nach oben

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Erschienen in:

08.04.2017 | General Review • ANKLE - FRACTURES

Management of acute injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis

verfasst von: Nicholas M. Fort, Amiethab A. Aiyer, Jonathan R. Kaplan, Niall A. Smyth, Anish R. Kadakia

Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The syndesmosis is important for ankle stability and load transmission and is commonly injured in association with ankle sprains and fractures. Syndesmotic disruption is associated with between 5 and 10% of ankle sprains and 11–20% of operative ankle fractures. Failure to recognize and appropriately treat syndesmotic disruption can portend poor functional outcomes for patients; therefore, early recognition and appropriate treatment are critical. Syndesmotic injuries are difficult to diagnose, and even when identified and treated, a slightly malreduced syndesmosis can lead to joint destruction and poor functional outcomes. This review will discuss the relevant anatomy, biomechanics, mechanism of injury, clinical evaluation, and treatment of acute injuries to the ankle syndesmosis.

Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP (1994) Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy 10(5):558–560CrossRefPubMed

Fallat L, Grimm DJ, Saracco JA (1998) Sprained ankle syndrome: prevalence and analysis of 639 acute injuries. J Foot Ankle Surg 37(4):280–285CrossRefPubMed

McCollum GA, van den Bekerom MP, Kerkhoffs GM, Calder JD, van Dijk CN (2013) Syndesmosis and deltoid ligament injuries in the athlete. Knee Surg Sports Trau-matol Arthrosc 21(6):1328–1337CrossRef

Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following trans-syndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19(2):102–108CrossRefPubMed

Purvis GD (1982) Displaced, unstable ankle fractures: classification, incidence, and management of a consecutive series. Clin Orthop Relat Res 165:91–98

Sagi HC, Shah AR, Sanders RW (2012) The functional consequence of syndesmotic joint malreduction at a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Orthop Trauma 26(7):439–443CrossRefPubMed

Wei F, Villwock MR, Meyer EG, Powell JW, Haut RC (2010) Biomechanical investigation of ankle injury under excessive external foot rotation in the human cadaver. J Biomech Eng 132(9):091001CrossRefPubMed

Lloyd J, Elsayed S, Hariharan K, Tanaka H (2006) Revisiting the concept of talar shift in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):793–796CrossRefPubMed

Norkus SA, Floyd RT (2001) The anatomy and mechanisms of syndesmotic ankle sprains. J Athl Train 36(1):68–73PubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Marvan J, Dzupa V, Krbec M, Skala-Rosenbaum J, Bartoska R, Kachlik D, Baca V (2016) Distal tibiofibular synostosis after surgically resolved ankle fractures: an epidemiological, clinical, and morphological evaluation of a patient sample. Injury 47(11):2570–2754CrossRefPubMed

11.

Veltri DM, Pagnani MJ, O’brien SJ, Warren RF, Ryan MD, Barnes RP (1995) Symptomatic ossification of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in professional football players: a sequel of the syndesmotic ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int 16(5):285–290CrossRefPubMed

12.

Boden SD, Labropoulous PA, McCowin P, Lestini WF, Hurwitz SR (1989) Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw. a cadaver study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 71(10):1548–1555CrossRef

13.

Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Slvan TP (2008) Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90(4):405–410CrossRef

14.

Lauge-Hansen N (1950) Fractures of the ankle. II. Combined experimental-surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations. Arch Surg 60(5):957–958CrossRefPubMed

15.

Am Pankovich (1976) Maisonneuve fracture of the fibula. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58(3):337–342CrossRef

16.

Weber BG (1972) Die Verletzungen ds Oberen Sprungelenkes. 2nd edn. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern

17.

Stark E, Tornetta P 3rd, Creevy WR (2007) Syndesmotic instability in Weber B ankle fractures: a clinical evaluation. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):643–646CrossRefPubMed

18.

Williams GN, Jones MH, Amendola A (2007) Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1197–1207CrossRefPubMed

19.

Zalavras C, Thordarson D (2007) Ankle Syndesmotic Injury. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(6):330–339CrossRefPubMed

20.

Beumer A, Swierstra BA, Mulder PGH (2002) Clinical diagnosis of syndesmotic ankle instability: evaluation of stress tests behind the curtains. Acta Orthop Scand 73(6):667–669PubMed

21.

Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L (1991) Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med 19(3):294–298CrossRefPubMed

22.

