Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 6/2012

01.08.2012 | Original Article

Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry

verfasst von: Thomas Zweig, Emin Aghayev, Markus Melloh, Daniel Dietrich, Christoph Röder, SWISSspine Registry Group

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Sonderheft 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Currently, many pre-conditions are regarded as relative or absolute contraindications for lumbar total disc replacement (TDR). Radiculopathy is one among them. In Switzerland it is left to the surgeon’s discretion when to operate if he adheres to a list of pre-defined indications. Contraindications, however, are less clearly specified. We hypothesized that, the extent of pre-operative radiculopathy results in different benefits for patients treated with mono-segmental lumbar TDR. We used patient perceived leg pain and its correlation with physician recorded radiculopathy for creating the patient groups to be compared.

Methods

The present study is based on the dataset of SWISSspine, a government mandated health technology assessment registry. Between March 2005 and April 2009, 577 patients underwent either mono- or bi-segmental lumbar TDR, which was documented in a prospective observational multicenter mode. A total of 416 cases with a mono-segmental procedure were included in the study. The data collection consisted of pre-operative and follow-up data (physician based) and clinical outcomes (NASS form, EQ-5D). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted with patients’ self-indicated leg pain and the surgeon-based diagnosis “radiculopathy”, as marked on the case report forms. As a result, patients were divided into two groups according to the severity of leg pain. The two groups were compared with regard to the pre-operative patient characteristics and pre- and post-operative pain on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and quality of life using general linear modeling.

Results

The optimal ROC model revealed a leg pain threshold of 40 ≤ VAS > 40 for the absence or the presence of “radiculopathy”. Demographics in the resulting two groups were well comparable. Applying this threshold, the mean pre-operative leg pain level was 16.5 points in group 1 and 68.1 points in group 2 (p < 0.001). Back pain levels differed less with 63.6 points in group 1 and 72.6 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Pre-operative quality of life showed considerable differences with an 0.44 EQ-5D score in group 1 and 0.29 in group 2 (p < 0.001, possible score range −0.6 to 1). At a mean follow-up time of 8 months, group 1 showed a mean leg pain improvement of 3.6 points and group 2 of 41.1 points (p < 0.001). Back pain relief was 35.6 and 39.1 points, respectively (p = 0.27). EQ-5D score improvement was 0.27 in group 1 and 0.41 in group 2 (p = 0.11).

