in the general adult population, and guidelines for their techniques had been established. However, the feasibility and safety of the two techniques in KFS patients with congenital C2–3 fusion has not been reported. This radiographic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of these two widely used methods in such patients. We recruited 108 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and reconstructed CTs were performed. Among them, 53 had C2–C3 congenital fusion diagnosed as KFS and 55 had normal cervical segmentation (NCS). The maximum possible diameters and length were measured along the ideal screw trajectories. Both of mean diameters and lengths of the C2 laminar screw trajectory in the C2–3 CF group were significantly larger than that in NCS. Mean diameters of the C2 pedicle screw trajectory in this group were significantly smaller than that in NCS group, however, C2–3 CF patients had longer pedicle paths than NCS. In the C2–3 CF group, all 53 cases had suitable trajectory for C2 laminar screw, while 21 (39.6%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5 mm. In the NCS group, 5 cases (9.1%) had a pedicle diameter less than 4.5 mm. All 108 cases had sufficient diameters for C2 laminar screw placement. Klippel–Feil patients with C2–3 CF are good candidates for the technique of C2 laminar screw. Preoperative radiography should be carefully evaluated and the option of C2 fixation be determined with a thorough consideration in these patients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Abumi K, Takada T, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (1999) Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine 24:1425–1434CrossRefPubMed Abumi K, Takada T, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (1999) Posterior occipitocervical reconstruction using cervical pedicle screws and plate-rod systems. Spine 24:1425–1434CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassinelli EH, Lee M, Skalak A, Ahn NU, Wright NM (2006) Anatomic considerations for the placement of C2 laminar screws. Spine 31:2767–2771CrossRefPubMed Cassinelli EH, Lee M, Skalak A, Ahn NU, Wright NM (2006) Anatomic considerations for the placement of C2 laminar screws. Spine 31:2767–2771CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke RA, Kearsley JH, Walsh DA (1996) Patterned expression in familial Klippel–Feil syndrome. Teratology 53:152–157CrossRefPubMed Clarke RA, Kearsley JH, Walsh DA (1996) Patterned expression in familial Klippel–Feil syndrome. Teratology 53:152–157CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean CL, Lee MJ, Robbin M, Cassinelli EH (2009) Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement. Spine J 9:258–262CrossRefPubMed Dean CL, Lee MJ, Robbin M, Cassinelli EH (2009) Correlation between computed tomography measurements and direct anatomic measurements of the axis for consideration of C2 laminar screw placement. Spine J 9:258–262CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ebraheim N, Rollins JR Jr, Xu R, Jackson WT (1996) Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine 21:691–695CrossRefPubMed Ebraheim N, Rollins JR Jr, Xu R, Jackson WT (1996) Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine 21:691–695CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Finn MA, Fassett DR, Mccall TD, Clark R, Dailey AT, Brodke DS (2008) The cervical end of an occipitocervical fusion: a biomechanical evaluation of 3 constructs. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9:296–300PubMed Finn MA, Fassett DR, Mccall TD, Clark R, Dailey AT, Brodke DS (2008) The cervical end of an occipitocervical fusion: a biomechanical evaluation of 3 constructs. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9:296–300PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorek J, Acaroglu E, Berven S, Yousef A, Puttlitz CM (2005) Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine 30:1513–1518CrossRefPubMed Gorek J, Acaroglu E, Berven S, Yousef A, Puttlitz CM (2005) Constructs incorporating intralaminar C2 screws provide rigid stability for atlantoaxial fixation. Spine 30:1513–1518CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:2467–2471CrossRefPubMed Harms J, Melcher RP (2001) Posterior C1–2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine 26:2467–2471CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosalkar HS, Sankar WN, Wills BP, Goebel J, Dormans JP, Drummond DS (2008) Congenital osseous anomalies of the upper cervical spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 90:337–348CrossRef Hosalkar HS, Sankar WN, Wills BP, Goebel J, Dormans JP, Drummond DS (2008) Congenital osseous anomalies of the upper cervical spine. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 90:337–348CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lapsiwala SB, Anderson PA, Oza A, Resnick DK (2006) Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws. Neurosurgery 58:516–521PubMed Lapsiwala SB, Anderson PA, Oza A, Resnick DK (2006) Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws. Neurosurgery 58:516–521PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS (2002) Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 27:2435–2440CrossRefPubMed Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, Lotz JC, Harms J, Bradford DS (2002) Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques. Spine 27:2435–2440CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16:861–869CrossRefPubMed Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K (1991) Cervical human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16:861–869CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR (2002) Anatomic suitability of the C1–C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 27:1494–1498CrossRefPubMed Resnick DK, Lapsiwala S, Trost GR (2002) Anatomic suitability of the C1–C2 complex for pedicle screw fixation. Spine 27:1494–1498CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, Puhl W, Wilke HJ (2002) Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine 27:1724–1732CrossRefPubMed Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, Puhl W, Wilke HJ (2002) Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques. Spine 27:1724–1732CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH (2008) The extent of fusion within the congenital Klippel–Feil segment. Spine 33:1637–1642CrossRefPubMed Samartzis D, Kalluri P, Herman J, Lubicky JP, Shen FH (2008) The extent of fusion within the congenital Klippel–Feil segment. Spine 33:1637–1642CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen FH, Samartzis D, Herman J, Lubicky JP (2006) Radiographic assessment of segmental motion at the atlantoaxial junction in the Klippel–Feil patient. Spine 31:171–177CrossRefPubMed Shen FH, Samartzis D, Herman J, Lubicky JP (2006) Radiographic assessment of segmental motion at the atlantoaxial junction in the Klippel–Feil patient. Spine 31:171–177CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tracy MR, Dormans JP, Kusumi K (2004) Klippel–Feil syndrome: clinical features and current understanding of etiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424:183–190CrossRefPubMed Tracy MR, Dormans JP, Kusumi K (2004) Klippel–Feil syndrome: clinical features and current understanding of etiology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 424:183–190CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang MY (2006) C2 crossing laminar screws: cadaveric morphometric analysis. Neurosurgery 59:ONS 84–88 Wang MY (2006) C2 crossing laminar screws: cadaveric morphometric analysis. Neurosurgery 59:ONS 84–88
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright NM (2004) Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:158–162PubMed Wright NM (2004) Posterior C2 fixation using bilateral, crossing C2 laminar screws: case series and technical note. J Spinal Disord Tech 17:158–162PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Park KW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2008) Undetected vertebral artery groove and foramen violations during C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine 33:E942–E949CrossRefPubMed Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Park KW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD (2008) Undetected vertebral artery groove and foramen violations during C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement. Spine 33:E942–E949CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshida M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2006) Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw. Spine 31:E513–E517CrossRefPubMed Yoshida M, Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Nakamura T (2006) Comparison of the anatomical risk for vertebral artery injury associated with the C2-pedicle screw and atlantoaxial transarticular screw. Spine 31:E513–E517CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pedicle versus laminar screws: what provides more suitable C2 fixation in congenital C2–3 fusion patients?
verfasst von
Shenglin Wang
Chao Wang
Peter G. Passias
Ming Yan
Haitao Zhou
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2010
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1418-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2010

European Spine Journal 8/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.