Jiang KN, Schulz BM, Tsui YL, Gardner TR, Greisberg JK (2014) Comparison of radiographic stress tests for syndesmotic instability of supination external rotation of ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Orthop Trauma 28(6):e123–e127CrossRefPubMed

23.

Kiter E, Bozkurt M (2005) The crossed-leg test for examination of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Int 26(2):187–188CrossRefPubMed

24.

Jones CB, Gilde A, Sietsema DL (2015) Treatment of syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00083

25.

de Cesar PC, Avila EM, de Abreu MR (2011) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain. Foot Ankle Int 32(12):1110–1114CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sman AD, Hiller CE, Refshauge KM (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for diagnosis of ankle syndesmosis injury: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 47(10):620–628CrossRefPubMed

27.

Harper MC, Keller TS (1989) A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle 10(3):156–160CrossRefPubMed

28.

Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MGE, Sallis JG, Potter HG, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2005) Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:216–221CrossRef

29.

Hoshino CM, Nomoto EK, Norheim EP, Harris TG (2012) Correlation of weight bearing radiographs and stability of stress positive ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 33(2):92–98CrossRefPubMed

30.

Nault ML, Hebert Davies J, Laflamme GY, Leduc S (2013) CT scan assessment of the syndesmosis: a new reproducible method. J Orthop Trauma 27(11):638–641CrossRefPubMed

31.

Vogl TJ, Hochmuth K, Diebold T, Lubrich J, Hofmann R, Stockle U, Sollner O, Bisson S, Sudkamp N, Maeurer J, Haas N, Felix R (1997) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of acute injured distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Investig Radiol 32(7):401–409CrossRef

32.

Pakarinen H, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Hyvonen P, Lakovaara M, Leppilahti J, Ristiniemi J (2011) Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93(22):2057–2061CrossRef

33.

Takao M, Ochi M, Naito K et al (2001) Arthroscopic diagnosis of tibiofibular syndesmosis disruption. Arthroscopy 17(8):836–843CrossRefPubMed

34.

Bonasia DE, Rossi R, Saltzman CL, Amendola A (2011) The role of arthroscopy in the management of fractures about the ankle. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 19(4):226–235CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sman AD, Hiller CE, Rae K, Linklater J, Black DA, Refshauge KM (2014) Prognosis of ankle syndesmosis injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46(4):671–677CrossRefPubMed

36.

Nussbaum ED, Hosea TM, Sieler SD, Incremona BR, Kessler DE (2001) Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med 29(1):31–35PubMed

37.

Mulligan EP (2011) Evaluation and management of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Phys Ther Sport. 12(2):57–69CrossRefPubMed

38.

Brosky T, Nyland J, Nitz A, Caborn DNM (1995) The ankle ligaments: consideration of syndesmotic injury and implications for rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 21(4):197–205CrossRefPubMed

39.

Samra DJ, Sman AD, Rae K, Linklater J, Refshauge KM, Hiller CE (2015) Effectiveness of a single platelet-rich plasma injections to promote recovery in rugby players with ankle syndesmosis injury. BMJ Open Sports Exerc Med 1:e000033. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000033 CrossRef

40.

Taylor DC, Englehardt DL, Bassett FH 3rd (1992) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. The influence of heterotopic ossification. Am J Sports Med 20(2):146–150CrossRefPubMed

41.

Mansour AA, Porter DA, Young JP, Hammer D, Boublik M, Schlegel TF (2013) Corticosteroid injections hasten return to play of National Football League players following stable ankle syndesmosis sprains. Orthop J Sports Med. doi:10.1177/2325967113S00023

42.

Hamoui M, Ali M, Lovas F, Bonnel F (2008) Rotational malalignment of the fibular malleolus after osteosynthesis of ankle fractures. Med Chir Pied 24:155–164CrossRef

43.

Marmor M, Kandemir U, Matityahu A, Jergesen H, McClellan T, Morshed S (2013) A method for detection of lateral malleolar malrotation using conventional fluoroscopy. J Orthop Trauma 27(12):e281–e284CrossRefPubMed

44.

Chu A, Weiner L (2009) Distal fibula malunions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17(4):220–230CrossRefPubMed

45.

Miller AN, Barei DP, Iaquinto JM, Ledoux WR, Beingessner DM (2013) Iatrogenic syndesmosis malreduction via clamp and screw placement. J Orthop Trauma 27(2):100–106CrossRefPubMed

46.

