Clinical outcomes and complications of titanium versus stainless steel elastic nail in management of paediatric femoral fractures—a systematic review

Femoral shaft fractures in children account for approximately 1.6% of all fractures. These fractures can be treated both operatively and non-operatively. Surgical fixation is more common in the age group above 6 years. Elastic intramedullary nails have become the most popular surgical modality of treatment over the last few decades. However, there is continuous debate about which type of elastic nails (titanium and stainless steel) provides better clinical outcomes with less complication. The main purpose of this study was to systematically search for and critically appraise articles comparing clinical outcomes and complications of titanium elastic nail system (TENS) and stainless steel elastic nail system (SSENS) in management of femoral fractures in the paediatric age group. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases was performed using specific search terms and limits. Applying strict eligibility criteria, the identified studies were screened. Five studies were identified and reviewed. All of the identified studies were non-randomised comparative studies apart from one randomised controlled study. Studies provide contradictory evidence with regard to time to fracture union and time to full weight bearing. Only one study commented on time to nail removal and found that it is shorter in the TENS group. Two studies showed significantly higher rate of malunion in the TENS group, whereas the rest showed no difference. There was no difference in the rates of delayed union or infection between the two groups and no consistent difference in the rates of skin irritation. Three studies compared Flynn’s outcome score and found no difference apart from one study which found better scores in the SSENS group. There is no consistent evidence to indicate the advantage of one type of elastic nails over the other in management of paediatric femoral shaft fractures; however, the overall trend is in favour of SSENS especially being cheaper than TENS. Critical appraisal of the studies identified significant methodological deficiencies, and further prospective randomised trials are recommended for more potent evidence.