Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 6/2012

01.06.2012 | Original Article

Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis

verfasst von: Matthew Shaw, Clayton J. Adam, Maree T. Izatt, Paul Licina, Geoffrey N. Askin

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 6/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The Cobb technique is the universally accepted method for measuring the severity of spinal deformities. Traditionally, Cobb angles have been measured using protractor and pencil on hardcopy radiographic films. The new generation of mobile ‘smartphones’ make accurate angle measurement possible using an integrated accelerometer, providing a potentially useful clinical tool for assessing Cobb angles. The purpose of this study was to compare Cobb angle measurements performed using a smartphone and traditional protractor in a series of 20 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Methods

Seven observers measured major Cobb angles on 20 pre-operative postero-anterior radiographs of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients with both a standard protractor and using an Apple iPhone. Five of the observers repeated the measurements at least a week after the original measurements.

Results

The mean absolute difference between pairs of smartphone/protractor measurements was 2.1°, with a small (1°) bias toward lower Cobb angles with the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for intra-observer variability were ±3.3° for the protractor and ±3.9° for the iPhone. 95% confidence intervals for inter-observer variability were ±8.3° for the iPhone and ±7.1° for the protractor. Both of these confidence intervals were within the range of previously published Cobb measurement studies.

Conclusions

We conclude that the iPhone is an equivalent Cobb measurement tool to the manual protractor, and measurement times are about 15% less. The widespread availability of inclinometer-equipped mobile phones and the ability to store measurements in later versions of the angle measurement software may make these new technologies attractive for clinical measurement applications.
Fußnoten
1
Measurement of Cobb angles using the iPhone involved measuring the angle of the inferior and superior vertebral endplates selected and then adding these numbers together to obtain the Cobb angle. Since performing this study, a newer version of the software application enables the addition of the two angles automatically thus avoiding a potential error in simple addition by the observer.
 
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275 Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Am Acad Orthop Surg Instr Course Lect 5:261–275
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kotwicki T (2009) Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil Rehabil 30:742–751CrossRef Kotwicki T (2009) Evaluation of scoliosis today: examination, X-rays and beyond. Disabil Rehabil 30:742–751CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Whittle MW, Evans M (1979) Instrument for measuring the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Lancet 1(8113):414PubMedCrossRef Whittle MW, Evans M (1979) Instrument for measuring the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Lancet 1(8113):414PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607PubMedCrossRef Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B (2009) A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J 18:593–607PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG (2003) Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:85–93PubMedCrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG (2003) Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 22:85–93PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181PubMed Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M et al (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23:551–555PubMedCrossRef Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M et al (1998) A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine 23:551–555PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ylikoski M, Tallroth K (1990) Measurement variations in scoliotic angle, vertebral rotation, vertebral body height, and intervertebral disc space height. J Spinal Disord 3:387–391PubMed Ylikoski M, Tallroth K (1990) Measurement variations in scoliotic angle, vertebral rotation, vertebral body height, and intervertebral disc space height. J Spinal Disord 3:387–391PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dutton KE, Jones TJ, Slinger BS et al (1989) Reliability of the Cobb-angle index derived by traditional and computer-assisted methods. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 12:16–23PubMed Dutton KE, Jones TJ, Slinger BS et al (1989) Reliability of the Cobb-angle index derived by traditional and computer-assisted methods. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 12:16–23PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC et al (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:320–327PubMed Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC et al (1990) Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:320–327PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zmurko MG, Mooney JF, Podeszwa DA et al (2003) Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs. J Surg Orthop Adv 12:208–213PubMed Zmurko MG, Mooney JF, Podeszwa DA et al (2003) Inter- and intraobserver variance of Cobb angle measurements with digital radiographs. J Surg Orthop Adv 12:208–213PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Harvey JR et al (2005) Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Spine 30:1664–1669PubMedCrossRef Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Harvey JR et al (2005) Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans. Spine 30:1664–1669PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Facanha-Filho FAM, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (2001) Measurement accuracy in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 83(1):42–45 Facanha-Filho FAM, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (2001) Measurement accuracy in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am A 83(1):42–45
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Loder RT, Urquhart A, Steen H et al (1995) Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:768–770PubMed Loder RT, Urquhart A, Steen H et al (1995) Variability in Cobb angle measurements in children with congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:768–770PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:328–333PubMed Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG (1990) Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:328–333PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory P et al (1982) The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2:378–382PubMedCrossRef Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory P et al (1982) The significance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2:378–382PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Heckman JD, Loder RT, Hensinger RN et al (2002) Statistical differences: consider the methodology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1078 Heckman JD, Loder RT, Hensinger RN et al (2002) Statistical differences: consider the methodology. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:1078
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Beekman CE, Hall V (1979) Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms. Phys Ther 59:764–765PubMed Beekman CE, Hall V (1979) Variability of scoliosis measurement from spinal roentgenograms. Phys Ther 59:764–765PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis
verfasst von
Matthew Shaw
Clayton J. Adam
Maree T. Izatt
Paul Licina
Geoffrey N. Askin
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2059-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2012

European Spine Journal 6/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.