Phisitkul P, Ebinger T, Goetz J, Vaseenon T, Marsh JL (2012) Forceps reduction of the syndesmosis in rotational ankle fractures: a cadaveric study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(24):2255–2261CrossRef

47.

Gardner MJ, Demetrakopoulos D, Briggs SM, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2006) Malreduction of the tibiofibular syndesmosis in ankle fractures. Foot Ankle Int 27(10):788–792CrossRefPubMed

48.

Franke J, von Recum J, Suda AJ, Grutzner PA, Wendl K (2012) Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in the treatment of acute unstable syndesmotic injuries. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94(15):1386–1390CrossRef

49.

Summers HD, Sinclair MK, Stover MD (2013) A reliable method for intraoperative evaluation of syndesmotic reduction. J Orthop Trauma 27(4):196–200CrossRefPubMed

50.

Schreiber JJ, As McLawhorn, Dy CJ, Goldwyn EM (2013) Intraoperative contralateral view for assessing accurate syndesmosis reduction. Orthopedics 36(5):360–361CrossRefPubMed

51.

Lambers KT, van den Bekerom MP, Doornberg JN, Stufkens SA, van Dijk CN, Kloen P (2013) Long-term outcome of pronation-external rotation ankle fractures treated with syndesmotic screws only. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95(17):e1211–e1217CrossRef

52.

Symeonidis PD, Iselin LD, Chehade M, Stavrou P (2013) Common pitfalls in syndesmotic rupture management: a clinical audit. Foot Ankle Int 34(3):345–350 CrossRefPubMed

53.

Hoiness P, Stromsoe K (2004) Tricortical versus quadcortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18(6):331–337CrossRefPubMed

54.

Se Rao, Muzammil S, Khan AH (2008) Syndesmosis fixation in bimalleolar Weber C ankle fractures; comparison of 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm screws. Prof Med J 15:49–53

55.

Markolf KL, Jackson SR, McAllister DR (2013) Syndesmosis fixation using dual 3.5 mm and 4.5 mm scres with tricortical and quadcortical purchase: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int 34(5):734–739CrossRefPubMed

56.

Sun H, Luo CF, Zhong B, Shi HP, Zhang CQ, Zeng BF (2014) A prospective randomised trial comparing the use of absorbable and metallic screws in the fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injuries:mid-term follow-up. Bone Jt J 96-B(4):548–554CrossRef

57.

Thordarson DB, Samuelson M, Shepherd LE, Merkle PF, Lee J (2001) Bioabsorbably versus stainless steel screw fixation of the syndesmosis in pronation-lateral rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 22(4):335–338CrossRefPubMed

58.

Beumer A, Campo MM, Niesing R, Day J, Kleinrensink GJ, Swierstra BA (2005) Screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a cadaver model comparing stainless steel and titanium screws and three and four cortical fixation. Injury 36(1):60–64CrossRefPubMed

59.

Boyer BA, Vrabec GA, Njus GO, Feliciano G, Kay DB, Bennett GL (2001) Biomechanical comparison of distal tibiofibular syndesmosis stability with use of screws placed at different distances from the ankle joint. In: Presented as a poster exhibit at the Annual Meeting of the Orthopedi Trauma Association, San Diego, California, Poster no. 49

60.

Kukreti S, Faraj A, Miles JNV (2005) Does position of syndesmotic screw affect functional and radiological outcome in ankle fractures? Injury 36(9):1121–1124CrossRefPubMed

61.

Schepers T, van der Linden H, van Lieshout EM, Niesten DD, van der Elst M (2014) Technical aspects of the syndesmotic screw and their effect on functional outcome following acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Injury 45(4):775–779CrossRefPubMed

62.

Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, Smith WR (2006) Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int 27(8):567–572CrossRefPubMed

63.

Wilkeroy AKB, Hoiness PR, Andreassen GS, Hellund JC, Madsen JE (2010) No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):17–23CrossRef

64.

Inge SY, Pull Ter Gunne AF, Aarts CA, Bemelman M (2016) A systematic review on dynamic versus static distal tibiofibular fixation. Injury 47(12):2627–2634CrossRefPubMed

65.

Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36(6):1199–1206 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

66.

Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of TightRope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2828–2835CrossRefPubMed

67.

