Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 8/2014

01.08.2014 | Review Article

Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence

verfasst von: Zhiwei Jia, Zhongjun Mo, Fan Ding, Qing He, Yubo Fan, Dike Ruan

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal surgical technique for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases (DDD) remains controversial. Hybrid surgery (HS) incorporating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc replacement (CDR) is increasingly performed for cervical DDD. This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical and clinical evidence available for HS and to provide a systematic review of current understanding of HS.

Methods

This systematic review was undertaken by following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. Multiple databases and online registers of clinical trials were searched up to February 2014. The biomechanical and clinical studies on HS for cervical DDD written in English were included. Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data.

Results

Fifteen studies including eight biomechanical studies and seven clinical studies were indentified. The biomechanical studies showed that HS was benefit to motion preservation of the operative levels and revealed less adverse effect on adjacent segments. All clinical studies demonstrated improvement in validated functional scores after HS. Segment motion and immobilization were achieved at the arthroplasty level and arthrodesis level, respectively. Postoperative assessments and complication rate were similar or in favor of HS when comparing with ACDF or CDR. However, the overall quality of evidence for HS was low to very low.

Conclusions

There is a paucity of high quality evidence for HS. HS may be a safe and efficacious technique to benefit a select group of multilevel cervical DDD, which is needed to be confirmed by further prospective, randomized controlled trials.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Fay LY, Huang WC, Tsai TY, Wu JC, Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H (2013) Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 23(3):627–634PubMedCrossRef Fay LY, Huang WC, Tsai TY, Wu JC, Ko CC, Tu TH, Wu CL, Cheng H (2013) Differences between arthroplasty and anterior cervical fusion in two-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 23(3):627–634PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P (2011) Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20(2):177–184PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P (2011) Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 20(2):177–184PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Dmitriev AE, Kuklo TR, Lehman RA Jr, Rosner MK (2007) Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics. Spine 32(6):E188–E196PubMedCrossRef Dmitriev AE, Kuklo TR, Lehman RA Jr, Rosner MK (2007) Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics. Spine 32(6):E188–E196PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lopez-Espina CG, Amirouche F, Havalad V (2006) Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation. Spine 31(9):972–978PubMedCrossRef Lopez-Espina CG, Amirouche F, Havalad V (2006) Multilevel cervical fusion and its effect on disc degeneration and osteophyte formation. Spine 31(9):972–978PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K (1999) Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24(7):670–675PubMedCrossRef Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, Yone K, Sakou T, Nakanishi K (1999) Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine 24(7):670–675PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT (2006) Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine 31(21):2439–2448PubMedCrossRef Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT (2006) Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine 31(21):2439–2448PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cepoiu-Martin M, Faris P, Lorenzetti D, Prefontaine E, Noseworthy T, Sutherland L (2011) Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine 36(25):E1623–E1633PubMedCrossRef Cepoiu-Martin M, Faris P, Lorenzetti D, Prefontaine E, Noseworthy T, Sutherland L (2011) Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine 36(25):E1623–E1633PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cason GW, Herkowitz HN (2013) Cervical intervertebral disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(3):279–285PubMedCrossRef Cason GW, Herkowitz HN (2013) Cervical intervertebral disc replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(3):279–285PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallah A, Akl EA, Ebrahim S, Ibrahim GM, Mansouri A, Foote CJ, Zhang Y, Fehlings MG (2012) Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 7(8):e43407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fallah A, Akl EA, Ebrahim S, Ibrahim GM, Mansouri A, Foote CJ, Zhang Y, Fehlings MG (2012) Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 7(8):e43407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kepler CK, Brodt ED, Dettori JR, Albert TJ (2012) Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery. Evid Based Spine Care J 3(S1):19–30PubMedCentralPubMed Kepler CK, Brodt ED, Dettori JR, Albert TJ (2012) Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review comparing multilevel versus single-level surgery. Evid Based Spine Care J 3(S1):19–30PubMedCentralPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Park DH, Ramakrishnan P, Cho TH, Lorenz E, Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH (2007) Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine 7(3):336–340PubMedCrossRef Park DH, Ramakrishnan P, Cho TH, Lorenz E, Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH (2007) Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine 7(3):336–340PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Prasarn ML, Baria D, Milne E, Latta L, Sukovich W (2012) Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 16(2):172–177PubMedCrossRef Prasarn ML, Baria D, Milne E, Latta L, Sukovich W (2012) Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 16(2):172–177PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon do H, Kim KN, Shin HC (2009) Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease. Spine 34(11):1153–1159 discussion 1160–1161PubMedCrossRef Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon do H, Kim KN, Shin HC (2009) Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease. Spine 34(11):1153–1159 discussion 1160–1161PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8(5):711–716PubMedCrossRef Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8(5):711–716PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbagallo GM, Assietti R, Corbino L, Olindo G, Foti PV, Russo V, Albanese V (2009) Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques? Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):29–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barbagallo GM, Assietti R, Corbino L, Olindo G, Foti PV, Russo V, Albanese V (2009) Early results and review of the literature of a novel hybrid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc arthroplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary techniques? Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):29–39PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hey HW, Hong CC, Long AS, Hee HT (2013) Is hybrid surgery of the cervical spine a good balance between fusion and arthroplasty? Pilot results from a single surgeon series. Eur Spine J 22(1):116–122PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hey HW, Hong CC, Long AS, Hee HT (2013) Is hybrid surgery of the cervical spine a good balance between fusion and arthroplasty? Pilot results from a single surgeon series. Eur Spine J 22(1):116–122PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716PubMedCrossRef Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www. cochrane-handbook.org Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www. cochrane-handbook.org
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schunemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schunemann HJ (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):383–394PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):401–406PubMedCrossRef Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64(4):401–406PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, Perrin G, Skalli W (2012) Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 21(3):432–442PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, Perrin G, Skalli W (2012) Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 21(3):432–442PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho BY, Lim J, Sim HB, Park J (2010) Biomechanical analysis of the range of motion after placement of a two-level cervical ProDisc-C versus hybrid construct. Spine 35(19):1769–1776PubMedCrossRef Cho BY, Lim J, Sim HB, Park J (2010) Biomechanical analysis of the range of motion after placement of a two-level cervical ProDisc-C versus hybrid construct. Spine 35(19):1769–1776PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J 10(4):341–349PubMedCrossRef Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC (2010) Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics. Spine J 10(4):341–349PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Faizan A, Goel VK, Biyani A, Garfin SR, Bono CM (2012) Adjacent level effects of bi level disc replacement, bi level fusion and disc replacement plus fusion in cervical spine––a finite element based study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(3):226–233CrossRef Faizan A, Goel VK, Biyani A, Garfin SR, Bono CM (2012) Adjacent level effects of bi level disc replacement, bi level fusion and disc replacement plus fusion in cervical spine––a finite element based study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 27(3):226–233CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Renner SM, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG (2011) Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion. Spine 36(23):1932–1939PubMedCrossRef Lee MJ, Dumonski M, Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Renner SM, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG (2011) Disc replacement adjacent to cervical fusion: a biomechanical comparison of hybrid construct versus two-level fusion. Spine 36(23):1932–1939PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin S, Ghanayem AJ, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Renner SM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG (2011) Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion. Spine 36(17):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef Martin S, Ghanayem AJ, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI, Havey RM, Renner SM, Carandang G, Abjornson C, Patwardhan AG (2011) Kinematics of cervical total disc replacement adjacent to a two-level, straight versus lordotic fusion. Spine 36(17):1359–1366PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Safavi-Abbasi S, Reyes PM, Abjornson C, Crawford NR (2013) Feasibility and biomechanics of multilevel arthroplasty and combined cervical arthrodesis and arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech (Epub ahead of print) Safavi-Abbasi S, Reyes PM, Abjornson C, Crawford NR (2013) Feasibility and biomechanics of multilevel arthroplasty and combined cervical arthrodesis and arthroplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech (Epub ahead of print)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao Y, Li Q, Mo Z, Sun Y, Fan Y (2013) Finite element analysis of cervical arthroplasty combined with fusion against 2-level fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(6):347–350PubMedCrossRef Zhao Y, Li Q, Mo Z, Sun Y, Fan Y (2013) Finite element analysis of cervical arthroplasty combined with fusion against 2-level fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 26(6):347–350PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardoso MJ, Mendelsohn A, Rosner MK (2011) Cervical hybrid arthroplasty with 2 unique fusion techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 15(1):48–54PubMedCrossRef Cardoso MJ, Mendelsohn A, Rosner MK (2011) Cervical hybrid arthroplasty with 2 unique fusion techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 15(1):48–54PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang L, Lin D, Ding Z, Liang B, Lian K (2013) Artificial disk replacement combined with midlevel ACDF versus multilevel fusion for cervical disk disease involving 3 levels. Orthopedics 36(1):e88–e94PubMedCrossRef Kang L, Lin D, Ding Z, Liang B, Lian K (2013) Artificial disk replacement combined with midlevel ACDF versus multilevel fusion for cervical disk disease involving 3 levels. Orthopedics 36(1):e88–e94PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SB, Cho KS, Kim JY, Yoo DS, Lee TG, Huh PW (2012) Hybrid surgery of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease: review of literature and clinical results. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52(5):452–458PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee SB, Cho KS, Kim JY, Yoo DS, Lee TG, Huh PW (2012) Hybrid surgery of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease: review of literature and clinical results. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52(5):452–458PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren X, Chu T, Jiang T, Wang W, Wang J, Changqing L, Zhang Z (2012) Cervical disc replacement combined with cage fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech (Epub ahead of print) Ren X, Chu T, Jiang T, Wang W, Wang J, Changqing L, Zhang Z (2012) Cervical disc replacement combined with cage fusion for the treatment of multi-level cervical disc herniation. J Spinal Disord Tech (Epub ahead of print)
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang B, Li H, Zhang T, He X, Xu S (2012) The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 7:e35032PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Yang B, Li H, Zhang T, He X, Xu S (2012) The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 7:e35032PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC, Willenberg R, Kim SH, Lim J (2007) Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7(1):33–39PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30(10):1165–1172PubMedCrossRef Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC (2005) Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 30(10):1165–1172PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Mo ZJ, Zhao YB, Wang LZ, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan YB (2014) Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue. Eur Spine J 23(3):613–621PubMedCrossRef Mo ZJ, Zhao YB, Wang LZ, Sun Y, Zhang M, Fan YB (2014) Biomechanical effects of cervical arthroplasty with U-shaped disc implant on segmental range of motion and loading of surrounding soft tissue. Eur Spine J 23(3):613–621PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldonado CV, Paz RD, Martin CB (2011) Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 3):403–407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Maldonado CV, Paz RD, Martin CB (2011) Adjacent-level degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 3):403–407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H (2011) Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J 20(11):1940–1945PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Song KJ, Choi BW, Jeon TS, Lee KB, Chang H (2011) Adjacent segment degenerative disease: is it due to disease progression or a fusion-associated phenomenon? Comparison between segments adjacent to the fused and non-fused segments. Eur Spine J 20(11):1940–1945PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, McVay BJ, Davis RC (2003) Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):314–323PubMedCrossRef DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, McVay BJ, Davis RC (2003) Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):314–323PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S–194SPubMedCrossRef Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4(6 Suppl):190S–194SPubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (1999) Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng 9(1):27–38PubMed Maiman DJ, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA (1999) Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng 9(1):27–38PubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434PubMedCrossRef Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, An HS (2002) Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27(22):2431–2434PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, Hu S, Tay BK, Lotz JC (2004) Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 29(24):2809–2814PubMedCrossRef Puttlitz CM, Rousseau MA, Xu Z, Hu S, Tay BK, Lotz JC (2004) Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics. Spine 29(24):2809–2814PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff KE (2013) Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine 38(26):2253–2257PubMedCrossRef Verma K, Gandhi SD, Maltenfort M, Albert TJ, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Radcliff KE (2013) Rate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Spine 38(26):2253–2257PubMedCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Lund T, Oxland TR (2011) Adjacent level disk disease––is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 42(4):529–541PubMedCrossRef Lund T, Oxland TR (2011) Adjacent level disk disease––is it really a fusion disease? Orthop Clin North Am 42(4):529–541PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho SK, Riew KD (2013) Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(1):3–11PubMedCrossRef Cho SK, Riew KD (2013) Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(1):3–11PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N (2005) Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3(5):335–341PubMedCrossRef Sekhon LH, Sears W, Duggal N (2005) Cervical arthroplasty after previous surgery: results of treating 24 discs in 15 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 3(5):335–341PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence
verfasst von
Zhiwei Jia
Zhongjun Mo
Fan Ding
Qing He
Yubo Fan
Dike Ruan
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3389-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

European Spine Journal 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.