Conclusions

Patients labeled as having radiculopathy (group 2) do mostly have pre-operative leg pain levels ≥ 40. Applying this threshold, the patients with pre-operative leg pain do also have more severe back pain and a considerably lower quality of life. Their net benefit from the lumbar TDR is higher and they do have similar post-operative back and leg pain levels as well as the quality of life as patients without pre-operative leg pain. Although randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings, they put leg pain and radiculopathy into perspective as absolute contraindications for TDR.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2009) Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64:338–344. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000337574.58662.E2 (discussion 344–335)PubMedCrossRef McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A (2009) Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64:338–344. doi:10.​1227/​01.​NEU.​0000337574.​58662.​E2 (discussion 344–335)PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96:34–44PubMed Asch HL, Lewis PJ, Moreland DB, Egnatchik JG, Yu YJ, Clabeaux DE, Hyland AH (2002) Prospective multiple outcomes study of outpatient lumbar microdiscectomy: should 75 to 80% success rates be the norm? J Neurosurg 96:34–44PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575. doi:00007632-200507150-00003 (discussion E1387–1591)PubMedCrossRef Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, Garcia R, Regan JJ, Ohnmeiss DD (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575. doi:00007632-200507150-00003 (discussion E1387–1591)PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, Dmietriev A, Maxwell JH, Regan JJ, Isaza J (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576–1583, (discussion E1388–E1590)PubMedCrossRef McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, Adams K, Blumenthal S, Guyer RD, Dmietriev A, Maxwell JH, Regan JJ, Isaza J (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1576–1583, (discussion E1388–E1590)PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318054e377 (discussion 1163)PubMedCrossRef Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, Linovitz RJ, Danielson GO, Haider TT, Cammisa F, Zuchermann J, Balderston R, Kitchel S, Foley K, Watkins R, Bradford D, Yue J, Yuan H, Herkowitz H, Geiger D, Bendo J, Peppers T, Sachs B, Girardi F, Kropf M, Goldstein J (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318054e377​ (discussion 1163)PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F (2006) Charite total disc replacement–clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183–195. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-1022-3 PubMedCrossRef Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, Gross C, Tohtz SW, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Perka C, Kandziora F (2006) Charite total disc replacement–clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15:183–195. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-005-1022-3 PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21:995–1000PubMedCrossRef Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F (1996) Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 21:995–1000PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong DA, Annesser B, Birney T, Lamond R, Kumar A, Johnson S, Jatana S, Ghiselli G (2007) Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis. Spine J 7:5–11. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.012 PubMedCrossRef Wong DA, Annesser B, Birney T, Lamond R, Kumar A, Johnson S, Jatana S, Ghiselli G (2007) Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis. Spine J 7:5–11. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2006.​04.​012 PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL (2008) Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9(5):374–386. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.007 PubMedCrossRef Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, Bitan FD, Cappuccino A, Geisler FH, Hochschuler SH, Holt RT, Jenis LG, Majd ME, Regan JJ, Tromanhauser SG, Wong DC, Blumenthal SL (2008) Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J 9(5):374–386. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2008.​08.​007 PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352–361PubMedCrossRef Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, Sachs BL, Rashbaum RF, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:352–361PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gornet M, Burkus JK, Mathews HH, Dryer RF, Peloza J (2007) MAVERICK total disc replacement vs. anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the INFUSE bone graft/LT-CAGE device: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE trial. Spine J 7(5):1S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.005 Gornet M, Burkus JK, Mathews HH, Dryer RF, Peloza J (2007) MAVERICK total disc replacement vs. anterior lumbar interbody fusion with the INFUSE bone graft/LT-CAGE device: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter IDE trial. Spine J 7(5):1S. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2007.​07.​005
17.
Zurück zum Zitat van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMedCrossRef van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2003) Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:369–383PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Moulin P, Roder C (2009) SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-0934-8 PubMed Schluessmann E, Diel P, Aghayev E, Zweig T, Moulin P, Roder C (2009) SWISSspine: a nationwide registry for health technology assessment of lumbar disc prostheses. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-009-0934-8 PubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Blumenthal SL (2002) Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S106–S110. doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0439-1 PubMed Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, Blumenthal SL (2002) Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S106–S110. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-002-0439-1 PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charite lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17:36–43. doi:10.1007/s00586-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef Punt IM, Visser VM, van Rhijn LW, Kurtz SM, Antonis J, Schurink GW, van Ooij A (2008) Complications and reoperations of the SB Charite lumbar disc prosthesis: experience in 75 patients. Eur Spine J 17:36–43. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-007-0506-8 PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat van Ooij A, Schurink GW, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2007) Findings in 67 patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 151:1577–1584PubMed van Ooij A, Schurink GW, Oner FC, Verbout AJ (2007) Findings in 67 patients with recurrent or persistent symptoms after implantation of a disc prosthesis for low back pain. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 151:1577–1584PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Röder PMC, Aebi M (2007) The SWISSspine Registry. In: Brayda-Bruno SGLH (ed) Nonfusion Technologies in Spine Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, NY, pp 267–275 Röder PMC, Aebi M (2007) The SWISSspine Registry. In: Brayda-Bruno SGLH (ed) Nonfusion Technologies in Spine Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, NY, pp 267–275
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mirza SK (2005) Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine 30:1561–1564PubMedCrossRef Mirza SK (2005) Point of view: commentary on the research reports that led to Food and Drug Administration approval of an artificial disc. Spine 30:1561–1564PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat German JW, Foley KT (2005) Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 30:S60–S67PubMedCrossRef German JW, Foley KT (2005) Disc arthroplasty in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment. Spine 30:S60–S67PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B (2004) Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc: invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143–154PubMedCrossRef Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B (2004) Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc: invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. J Neurosurg Spine 1:143–154PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Influence of preoperative leg pain and radiculopathy on outcomes in mono-segmental lumbar total disc replacement: results from a nationwide registry
verfasst von
Thomas Zweig
Emin Aghayev
Markus Melloh
Daniel Dietrich
Christoph Röder
SWISSspine Registry Group
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe Sonderheft 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1863-x

Weitere Artikel der Sonderheft 6/2012

European Spine Journal 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.