Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 3/2015

01.03.2015 | Original Article

Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes

verfasst von: Shih-Hao Chen, Chen-Hsiang Lee, Kuo-Chin Huang, Pang-Hsin Hsieh, Shan-Yin Tsai

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII) places patients at risk for pseudarthrosis, correction loss, spondylodiscitis, adverse neurological sequelae, and even death; however, prognostic factors that predict long-term treatment outcomes have not been clearly investigated. In addition, few studies concerning the feasibility of reconstructing the failed spinal events have been published.

Methods

We performed a cohort study of 51 patients who contracted PSII in the posterolateral thoracolumbar region at a single tertiary center between March 1997 and May 2007. Forty-seven patients (92.2 %) had one or more medical problems. Isolated bacterial species, infection severity, treatment timing, and hosts’ defense response were evaluated to assess their relationship with management outcomes. The use of implant salvage, or removal subsequent with a revision strategy depended on the patient’s general conditions, infection control, and implant status for fusion.

Results

The most common infective culprit was Staphylococcus spp. found in 35 of 60 (58.3 %) isolates, including 20 methicillin-resistant species. Gram-negative bacilli and polymicrobial infection were found significantly in patients presenting early-onset, deep-site infection and myonecrosis. Prompt diagnosis and aggressive therapy were responsible for implant preservation in 41 of 51 cases (80.4 %), while implant removal noted in 10 cases (19.6 %) was attributed to delayed treatment and uncontrolled infection with implant loosening, correction loss, or late infection with spondylodesis. The number of employed debridements alone was not significantly correlated with successful implant preservation. Delayed treatment for infection >3 months significantly led to implant removal (p < 0.05) and a higher number of failed spinal events. Patients with significant comorbidities, malnutrition, severe trauma, neurological deficits, long-level instrumentation, and delayed treatment had poor outcomes. Sixteen patients (31.4 %) exhibited probable nonunion or pseudarthrosis, and eight symptomatic patients among them underwent successful revision surgery.

Conclusions

Retention of the mechanically sound implants in early-onset infection permits fusion to occur, while delayed treatment, severe malnutrition and multiple comorbidities will most likely result in a lack of effectiveness in eradicating the infecting pathogens. Restoring optimal physiological conditions is imperative in high-risk patients to allow for further healing. When loosened screws cause peridiscal erosion and incapacitating motion pain, premature implant removal possibly results in failed fusion and correction loss. Reconstruction for a failed spinal event is feasible following infection control.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller JG, Garfin SR (1990) Postoperative infection of the spine. Semin Spine Surg 2:268–282 Heller JG, Garfin SR (1990) Postoperative infection of the spine. Semin Spine Surg 2:268–282
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rimoldi RL, Haye W (1996) The use of antibiotics for wound prophylaxis in spinal surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 27:47–52PubMed Rimoldi RL, Haye W (1996) The use of antibiotics for wound prophylaxis in spinal surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 27:47–52PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Nirvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(9S):125–137. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d8342c CrossRef Schuster JM, Rechtine G, Nirvell DC, Dettori JR (2010) The influence of perioperative risk factors and therapeutic interventions on infection rates after spine surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(9S):125–137. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181d8342c​ CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Dan X, Jian XM, Xin LM, Dong HS, Jie W, Yang C, Yang Y, Shao WZ, Bao YM, Rui F (2013) A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 22:605–615. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2514-6 CrossRef Dan X, Jian XM, Xin LM, Dong HS, Jie W, Yang C, Yang Y, Shao WZ, Bao YM, Rui F (2013) A methodological, systematic review of evidence-based independent risk factors for surgical site infections after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J 22:605–615. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-012-2514-6 CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Picada R, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Perra JH (2000) Postoperative deep wound infection in adult after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management. J Spinal Disord 13:42–45. doi:10.1097/00002517-200002000-00009 CrossRefPubMed Picada R, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Perra JH (2000) Postoperative deep wound infection in adult after posterior lumbosacral spine fusion with instrumentation: incidence and management. J Spinal Disord 13:42–45. doi:10.​1097/​00002517-200002000-00009 CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426CrossRefPubMed Weinstein MA, McCabe JP, Cammisa FP Jr (2000) Postoperative spinal wound infection: a review of 2391 consecutive index procedures. J Spinal Disord 13:422–426CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2007) The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 44:913–920. doi:10.1086/512194 CrossRefPubMed Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2007) The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 44:913–920. doi:10.​1086/​512194 CrossRefPubMed
19.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Fu KM, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR, Hart RA, Donaldson WF, Polly DW, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:556. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eadd41 CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Sansur CA, Berven SH, Fu KM, Broadstone PA, Choma TJ, Goytan MJ, Noordeen HH, Knapp DR, Hart RA, Donaldson WF, Polly DW, Perra JH, Boachie-Adjei O (2011) Rates of infection after spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report from the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:556. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181eadd41​ CrossRefPubMed
25.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471–478. doi:10.1086/499234 CrossRefPubMed Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen SW, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR (2006) Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis 42:471–478. doi:10.​1086/​499234 CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J et al (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus infection in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1770CrossRefPubMed Klevens RM, Morrison MA, Nadle J et al (2007) Invasive methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus aureus infection in the United States. JAMA 298:1763–1770CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, Hu SS, Mummaneni PV, Deviren V, Ames CP, Chou D, Weinstein PR, Burch S, Berven SH (2012) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine 37:1340–1345. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318246a53a CrossRefPubMed Abdul-Jabbar A, Takemoto S, Weber MH, Hu SS, Mummaneni PV, Deviren V, Ames CP, Chou D, Weinstein PR, Burch S, Berven SH (2012) Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: description of surgical and patient-based risk factors for postoperative infection using administrative claims data. Spine 37:1340–1345. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e318246a53a​ CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Muschik M, Luck W, Schlenzka D (2004) Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction: a retrospective analysis of 45 cases. Eur Spine J 13:645–651. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0694-4 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Muschik M, Luck W, Schlenzka D (2004) Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction: a retrospective analysis of 45 cases. Eur Spine J 13:645–651. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-004-0694-4 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Mok James M, Guillaume Tenner J, Talu Ufuk, Berven Sigurd H, Deviren Vedat, Kroeber Markus, Bradford David S, Hu SS (2009) Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 34:578–583. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819a827c CrossRefPubMed Mok James M, Guillaume Tenner J, Talu Ufuk, Berven Sigurd H, Deviren Vedat, Kroeber Markus, Bradford David S, Hu SS (2009) Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine 34:578–583. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e31819a827c​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes
verfasst von
Shih-Hao Chen
Chen-Hsiang Lee
Kuo-Chin Huang
Pang-Hsin Hsieh
Shan-Yin Tsai
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2015
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3636-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

European Spine Journal 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.