Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 7/2016

05.03.2016 | Original Article

A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes

verfasst von: Julio Urrutia, Tomas Zamora, Mauricio Campos, Ratko Yurac, Joaquin Palma, Sebastian Mobarec, Carlos Prada

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 7/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We performed an agreement study using two subaxial cervical spine classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson (A&F) classifications. We sought to determine which scheme allows better agreement by different evaluators and by the same evaluator on different occasions.

Methods

Complete imaging studies of 65 patients with subaxial cervical spine injuries were classified by six evaluators (three spine sub-specialists and three senior orthopaedic surgery residents) using the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine classification system and the A&F scheme. The cases were displayed in a random sequence after a 6-week interval for repeat evaluation. The Kappa coefficient (κ) was used to determine inter- and intra-observer agreement.

Results

Inter-observer: considering the main AO injury types, the agreement was substantial for the AOSpine classification [κ = 0.61 (0.57–0.64)]; using AO sub-types, the agreement was moderate [κ = 0.57 (0.54–0.60)]. For the A&F classification, the agreement [κ = 0.46 (0.42–0.49)] was significantly lower than using the AOSpine scheme. Intra-observer: the agreement was substantial considering injury types [κ = 0.68 (0.62–0.74)] and considering sub-types [κ = 0.62 (0.57–0.66)]. Using the A&F classification, the agreement was also substantial [κ = 0.66 (0.61–0.71)]. No significant differences were observed between spine surgeons and orthopaedic residents in the overall inter- and intra-observer agreement, or in the inter- and intra-observer agreement of specific type of injuries.

Conclusion

The AOSpine classification (using the four main injury types or at the sub-types level) allows a significantly better agreement than the A&F classification. The A&F scheme does not allow reliable communication between medical professionals.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1982) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7:1–27CrossRef Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1982) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7:1–27CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr, Anderson P, Harrop J, Oner FC, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Hedlund R, Madrazo I, Rechtine G, Aarabi B, Shainline M, Spine Trauma Study Group (2007) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2365–2374. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181557b92 CrossRef Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr, Anderson P, Harrop J, Oner FC, Arnold P, Fehlings M, Hedlund R, Madrazo I, Rechtine G, Aarabi B, Shainline M, Spine Trauma Study Group (2007) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2365–2374. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3181557b92​ CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, Oner FC, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Kandziora F, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, Aarabi B, Rajasekaran S, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vialle LR (2015) AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3831-3 Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Radcliff KE, Oner FC, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Kandziora F, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF, Aarabi B, Rajasekaran S, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vialle LR (2015) AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-015-3831-3
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L, Injury AOSC, AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury & Trauma Knowledge Forum (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2028–2037. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381 CrossRef Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L, Injury AOSC, AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury & Trauma Knowledge Forum (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:2028–2037. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0b013e3182a8a381​ CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2015) An independent inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001302 Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2015) An independent inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation of the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine injury classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000001302​
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2015) An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E54–E58. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000656 CrossRef Urrutia J, Zamora T, Yurac R, Campos M, Palma J, Mobarec S, Prada C (2015) An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:E54–E58. doi:10.​1097/​BRS.​0000000000000656​ CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Dvorak MF, Kandziora F, Rajasekaran S, Aarabi B, Vialle LR, Fehlings MG, Schroeder GD, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Cumhur Oner F (2015) Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naive spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3765-9 Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR, Koerner JD, Dvorak MF, Kandziora F, Rajasekaran S, Aarabi B, Vialle LR, Fehlings MG, Schroeder GD, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Bellabarba C, Cumhur Oner F (2015) Reliability analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by a worldwide group of naive spinal surgeons. Eur Spine J. doi:10.​1007/​s00586-015-3765-9
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanders RW (1997) Editorial. The problem with apples and oranges. J Orthop Trauma 11:465–466CrossRef Sanders RW (1997) Editorial. The problem with apples and oranges. J Orthop Trauma 11:465–466CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson PA, Moore TA, Davis KW, Molinari RW, Resnick DK, Vaccaro AR, Bono CM, Dimar JR 2nd, Aarabi B, Leverson G, Spinal Trauma Study Group (2007) Cervical spine injury severity score. Assessment of reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1057–1065. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00684 CrossRefPubMed Anderson PA, Moore TA, Davis KW, Molinari RW, Resnick DK, Vaccaro AR, Bono CM, Dimar JR 2nd, Aarabi B, Leverson G, Spinal Trauma Study Group (2007) Cervical spine injury severity score. Assessment of reliability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1057–1065. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​F.​00684 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat van Middendorp JJ, Audige L, Bartels RH, Bolger C, Deverall H, Dhoke P, Diekerhof CH, Govaert GA, Guimera V, Koller H, Morris SA, Setiobudi T, Hosman AJ (2013) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: an external agreement validation study. Spine J 13:1055–1063. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.040 CrossRefPubMed van Middendorp JJ, Audige L, Bartels RH, Bolger C, Deverall H, Dhoke P, Diekerhof CH, Govaert GA, Guimera V, Koller H, Morris SA, Setiobudi T, Hosman AJ (2013) The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: an external agreement validation study. Spine J 13:1055–1063. doi:10.​1016/​j.​spinee.​2013.​02.​040 CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chhabra HS, Kaul R, Kanagaraju V (2015) Do we have an ideal classification system for thoracolumbar and subaxial cervical spine injuries: what is the expert’s perspective? Spinal Cord 53:42–48. doi:10.1038/sc.2014.194 CrossRefPubMed Chhabra HS, Kaul R, Kanagaraju V (2015) Do we have an ideal classification system for thoracolumbar and subaxial cervical spine injuries: what is the expert’s perspective? Spinal Cord 53:42–48. doi:10.​1038/​sc.​2014.​194 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A comparative agreement evaluation of two subaxial cervical spine injury classification systems: the AOSpine and the Allen and Ferguson schemes
verfasst von
Julio Urrutia
Tomas Zamora
Mauricio Campos
Ratko Yurac
Joaquin Palma
Sebastian Mobarec
Carlos Prada
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 7/2016
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4498-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2016

European Spine Journal 7/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.