Westermann RW, Rungprai C, Goetz JE, Femino J, Amendola A, Phisitkul P (2014) The effect of suture-button fixation on simulated syndesmotic malreduction: a cadaveric study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96(20):1732–1738CrossRef

68.

Kim JH, Gwak HC, Lee CR, Choo HJ, Kim JG, Kim DY (2016) A comparison of Screw fixation and Suture-Button Fixation in a Syndesmosis Injury in an Ankle Fracture. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(5):985–990CrossRefPubMed

69.

Schepers T, van Zuuren WJ, van den Bekerom MP, Vogels LM, van Lieshout EM (2012) The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey. Injury 43(10):1718–1723

70.

Welck MJ, Ray P (2013) Tibialis anterior tendon entrapment after ankle TightRope fixation. Foot Ankle Spec 6(3):242–246CrossRefPubMed

71.

Hohman DW et al (2011) Pathologic tibia/fibula fracture through suture button screw tract: case report. Am J Sport Med 39(3):645–648CrossRef

72.

Citak M et al (2011) Distal tibial fracture post syndesmotic screw removal: an adverse complication. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(10):1405–1408CrossRefPubMed

73.

Gardner MJ, Brodsky A, Briggs SM, Nielson JH, Lorich DG (2006) Fixation of posterior malleolar fractures provides greater syndesmotic stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:165–171 CrossRefPubMed

74.

Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, Hennessy M, Platt S (2016) Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 55(1):140–145CrossRefPubMed

75.

Drijfhout Van Hoof CC, Verhage SM, Hoogendoorn JM (2015) Influence of fragment size and post-operative joint congruency on long term outcome of posterior malleolar fractures. Foot Ankle Int 36(6):673–678

76.

Schepers T, Van Lieshout EM, Van der Linden HJ, De Jong VM, Goslings JC (2013) Aftercare following syndesmotic screw placement: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 52(4):491–494CrossRefPubMed

77.

Huber T, Schmoelz W, Bolderl A (2012) Motion of the fibula relative to the tibia and its alterations with syndesmosis screws: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg 18(3):203–209CrossRefPubMed

78.

Hamid N, Loeffler BJ, Braddy W, Kellam JF, Cohen BE, Bosse MJ (2009) Outcome after fixation of ankle fractures with an injury to the syndesmosis: the effect of the syndesmosis screw. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91(8):1069–1073CrossRef

79.

Egol KA, Pahk B, Walsh M, Tejwani NC, Davidovitch RI, Koval KJ (2010) Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):7–11CrossRefPubMed

80.

Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, Macleod MD (2010) Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):2–6CrossRefPubMed

81.

Kellett JJ (2011) The clinical features of the ankle syndesmosis injuries: a general review. Clin J Sports Med 21(6):524–529

82.

Weening B, Bhandari M (2005) Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Ortho Trauma 19:102–108

83.

Stuart K, Panchbhavi VK (2011) The fate of the syndesmotic screws. Foot and Ankle Int 32(5):S519–S525

84.

Dingermans SA, Rammelt S, White TO, Goslings JC, Schepers T (2016) Should syndesmotic screws be removed after surgical fixation of unstable ankle fractures? A systematic review. Bone Jt J 98-B(11):1497–1504CrossRef

Titel: Management of acute injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis
verfasst von: Nicholas M. Fort
Amiethab A. Aiyer
Jonathan R. Kaplan
Niall A. Smyth
Anish R. Kadakia
Publikationsdatum: 08.04.2017
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1956-2

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Arthroskopie kann Knieprothese nicht hinauszögern

25.04.2024 Gonarthrose Nachrichten

Ein arthroskopischer Eingriff bei Kniearthrose macht im Hinblick darauf, ob und wann ein Gelenkersatz fällig wird, offenbar keinen Unterschied.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Adjacent segment pathology: natural history or effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? A 10-year follow-up radiological multicenter study using an evaluation scale of the ageing spine

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ipsi- or contralateral hamstring tendon grafts

Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity

Reply to “Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for closed distal tibial fractures: a consecutive study based on 25 patients” by Bhat R, Wani MM, Rshid S, Akhter N in Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Apr; 25(3): 563–568

Carpal scaphoid non-union treatment: a retrospective trial comparing simple retrograde percutaneous screw fixation versus percutaneous screw fixation plus pulsed electromagnetic fields (Physiostim®)